SA will host 'successful G20' whether US attends or not
Deputy President Paul Mashatile says South Africa will host a 'successful G20' meeting, whether the United States decides to attend.
Mashatile addressed a business breakfast hosted by Trade, Industry, and Competition Minister Parks Tau in Pretoria on Monday.
The G20 summit is scheduled to kick off in Johannesburg on November 22. South Africa assumed the Presidency of the G20 in December last year, taking over from Brazil.
US boycotting G20
In February, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a social media post on X, said he 'will not' attend a summit of the grouping to protest the South African government's controversial land seizure bill.
'I will not attend the G20 summit in Johannesburg. South Africa is doing very bad things. Expropriating private property. Using G20 to promote 'solidarity, equality, & sustainability.' In other words: DEI and climate change.
'My job is to advance America's national interests, not waste taxpayer money or coddle anti-Americanism.'.
WATCH: Paul Mashatile speaking about SA hosting a successful G20 meeting
Deputy President Paul Mashatile said South Africa will host a 'successful G20' meeting whether the United States decides to attend or not. #G20 #PaulMashatile #US @TheCitizen_News pic.twitter.com/Qn2K3XBEp2 — 𝙵𝚊𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚕 𝙿𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚕 ⚡️ (@FaizelPatel143) May 5, 2025
ALSO READ: US secretary Marco Rubio will not attend G20 summit because SA 'is doing very bad things'
G20 without US
Mashatile told the gathering that G20 meetings are taking place as the country prepares for the main event in November.
'I know that a number of meetings are already taking place. Ministers of Finance have met, Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and some of the business meetings have also taken place, with the meeting for heads of state taking place in November this year.
'We are looking forward to a very successful G20 meeting this year, even though the United States said they may not come, but we are proceeding, and we are going to make sure that it's a success,' Mashatile said to applause.
ALSO READ: SA to prioritise food security, economic growth in G20 presidency, says Ramaphosa
Transformation fund
Mashatile also spoke about measures to prevent corruption from collapsing the Transformation Fund.
The legislative rationale for the transformation fund is anchored in the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Act, which mandates that the government increase the effective participation of black-owned and managed enterprises in the economy and enhance their access to both financial and non-financial support.
According to Tau, the transformation fund will be capitalised at R20 billion per year over a five-year period and disbursed through a combination of grants, loans and equity support, complemented by technical assistance, pre- and post-investment support and market access facilitation.
Some opposition parties like the DA do not support the fund in its current form and see a better shot at economic growth through providing resources purely based on merit and the prospective beneficiary's business viability and growth potential.
Corruption
Mashatile said the country will not achieve an inclusive economy as long as corruption persists, both in the public and private sectors.
'Corruption hinders the growth of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) by increasing costs, reducing profits, and creating uncertainty.
'To promote an inclusive economy, we must commit to addressing corruption by strengthening our institutions, fostering transparency and accountability, and promoting citizen engagement. This includes developing and implementing robust anti-corruption frameworks, strengthening our criminal justice system, and encouraging public participation and oversight,' Mashatile said.
Mashatile added that the government is committed to fighting corruption, focusing on accountability, transparency, and the dismantling of corrupt networks.
This effort, he said, includes establishing specialised 'investigative units and strengthening legislation to combat money laundering and fraud'.
