&w=3840&q=100)
'Unacceptable': Replit CEO apologises after AI fakes data, deletes code
The incident took place during a 12-day 'vibe coding' challenge led by Jason Lemkin, the founder and CEO of SaaStr.AI and a prominent investor in software startups.
According to Lemkin, things went wrong on Day 8 of the experiment. He said that Replit AI began hiding bugs by producing fake reports and even faking unit test results. 'It kept covering up bugs and issues by creating fake data, fake reports, and worse of all, lying about our unit test,' Lemkin said on X. 'I will never trust Replit again.'
On Day 9, Lemkin had directed the AI tool to freeze all code changes. Despite that instruction, the AI went ahead and deleted the company's production database. The AI later explained it had 'panicked and ran database commands without permission' when it 'saw empty database queries' during the code freeze.
Lemkin also claimed that the tool fabricated user data. 'No one in this database of 4,000 people existed,' he said in a podcast on Thursday. 'It lied on purpose.'
What is Replit and vibe coding?
Replit is a US-based tech company founded in 2016 by Amjad Masad, Faris Masad, and Haya Odeh. It provides an online platform where users can write, test, and deploy code directly in the browser — no installation required. The company promotes itself as 'The safest place for vibe coding'.
Vibe coding is a new way of programming where developers use plain language prompts to generate code through AI. The term gained popularity in early 2025, thanks to OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy.
Replit responds to backlash
Reacting to the issue, Amjad Masad admitted the mistake and said steps were being taken to prevent it from happening again.
'We saw Jason's post. Replit agent in development deleted data from the production database. Unacceptable and should never be possible,' he wrote on X.
We saw Jason's post. @Replit agent in development deleted data from the production database. Unacceptable and should never be possible. - Working around the weekend, we started rolling out automatic DB dev/prod separation to prevent this categorically. Staging environments in… pic.twitter.com/oMvupLDake
— Amjad Masad (@amasad) July 20, 2025
Masad said Replit is now building automatic safeguards to keep development and production environments separate. He also confirmed that Lemkin had been refunded for the inconvenience.
'I reached out to Jason the moment I saw this on Friday morning to offer assistance. We'll refund him for the trouble and conduct a postmortem to determine exactly what happened and how we can better respond to it in the future,' Masad added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
NCLT admits BluSmart Mobility into insolvency
BENGALURU: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Ahmedabad has admitted Catalyst Trusteeship's petition against electric‑cab operator BluSmart Mobility for defaulting on dues of about Rs 1.28 crore. The tribunal's order initiated the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) and appointed NPV Insolvency Professionals Private Ltd as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). BluSmart, once a high‑profile player in India's EV‑based ride‑hailing market, has been battling mounting liabilities and cash flow pressures. Despite attracting venture backing and expanding its fleet, the company struggled to keep pace with operating costs and payment obligations, culminating in the admitted default that triggered the insolvency process. The proceedings come at a time when BluSmart's key shareholder, Gensol Engineering, and its subsidiary Gensol EV Lease are also under insolvency. The tribunal recently admitted separate petitions by the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (Ireda) for defaults of Rs 510.10 crore against Gensol Engineering and Rs 218.95 crore against Gensol EV Lease. According to Ireda's filings, cross‑default provisions linked the two entities, which had availed term loans for electric vehicle leasing and infrastructure. Personal guarantees by promoters Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi and corporate guarantees from Gensol Engineering were also invoked. Troubles at Gensol and BluSmart deepened after a Sebi investigation two months ago alleged that the Jaggi brothers diverted loans taken in Gensol's name to buy a luxury flat, inflate Gensol's stock price and fund personal ventures, while also forging no‑default letters from lenders such as Ireda and Power Finance Corporation to falsely claim that the company was not in default. 'The NCLT's decision, despite BluSmart's attempt to resist insolvency proceedings by citing temporary financial difficulties and minor technical defaults that were later fixed, reinforces that defaulters cannot take shelter under vague grounds,' said Akshit Goyal, partner at Goyel & Goyal. 