Seeking to start a dialogue, Idaho legislator unveils local option tax proposal
An Idaho legislator is seeking the public's feedback on a new proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that would give voters the power to approve a new local option sales and use tax.
Rep. Britt Raybould, R-Rexburg, sponsored House Joint Resolution 5 and a companion bill, House Bill 375.
'As we have heard over the course of our service here … there has been interest expressed from our local communities about having a more general local use tax made available,' Raybould said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
A new local sales and use tax would be a new tax for specific products or services in a specific city or county that would be put forward for local voters to approve or deny.
If voters approved a local sales and use tax, the tax would only be for specific products or services listed and only for local communities that vote to approve the new tax. The new tax would be in addition to the state's existing 6% sales tax.
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to introduce both bills on Thursday morning, and both bills are available to the public on the Idaho Legislature's website, or by clicking on the highlighted bill number near the beginning of this article.
Raybould told legislators she isn't trying to pass House Joint Resolution 5 or House Bill 375 this year. Instead, Raybould said she put the proposals forward to circulate them publicly, gather feedback from Idahoans about her proposals and start a conversation.
'I want these ideas to be out there so that during the interim there can be ongoing conversations and proposals brought forward, because I felt that the time is ripe to resolve what this issue is going to look like going forward,' Raybould told legislators Thursday at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise.
CONTACT US
House Joint Resolution 5 is a proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that would ask Idaho voters to decide whether to give counties or municipalities the option to authorize a new local sales and use tax within its jurisdiction. Under the proposal, the maximum levy rate would be 2% and be limited to a maximum of four years.
Even if statewide voters approve the proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution, no sales and use tax could be imposed unless it was also approved by a majority of voters within the jurisdiction during an general election taking place in an even numbered year.
Under the proposal, any proposed local option sales and use tax up for election would be required to include a detailed description of the product or services that would be subject to the tax, as well as a description of how the money collected through the new tax would be used.
Raybould said a new local option sales and use tax might be appealing to Idaho cities or counties that experience an influx of tourists and want to establish a local sales and use tax that targets products or services related to tourism, but doesn't really affect local residents.
'For instance, if I wanted to have a tax on hotels, I could establish that for the purposes of this particular local option tax, that it would apply to nights spent in a hotel,' Raybould said. 'You have to have an intended purpose. This can't just be for general maintenance and operations, there would need to be a specific purpose outlined.'
The bill also includes what Raybould described as a trade-off. If the proposed amendment passes, Raybould said it would phase out any existing sales or use taxes available to cities and counties, such as an auditorium district.
According to the Idaho State Tax Commission, there are three existing auditorium districts in place in Idaho. Those auditorium districts include:
The Greater Boise Auditorium District, or GBAD
The Idaho Falls Auditorium District
The Pocatello Auditorium District
'That would be the trade, essentially, is that for a local option tax with flexibility that you would do the trade off with, potentially, like an auditorium district,' Raybould said.
Raybould said the idea is that the new local option sales and use tax would eventually replace auditorium districts if her proposals pass.
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to introduce Raybould's proposals, but several legislators had questions or concerns about phasing out existing auditorium districts.
'I do want to make sure that we really talk this through, because I'm not sure that something that could cause an auditorium district to go away or prevent other communities from creating one is in the best long term interests of the community,' said Rep. Steve Berch, a Boise Democrat who used to serve on the board of an auditorium district.
Raybould said existing auditorium districts would be allowed to remain in place until their stated expiration date.
'Whatever date exists on an existing auditorium district, they would be able to continue through the end of that period, but going forward the formation of any new district, assuming the amendment passed, would no longer be supported under the combination of these two bills,' Raybould said.
