Wolves Opponent Watch Party: Thunder at Nuggets
For the second year in a row, the Minnesota Timberwolves are heading to the Western Conference Finals.
Take a moment. Let it marinate. Maybe even pour yourself a celebratory Grain Belt and cue up that YouTube clip of KG jumping on the scorers' table in 2004, just to set the mood. Because if you've spent the last two decades living and dying with this team, this isn't just surreal—it's practically biblical.
Advertisement
The Wolves have now doubled their playoff series win total from the previous 34 years in the past two postseasons. This franchise went from 'lovable losers' to 'low-key killers' seemingly overnight. And now, they're one step away from the NBA Finals.
But we'll get to that. Because for the next few days (or maybe hours), Minnesota waits.
We wait to find out who's stepping into the ring next. It'll be either the surging Denver Nuggets or the shiny new Oklahoma City Thunder, both currently locked in a second-round slugfest. Ideally, this series goes seven games, features a couple 55-minute double overtimes, and ends with Jamal Murray and Chet Holmgren crawling off the court like they just finished The Revenant.
So yeah, for tonight, you're rooting for Denver. Even if you've spent the last calendar year loving to hate them. You want a Game 7. You want the long haul. You want whoever emerges to walk into the Western Conference Finals already halfway to exhaustion.
OKC or Denver? The Matchup Math
Let's start with Denver.
Advertisement
I know the Wolves have beaten them six times in a row. I know this current iteration of Minnesota might be the best-equipped team in the league to deal with Nikola Jokic.
But don't let all that fool you.
This would be the third postseason series in a row between the two teams. The Nuggets are a proud, battle-tested group, and you can bet Jokic still has the Game 7 collapse from last year etched into his basketball soul. If Denver wins Game 6 and then wins a rock fight of a Game 7, they're walking into the WCF looking for revenge like John Wick after someone touched his dog. It would be personal. Spiteful. Physical. And wildly entertaining.
And still? I'd take it.
Advertisement
Not just because of the history, or the Wolves' frontcourt depth, or the fact that Rudy Gobert has actually made Jokic work for his MVP-level buckets. But because Denver is thin. Really thin. You can feel the fatigue already setting in. These are the types of minutes that show up when you're six games into your second straight do-or-die series.
The Wolves have been there. Ask Anthony Edwards what a seven-game second-round straight slugfest feels like. The mileage adds up, and suddenly those springy closeouts turn into slow lunges. That's when a rested team like Minnesota—who's finally clicking, defending like lunatics, and riding a Randle-Edwards two-man game that's low-key devastating—can pounce.
Now let's talk OKC.
They're the shiny new toy of the Western Conference. Loaded with length, twitchy athleticism, and a future that probably involves them annoying us all for the next decade. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is the kind of guy who drops 38 and somehow feels like he's coasting while doing it. The Thunder are scary in a very different way. They're fast, they're weird, and they're young enough not to know what they're supposed to be afraid of. But the Wolves? They're built for this matchup too.
Advertisement
Minnesota has already proven they can beat OKC. They took two of three in that February series—one of them being the 'Are you kidding me?' comeback from down 25 in the fourth quarter. They have size advantages all over the floor. And in a playoff series where the whistle tightens up and foul-hunting becomes less of a cheat code? Shai's bag of tricks becomes a little less useful.
More importantly, OKC doesn't have a second star who can keep pace with Ant and Julius when they're both cooking. They're good—really good—but they may not have that top-gear firepower to break Minnesota's defensive shell.
Would OKC be a tougher matchup than Denver on paper? Maybe. But the Nuggets come with more mental warfare. With OKC, you're getting chaos. With Denver, you're getting scars.
A Rested Wolf Is a Dangerous One
Here's the bottom line: the best thing for the Wolves is rest. Period. That's the only absolute truth in this entire equation. Whether it's Denver or OKC, you want this to go the distance. You want physicality. Overtime. Maybe a little altitude sickness for good measure. And when it's all over, you want a tired, bruised-up team heading into Game 1 on short rest while Ant's in full Terminator mode and Julius is already halfway into his villain arc.
Advertisement
Last year, the Wolves ran out of gas. This year, they're refueled, refocused, and frankly more dangerous than anyone wants to admit.
Four wins from the Finals.
Eight wins from immortality.
And for the first time in your basketball-loving life, you don't need to squint and pretend this team is a contender.
They are the contender.
