Did the Internet Die in 2016? There's an Online Community That Thinks So
I've got two words for you: Shrimp Jesus. If you don't know what I'm talking about, it's the infamous AI-generated Facebook image of Shrimp Jesus and other variations floating around the internet. That image first surfaced in March 2024 and appeared to be a meme at first glance. However, Shrimp Jesus was the jumping-off point for Facebook AI art slop. These consist of newly AI-generated memes sweeping the internet, such as the Challah Horse, the 386-year-old granny baking her own birthday cake and the random wooden cars, just to name a few. You might think these are just memes, but these images reignite discussions surrounding an old online conspiracy called the Dead Internet Theory, which began in 2021.
As someone who writes about the internet for a living, this was the first time I'd heard of this idea, and researching it led me down a bottomless rabbit hole from which I struggled to emerge. But if you frequently use TikTok, Instagram or Facebook, you might have unwittingly already seen examples online that echo this premise. So, what is the Dead Internet Theory, and how does it parallel the rise of artificial intelligence?
The Dead Internet Theory first emerged in 2021 on the online forums, 4chan and Wizardchan. People took to these forums claiming that the internet died in 2016 and that AI bots mostly run the content we now see online. This theory also supports the possibility that AI is being used to manipulate the public due to a much larger and sinister agenda. These posts were pieced together in a lengthy thread and published on another online forum called Agora Road's Macintosh Cafe. Be aware, the thread can be easily accessed online, but I did not link to it due to the obscene language in the post.
User IlluminatiPirate wrote, 'The internet feels empty and devoid of people. It is also devoid of content.'
Now, years later, this conspiracy is seeing the light of day again with a rise of TikTok creators dissecting the theory and finding examples to support it. One creator, with a username of SideMoneyTom, posted a video in March 2024, showing examples of different Facebook accounts posting variations of AI-generated images of Jesus. These images provide little traffic online, yet they can still easily proliferate your feed. Like many other online creators, SideMoneyTom echoed the same sentiment: These Facebook accounts are run by AI bots and create all content. To better understand this theory, it helps to know how generative AI works.
Generative AI uses artificial intelligence systems that produce new content in the form of stories, images, videos, music and even software code. According to Monetate, 'Generative AI uses machine-learning algorithms and training data to generate new, plausibly human-passing content.' With the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, chatbots have become all the rage these days, with tech giants like Google, Apple and MetaAI creating a slew of AI tools for their products. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)
Now, back to Shrimp Jesus. If you feed specific data and prompts to a chatbot, you'll find that these images are 'human-passing.' Emphasis on 'passing.' Content created by chatbots is certainly known to have its faults.
"While large pre-trained systems such as LLMs [large language models] have made impressive advancements in their reasoning capabilities, more research is needed to guarantee correctness and depth of the reasoning performed by them,' AI experts wrote in a report by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
However, Shrimp Jesus and other AI-generated images aren't the only things online believers use to substantiate this theory.
If you spend enough time on social media, you'll see odd things in the comments section of certain posts, like repetitive comments from accounts that are irrelevant to the post. These comments are often strange and don't make sense. Last winter, Bluesky subscribers took to Reddit to complain about being plagued by reply bots that were politely and annoyingly argumentative.
One user flagged the common signs to spot these reply bots and what to do when encountering them. Some indications you're experiencing a bot are when the account is new and has many replies to different posts, as seen from this Bluesky reply bot account.
According to Imperva's 2024 Bad Bot Report, nearly half of all internet traffic came from bots in 2023, a 2% increase from the year prior. That report also highlights that the rapid adoption of generative AI and other LLMs has increased simple bots.
AI's growth has accelerated in recent years, but so have the fears and concerns surrounding these changes. According to recent data from the Pew Research Center, AI experts were more likely than Americans to believe that AI will positively impact the US in the next 20 years. Data shows that over 47% of experts are excited about using AI daily, versus 11% of the public. That same report also highlights that over 51% of US adults have been concerned about the growth of AI since 2021.
Regarding the growing concerns over whether the internet is dead, Sofie Hvitved, technology futurist and senior advisor at the Copenhagen Institute of Future Studies, believes that the internet is not dead, but evolving.
'I think the internet, as it looks like now, will die, but it has been dying for a long time, in that sense,' Hvitved said.
'It's transforming into something else and decomposing itself into a new thing, so we have to figure out how to make new solutions and better algorithms… making it better and more relevant to us as humans.'
In 2024, a NewsGuard audit report revealed that generative AI tools were used to spread Russian propaganda in over 3.6 million articles. NewsGuard also found that AI chatbots were used to create false narratives online from a Russian misinformation news site. To that point, Hvitved emphasized that these issues stemming from AI do not signify that the internet is dead but instead force us to address how we can improve these AI tools.
'Since there are large language models, and you know, AI feeds on all the information it can gather, it can start polluting the LLMs and pollute the data, which is a huge problem,' said Hvitved.
The Dead Internet Theory isn't dying anytime soon, no pun intended. Online discourse surrounding this theory isn't limited to the TikTok community but has also found a home on multiple Reddit threads.