'It upholds the sanctity of the IBC and reflects that insolvency is a last‑resort remedy to protect the lending ecosystem, not a tool for routine recovery. ' As part of the BluSmart order, the tribunal imposed a moratorium that bars any recovery proceedings, transfer of assets or enforcement of security interests against the company while the CIRP is underway. The IRP has been directed to take control of assets within seven days, invite claims from creditors, and file progress reports with the tribunal. Catalyst has been asked to provide Rs 10 lakh as interim funding to run the process, a procedural deposit that will later be adjusted by the committee of creditors. The Registrar of Companies has also been instructed to reflect BluSmart's insolvency status on the MCA portal. A significant concern for customers arises from BluSmart's wallet system. The company operated a closed‑system prepaid payment instrument (PPI), which is essentially an app‑based wallet that could only be used for BluSmart rides and related services. As per the Reserve Bank of India's master directions, these instruments do not permit cash withdrawal or redemption and do not require authorisation from the Reserve Bank. This means funds parked in such wallets are outside the purview of RBI regulation and lack the protections available to regulated payment instruments. 'There is a chance that customers may get refunds because the company's wallet operates through a PPI licence. If there was no PPI, customers would have had to file their claims, as they rank last in the recovery waterfall," Sonam Chandwani, managing partner at KS Legal & Associates, told TOI. 'The larger concern will likely be for investors rather than customers, given that wallet balances are usually small. Since BluSmart has tangible assets, the case could attract serious resolution interest, and there is also a possibility of a group insolvency angle. ' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Boeing/Saab in talks with BAE on UK jet trainer bid, sources say
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel PARIS/LONDON, - Boeing and Sweden's Saab are in talks with Britain's BAE Systems about teaming up on a future replacement of Britain's Hawk trainer in a growing niche of the fast jet industry, three people familiar with the matter and Saab have jointly developed the T-7 advanced trainer for the U.S. Air Force, while Britain has said it plans to replace its out-of-production Hawk fleet, part of which is instantly recognisable through its Red Arrows display are at an early stage and details are still to be worked out, with no guarantee that an agreement can be reached, one of the sources said."We don't comment on rumour and speculation," said a spokesperson for BAE Systems, whose corporate predecessor developed the successful Hawk trainer in the early 1970s."Training remains an important pillar of our air sector strategy. We continue to explore and develop our footprint in this area across both live and synthetic capabilities."A Saab spokesperson said: "We have a long-term partnership with Boeing on the co-development of T-7. Saab will not comment on rumours or speculation."Boeing had no immediate June, a UK defence strategy review recommended that the Hawk be replaced, and the government said it would welcome interest from UK-based has said it has not decided whether to develop a new jet to replace the Hawk, whose production line closed in was not immediately clear whether any potential co-operation would be restricted to the UK contest or eventually seek to take advantage of BAE's incumbency in the wider export market, where over 1,000 Hawks have been sold to 18 of the sources said it was premature to think beyond the British for nimble trainers is to U.S.-based consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory, the market for military trainer aircraft is expected to rise to $3.7 billion in 2030 from $2.8 billion, excluding substantial related spending on support, sustainment and training suppliers include the Boeing-Saab T-7, Leonardo's Aermacchi M-346 and the Korea Aerospace Industries T-50 Golden a privately owned early-stage British company, has designed a new jet trainer that it says could replace the analysts have expressed concerns, however, that the case for an all-new fleet is being driven in part by Britain's Red Arrows, a diplomatic symbol abroad and a popular feature of royal events at home. Their jets are due to retire in publication Defence Eye reported last week that Britain is looking at buying a first batch of new trainers over the next five years to replace the Red Arrows' Hawk T1s, followed by a larger second batch of T2 replacements in the late 2030s."A major complicating factor is the need for the Red Arrows aircraft to be British-designed, or at least British-assembled, to allow the aircraft to act as a promotional tool for the UK aerospace industry," the report by UK defence expert Tim Ripley choice of trainer also has potential implications in the bigger global market for fighter defence committee has warned the T2 will not meet training requirements for future fighters envisaged by Britain, Japan and Italy known as the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP).For Boeing and Saab, a UK sale would not only provide a key European market, but could potentially mean getting a toe-hold in the training requirements for GCAP and generate potential future trainer business from exports of the combat BAE, having a ready-made trainer could be one extra marketing point for its future combat jet system, Ripley said."It would increase the value that you can export with GCAP," he told the other hand, analysts say BAE's existing Italian partner in GCAP, Leonardo, is likely to press the industrial and strategic case of its own M-346 as the GCAP trainer of could not immediately be reached for comment.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
