logo
WA to Pay $85,000 to Indigenous Survivors of the Stolen Generations

WA to Pay $85,000 to Indigenous Survivors of the Stolen Generations

Epoch Times6 days ago

Western Australia (WA) has unveiled a long-awaited scheme to financially compensate members of the Stolen Generations, offering up to $85,000 per person.
The scheme will deliver individual taxpayer-funded payments to Aboriginals removed from their families by the state prior to July 1, 1972.
State Premier Roger Cook said the gesture was a necessary step.
'No amount of money could ever make up for the experience of Stolen Generations members and their families, and the ongoing effects on people's lives,' he said.
Applications for the scheme will open later in 2025, with initial payments expected to be processed by year's end.
The announcement aligns WA with almost all other states and territories, with Queensland now the only jurisdiction without such a program.
Announcement Follows 'Sorry Day' Observance
The decision comes a day after National Sorry Day, which commemorates the release of the 1997 Bringing Them Home report. That report chronicled the stories of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children forcibly taken from their communities over several decades.
Related Stories
5/11/2025
4/24/2025
WA has historically seen the highest number of children removed under these policies. Compensation for survivors was among more than 50 key recommendations made in the report.
Cook called the announcement 'a major step in the pursuit of reconciliation and healing.'
In February, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed federal support would continue.
'The process of healing that began with the Apology goes on, a process we are assisting by extending the Territories Stolen Generations Redress Scheme to June 30, 2028,' Albanese said during his address marking the 17th anniversary of the national apology.
Support from Aboriginal Group
The Healing Foundation, a national organisation supporting Stolen Generations survivors, praised the WA government's move.
CEO Shannan Dodson said the decision followed years of advocacy.
'I pay tribute and honour all the Stolen Generations organisations that have advocated and stood alongside survivors throughout this long journey,' she said.
She noted that while financial compensation cannot erase the trauma, it does offer acknowledgment and some form of restitution.
Concerns Scheme Lacks Nuance
Chair of the Close the Gap Research group, Gary Johns, said the premier was correct in saying the state could not change history.
'The scheme does not distinguish Indigenous children taken from families, to those given up, or those taken responsibly for their protection, and those who allegedly were stolen,' he told The Epoch Times.
'By lumping every applicant together the moral underpinning of the scheme has been degraded,' he added, saying it erred more towards virtue signalling.
'Taxpayers should condemn the scheme.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Withdraws Isaacman as NASA Administrator Nominee
Trump Withdraws Isaacman as NASA Administrator Nominee

Epoch Times

timea day ago

  • Epoch Times

Trump Withdraws Isaacman as NASA Administrator Nominee

A White House spokesperson confirmed on May 31 that President Donald Trump was withdrawing his nomination of Jared Isaacman to become the next administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 'The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars,' White House spokesperson Liz Huston said in an email received by The Epoch Times.

Trump Hammers the Markets with New Scorched Earth Trade War on Apple and Europe
Trump Hammers the Markets with New Scorched Earth Trade War on Apple and Europe

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Hammers the Markets with New Scorched Earth Trade War on Apple and Europe

Donald Trump reignited his scorched-earth trade war on Friday, unleashing a fiery social media tirade that took aim at Apple and Europe with fresh tariff threats. In classic flip-flop fashion, the president is back on the offensive. Just weeks after hitting pause on his so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs amid market turmoil, he's doubling down with predictable results sending Dow Futures plunging by around 400 points in early trading. In blistering posts on Truth Social on Friday morning, Trump warned that Apple would face a 25 percent tariff unless it moves iPhone production to the U.S. He also said he is 'recommending' a 50 percent tariff on the European Union starting June 1, escalating tensions with the continent that is traditionally one of America's closest allies. The EU 'has been very difficult to deal with,' Trump wrote. 'Our discussions with them are going nowhere!' Increased tariffs on Europe would lead to huge effective taxes on luxury goods. 'We've had this de-escalation tailwind at the market's back for like six weeks now — and the market has had one of its best six-week stretches in the last 75 years — and a re-escalation of trade war rhetoric threatens that,' Ross Mayfield, an investment strategist, told CNBC. Trump's first call of order was to escalate his stand-off with Apple CEO Tim Cook after the tech giant signaled it would switch assembly of its iPhones for the U.S. market to India. The president threatened the company after Cook failed to bend the knee and was a notable absentee from the tech mogul road trip to the Mideast last week. The California giant's shares immediately fell 3 percent in premarket trading. After previously reversing tariffs on Apple goods, Trump said the tech company will face a 25 percent tariff if production for iPhones isn't shifted to the U.S. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,' Trump wrote. 'If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S,' he added. 'Thank your for your attention to this matter!' His warning came days after Cook said that factories in India would soon supply the 'majority' of iPhones sold in the U.S., as the tech company attempts to swerve the tariffs Trump has slapped on Chinese-made products. Apple plans to source the 60 million iPhones sold annually in the U.S. from India by the end of 2026, according to the Financial Times. The newspaper also reported Friday that Foxconn, a key Apple supplier, is investing $1.5 billion to ramp up production of the company's best-selling product in India. According to Reuters, it's unclear if Trump can slap tariffs on an individual company. The very public warning came days after Trump said he told his 'friend' Cook that he 'had a little problem' with him looking to build Apple products in India. 'I said to Tim… 'Tim look, we treated you really good…India can take care of themselves ... we want you to build here,'' Trump said. The Daily Beast has contacted Apple for comment. Trump took aim at the EU some 30 minutes later, over what he said was stalled trade negotiations between the key trading partners. 'The European Union, which was formed for the primary purpose of taking advantage of the United States on TRADE, has been very difficult to deal with,' the president said. 'Their powerful Trade Barriers, Vat Taxes, ridiculous Corporate Penalties, Non-Monetary Trade Barriers, Monetary Manipulations, unfair and unjustified lawsuits against Americans Companies, and more, have led to a Trade Deficit with the U.S. of more than $250,000,000 a year, a number which is totally unacceptable,' he ranted. Trump added: 'Our discussions with them are going nowhere! Therefore, I am recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025. There is no Tariff if the product is built or manufactured in the United States.' Top U.S. and EU trade officials were expected to hold talks Friday to assess progress in their ongoing tariff negotiations, the Wall Street Journal reported. Officials have a prearranged call at 11:30 a.m. and the EU won't comment on Trump's threats until after that call takes place said, an official said. The outburst came after weeks of market chaos triggered by Trump's sweeping 'reciprocal tariffs' on more than 180 countries. He announced a 90-day pause just a week later, granting a brief window for trade deal negotiations to take place between every country besides China—though the U.S. and China had finally agreed to a 90-day truce beginning May 14 to significantly lower tariffs.