One Reddit user wrote, 'AI chatbots are going to be catastrophic for so many people's mental health.'
Another posted, 'Considering that we are just at the beginning of AI, especially its capabilities with video, I'd say there's a real chance that it will destroy the usefulness of the internet and make it dead.'
Other people echo the same sentiment by adding that the ratio of AI content to human content will change dramatically over the next few years.
One even compiled a list of over 130 examples of subreddit threads on the internet, which consisted of comments and posts generated by AI bots.
One looming question following the Dead Internet Theory is whether AI will completely replace human-made content. If so, how will this shape internet culture?
Hvitved is also the Head of Media at the Copenhagen Institute for Future Studies and specializes in examining the relationship between emerging technologies like AI and their impact on communication. She has a take on the future of a new internet culture as AI use increases.
'Maybe the static element of the internet is going to die. So we have articles, static pages and web pages you must scroll through, but is that the death of the internet? I don't think so.'
She believes this new internet culture could mean more relevant content for broadband users.
'That kind of contextual internet, knowledge graphs, real-time summaries and interactive microformats, that's something these [AI] agents can go out and pick from to create something specialized for you.'
This new internet culture will emphasize AI's ability to tailor unique content for each user and may mean abandoning the concept of shared spaces and communities.
'We have to pay attention to echo chambers or diving into your own little worlds that only you would understand. We won't have any shared reality anymore,' Hvitved said.
If you've watched films like The Terminator, Blade Runner or Wall-E, you know there's always been a fascination with robots and whether they will take over the world one day. The resurgence of the Dead Internet Theory is just the latest evidence of that ongoing discourse. One could argue that AI shaping a new internet culture would mean the death of the internet as we know it. But this doesn't imply that the internet will just disappear. To echo what AI expert Sofie Hvitved conveyed, the internet may eventually evolve into something new. With the rapid growth of AI in our day-to-day lives, there's no question this is transforming the digital landscape. But is the internet dead? As a broadband writer working with numerous hard-working CNET writers daily, I can testify that it's alive.
The Dead Internet Theory emerged in 2021 from online conspiracy theorists on forums like 4chan and Wizardchan. It suggests that the internet died in 2016 and that the content we see online is run mainly by AI bots. The Dead internet Theory also suggests that AI is being used to manipulate the public due to a much larger and sinister agenda.TikTok creators note the increased number of Facebook bot accounts creating AI-generated images, with Shrimp Jesus and other variations of this image being the most infamous. This image also became the jumping point for Facebook AI art slop to spread online, with newly generated AI memes like the Challah Horse, the 386-year-old granny baking their own birthday cake, and the random wooden cars. In addition, followers also ascribe to this theory due to the spread of bot accounts filling the comment sections across different social media platforms.
Generative AI uses artificial intelligence systems to create new content, including stories, images, videos, music and software code. The way it works is you feed specific prompts and data to a chatbot, and it creates a particular output for you. Examples of generative AI include chatbots like ChatGPT, Preplexity, Google Gemini and Claude by Anthropic -- a CNET Editors' Choice for the best overall AI chatbot.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Will $50,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Be Worth $1 Million in 10 Years?
Nvidia shares are up 850% since ChatGPT sparked the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, but most Wall Street analysts still recommend buying the stock. The company is the market leader in AI accelerator chips, but its true strength lies in vertical integration that spans hardware and software products. Seven stocks in the S&P 500 generated such colossal returns in the last decade that they would have turned $50,000 into $1 million. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a cornerstone of the artificial intelligence (AI) trade for several years. Its share price has increased 850% since January 2023, a period that roughly coincides with the launch of ChatGPT. But Wall Street is still overwhelmingly bullish on the semiconductor company. Angelo Zino at CFRA Research thinks Nvidia "will be the most important company to our civilization over the next decade." More broadly, among 73 analysts following Nvidia, the median 12-month target price is $175 per share. That implies 25% upside from its current share price of $140. Could Nvidia stock turn $50,000 into $1 million over the next decade? Here are my thoughts. What sets Nvidia apart is vertical integration. The company has over 90% market share in data center graphics processing units (GPUs), chips that accelerate complex workloads such as artificial intelligence (AI). But the company supplements its GPUs with adjacent hardware like CPUs, interconnects, and networking equipment. Nvidia also develops software products. AI Enterprise is a suite of tools, code libraries, and pretrained models that streamline the development of AI applications for use cases like autonomous robots, conversational agents, and optimization systems. CrowdStrike uses those tools to power threat detection capabilities on its cybersecurity platform. Similarly, Omniverse is a software platform that supports 3D application development. It also serves as a simulation engine that lets engineers generate synthetic data for developing machine learning models. Amazon uses the Omniverse platform to optimize warehouse design and train fulfillment center robots. Nvidia frequently sets performance records at the MLPerf benchmarks, objective tests that evaluate AI systems on training and inference