Development noise ‘stressed hens out'
Poultry farmer Nigel Hewitson at his Tisbury poultry farm yesterday. PHOTO: NINA TAPU
Invercargill poultry farmer Nigel Hewitson is living a ''nightmare every damn day''.
Mr Hewitson spoke at the public forum of the Invercargill City Council's community wellbeing and regulatory committee meeting this week .
Mr Hewitson said since September last year the noise from a nearby housing development had disturbed the 5000 hens on his Tisbury poultry farm, causing him and his employees distress.
''The noise and vibration of the development stressed the hens out,'' he said.
''They were attacking each other.''
The hens lost their appetite and their condition, and egg production dropped.
In particular, the machine used to compact the construction site was ''like earthquakes'' to the hens.
Hens had no muscles in their feet and felt the vibration throughout their bodies, he said.
It was very upsetting for staff members to pick up the dead bodies of the chickens, he said.
''I'm living this nightmare every damn day and it plays on you.''
When he talked to a council staff member in November he was told the project complied with the Resource Management Act (RMA), he said.
''I'm tired of fighting people because all I ever get out of the city council office is 'there's nothing we can do ... oh, this is a unique situation'''.
He could not understand why the RMA part of the consent had been signed off as not affecting anyone else, he said.
He believed the council was remiss because the welfare of animals had not been considered when the consent was approved.
The poultry farm was established on the property in 1938 and was one of the oldest businesses in the region, he said.
He was also concerned where the stormwater from the 40 plus houses in the development would go.
Mr Hewitson said the birds were now so affected by noise even a cough or sneeze caused them to panic and run to the end of the shed, where they piled up.
Some had died of smothering as a result of the pile-up.
Mr Hewitson said he had been advised by a council staff member to contact the Ministry for Primary Industries as the noise was an animal welfare issue.
After an MPI staff member visited they issued a compliance order to the developer giving it 14 days to work with him to resolve the issue, Mr Hewitson said.
When the company failed to do so, he appealed to the High Court as his ''only option'', he said.
''I was picking up deceased animals all the time and I had to do that because nobody had my back.''
The emotional and financial toll of the situation was high.
He was still feeding the hens the same amount of food, but production was halved and there were lawyer's fees as well.
Cr Grant Dermody asked how Mr Hewitson would like to see the situation resolved.
Mr Hewitson said the only way he could make a living from the land was through poultry farming and he did not want to give up his business.
Cr Dermody then asked if Mr Hewitson could co-exist with the development until it was finished.
Mr Hewitson said it was possible.
However, there would need to be give and take and at present it seemed like he was the only one giving, he said.
After Mr Hewitson's presentation, committee chairman Darren Ludlow said it was important to acknowledge the distress Mr Hewitson was experiencing.
Council consenting and environment group manager Jonathan Shaw was investigating the matter.
Mr Shaw spoke to the meeting and said while he had met Mr Hewitson it was too soon for him to report what he had found out.
Cr Ludlow asked for a timeline of when Mr Shaw would make his report.
It was agreed Mr Shaw would share his findings with Mr Hewitson within 14 days and report back to the committee when it met next month.
- By Sandy Eggleston
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Pines, wallaby programmes set to continue
A $2 million work programme to control wilding pines and eradicate wallabies from Otago appears set to continue amid delays from the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and no funding agreement in place. Otago regional councillors will tomorrow consider a staff proposal to continue the Otago Regional Council work programme on the National Wilding Conifer Control Programme and the Tipu Mātoro National Wallaby Eradication Programme from the beginning of this financial year on July 1, "even if there is a delay in the signing of the agreements with MPI". "For the last two years there has been a delay in MPI issuing the funding agreements for the Wilding Conifer Programme and Tipu Mātoro Wallaby Programme to council for signing," a council staff report said. "This delay has created issues for delivery of both national programmes. "To address this delay, it is proposed that council starts the delivery of works for the National Wilding Conifer Control Programme and the Tipu Mātoro Wallaby Programme from July 1, 2025, even if the goods and services agreements are not yet signed. "The council biosecurity budget can carry the financial risk, until signed agreements are received, to ensure continuity and effective delivery of the programmes." The report said from 2016 to last year the national programme had spent $140m in wilding pine control nationally. From July 1, last year, funding of $10m a year had been committed by MPI to the national programme. The council had entered two previous funding agreements on pine control, the report said. One was from 2020 to 2024 and a second one was for the 2024-25 financial year, which expired at the end of this month. There had been discussion with Biosecurity New Zealand staff and there was an understanding there would be a new five-year deal with variations for annual funding on offer. However, MPI had not yet provided the council with a draft agreement to replace the agreement that was expiring, the report said. Likewise, after the council established an Otago Wallaby Programme following increased sightings of the pests in 2016, the Tipu Mātoro National Wallaby Eradication Programme was set up in 2020. The national programme was given $27m over the next four years for control of populations outside of containment areas, such as the one in South Canterbury. Again, the council signed a 2020-24 four-year deal and a subsequent one-year deal that was due to expire at the end of this month, the report said. In the case of wallaby control, MPI had provided a draft agreement, the report said. Like the expected wilding control agreement, it was a five-year deal with variable annual funding, it said. The report said council staff had informed MPI officials the delays were having an effect on the council's processes. Staff would continue to argue funding delays should be "reduced" to make sure the programmes were delivered "as efficient and effective as possible". In order to get the work started, it was proposed that the council get to work on the control programmes with the understanding the funding agreements would arrive and chief executive Richard Saunders would sign them on the council's behalf if there were no surprises. "It is proposed that the work programmes may commence prior to signed funding agreements with MPI, if these are not provided early enough in the financial year," the report said. "Funding is highly likely to still be provided by the government, there will just be a delay due to how their systems work." For wilding pine work, it was expected the council's obligations would be the same as last year and $1.07m would be received from MPI. The council was expecting $950,000 for wallaby work, the report said. Biosecurity New Zealand pest management director John Walsh told the Otago Daily Times yesterday the funding was secure. "Biosecurity New Zealand recognises that a delay to release funding has caused some issues for the council. However, there has been no reduction in funding available and we've been working collaboratively with the council to support the delivery of these programmes," he said.
