logo
100 charities challenge Scottish Labour MPs to oppose UK welfare cuts

100 charities challenge Scottish Labour MPs to oppose UK welfare cuts

The National7 hours ago

Charities including The Poverty Alliance, Carers Scotland, and Glasgow Disability Alliance have written a joint letter to Scottish Secretary Ian Murray, and all of Scotland's MPs, urging them to vote against the planned welfare cuts.
The Labour Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill aims to cut back disability benefit payments by around £5 billion per year. The SNP have made clear that their MPs will be opposing the changes.
In the letter, the charities highlight that an estimated 400,000 people will be pushed into poverty if the changes to Personal Independence Payments (Pip) and Universal Credit go ahead.
READ MORE: Scottish Enterprise to keep funding Israel-linked arms firms, Kate Forbes says
They also warned MPs that the proposed cuts will mean 'destitution and misery' for many sick and disabled people, along with others in their households, including children and unpaid carers.
'This is a question about the kind of society we want to be,' the letter reads.
'Scotland is a country that believes in justice and compassion, and people want our governments to make decisions which align with those values.
'We urge ministers to drop these proposals. We urge Scottish MPs to vote against these cuts, sending a strong, positive message to disabled people and carers in Scotland that this Government will build a country free from poverty, not one that forces people into deeper poverty and destitution.'
MPs are expected to get their first chance to vote on the cuts in the Commons on July 1.
However, more than 130 Labour MPs' signatures have appeared on a reasoned amendment explaining why they cannot support the Labour Government's proposals to slash welfare spending.
If passed, which it could with support from opposition parties, the amendment would block the bill from progressing to its second reading when it returns to the Commons and would hand Keir Starmer his first major defeat of his time as Prime Minister.
The amendment notes that the UK Government's 'own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of [the bill], including 50,000 children'.
Peter Kelly, chief executive of The Poverty Alliance, said the UK Government's plans to press ahead with the bill would mean more disabled people living in poverty, relying on food banks, and being pushed into destitution.
He said: 'People are desperate for the UK Government to deliver a just and compassionate society – but these proposals will deliver the opposite.
'If enacted, these cuts will mean more disabled people living in poverty, relying on foodbanks, and pushed into destitution. That's not the change people voted for at the last general election.'
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has supported the UK Government's plans to cut welfare despite unease among his group. At the time of writing, 11 Scottish Labour MPs had signed the rebel amendment.
Starmer said on Wednesday morning: 'We're pressing on with a vote on this because we need to bring about reform.'
(Image: PA)
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner clarified that a vote would be going ahead, despite reports that the UK Government was planning to delay it due to the scale of the rebellion.
Fiona Collie of Carers Scotland said an estimated 50,000 unpaid carers across the UK stand to lose carers' benefits as a direct result of the changes.
She said: 'We need a government that will reduce the poverty that unpaid carers face. If these cuts go ahead, even more of them will be pushed into crisis – leaving people struggling to afford food, heating, and other essentials.
'We estimate that around 150,000 unpaid carers across the UK stands to lose carers' benefits as a direct result of these changes. That's completely wrong - and any MP who votes to inflict that kind of deliberate harm on people in their constituency will have to justify themselves to electors.'
In a survey last year, 71% of Glasgow Disability Alliance members said they didn't have enough money to manage the cost of their needs, 68% couldn't afford utilities, and 58% couldn't manage the costs of food and essential groceries.
Tressa Burke of the Glasgow Disability Alliance added that the cuts will undermine disabled people's human rights and leave them facing even greater inequality and discrimination.
She said: 'It is shameful to try to balance the nation's books on the backs of disabled people. We have around 6000 members who have already suffered the worst impacts of the cost-of-living crisis, and more than a decade of austerity and social security cuts.
'These plans will cause untold harm to many disabled people and push them into destitution. It will undermine their human rights and leave them facing even greater inequality and discrimination.
'If MPs in Scotland support these heartless cuts, it will be a bleak day indeed. They will absolutely not get people into work, and will act as a reason to fall out of work too, where PIP has been topping up low-paid work.'
A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to create a welfare system – backed by dedicated employment support we are investing in now – that will help people into work and out of poverty in all parts of the country.
'We will never compromise on protecting people who need our support, and our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work.
'We are working with devolved administrations to ensure their views are at the heart of what we do, which is why we held Green Paper consultation events in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.'
Scottish Labour has been approached for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Food firm boss takes on Tanzania charity challenge
Food firm boss takes on Tanzania charity challenge