UBS steps up contingency planning as it tries to tame Swiss rules, sources say
ZURICH/HONG KONG, - UBS is briefing senior staff that the need to examine moving its HQ from Switzerland has grown since the government proposed new capital rules, a source with knowledge of the matter said, while another pointed to London as a favourite alternative. The Swiss government proposed reform measures in June that envisage that UBS - as Switzerland's sole remaining global bank with a balance sheet about double the size of the economy - should capitalise its foreign subsidiaries by 100% rather than 60% currently, to cover potential losses abroad. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Orthopedic Knee Surgeon: Suffering From Pain After Age 50? Do This Every Morning Wellnee Undo That could mean the bank has to carry an extra $24 billion in capital. A review by UBS looking at contingency planning has concluded that London is one of the best options for an alternative location should the bank try and move, one of the sources said. Live Events Britain has similar rules on foreign subsidiaries but a third source said authorities outside Switzerland may show more flexibility. Two sources familiar with the bank's thinking said UBS was also warning internally that it could be vulnerable to a future takeover by a foreign rival if it were weakened by the rules. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions are confidential. UBS, which is due to release second quarter earnings on Wednesday, has intensified lobbying with parliament since June 6 to push back against the proposed capital changes, two lawmakers said. Even insiders at the Zurich-based wealth manager say UBS - whose leadership argues it came to the rescue when it bought Credit Suisse in a government-engineered deal - does not intend to leave Switzerland. All agree that UBS's principal objective is to soften the regulations. Even so, UBS executives think the government's demands mean that if no compromise is reached, it may need to respond radically, one source familiar with the lender's thinking said, pointing to a possible relocation. UBS told Reuters it would engage in the consultation process for the new rules while evaluating appropriate measures "to address the negative effects that extreme regulations would have on its shareholders." Its Swissness was a "differentiating element", it said, adding that UBS - which has been running an advertising campaign themed "A bank like Switzerland" - wanted to be based in Switzerland "leveraging the mutually beneficial relationship." Switzerland's finance ministry declined to comment on what it said were internal UBS decisions. FINMA, the Swiss regulator, declined to comment. UBS earlier this year started warning about the possibility of shifting its headquarters, but the latest deliberations are reported here for the first time and highlight a political tug-of-war between UBS, led by CEO Sergio Ermotti, and the government about what is best for the bank and for Switzerland. Representatives for the UK Treasury, Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority declined to comment. Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter said in June that the new rules would make it more costly for the bank to grow abroad but that she hoped UBS would stay in Switzerland. DIFFICULT MOVE As for any large bank, relocation would be costly and difficult and industry insiders say Switzerland's global renown as a wealth management centre has been central to UBS' business model. Pressure is, however, growing on the bank. UBS's shares have underperformed rivals, gaining 7% in 2025 against the wider sector's 37% as investors fear the new rules will impede shareholder payouts and growth prospects. One UBS shareholder, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters it would be difficult for the bank to attract investors if the capital rules talks dragged on for three or four years without the bank making progress in softening them. The ball "is in UBS's court" to find a solution, the investor said. Under the proposed capital requirements, UBS's Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, a key measure of bank capital, of 14.3% could reach 17%. That would put it above rivals like JPMorgan at 15.8%, Morgan Stanley at 15.7%, and Goldman Sachs at 15.3%, the government estimated in June. Outside experts say like-for-like comparisons are difficult. PERSUADING INVESTORS Switzerland's parliament is not due to receive a draft law on the rules until well into 2026. But UBS executives want to reassure investors by early 2026 they can soften the final legislation, two of the sources said. If it cannot placate investors coming into 2026, UBS may try to repatriate more than the $5 billion in capital it already plans to return to its parent bank, which could eventually fund payouts, analysts say. UBS's efforts have already yielded fruit. Last month a parliamentary committee backed a motion to make the government send all the new banking rules to parliament instead of issuing some directly. "We have to find the right balance between capital that minimises risks but also maintains UBS's competitiveness," said Beat Walti, the lawmaker who proposed the amendment.