RNZ News
29-05-2025
- RNZ News
Govt launches Resource Management consultation
The government is billing its Resource Management consultation as the country's biggest ever change to national direction. It comes hot on the heels of the fast track changes and leading up the full RMA replacement due next year. Announcements were released under six ministers' names on everything from housing to mining to agriculture - and some of it's got environmental groups up in arms. Political reporter Russell Palmer has more.
RNZ News
29-05-2025
- RNZ News
Watch live: Ministers outline sweeping changes to RMA rules
Sweeping changes to the rules governing councils' oversight of everything from housing - to mining - to agriculture - under the Resource Management Act are being released to the public for feedback. The government has released discussion documents covering 12 national policy statements and similar instruments, with the aim of having 16 new or updated ones by the end of the year - ahead of legislation replacing the RMA next year. The consultation covers three main topics: infrastructure and development, the primary sector and freshwater. It is open from 29 May to 27 July. The topics cover a wide range of portfolios, the early afternoon announcement fronted by RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay, Energy Minister Simon Watts, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones, Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard, and Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. Minister responsible for RMA reform Chris Bishop Photo: RNZ/Calvin Samuel "The changes we're now proposing to national direction under the existing RMA give effect to a range of coalition commitments, can be done quickly and relatively easily, and will help unclog the growth arteries of the economy," Bishop said. "Next year we'll replace the RMA with new legislation premised on property rights. Our new system will provide a framework that makes it easier to plan and deliver infrastructure and energy projects, as well a protecting the environment." The changes would "rebalance Te Mana o te Wai to better reflect the interests of all water users", with councils able to "tailor" monitoring and management to local conditions. Councils would be directed to consider how they could help ensure stable domestic food supply, including providing for crop rotation in regional plans. Crop rotation within catchments could be allowed without a consent. Water storage rules would change aiming to ensure water flows during dry periods, protect against climate-change-caused drought, and reduce the need for extraction from natural rivers and lakes. Wetland regulations would change aiming to protect water filtration, flood control, and habitat for diverse species. The definition of "wetland" would be amended, now excluding unintentionally created "induced" wetlands, and allowing farming activities like irrigation, on-farm water storage and fencing considered "unlikely" to have an adverse effect, while constructed wetlands would have a new objective, standards, and consent pathway. Councils would no longer need to map wetlands by 2030, but Source Water Risk Management areas would now need to be mapped "to help safeguard drinking water sources from contamination". The government is also proposing to "simplify" requirements for fish passages to reduce the administrative burden "while still providing appropriate protection". Changes to rules for synthetic fertiliser are also proposed. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay Photo: RNZ / Reece Baker Highly productive land changes would extend the timeframes to 2027/28, see the removal of the "Land Use Capability 3" category and trial the use of "special agricultural areas". Grazed beef cattle and deer in low intensity farms would no longer need to be kept out of wetlands. In forestry, councils would lose the ability to set harder controls, slash would need to be planned for and - above a certain size - removed, and low-intensity harvesting will be permitted by default if "any relevant forest planning requirement is complied with". Restrictions on mines and quarries in wetlands would be loosened. Aquaculture changes aim to streamline consenting for activities and research, and allow small structures in coastal marine areas with no consent. Granny flats of up to 70sqm, and papakāinga of up to 10 homes would be allowed without a consent on specific land zones. Papakāinga would also allow commercial activities of up to 100sqm, conservation activity, accommodation for up to eight guests, along with education, health, sports, marae, urupā and māra kai facilities. Medium papakāinga of up to 30 homes would be considered a "restricted discretionary" activity, with those of more than 30 units becoming "discretionary" activities. Energy changes include new policies on supporting the needs of the electricity network and management of environmental interests, and another new policy on recognising and providing for Māori interests in electricity transmission, and other changes. These would allow more routine work on electricity networks, establish a National Grid Yard and Subdivision Corridor, and scrap consenting for distribution and EV charging infrastructure. A new policy for natural hazards - covering flooding, landslips, coastal erosion, coastal inundation, active faults, liquefaction and tsunami - would cover all environments and zones including coastal environments, directing councils to take a risk-based approach and assess risk based on "likelihood and consequence". A definition of "significant risk" using a risk matrix would be provided, with councils directed to also use the best available information when making decisions. In telecommunications, new poles would be allowed by default in more areas, with restrictions in the road reserve also removed. Renewable energy generation, temporary facilities and connection lines to heritage buildings for telecommunications would no longer need consenting.
