G7 agrees to avoid higher taxes for US and UK companies
WASHINGTON: The United States and the Group of Seven (G7) nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt US companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G7 said in a statement on Saturday.
The group has created a "side-by-side" system in response to the US administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency.
The G7 said the plan recognises existing US minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system.
The US Treasury Department said that following the removal of Section 899 from the US Senate version of the tax and spending bill, there is a shared understanding that a side-by-side system could preserve important gains made by jurisdictions inside the Inclusive Framework in tackling base erosion and profit shifting.
"We look forward to discussing and developing this understanding within the Inclusive Framework," the department said in a post on X on Saturday.
UK businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill.
Britain said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been removed. "Today's agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns," Finance Minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was needed to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance.
G7 officials said they look forward to discussing a solution that is "acceptable and implementable to all".
In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the US, effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries.
He also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on US firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
42 minutes ago
- Malaysian Reserve
G7 agrees compromise with US over global minimum tax for firms
NEW YORK — The G7 nations have backed a compromise with the United States in the dispute over an international minimum tax agreement for large corporations, reported German news agency dpa. The agreement means that US companies would be exempt from the global minimum tax but would instead be subject to taxation under a parallel US system, according to a statement from the Canadian G7 presidency following a summit there earlier this month. It has been agreed that the arrangement proposed by Washington ensures progress in combating international profit shifting. After taking office again in January, President Donald Trump declared the global minimum tax for large companies invalid in the United States. The White House views the global tax agreement as an unacceptable infringement on national sovereignty over finances and taxation. The minimum tax idea is part of a global corporate tax reform agreed by approximately 140 countries via the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Under the agreement, all multi-nationals with annual revenues exceeding €750 million (US$880 million) must pay at least 15 per cent in taxes, regardless of where the profits are generated. German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil welcomed the compromise following talks by the Group of Seven major industrialised democracies. 'The G7 agreement makes it possible for us to further advance the fight against tax havens, tax evasion and tax dumping,' he said in a statement on Sunday. He added that the US no longer opposes the global minimum tax per se, and planned punitive measures against European companies have been dropped. 'This allows the OECD and US minimum taxes to coexist,' he said. –BERNAMA-dpa
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump blasts ‘communist' winner of New York Democratic primary
Zohran Mamdani's surprise win in New York's mayoral primary shocked Democrats and triggered backlash from Donald Trump's camp. (Zohran Mamdani pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump branded the winner of New York City's mayoral Democratic primary a 'pure communist' in remarks that aired Sunday, an epithet the progressive candidate dismissed as political theatrics. Zohran Mamdani's shock win last week against a scandal-scarred political heavyweight resonated as a thunderclap within the party, and drew the ire of Trump and his collaborators, who accused Mamdani of being a radical extremist. The Republican's aggressive criticism of the self-described democratic socialist is sure to ramp up over the coming months as Trump's party seeks to push Democrats away from the political centre and frame them as too radical to win major US elections. 'He's pure communist' and a 'radical leftist… lunatic,' Trump fumed on Fox News talk show 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo.' 'I think it's very bad for New York,' added Trump, who grew up in the city and built his sprawling real estate business there. 'If he does get in, I'm going to be president and he is going to have to do the right thing (or) they're not getting any money' from the federal government. Trump's White House has repeatedly threatened to curb funding for Democratic-led US cities if they oppose his policies, including cutting off money to so-called sanctuary cities which limit their cooperation with immigration authorities. Mamdani also took to the talk shows Sunday, asserting he would 'absolutely' maintain New York's status as a sanctuary city so that 'New Yorkers can get out of the shadows and into the full life of the city that they belong to.' Asked directly on NBC's 'Meet the Press' whether he is a communist, Mamdani – a 33-year-old immigrant aiming to become New York's first Muslim mayor – responded 'No, I am not. 'And I have already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am, ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for,' Mamdani said. 'I'm fighting for the very working people that he ran a campaign to empower, that he has since then betrayed.' The Ugandan-born state assemblyman had trailed former governor Andrew Cuomo in polls but surged on a message of lower rents, free daycare and buses, and other populist ideas in the notoriously expensive metropolis. Although registered Democrats outnumber Republicans three to one in New York, victory for Mamdani in November is not assured. Current mayor Eric Adams is a Democrat but is campaigning for re-election as an independent, while Cuomo may also run unaffiliated.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
US Senate edges towards vote on Trump's divisive spending bill
WASHINGTON: US senators were inching Sunday towards a vote on Donald Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. Trump is hoping the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will help seal his legacy, extending his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of $4.5 trillion and beefing up border security. But Republicans eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over the package, which would strip health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than $3 trillion to the country's debt. The Senate formally opened debate on the bill late Saturday, after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote. Senators narrowly passed the motion to begin debate, with two Republicans joining 47 Democrats in voting against it -- drawing sharp rebukes from Trump. The US president has pushed his party to get the bill passed and on his desk for him to sign into law by July 4, the United States' Independence Day. On Sunday, however, he seemed to cast doubt on that timeline, and accused the opposition Democrats of delaying proceedings for political reasons. 'There are a lot of bad people in the Democrat Party,' he told Fox News in an interview aired Sunday, berating his political opponents for not backing an increase to the debt ceiling. Earlier, Trump's tone had been even sharper. 'Republicans must remember that they are fighting against a very evil, corrupt and, in many ways, incompetent (Policywise!) group of people, who would rather see our Country 'go down in flames' than do the right thing,' he said on social media. Democrats are bitterly opposed to the legislation and Trump's agenda, and have vowed to hold up the debate. They began by insisting that the entirety of the roughly 1,000-page bill be read aloud to the chamber before the debate commenced. If passed in the Senate, the bill would go back to the House for approval, where Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes -- and are facing stiff opposition from within their own ranks. On Sunday, Republican Senator Thom Tillis, who opposes the bill, said he would not seek reelection next year, US media reported, after Trump excoriated him for his opposition to the spending plan. Divisive cuts Republicans are scrambling to offset the $4.5 trillion cost of Trump's tax relief, with many of the proposed cuts to come from decimating funding for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans. Republicans are split on the Medicaid cuts, which will threaten scores of rural hospitals and lead to an estimated 8.6 million Americans being deprived of health care. The spending plan would also roll back many of the tax incentives for renewable energy that were put in place under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. On Saturday, former Trump advisor Elon Musk -- with whom the president had a public falling out this month over his criticism of the bill -- called the current proposal 'utterly insane and destructive.' 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future,' said Musk, who is the world's richest person, and heads electric vehicle company Tesla and space flight firm SpaceX, among others. Independent analysis also shows that the bill would pave the way for a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest 10 percent of Americans to the richest. The bill is unpopular across multiple demographic, age and income groups, according to extensive recent polling. Although the House has already passed its own version, both chambers have to agree on the same text before it can be signed into law.