ALSO READ: WATCH: 'I would be ashamed', Mashatile slams DA ministers over budget
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
38 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
We'll adjust to the game, says the citrus industry as Tau, Steenhuisen target new markets
A 30% tariff on South African citrus would push up prices by about $4.25 a carton in the US, putting South Africa at risk of losing market share to Chile and Peru, which face only a 10% tariff. According to Hannes de Waal, chief executive of the Sundays River Citrus Company and board member of the Citrus Growers Association, the industry expects a favourable outcome from tariff negotiations with the US — if not now, then soon. 'Citrus and fruit growers are important to this country as job creators and obviously as earners of foreign exchange. We play an important role in the economy. We still expect that there will be a favourable outcome,' he said. 'Nothing stays fixed, you know… Everything is up for negotiation.' The US has imposed a 30% tariff on some South African imports, effective from 7 August 2025, hitting key sectors including agriculture and the automotive industry. De Waal said the tariff would make South African citrus unaffordable to the average American consumer. Some citrus growers contacted by Daily Maverick said they were still bracing for impact, but would count their losses only in the coming weeks. He said the US' shift from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) — a trade programme that gives eligible sub-Saharan African countries preferential access to the US market — to a tariff-based approach had changed the game, but he trusted that the industry would recover and find other ways to survive. 'We will adjust to the game and we will make sure that we can ship citrus to the world.' New markets Speaking at a joint press briefing between the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition and the Department of Agriculture on Tuesday, 12 August 2025, Ministers Parks Tau and John Steenhuisen presented a unified front regarding the efforts being undertaken to maintain existing export markets and develop new opportunities. They said increasing the standard of our citrus quality could expand access to the EU and China, and noted potential new export routes to Japan, Thailand and Vietnam, as well as across Africa. Excusing himself for the pun, Steenhuisen stated that 'the low-hanging fruit would be the ability to redirect citrus that is going to the US'. Despite the pivot toward new export markets, both ministers were clear that negotiations with the US were continuing and that the country remained an important trading partner. 'And when it comes to citrus, both the processing and the quality of the South African offering… I think that the US gets a good deal from South African agriculture,' said Steenhuisen. According to economic data platform Trading Economics, South Africa exported more than $233-million worth of edible fruits, nuts, peel of citrus fruit and melons to the US in 2024. The agriculture department had established a 'high-level negotiation team', said Joylene van Wyk, Steenhuisen's spokesperson. Led by Director-General Mooketsa Ramasodi, it includes Mike Modisane, chief director for Animal Production and Health, and Dr Maanda Rambauli, the director for Plant Health, who will advise on 'sanitary and phytosanitary matters'. A 30% tariff on South African citrus would increase the price of a carton by roughly $4.25. This puts South Africa at risk of losing market share to Chile and Peru, which face a 10% US tariff. South Africa typically exported about seven million cartons of citrus (the equivalent of 100,000 tons) to the US – which was 4% of all South African citrus exports, Van Wyk said. She said that among the negotiation points was that South African citrus was counter-seasonal, meaning its exports did not compete directly with US citrus production. Exemption SA Citrus Growers' Association chief executive Dr Boitshoko Ntshabele reiterated the association's call to the South African government to secure a mutually beneficial trade deal with the US, or an exemption for seasonal fresh produce. 'There are examples where this approach has yielded success,' he said. 'Brazilian orange juice has been exempted from US tariffs. This is good news for citrus in general, and hopefully points towards a precedent for South Africa. 'Quality, fresh South African citrus plays a significant role in ensuring year-round supply of citrus for US consumers, and in avoiding possible citrus price increases in the US. We urge the US to take this into account, as well as the fact that we supply citrus when the US growers themselves are out of season,' Ntshabele said. Accelerating shipments Ntshabele said that as the southern hemisphere's citrus season ended in October, South Africa had passed the middle of the season. This meant local citrus growers had managed to accelerate shipments to the US before the deadline. Ntshabele said this had lessened some of the effects of the tariff on the current season's US exports, but the financial impact on producers would be detrimental next season should a beneficial trade deal not be concluded. He said some growers in the Northern and Western Cape had planted orchards specifically to meet US demand. 'These growers are now deciding whether to divert what is left of their crops to other markets, if possible,' Ntshabele said. 'They can, in certain situations, also choose to absorb the immense financial costs of the tariff, to the detriment of the financial viability of their entire enterprise.' Ntshabele noted that growers would ensure that fruit would not be left to rot or wasted, saying it could go to charity. 'The primary goal of South Africa's citrus growers is to keep their enterprises afloat and their workers employed by selling premium citrus at profitable prices in overseas markets,' Ntshabele said. 'We welcome the support measures announced by the government thus far, but the only way to fully protect everybody in our vulnerable rural communities from big tariff shocks would be to negotiate a deal or exemption urgently,' he said. DM
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Here's why B-BBEE should not be scrapped – and what needs to change
