Labour MP Willie Jackson accuses government of rigging next election
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Labour MP Willie Jackson has accused the government of trying to rig next year's election through its move to block people from being able
to enrol for 12 days before voting day
.
The claim - made during Parliament's general debate on Wednesday - goes further than
Labour's official position
which has been that electoral changes would make it harder to vote.
Jackson also used his speech to criticise Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour as the "biggest dropkick of all" following Seymour's use of the term to disparage late enrollers.
"I don't know what's more offensive," Jackson told MPs. "The gerrymandering of our voting rules to rig the election, or the deputy prime minister referring to 600,000 people as dropkicks."
Seymour last week told reporters he was "sick of dropkicks that can't get themselves organised to follow the law". More than 600,000 people enrolled or updated their enrolment details after writ day in 2023, including 110,000 on election day itself.
In a fiery speech on Wednesday, Jackson poured contempt on the "disgraceful, rotten, useless government", accusing it of actively suppressing the vote and "vandalising democratic participation".
He pointed to official advice which noted that young people, Māori, Pasifika and Asian communities would be disproportionately affected by the changes.
"It's racist disenfranchisement," Jackson said. "It's a breach of democracy... this government risks being accused of rigging the next election."
Jackson commended Attorney-General
Judith Collins
as "one of the most principled National Party members" for standing up to her "weak and useless leader" by warning that the voting changes breached human rights.
"She's had the courage to call these voter suppression powers what they are: discriminatory."
Jackson concluded his speech by taking at aim at Seymour, calling on him to apologise for his "disgraceful" description of some voters as dropkicks.
"He's the most dangerous politician of the last generation... not only a disgrace as the deputy prime minister, but surely the biggest dropkick of all."
Speaking to RNZ, Seymour laughed off Jackson's description of him as a dropkick: "To be honest, I was always an open side flanker. Didn't really do a big drop kick, although, on a good day, I could nail one from just outside the 22."
Seymour said Jackson's claims were "wrong and insane" but he could not help but like the man because "you know he doesn't mean it".
"He's more a figure of fun for me," Seymour said. "Although I do worry a little bit about - you know - a man of his age - the old ticker can give out if he hyperventilates too much at work in the House."
In a statement to RNZ, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said Jackson was prone to "hyperbole and mangling of the facts".
"People are not being disenfranchised, they are merely being required to enrol," the spokesperson said.
The government's legislation banning same-day voter enrolment
passed its first reading
in Parliament on Tuesday and will now be considered by select committee.
During the debate, Goldsmith told MPs the change was required because the increasing number of special votes was delaying the final vote count.
"The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," Goldsmith said. "The advice I received is that if we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections."
Goldsmith flatly rejected the claim that people were being disenfranchised, saying the 110,000 people who updated their details on election day in 2023 only did so because they had been told they could.
"The message will be different this election. People will be told they need to be enrolled well before voting starts. It's not that hard, and people are capable of doing these things."
Justice officials, however, recommended against the move and warned it could result in
lower turnout
and reduce confidence in the electoral system.
"Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant," officials said.
The
move has also been criticised
by the Chief Human Rights Commissioner and electoral law experts Andrew Geddis and Graeme Edgeler.
