Seeking to start a dialogue, Idaho legislator unveils local option tax proposal
Idaho state Rep. Britt Raybould, R-Rexburg, speaks from the House floor at the State Capitol building on Jan. 23, 2024. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)
An Idaho legislator is seeking the public's feedback on a new proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that would give voters the power to approve a new local option sales and use tax.
Rep. Britt Raybould, R-Rexburg, sponsored House Joint Resolution 5 and a companion bill, House Bill 375.
'As we have heard over the course of our service here … there has been interest expressed from our local communities about having a more general local use tax made available,' Raybould said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
A new local sales and use tax would be a new tax for specific products or services in a specific city or county that would be put forward for local voters to approve or deny.
If voters approved a local sales and use tax, the tax would only be for specific products or services listed and only for local communities that vote to approve the new tax. The new tax would be in addition to the state's existing 6% sales tax.
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to introduce both bills on Thursday morning, and both bills are available to the public on the Idaho Legislature's website, or by clicking on the highlighted bill number near the beginning of this article.
Raybould told legislators she isn't trying to pass House Joint Resolution 5 or House Bill 375 this year. Instead, Raybould said she put the proposals forward to circulate them publicly, gather feedback from Idahoans about her proposals and start a conversation.
'I want these ideas to be out there so that during the interim there can be ongoing conversations and proposals brought forward, because I felt that the time is ripe to resolve what this issue is going to look like going forward,' Raybould told legislators Thursday at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise.
CONTACT US
House Joint Resolution 5 is a proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that would ask Idaho voters to decide whether to give counties or municipalities the option to authorize a new local sales and use tax within its jurisdiction. Under the proposal, the maximum levy rate would be 2% and be limited to a maximum of four years.
Even if statewide voters approve the proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution, no sales and use tax could be imposed unless it was also approved by a majority of voters within the jurisdiction during an general election taking place in an even numbered year.
Under the proposal, any proposed local option sales and use tax up for election would be required to include a detailed description of the product or services that would be subject to the tax, as well as a description of how the money collected through the new tax would be used.
Raybould said a new local option sales and use tax might be appealing to Idaho cities or counties that experience an influx of tourists and want to establish a local sales and use tax that targets products or services related to tourism, but doesn't really affect local residents.
'For instance, if I wanted to have a tax on hotels, I could establish that for the purposes of this particular local option tax, that it would apply to nights spent in a hotel,' Raybould said. 'You have to have an intended purpose. This can't just be for general maintenance and operations, there would need to be a specific purpose outlined.'
The bill also includes what Raybould described as a trade-off. If the proposed amendment passes, Raybould said it would phase out any existing sales or use taxes available to cities and counties, such as an auditorium district.
According to the Idaho State Tax Commission, there are three existing auditorium districts in place in Idaho. Those auditorium districts include:
The Greater Boise Auditorium District, or GBAD
The Idaho Falls Auditorium District
The Pocatello Auditorium District
'That would be the trade, essentially, is that for a local option tax with flexibility that you would do the trade off with, potentially, like an auditorium district,' Raybould said.
Raybould said the idea is that the new local option sales and use tax would eventually replace auditorium districts if her proposals pass.
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to introduce Raybould's proposals, but several legislators had questions or concerns about phasing out existing auditorium districts.
'I do want to make sure that we really talk this through, because I'm not sure that something that could cause an auditorium district to go away or prevent other communities from creating one is in the best long term interests of the community,' said Rep. Steve Berch, a Boise Democrat who used to serve on the board of an auditorium district.
Raybould said existing auditorium districts would be allowed to remain in place until their stated expiration date.
'Whatever date exists on an existing auditorium district, they would be able to continue through the end of that period, but going forward the formation of any new district, assuming the amendment passed, would no longer be supported under the combination of these two bills,' Raybould said.
