logo
South Africa opens a new inquiry into apartheid-era killings known as Cradock Four

South Africa opens a new inquiry into apartheid-era killings known as Cradock Four

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — When Nombuyiselo Mhlauli was given her husband's body back for burial, he had more than 25 stab wounds in his chest and seven in his back, with a gash across his throat. His right hand was missing.
Sicelo Mhlauli was one of four Black men abducted, tortured and killed 40 years ago this month by apartheid-era security forces in South Africa. No one has been held accountable for their deaths.
But a new judge-led inquiry into the killings of the anti-apartheid activists who became known as the Cradock Four — and who became a rallying cry for those denied justice — opened this month.
It is part of a renewed push for the truth by relatives of some of the thousands of people killed by police and others during the years of white minority rule and enforced racial segregation.
Mhlauli described the state of her husband's body during testimony she gave at the start of the inquiry in the city of Gqeberha, near where the Cradock Four were abducted in June 1985. Relatives of some of the three other men also testified.
Thumani Calata never got to know her father, Fort Calata, who had been a teacher. She was born two weeks after the funerals of the Cradock Four, which drew huge crowds and galvanized resistance to apartheid.
'I don't know how it feels, and I will never know how it feels, to be hugged by my dad,' Thumani Calata, now 39, told the inquiry as she wept.
Two previous inquiries were held during apartheid. A two-year inquest that started in 1987 found the men were killed by unknown people. Another in 1993 said they were killed by unnamed policemen.
Police officers implicated have since died
Relatives of the Cradock Four likely will never see justice. The six former police officers directly implicated in the abductions and killings have died, the last one in 2023. None was prosecuted despite the post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission identifying them and denying them amnesty in the late 1990s.
That commission, set up by then-President Nelson Mandela, attempted to confront the atrocities of apartheid in the years after the system officially ended in 1994. While some killers were granted amnesty, more than 5,000 applications were refused and recommended for criminal investigation.
Hardly any made it to court.
Oscar van Heerden, a political analyst at the University of Johannesburg, said the bitter emotion of relatives at the Cradock Four inquiry showed wounds have not healed.
'Where it was felt that truth was not spoken and there wasn't sufficient evidence to warrant forgiveness, those were cases that were supposed to be formally charged, prosecuted and justice should have prevailed,' van Heerden said. 'None of that happened.'
Taking the government to court
The failure by post-apartheid governments for 25 years to pursue cases is now being scrutinized. Frustrated, the families of the Cradock Four finally forced authorities to rule last year that there would be a new inquiry into the killings.
They also joined with a group of relatives of other apartheid-era victims to take the South African government to court this year over the failure to investigate so many crimes.
As part of the settlement in that case, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa ordered a national inquiry led by a retired judge into why apartheid-era killers were not brought to justice. The inquiry, which has not opened yet, threatens to expose further uncomfortable moments for South Africa.
While the majority of victims of political violence during apartheid were Black and other people of color, some were white, and families have come together across racial lines. A group of survivors and relatives from the 1993 Highgate Hotel massacre, where unknown men opened fire in a bar full of white customers, joined with the Cradock Four families and others in the case against the government.
They allege that post-apartheid authorities deliberately blocked investigations.
Other inquests have been reopened, including one into the 1967 death of Albert Luthuli, who was president of the banned anti-apartheid African National Congress movement when he was hit by a train. Luthuli's death has been viewed with suspicion for more than 50 years.
Last chance to know the truth
At the Cradock Four inquiry, which is expected to resume in October for more testimony, Howard Varney, a lawyer for the families, said this is their last chance to know the truth.
The new inquiry has attempted to retrace the killings, from the moment of the men's abduction at a nighttime police roadblock to the time their bodies were discovered, burned and with signs of torture. The families also want a former military commander and ex-police officers who may have knowledge of the killings to testify.
Lukhanyo Calata, the son of Fort Calata, said he accepted it was unlikely anyone would ever be prosecuted over the death of his father and his friends Mhlauli, Matthew Goniwe and Sparrow Mkonto. But he said he wants official records to finally show who killed them.
'Justice now can really only come in the form of truth,' Lukhanyo Calata told The Associated Press. 'They may not have been prosecuted, they may not have been convicted, but according to court records, this is the truth around the murders of the Cradock Four.'
___
AP Africa news: https://apnews.com/hub/africa
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Judges Approve Trump's Choice for U.S. Attorney in Manhattan?
Will Judges Approve Trump's Choice for U.S. Attorney in Manhattan?

New York Times

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Will Judges Approve Trump's Choice for U.S. Attorney in Manhattan?