Since 2019, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
13 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Former minister likely sexually abused children: police review
Aussie Malcolm. Photo: Malcolm Pacific Immigration/Supplied via RNZ By Sam Sherwood of RNZ Former National Party Cabinet minister Aussie Malcolm likely engaged in coercive and/or criminal sexual conduct with "multiple young boys", a police review reveals. Anthony 'Aussie' Malcolm died in September last year aged 83. Following his death it was revealed there had been at least three police investigations into alleged sexual abuse. Police then launched a review of historical complaints in relation to Malcolm. A summary of the review was released to RNZ on Monday under the Official Information Act. The document says review was initiated following referrals from the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State Car concerning historical sexual assault allegations against Malcolm. Allegations spanned from 1992 to 2018 and involved multiple complainants, all male and underage at the time of the alleged incidents. The review concludes that Malcolm "likely engaged in coercive and/or criminal sexual conduct with multiple young boys". "While no charges were laid during his lifetime, the cumulative evidence - had it been available and considered together - could have supported prosecution, particularly in the Complainant C case." "The review highlights systemic issues in historical file retention and inter-agency communication, which hindered earlier detection and action." Malcolm was first elected as MP for Eden in 1975 defeating the then-upcoming politician and future Prime Minister Mike Moore. He held one of New Zealand's most marginal electorates for three elections, but was defeated when National lost power in 1984. A staunch supporter of then Prime Minister Robert Muldoon, he was promoted to be a parliamentary under-secretary in 1978 and to Cabinet in 1981. He served as immigration minister from February 1981 and was also appointed to the contentious health portfolio after the 1981 election. As immigration minister he approved the visas given to the South African rugby team, allowing their controversial tour of New Zealand to go ahead. After his election defeat he set up one of the first immigration advice consultancies, Malcolm Pacific Immigration, and was prominent in the Association of Migration and Investment, cowriting its code of ethics. In 1986 and 1987 he was one of the businesspeople backing New Zealand's first America's Cup Campaign.
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Former National Party MP Anthony 'Aussie' Malcolm likely sexually abused children
Aussie Malcolm likely engaged in coercive and/or criminal sexual conduct with "multiple young boys". Photo: Malcolm Pacific Immigration/Supplied Former National Party Cabinet minister Aussie Malcolm likely engaged in coercive and/or criminal sexual conduct with "multiple young boys", a police review reveals. Anthony 'Aussie' Malcolm died in September last year aged 83. Following his death it was revealed there had been at least three police investigations into alleged sexual abuse . Police then launched a review of historical complaints in relation to Malcolm. A summary of the review was released to RNZ on Monday under the Official Information Act. The document says review was initiated following referrals from the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State Car concerning historical sexual assault allegations against Malcolm. Allegations spanned from 1992 to 2018 and involved multiple complainants, all male and underage at the time of the alleged incidents. The review concludes that Malcolm "likely engaged in coercive and/or criminal sexual conduct with multiple young boys". "While no charges were laid during his lifetime, the cumulative evidence - had it been available and considered together - could have supported prosecution, particularly in the Complainant C case." "The review highlights systemic issues in historical file retention and inter-agency communication, which hindered earlier detection and action." Malcolm was first elected as MP for Eden in 1975 defeating the then-upcoming politician and future Prime Minister Mike Moore. He held one of New Zealand's most marginal electorates for three elections, but was defeated when National lost power in 1984. A staunch supporter of then Prime Minister Robert Muldoon, he was promoted to be a parliamentary under-secretary in 1978 and to Cabinet in 1981. He served as immigration minister from February 1981 and was also appointed to the contentious health portfolio after the 1981 election. As immigration minister he approved the visas given to the South African rugby team, allowing their controversial tour of New Zealand to go ahead . After his election defeat he set up one of the first immigration advice consultancies, Malcolm Pacific Immigration, and was prominent in the Association of Migration and Investment, cowriting its code of ethics. In 1986 and 1987 he was one of the businesspeople backing New Zealand's first America's Cup Campaign. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
43 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Teachers optimistic over NCEA changes