workloads. That is an important competitive advantage: Nvidia builds the best AI accelerators on the market. But vertical integration reinforces that advantage by letting the company design entire data center systems with the "lowest total cost of ownership," according to CEO Jensen Huang. Grand View Research says spending on AI hardware, software, and services will increase at 35.9% annually through 2030. Nvidia has a good shot at matching that growth rate. Indeed, Wall Street expects earnings to grow at 40% annually through the fiscal year ending January 2027. That makes the current valuation of 44 times earnings seem fair. Nvidia shares would need to increase 1,900% (20-fold) in the next decade to turn $50,000 into $1 million. Returns of that magnitude are theoretically possible in that time frame. In fact, seven stocks currently in S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) hit that mark in the last decade, as listed: Nvidia: +25,700% Advanced Micro Devices: +4,980% Axon Enterprise: +2,380% Texas Pacific Land: 2,110% Arista Networks: 1,950% Tesla: 1,920% Fair Isaac: 1,900% However, while 20-fold returns are theoretically possible, Nvidia has virtually no chance of hitting that mark in the next decade. The company is already worth $3.4 trillion, meaning its market value would hit $68 trillion if the stock increased 20 times. That seems highly unlikely when the entire S&P 500 is only worth $48 trillion today. Nevertheless, Nvidia is still a worthwhile investment. AI will likely be the most transformative technology in history, and the company is well positioned to benefit as demand for AI infrastructure increases. Potential catalysts include generative AI, autonomous vehicles, and humanoid robots. Also, Nvidia has a burgeoning software business that may evolve into a significant source of revenue as those catalysts take shape. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Amazon, Arista Networks, Axon Enterprise, CrowdStrike, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Arista Networks, Axon Enterprise, CrowdStrike, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Fair Isaac. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Will $50,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Be Worth $1 Million in 10 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Elle
38 minutes ago
- Elle
Taylor Swift Sneakily Attended a Wedding With Travis Kelce in a Strapless Blue Dress
This week, Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce were guests at a backyard wedding in Tennessee and though all eyes were on the bride and groom, some pictures of the famous couple showed them having a romantic evening of their own. The dress code appeared to be summer casual and Swift fit in perfectly in a strapless blue dress with a small flower pattern, structured bodice, and flowing skirt that ended at her ankles. On her feet, she wore tan high-heeled sandals. The Eras Tour star had her hair half up and wore a bracelet and small pieces of jewelry for accessories. Kelce was wearing dress pants and a short-sleeved button-down shirt in brown. In a TikTok shared by creator @laurenelizabethduhhh, Swift and Kelce can be seen seated side-by-side at a long table, watching the newly wedded couple enjoy their first dance. Swift starts swaying to the music and Kelce joins her in a cute shared moment. Since the end of the NFL season in February, Swift and Kelce have been enjoying some quality time together out of the spotlight. This week, they were seen in Florida together, where Swift wore a classic little black dress to their dinner date. Just before the images of their date night started circulating, a source told Us Weekly that the two were keeping a low profile on purpose right now. 'They are making fewer public appearances together because [their relationship] brings too much unwanted attention, but there isn't trouble in paradise,' the insider explained. A second source shared that Swift has been living in both Miami, where Kelce has been training during his offseason, and New York: 'Taylor has been coming and going to Florida and is still spending a lot of her time in NYC.' And it appears she's making some special time for Tennessee.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Travis Kelce Makes Bold Statement to NBA Legend About Taylor Swift Regaining Control of Her Music
Travis Kelce Makes Bold Statement to NBA Legend About Taylor Swift Regaining Control of Her Music originally appeared on Parade. fans have dubbed May 30 Swiftie Independence Day after the singer announced she finally regained control of her masters last weekend and purchased her entire music catalog, but there may not be anyone prouder of her than boyfriend . During the Wednesday, June 4 edition of New Heights — the podcast that the Kansas City Chiefs player shares with brother Jason Kelce — he celebrated Swift's major win with guest Shaquille O'Neal. 🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬 On a clip from the episode that was shared on TikTok, Shaq says he needs to show the Kelce brothers something before hitting play on Taylor's song "I Knew You Were Trouble," immediately sending Travis into dance mode. Not only did Travis take the opportunity to boogie down, but he also showed his Swift smarts by acknowledging that the version Shaq played was from the original Red album, not the more recently released Taylor's Version. 'Shout out to Tay Tay,' Travis said. 'Just got that song back, too." He continued, "Just bought all her music back. So it's finally hers too man. I appreciate that dog."Fans are swooning over Travis' latest show of very public support for Taylor — something that hasn't always been a given in her past relationships, especially when it came to Joe Alwyn, who once refused to name his favorite song of hers in an interview with British GQ back in 2018. "I love how excited Trav was to say that she just got all her music back," one fan commented on TikTok. Another wrote, "Travis's face when anyone talks about Taylor! I love how much he loves her!" Travis, never change. Once you have the Swifties on your side, you're in good. Travis Kelce Makes Bold Statement to NBA Legend About Taylor Swift Regaining Control of Her Music first appeared on Parade on Jun 4, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 4, 2025, where it first appeared.