The Herald Scotland

time30 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Food firm boss takes on Tanzania charity challenge

Departing on July 3, Mr Rowan will raise money for AWARE Scotland, which supports young people through respite breaks and days out; and The Haven, a Lanarkshire-based organisation that helps individuals and families affected by life-limiting conditions. The expedition will see Rowan join fellow riders from The Country Range Group for up to nine hours a day in the saddle under the Tanzanian sun. READ MORE: The route will pass through mountain trails, rural villages, and the foothills of Mount Kilimanjaro, ending at the Ngorongoro Crater National Park, one of Africa's most iconic landscapes. Together, the team is raising vital funds for MAG (Mines Advisory Group) International, which clears landmines, cluster munitions and unexploded ordnance in former war zones. Mr Rowan was also determined to make the challenge count closer to home by using the 'Bikes Against Bombs' ride to support Dunns' long-standing charity partners in Scotland. Mr Rowan, who has been with the company since 1989, said: 'Taking part in this challenge reflects the values we hold as a company. I wanted to mark the 150th milestone by doing something that makes a real difference to the lives of others. 'This will mark Bikes Against Bombs 10th ride, an initiative created by people in our industry to make a real difference. To mark 150 years of Dunns Food and Drinks, chairman Jim Rowan will cycle 380km across Tanzania this July in aid of Scottish charities AWARE Scotland and The Haven (Image: Herald Picture Agency) 'As a fourth-generation, family-owned business, we've been committed to fully participating within our communities . It's a privilege to ride in support of these causes, and it's been a privilege to spend so much of my working life as part of this company. 'It's going to be incredibly tough, but it will be a once-in-a-lifetime experience that I'm hoping through the generosity of sponsors will make a meaningful impact to the two Dunns' charities.' Founded in 1875, Dunns is one of Scotland's longest-established wholesalers, supplying food and drink to hospitality venues across the country. Ahead of its anniversary year, the business has outlined bold growth plans – but insists community and charitable work will remain central to its mission. Managing Director Julie Dunn carries on the family name in Dunns Food and Drinks in the footsteps of her father, Christopher Dunn, her grandfather, William, and great-grandfather/company founder, Joseph Dunn. She commented: 'The whole team is behind Jim and incredibly proud of what he's doing. Charity and community have been central to Dunns since day one, and I couldn't think of a better way to mark our 150th anniversary celebrations. 'But this is just the beginning, and we look forward to sharing more about our exciting plans to celebrate this big birthday.' The ride takes place from July 3 to 11 and is expected to raise tens of thousands of pounds. Supporters can follow the journey and donate here:

Boffin denies being corrupt, but admits being incompetent
Boffin denies being corrupt, but admits being incompetent

The Herald Scotland

time30 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Boffin denies being corrupt, but admits being incompetent