Although the DA wants to get rid of B-BBEE, political analysts say the policy should not be scrapped yet. Despite concerns about the broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) policies in South Africa, some economists and political analysts believe this policy can still benefit many black people. On Monday, DA leader John Steenhuisen said his party is declaring war on the B-BBEE system. Other political parties, such as the Freedom Front Plus (FF+), have criticised the policy, describing it as dysfunctional and only benefiting a few politically connected people. They also claim it has not helped create work opportunities for the majority of previously disadvantaged people. Why B-BBEE is seen as a failure However, Sanet Solomon, a political analyst from Free State University (UFS), believes that this policy can still work if implemented properly. 'It is important to note that B-BBEE is not a form of affirmative action favouring a singular group, but rather legislation aimed at helping marginalised groups enter sectors in which they are underrepresented. 'If it is implemented correctly, it could assist large portions of society,' she said. The problem, she said, is that the B-BBEE policy has been manipulated by some individuals. 'Despite the continued updates to legislation, individuals and groups have still managed to find loopholes to bypass what could be a beneficial policy and system. She said this creates the impression that B-BBEE is 'an absolute failure'. ALSO READ: Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs 'tweaking' Solomon said when this legislation was introduced in 1994 it had good intentions of leveling the scales between black and white South Africans. 'The introduction of the BEE was needed post-1994 to remedy the impact of South Africa's apartheid legacy. 'Despite their good intentions, these policies have been utilised to abuse the country's procurement policies, which have resulted in high levels of bureaucracy and the prominence of entrepreneurs who are solely dependent on state contracts,' she said. Because of this, the political analyst said, B-BBEE has consequently failed emerging entrepreneurs and small businesses instead of assisting them. What will replace B-BBEE? Prof Ntsikelelo Breakfast, a political analyst from Nelson Mandela University (NMU), told The Citizen that he also believes B-BBEE should not be scrapped. 'The policy has not achieved its desired outcome but that does not mean there is no need for black people to get empowered. One can also argue that it has created a scope for corruption coupled with the privatization of services. 'But if you do away with the policy then how do you make sure that black people are part of the main stream economy on a large scale, and how do you make sure that black people are entrenched in the commanding heights of the economy,' he said. Breakfast said the application of B-BBEE has been problematic. 'The people who have benefited from this policy are normally associated with the ruling party, this includes people like Ramaphosa, Tokyo Sexwale and other big names. Those are people who have benefited on a large scale,' he said. The DA does not see colour? Breakfast, said the DA's view is that they do not see colour when it comes to crafting their policies. 'They are moving from the premise that they do not believe in racial categorisation or racial classification. They have the philosophical tradition of non-racialism, meaning that they are colour blind. 'The agreement they are using against this law they are also using it against affirmative action or the Employment Equity Act,' he said. Who benefits from B-BBEE? Breakfast said B-BBEE was intended to benefit women, people with disabilities and all groups that were previously disadvantaged before 1994. 'There are seven pillars of this law before a business is awarded to you; you must meet those requirements,' he said. Prof Dirk Kotze, a political analyst from the University of South Africa (Unisa) said opposition parties such as the DA are not opposed to the empowerment of black people. But instead, are against the negative effects of the law. 'It's not about the principle; it's about the policies. Even inside the the ANC this has been discussed,' he said. Kotze said there is a view that B-BBEE has failed to ensure that businesses that are completely black-owned grow and get listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). 'There is a view that it hampers the development of black companies,' he said. ALSO READ: Economists question if SA has a plan for US tariffs, Tau says here it is Economists weigh in Meanwhile, economist Makwe Masilela told The Citizen that he believes that the policy should not be scrapped. 'The issue with B-BBEE is that it's perceived to benefit the few, and honestly, there's some element of truth in that. 'But that doesn't mean it must be scrapped instead. We need to make sure that the implementation thereof gets done in such a way that the policy meets the intended purpose. 'I guess just like any other policy, if not implemented correctly or allowed to be abused, then it's expected that people will start to be against it,' he said. Another economist, Dawie Roodt, said the problem with B-BBEE is that it was now empowering the rich. 'It does not empower the majority of people but it empowers that few select individuals who are fabulously rich, so we have to get rid of this nonsense called BEE and ensure that government empowers its citizens and not a select few. 'It turned out completely wrong and I am opposed to the way we apply BEE in South Africa,' he said. According to Roodt, real empowerment means equipping the country's citizens with skills and education. He said a functional state that delivers services will create a conducive environment where black people can prosper. NOW READ: DA declares war on B-BBEE system
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
We should all embrace the national dialogue
As the 2030 deadline for the 20-year National Development Plan draws near, the time has come to draft a path forward for the next 30 years 10 August 2025 - 00:00 By LINDIWE MAZIBUKO I wonder how many of us still remember Constitutional Talk, the mid-1990s project of the Constitutional Assembly to engage with and solicit the views of South African people to aid the drafting of the constitution. After years of white minority rule, institutionalised injustice and oppression for the vast majority of society, South Africans were invited to contribute to the drafting of our nation's founding document. What followed was an unprecedented period of public participation and civic engagement...