The investigation into Hogsett's handling of harassment claims is over. What the firm found
The investigation into Hogsett's handling of harassment claims is over. What the firm found

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

The investigation into Hogsett's handling of harassment claims is over. What the firm found

An independent investigation into Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett's response to alleged harassment by his former chief of staff Thomas Cook found that the city didn't break any laws in its response to those complaints, but raised new questions about the end of Cook's tenure as chief of staff back in 2020. Chicago-based law firm Fisher Phillips' investigation found that Cook was allowed to stay on as chief of staff for 68 days following the city's 2020 investigation that found Cook had violated city policy by having another relationship with a subordinate. The law firm said that time period warrants further investigation. The overall finding from the law firm is that Hogsett's administration acted within the law during three investigations conducted in 2017, 2020 and 2023 as the result of Cook's alleged behavior. IndyStar reported last year that three women alleged that Cook sexually harassed them while he was their supervisor, and Cook engaged in another consensual relationship with a subordinate employee. One of the women alleging harassment against Cook also said that he sexually assaulted her. "While complainants 1 and 2 challenge the existence, timing, and integrity of the investigations into their raised complaints, the response by Mayor Hogsett and his administration was legally sufficient and reasonable under the circumstances," according to the law firm's final report. However, the report noted that while the mayor's decision to allow Cook to resign as opposed to face termination was "not inconsistent with the law," the fact that Cook had knowingly violated a prior directive against having relationships with employees "would reasonably cause the City-County's decision to be questioned." In addition, the law firm noted that "Some individuals interviewed during this investigation shared their perception that (Cook) was given an opportunity to use the period from November 2, 2020, through December 30, 2020, to position himself for personal gain by negotiating contracts for his own benefit," according to the report. "We also recommend (the city) identifies action steps the City-County can take to minimize potential for City-County employees to negotiate contracts for personal gain while employed at the City-County or for the 12-months following their departure," according to the firm. Several council members on the investigative committee - including Democratic committee Chair Christa Carlino - said they felt there was a difference between the administration's legal obligations and its ethical ones. "Just because something's perfectly legal, doesn't make it right," Carlino said. She said the council should look further into Cook's departure from the city in 2020. Fisher Phillips also recommended that the city dissolve its current human resources structure in favor of an independent one, as well as appoint an independent inspector-general, in its presentation of a final report at the Indianapolis City-County Council's investigative committee on May 29 after a months-long investigation. Fisher Phillips' attorney Danielle Kays said 12 people were interviewed over the course of the investigation, including Hogsett and two women who said they were harassed by Cook. Kays said the firm reached out to Cook multiple times and received no response. Cook previously apologized for his conduct in a statement to IndyStar last year. He has not been charged with a crime. The meeting was tense and emotionally charged. At one point, Carlino recessed the meeting as Lauren Roberts, Hogsett's former deputy campaign manager, who was on speaker phone, pleaded with Carlino to get a copy of the report, which she had not received even as the law firm presented their findings about her case to the public. "This entire thing has been torture," Roberts said. "I'm sitting here being dissected in public." Carlino said no one from the council or public — besides its general council — had access to the report before it was presented tonight by the law firm. "I know the wait has been excruciating for those survivors," Carlino said. Hogsett said in a statement after the report presentation that "the findings are clear that the earlier investigations and resulting sanctions were handled appropriately and confidentially," though clarified he hadn't had time to read the report in full. "It remains crucial that the city has the best system in place for reporting, investigating, and dealing with harassment of any kind, which is why I will work with the City-County Council on how these recommendations may further strengthen efforts to create a safer, better workplace for everyone throughout the city's operations," Hogsett said. The City-County Council launched an investigative committee last year to probe Hogsett's response to the alleged harassment by Cook. IndyStar reported in 2024 that Cook faced sexual harassment and assault claims by three women who worked under Cook over the course of a decade. The sexual harassment allegations in Mayor Hogsett's administration: What you need to know Cook also had a relationship with another subordinate employee while he was serving as chief of staff, which prompted him to be asked to resign from the administration back in 2020. Two of the women have alleged that Hogsett didn't handle the allegations properly. Roberts, for example, has said that Hogsett didn't respond to her when she reached out about Cook's alleged treatment of her during the campaign, and that she was never interviewed as part of any investigation over the conduct. Hogsett previously apologized to women who say they were harmed by Cook, but has also defended his response. This story will be updated. Contact senior government accountability reporter Hayleigh Colombo at hcolombo@ Sign up for our free weekly politics newsletter, Checks & Balances, by IndyStar political and government reporters. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Here's what law firm found on Hogsett's response to sexual harassment

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store