Introducing House Joint Resolution 5 and House Bill 375 clears the way for both proposals to return to the House Revenue and Taxations Committee for full public hearing. However, neither proposal is expected to pass this legislative session.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Watch: Jeffries gives remarks as GOP weighs Trump agenda, Musk feud
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) gave remarks Friday morning as Democrats push back against President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' — which faces significant roadblocks in the Senate. His comments also came after blows between Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently departed from the administration. Musk's opposition to the GOP megabill frustrated the president, which led to a public spat between the duo, offering Democrats fodder for their criticism of the sprawling spending package. The news conference was scheduled to begin at 10:45 a.m. EDT. Watch the video replay above. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Accuses Donald Trump Of Epstein Association Amid Feud
Elon Musk and President Donald Trump have taken their professional rift online. On Thursday (June 5), Musk made claims against Trump and took credit for him winning the election. The feud began on Tuesday (June 3) when Musk labeled Trump's 'big beautiful bill' a 'disgusting abomination,' according to CNN. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' shared Musk on X. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' In an additional post on the social media platform that he acquired in 2022, Musk exclaimed, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' According to ABC News, President Trump has previously claimed, 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island,' and noted that he has not publicly objected to releasing the files. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Donald Trump detailed to New York magazine in 2002. Epstein was found dead in his jail cell of an apparent suicide in 2019. He was awaiting trial for allegedly running an elaborate child sex trafficking operation, according to News Nation. Since the political fallout, Musk has experienced a financial hit. The 53-year-old's net worth fell below $400 billion, marking a decline of $26.7 billion. Additionally, Musk's Tesla stock declined 14%, or $47 per share, to $285. Musk exited his role as one of Trump's advisors and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). ABC News reported that multiple administration officials have attempted to contact Musk without success as the public spat continues. As the beef continues, Steve Bannon has suggested that Trump investigate Musk's alleged drug use and immigration status, according to the New York Times. More from Elon Musk's Net Worth Takes $27 Billion Hit Amid Feud With Pres. Donald Trump Elon Musk Slams Donald Trump Agenda Bill Days After White House Exit Diddy's Team Is Reportedly Working Toward A Presidential Pardon From Donald Trump


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps
Nearly 200 House members signed onto a bipartisan letter this week to express support for Job Corps after the Labor Department (DOL) recently announced it would soon be pausing operations at centers nationwide. In the letter to Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, the lawmakers express support 'for the continuation of the Job Corps program,' while noting it remains funded through government funding legislation that passed earlier this year. 'Nearly 20,000 young people utilize Job Corps to learn skills for in-demand vocational and technical job training,' the letter said. 'Job Corps is one of the few national programs that specifically targets the 16-24-year-old population that is neither working, nor in school, and provides them with a direct pathway into employment openings in industries such as manufacturing and shipbuilding.' Job Corps, established as part of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, is a free residential education and job training program for low-income people between 16 and 24 years of age. In an announcement explaining the DOL's decision to suspend operations at Job Corps centers, Chavez-DeRemer said the program was found to no longer achieve 'the intended outcomes that students deserve,' citing what she described as 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' 'We remain committed to ensuring all participants are supported through this transition and connected with the resources they need to succeed as we evaluate the program's possibilities.' The department said it will begin a 'phased pause' initiating 'an orderly transition for students, staff, and local communities.' The pause will occur by June 30, the office said. The move was met with swift backlash from lawmakers, including Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), who defended the program in a statement expressing strong opposition to the DOL's move to pause operations. 'Serving nearly 500 students in Maine, the Loring Job Corps Center and the Penobscot Job Corps Center have become important pillars of support for some of our most disadvantaged young adults,' Collins said at the time. In the new letter sent to the secretary Thursday, the group of lawmakers said that, by 'filling job openings, Job Corps ensures that young people become productive members of the American workforce.' 'No other program takes homeless youth and turns them into the welders, electricians, shipbuilders, carpenters, nurses, mechanics, and vocational workers of the future.' The Hill has reached out to DOL for comment. The letter came a day after a federal judge temporarily blocked the administration from suspending operations at Job Corps centers as critics argue the move is illegal.