The former Russian diplomat faced several charges, including money laundering, that could have landed him behind bars for a long time. But in June, shortly before his trial, the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office accepted a guilty plea from the man to only one charge, which might let him avoid prison altogether. The judge, Jed S. Rakoff, said he was curious: Was the office's change in position discussed with or initiated by the Justice Department in Washington? 'No, your honor,' a prosecutor replied. 'OK,' Judge Rakoff said. 'I wanted to make sure we didn't have an Adams situation here.' The judge was referring to the resignation in February of the head of the U.S. attorney's office after she refused a Trump Justice Department edict to seek the dismissal of charges against New York's mayor, Eric Adams. The department then orchestrated the dismissal anyway. The former diplomat's guilty plea proceeded as planned, but the courtroom exchange was revealing. It showed that judges still have lingering concerns about the independence and authority of the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York, now led on an interim basis by Jay Clayton, President Trump's pick to be the top prosecutor. The issue is expected to crystallize later this month when the roughly four dozen judges of the Southern District court, based in Manhattan, are to vote on whether to appoint Mr. Clayton to remain in the post. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Gabbard Delivers Epic World Salad to ‘Prove' Russiagate Conspiracy
Gabbard Delivers Epic World Salad to ‘Prove' Russiagate Conspiracy

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gabbard Delivers Epic World Salad to ‘Prove' Russiagate Conspiracy

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard stumbled in an appearance on Fox News when offered a layup to explain why she has accused the Obama administration of a 'treasonous conspiracy.' Trump's intelligence chief claims top Obama officials manufactured intelligence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to frame her boss and has referred her findings to the Justice Department to pursue criminal charges. But in an appearance on Fox News, when asked about her claim that she has 'irrefutable evidence' that former President Barack Obama was the mastermind, Gabbard on Tuesday delivered a garbled word salad of an answer. 'What is that irrefutable evidence for our viewers tonight?' pressed conservative host Laura Ingraham. 'Laura, you know, as you were playing those clips of these people like Morning Joe seemingly befuddled saying that by no account is any of this true, I would challenge them to see if they have actually read the documents, every single page of the documents that we've released over the last couple of weeks,' Gabbard said. She then plugged the website where the DNI has been posting documents, claiming: 'It's all right there for anyone to see.' What Gabbard did not deliver in her response was that 'irrefutable evidence,' instead resorting to the blanket accusations she has been making for weeks. 'Those who go in and read this will see how President Obama directed that a National Security Council meeting be called to talk about Russia,' Gabbard said. She went on to say that the report that came out of the meeting was filled with tasks directed by the president to former CIA Director John Brennan and others in the intelligence community. Gabbard argued that, 'they were tasked to create an intelligence assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election, not if but how, and this was the beginning of this manufactured intelligence assessment.' The DNI also argued that Obama officials 'knowingly wrote things in this assessment that were false.' She did not point to any specific evidence to back her claim that they knew specifically new information was 'false' despite weeks of peddling her accusations. Gabbard has been posting documents on the DNI government website for weeks, including emails from Obama administration officials as well as a declassified House report written by Republican staff. The findings all show that Russia was not able to specifically hack the U.S. election infrastructure and change votes, but Moscow did carry out a campaign to influence the 2016 election. The emails discuss how Russia meddled in the election, but there is no evidence that officials knowingly wrote in the assessment information they knew was false or that the president was a mastermind behind 'manufactured' intelligence. The separate declassified report from House Republicans on Russian election interference that Gabbard released also found that Russia interfered in the U.S. election. Where that report did not align with other bipartisan assessments was that the meddling was done specifically to help Donald Trump. However, Gabbard has accused Obama officials of trying to 'subvert' Trump's presidency and carrying out a years-long 'coup.' Attorney General Pam Bondi has taken Gabbard's claims and run with them. She ordered a grand jury to potentially hear evidence in the case. On Tuesday, Gabbard confirmed on Fox News that the Justice Department was asking for more documents, further undermining Gabbard's own claim that she had already delivered 'irrefutable evidence.' Gabbard said she spoke with DOJ investigators, and they were committed to leaving 'no stone unturned' but had more questions. Obama's office issued a rare statement in response to the Trump administration's accusations when Gabbard first started making them. His office called them 'bizarre' and a distraction.

Final bid to find rapist 'on the run' for 50 years
Final bid to find rapist 'on the run' for 50 years

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Final bid to find rapist 'on the run' for 50 years

It's hoped new images of a man wanted for the "brutal" rape of a woman 50 years ago will finally bring him to justice. A 30-year-old woman was asleep in her Melbourne home in the early hours of 22 July, 1974 when she was woken by a stranger and raped. Nine days later police charged George Karakis with rape, burglary and indecent assault. He was bailed on a $1000 surety put up by his wife and has been "on the run" ever since. He would now be 78. NSW Police thought they had found him in Sydney's eastern suburbs in 1990, but he disappeared again before a warrant could be executed. A public appeal in 2015 also failed to locate the Greek speaking, Turkish-born fugitive. More than 50 years after his arrest, police on Monday released his 1974 mug shot as well as a digitally generated image of what Karakis could look like today. At the time of his arrest, Karakis was 27 and living in Gore Street, Fitzroy with his wife, sister and brother-in-law. Yarra Crime Investigation Unit Detective Senior Constable Ruby Roberts said Karakis' victim was now in her 80s and had been forced to live most of her life knowing this man had not faced court for the "brutal" crime he is accused of. "This crime changed her life forever and 50 years is a long time to live without the justice we would so dearly like to give her," Det Roberts said. "There will absolutely be people out there who know where Karakis fled and may even know where he is now residing." Given the length of time since his arrest, police say there is a possibility that Karakis has died - but are hell bent on finding answers so they can close a chapter in the victim's life. Anyone with information about Karakis's whereabouts is urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or make a confidential report at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store