Introducing House Joint Resolution 5 and House Bill 375 clears the way for both proposals to return to the House Revenue and Taxations Committee for full public hearing. However, neither proposal is expected to pass this legislative session.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery
After California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he would move forward with a state redistricting plan – replete with implied mockery of President Donald Trump – California Republicans responded late Thursday. Newsom had declared "liberation day" – an apparent reference to Trump's own moniker for the day he introduced a comprehensive tariff regime – and preceded the announcement with "ALL CAPS" social media posts meant to mock the president's penchant for doing the same on Truth Social. California Republicans were not amused and pushed back on the project that could put an end to their already muted federal representation in America's most populous state. "Californians demand and deserve transparency from their government. Governor Newsom's sinister redistricting scheme is the opposite," the top Republican on the state's Elections Committee said. California's Top Republican Rips Dems Blocking 'Oil Goldmine' After New Trump Project Rebuffs Schiff "There is no public input," lamented state Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo, R-Tulare, as the state hosts nine Republican federal House lawmakers of the 52 total. The state's last Republican senator was Sen. John Seymour in 1991 – who had been appointed for a brief stint after Sen. Pete Wilson resigned to take the governor's office. Read On The Fox News App Macedo suggested Newsom would go to great lengths just to grab national headlines, no matter what the "will of the voters" is in reality. "Governor Newsom is on a mission to take power away from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission," Macedo said of the panel that typically would help decide decennial mapping. "Governor Newsom's power-grab erodes public trust in our government. Undermining the commission's hard work … is shortsighted and insulting to voters," said Macedo, whose caucus holds 19 of the 60 assembly seats. Mamdani Studies 'America's Worst Mayor' Brandon Johnson To Avoid His Political Pitfalls: Report Newsom, however, defended his decision, saying that Trump "poked the bear" – the animal which also appears on the Golden State's flag – and that California will therefore push back. "DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!)," Newsom wrote in his Trump-esque post. Trump has supported a "simple redrawing" of the Texas congressional map to represent the state's Republican bent, he said. "We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas, I got the highest vote in the history of Texas as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats," Trump recently said. Sen. Brian Jones, R-San Diego, leader of the upper chamber's minority in Sacramento, directed Fox News Digital to recent comments prior to the official announcement by Newsom. "Californians didn't elect Newsom to play gerrymandering games to boost his presidential campaign, they elected him to solve problems here at home," said Jones, who leads 10 senators compared to the Democrats' 30. "What he's doing now undermines the independent redistricting commission that voters created to stop exactly this kind of political manipulation." He also ripped Democrats after hearing that California Secretary of State Shirley Weber told reporters the legislature would have only a short window to schedule a special election for redistricting to coincide with the November elections. California lawmakers are on summer recess until Monday. The process would have to finish by next Friday; five days. "Once again, Newsom convinced Senate and Assembly Democrats to roll over, ignore voters, rush sham hearings, and violate the California Constitution," Jones said. "Democracy is dead in California, killed by Newsom's corrupt pursuit of the presidency." Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this article source: California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Texas state senators take first step toward redistricting
State senators in Texas launched a public hearing Sunday on a bill to redraw congressional voting districts in the state, a move that could win Republicans five more seats in the House if the GOP plan works perfectly. The public hearing is a required step before a bill can advance for a vote on the state Senate floor, Nexstar's KXAN reported. Democrats fled the state earlier this summer to prevent Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republicans from having the legislative quorum necessary to pass legislation. But Democrats are expected to attend the new special session after garnering attention with their walkout, and triggering more redistricting efforts around the country. 'We did exactly what we said we needed to do, and that is bringing a spotlight on this issue,' State Rep. Josey Garcia (D-San Antonio) said in an interview with KXAN one day before Abbott called the second special session. Most notably, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is spearheading an effort to change district lines in his state to make up for any potential losses for Democrats in Texas. Democrats released their proposed map on Friday evening. Newsom (D) is vying to hold a special election this fall on a ballot measure that would suspend the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade in an effort to keep up with Republican gerrymandering. Newsom has stressed that bypassing the commission, which Californians approved back in 2008 and 2010, would be temporary, and that redrawing the lines would only be triggered by redistricting in red states. 'They do five seats, we do five seats,' Newsom has said. KXAN reported that Texas House leaders expect that the House will have enough members present Monday to conduct legislative business. GOP State Sen. Phil King told KXAN that the new mapy would be legal and will perform better for Republicans in the state. 'We heard a lot of testimony that the current map had a number of districts that were not compact, were not close together, were not tight, in in their in their design, and in this map, listening to that testimony, we applied it, and this map also is much more compact than the current congressional redistricting map.' The proposed changes target five districts in areas around Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, creating Republican-leaning seats. The Texas push was directed by President Trump, who has also been pushing other states where Republicans are in control of government to look at redistricting to gain Republicans seats. The states considering such options include Missouri and Indiana. Trump was impeached twice in his first term after Democrats regained control of the House. Because the GOP has a very narrow majority in the House and the president's party typically loses seats in the midterm elections, the possibility of Democrats regaining the House majority is a real possibility in 2026.


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump ‘bela' post is new ‘covfefe,' stirs Newsom into action
A key meeting on the Russia-Ukraine war is set for Monday. Erin has been downgraded to a tropical storm but could still cause danger. But some on the internet want to know what Trump was talking about with his 'bela' post. Trump at 8:31 a.m. on Sunday posted the one-word message on his Truth Social media account. The word means beautiful in Italian if spelled with a double L, as 'bella.' Perhaps the president was looking at something, outside or on television, that sparked him to send the message. Whatever it was, it had a number of notables weighing in. Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have been feuding, and the Democrat's press office took the occasion to argue it is winning. 'We broke Donald Trump,' Newsom's press office wrote in response to the 'bela' post. In an earlier post, Newsom's office took more shots at Trump, seemingly inviting the president into an online fight with shots at his 'tiny hands.' The Lincoln Project, the conservative group that opposes Trump and is active on social media, wrote that Trump had dropped the new 'Covfefe.' Trump, during his first term, bewildered much of the country back in 2017 with the original covfefe tweet, which was likely a typo of some sort. Back then, the president's musings on Twitter were watched by much of the country and world – perhap more avidly than now. George Conway, the frequent Trump critic, was also reminded of covfefe, writing that bela was a 'blend' of covfefe. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), responding to the tweet, wrote 'that's what we call Comer,' apparently a reference to the chairman of the House Oversight panel, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.). Another account suggested a simple explanation. Trump was writing about Belarus, and got cut off with a typo.