Teachers' unions are cautiously optimistic that changes to New Zealand's secondary school qualifications framework will work - provided they are implemented and resourced well. Govt plans to replace NCEA But opposition parties are concerned the "complete overhaul" of the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) goes too far. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced that NCEA Level 1 would be replaced with foundation literacy and numeracy tests. Levels 2 and 3 would be replaced with a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate. Students would be required to take five subjects and pass at least four to get each certificate. Marking would be out of 100, and grades range from A to E. Stanford said, as a parent, she did not understand how NCEA worked. "I thought that if you're sitting English, everyone's sitting the same English - but that's not the case… "There is too much credit counting and bringing together of sometimes quite ad hoc standards because we moved to the standards-based assessment that are not setting students up for success." The new system is not a return to the days of single three-hour exams measuring a students' learning for the year, nor will it be graded, forcing a certain percentage of students to fail. "I think it's really important to know that this is still standards-based assessment," Post Primary Teachers' Association president Chris Abercrombie told RNZ's Nine to Noon programme today. "So the real heart of NCEA, that standards base, is still there, which is really good to see because we know that helps students show their knowledge and understanding in various forms, so that's really good to see that that still exists… "Because it's all standards-based assessment… the 'bell curve' is not going to be put into the marking. So it's not gonna change that aspect fundamentally, which is really good." The new system is expected to be implemented one year at a time, so students will not be doing a mix of NCEA and and the new qualifications. Abercrombie said implementing it in a planned, robust and well-resourced way would be key to its success. "There's a significant concern about this because we know because of the poor implementation plan of Level 1, it did create a lot of stress on schools and teachers and principals to do that. "So, as I say, implementation is going to be absolutely key. We cannot repeat the mistakes made during the implementation of the new Level 1, and the co-requisites literacy and numeracy." Secondary Principals Association president Louise Anaru said the government must give teachers the training, resources and time they needed to introduce the overhaul. "The staging and sequencing of the changes are really important, and I can see that there is a timeline in place. Our schools will need to be resourced sufficiently, and they also need adequate time to implement all of the changes." Anaru believed the overhaul retained the best parts of NCEA. Abercrombie noted that so far, principals had been consulted on the changes - but not teachers. "We need to make sure the sector really is listened to in this and so, hopefully the consultation period will allow that to happen." He also noted teachers "asked to do a lot of work for a 1 percent" pay increase, so "some more movement on the negotiation table" would be expected from the government. Consultation closes on 1 September. Students who will miss out on the new qualifications should not be worried, Abercrombie said. "[NCEA] will still be recognised at universities. We have students using their NCEA grads to attend universities all around the world. We've had 20 years of people being lawyers and doctors and builders and plumbers and nurses and everything in between, based on their NCEA results… "It's a very valid assessment, and they'll be able to reach their goals whatever they want to with that." Stanford agreed, saying her kids were doing NCEA - even her son, who had a choice between that and the alternative International Baccalaureate programme. "It is a good qualification. Children still get into universities around the world with this qualification. We can make it so much better. There is a lack of consistency, but my message to parents who are still going through NCEA like me, you can still rely on NCEA. "It's a good qualification, but we need to look to the future and be more ambitious for our kids, and that's what I'm doing." Claire Amos, president of the Auckland Secondary Principals' Association and principal of Albany Senior High School, told RNZ's Midday Report aside from replacing Level 1, the changes felt "a little bit like window dressing". She feared there would be a narrowing of the current 67 subjects schools could choose to offer. "It does look like it will be less flexible, with a focus on whole subjects rather than at present, we could actually put together a whole lot of achievement standards and unit standards to make up a total of 60 credits for students - and in some schools, that may not be just made up of four or five subjects." She said rather than being dismissed as a "patchwork" qualification, NCEA Levels 1 and 2 should be seen as a "diverse definitions of success". Amos was also concerned with the discussion document's mention of possibly raising the school leaving age from 16 to 17. "On paper, that sounds great. But if you've got young people who don't see themselves in the qualification framework that's on offer, we're actually going to be managing these disengaged learners." Opposition parties warned the overhauled risked throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Labour education spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said NCEA was not perfect, but changes must be based on evidence and proper sector consultation. "People are reading the consultation document and asking questions like, what will this mean for the subjects? What subjects are going to be offered? How will they be weighted? "There's those questions that are unanswered and families are looking for and needing certainty for their children. What we don't want to see is these rushed overhauls and a generation of children being used as guinea pigs for things that have failed in the past, like national standards." Green Party education spokesperson Lawrence Xu-Nan said the proposals risked turning back the clock on decades of progress, with a return to a one-size-fits-all rigid approach. "NCEA definitely has its strengths. It's a well-designed, inclusive and flexible qualification and it is an internationally recognised qualification. Chucking it all out isn't going to address the real problems, which are policy instability and under-resourcing of education." He said there was a lot of "engineered fear" that the NCEA system could be gamed. "By and large if you're talking to students and teachers, that doesn't happen as commonly as people think it does. There are areas of NCEA that need to be rejigged, but not to the extent of what we are seeing in the announcement today, which is a complete overhaul."