Just hours before his debate on tackling the menace of wayward seabirds, Mr Ross hauled Professor Iain Gillespie, former principal of the University of Dundee, in front of the Education Committee for what turned out to be a three-hour kicking. In all my years watching Holyrood debates, I've never seen a mauling quite like this. READ MORE: It's not just that the MSPs on one of Holyrood's most dysfunctional committees were well briefed and at the top of their game, and working well together. But I cannot remember a witness more out of their depth and underprepared than Prof Gillespie. I don't think we can rule out the possibility that he was in the Parliament for a tour and just wandered into Committee Room 4 by accident. You have to wonder why he put himself through that. Sure, under Section 23 of the Scotland Act, the Scottish Parliament has the power to require any person to attend a committee to give evidence, but compelling someone to come along is a massive pain in the hoop. He could have said no. He should have said no. It would have made him look like he had something to hide, yes, but I'm not sure his evidence will have convinced anyone otherwise. Here's another top tip if you're ever hauled in front of a Holyrood committee — and it applies in other circumstances too — if someone asks you if you are corrupt or incompetent, you can say you're neither. You do not have to choose one or the other. And if you are going to choose one of the two, don't, as Prof Gillespie did, take a second or two to think about it. What did we learn from the startling session? That Prof Gillespie's plea for a knighthood was a joke, and that despite going on 11 foreign trips in two years, flying first class, and staying in five-star hotels at the university's expense, he is not a 'good time Charlie'. And that nothing should be read into the fact that when he quit he left his keys and staff card on a book called The Spy and the Traitor. Sure. He was asked a number of times if he thought he should pay back the £150,000 golden goodbye. It was, he said, not in his 'thought process' to give back the cash, but that he would 'reflect' on it. It was a brutal session. If this is what Douglas Ross is like with incompetent academics, just imagine what he'll be like if a herring gull ends up in charge of the new Qualifications Scotland body.

MSP calls for publicly owned bus company in Glasgow
MSP calls for publicly owned bus company in Glasgow

Glasgow Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

MSP calls for publicly owned bus company in Glasgow

SPT has recently consulted on a plan to introduce a franchising system for buses in the city region. It would involve the authority setting expectations for routes, timetables and fares, which bus operators would then bid to deliver. Patrick Harvie, Green MSP for Glasgow, writing for the Glasgow Times, sets out his position, which would see the city go even further and set up a publicly owned bus firm. Patrick Harvie said: "Glasgow deserves world class public transport, but everyone who uses it can see that it's confusing, expensive and unreliable. "I rely on bike, bus and train to get around, and I see the problems every day. On a recent trip to a Glasgow hospital, figuring out the bus journey was far more stressful than the medical procedure I was there for! "Public transport is vital to connect people with opportunities, jobs and services, friends, family and basic essentials. Yet all too often people in Glasgow simply can't rely on it, making our lives harder and inequality deeper. READ NEXT:Glasgow's new ship hall opened in honour of woman shipbuilding pioneer "People on the sharp end of the cost of living crisis are the most reliant on buses, yet a First Bus local day ticket is now nearly £6 - and that's if they haven't already cut your bus route. "It doesn't have to be this way! We can have bus services that serve passengers instead of profit. Campaigners like Get Glasgow Moving and the STUC have been building the case for change, and that's why I'm bringing a debate on the future of Glasgow's buses to Holyrood. "The Scottish Greens have always made the case for cheaper and better transport, winning free bus travel for under 22s and scrapping peak rail fares, as well as investing to make it safer and easier to walk and cycle. "Free bus travel has had an incredibly positive impact on young people's lives; 94,000 young people in Glasgow have taken just shy of 30 million free bus journeys since it was introduced in 2022. "But bus fares should be cheap or free for everyone, all the time. But without reliable, accessible and integrated buses even free travel won't get you very far. READ NEXT:Susan Aitken says new wave of youth violence needs re-energised response "If we had publicly owned bus companies we'd deliver great results for communities. You just have to look at Lothian buses in Edinburgh - over the last decade, they've paid back a £36 million dividend to the Council that runs them. That's the norm in many parts of Europe, and cities like Manchester have made great progress in recent years too. "So why can't we run our buses ourselves here in Glasgow too? "SPT is already looking at how Glasgow could either commission or run bus services. But the Scottish Government must back this plan if it's going to work. "First, we need to give councils the power to plan the routes they need and cap fares. But that's only the first step - from there we need to properly support new publicly owned bus operators. "If we get this right, Glasgow and the wider region can achieve better buses for everyone - cheaper, more reliable, and greener. Glasgow deserves nothing less."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store