So buckle up, Minnesota. Get your popcorn ready. And tonight? Hold your nose and root for Denver. A tired rival is a beautiful thing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Position changes – for Mookie Betts or Teoscar Hernández – aren't coming any time soon for Dodgers
DENVER — Shortly after Monday night's debacle, Mookie Betts was in his manager's office. The six-time Gold Glove right fielder turned shortstop had already showered and changed as media entered the visiting clubhouse at Coors Field, and the door remained open as Betts sat on the couch and talked with Los Angeles Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman and manager Dave Roberts. Advertisement Betts' transition to shortstop has been an unquestioned individual defensive success, as the 32-year-old has more than handled his own at the game's premier position. The defense in Betts' old position — the one he stood at when the Dodgers recorded the final out of their World Series run last October — has fallen off. Teoscar Hernández's inability to record an out on a ball that (according to Statcast) had a 90 percent catch probability had sunk the Dodgers in a walk-off loss to a putrid Colorado Rockies team, once again drawing the attention on his right field play that has been amongst the worst in baseball. The topic of Monday night's conversation, according to all parties involved, never touched upon right field. Rather, it was one of several check-ins that Betts has had with Roberts — some of which have been visible to media — as he's dealt with his struggles over the course of the worst offensive season of his career. 'Mookie pops into my office all the time,' Roberts said. 'I hope too much wasn't made of that.' Betts is not the only one; Freddie Freeman was spotted in Roberts' office prior to Tuesday night's contest for a brief conversation. Betts and Friedman each independently told The Athletic before Roberts' comments that the three were discussing the progress of Betts' swing as he's gone 16-for-48 (.333) over his last 12 games — and not about a possible switch at right field. Sure enough, Betts did not replace Hernández in right field on Tuesday night, as both former All-Stars assumed the same positions they started the season in. Tonight's #Dodgers lineup at Rockies: — Los Angeles Dodgers (@Dodgers) August 19, 2025 Still, the tumultuous 24 hours at least temporarily brought back calls for Betts to return to the outfield, as he did last August for the team's stretch run after starting that season as the team's shortstop. Roberts said right field has not come up 'at all' in conversations with Betts this season. Advertisement 'I think that's a fair question,' Roberts said. 'But I don't think we're there yet.' Roberts pointed to the lack of options in the Dodgers' infield, which is currently without Tommy Edman, Hyeseong Kim, Kiké Hernández and Max Muncy. The Dodgers are reluctant to put Miguel Rojas into an everyday role at age 36, especially when he was far from 100 percent last postseason. They've already forced prospect Alex Freeland into what is essentially an everyday role to make up for their absences, and would exacerbate that by moving Betts to the outfield. The absences of Edman, Hernández and Kim also remove certain options from the outfield mix that could reduce Teoscar Hernández's exposure to right field without moving Betts off of shortstop. Roberts said Edman will not return until his sprained right ankle can physically handle center field, which would move Andy Pages to right field and, in theory, put Hernández in left field for certain matchups. That would, in theory, also boost the lineup offensively, with Michael Conforto still providing nothing at the plate and Alex Call going 4-for-23 to start his Dodgers career after being acquired at the deadline. There's also the fact that Betts might not even be the best defensive right fielder on the roster right now. Pages' arm ideally puts him in right. Betts' defensive metrics (as much as public metrics can be trusted) had not been as strong as his peak years in Boston even before he moved off the position, and he was essentially average at the position in the final month and a half of 2024 by Outs Above Average. That's still better than Hernández's -9 Outs Above Average so far this season, but worse than Betts' 2 Outs Above Average at a more important defensive position so far in 2025. Roberts still acknowledged that this all becomes more of a conversation if the Dodgers can get closer to full strength, anyway, before retracting some of his pointed criticism of Hernández from Monday night and doubling down on his belief that Hernández can improve his range. Advertisement 'I think, just in totality, we can all do a better job,' Roberts said. 'All of us. So I just refuse to pin it on one position, one person. … That's just not what I do. But I do believe … if there's ways to get better on the margins I think that way to look at it is completely fair and completely honest. 'I do know that Teo feels more comfortable in right. I know the numbers don't speak to it this year. I'm counting on him to improve play out there. I really am. I'll leave it at that.' Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Matt Wallner's RBI double
Matt Wallner hits a double to right field, giving the Twins' a 1-0 lead in the bottom of the 2nd inning
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Nuggets guard Russell Westbrook gets free agency update
Ex-Nuggets guard Russell Westbrook gets free agency update originally appeared on The Sporting News Russell Westbrook, 36, played just one season for the Denver Nuggets before deciding to walk away from the organization. He helped the team reach the NBA Playoffs as the No. 4 seed and a 50-32 record in 2024-25. After the Nuggets were eliminated by the championship-winning Oklahoma City Thunder in the second round of the playoffs, Westbrook decided that he would decline the player option in his contract and test out free agency. It seems that Westbrook's desire to find a new team isn't going as planned, and the nine-time All-Star remains unsigned. Russell Westbrook could remain a free agent for the start of the 2025-26 season Westbrook has been rumored to have received interest from multiple teams in the league. The Sacramento Kings, Miami Heat, New York Knicks, and Milwaukee Bucks, according toBleacher Report's Andy Bailey, are all organizations that are potential fitters for the 36-year-old. With the NBA offseason winding down and preseason games starting in less than a month and a half, inside sources have said that it wouldn't be surprising if Russell Westbrook begins the 2025-26 season unsigned, per Sam Amico of HoopsWire. "If he does get signed, it would likely be to a minimum contract, and it may or may not be a deal with any of the teams mentioned above," Amico wrote. There's no denying that Westbrook is still an NBA talent. Through 75 games and 36 starts last season, he averaged 13.3 points, 4.9 rebounds, 6.1 assists, and 1.4 steals while shooting 44.9% from the field.
