Govt launches Resource Management consultation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
17 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Changes to NCEA labelled a rebranding
education youth 40 minutes ago An Auckland school principal is describing government plans to scrap NCEA as more window dressing than radical overhaul. Claire Amos from the Auckland Secondary Prinicipals' Association spoke with Charlotte Cook.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Operator of troubled Kāeo water scheme trespassed from treatment plant as decade-long boil-water notice continues
Kāeo's water treatment plant draws from the Waikara Stream. Photo: RNZ / Peter de Graaf In a new twist to the long-running Kāeo water saga , it has emerged the operator of the troubled water scheme has been trespassed from the town's treatment plant. Last month the Far North town marked 10 years under a boil-water notice , imposed in July 2015 due to the presence of E. coli bacteria in the water supply. The trespass notice meant the operator of the private water scheme had to get a police escort to access the treatment plant. Wayne Mighorst, who owned the land on School Gully Rd where the plant is located, said he issued the trespass notice. "It's because he hasn't paid rent for seven years, since I've been on the property. And that's why I got him trespassed. We still let them operate the water plant, but that could change." That was disputed by Kāeo Water operator Bryce Aldridge, who said he had a document proving he could use the land rent-free. However, Mighorst said he had never seen such a document, and believed the operator had paid rent to the previous landowner. Mighorst said he wanted someone else to operate the treatment plant. "I'd like to see it taken over by the council, or somebody else that will look after the people in Kāeo, and make sure that we get good water." The main street of Kāeo. Photo: RNZ/Peter de Graaf The effects of the boil-water notice were "pretty bad", he said. "A lot of them [Kāeo Water customers] are commercial buildings and they rely on good clean water, they've got to serve the public with it. It's a bit of a downer not having good water." Police confirmed they were called on at times to assist with access to the treatment plant. "Police have been present at the site on occasion through agreement between both parties involved in this civil matter. Our role there is to keep the peace." The water scheme, which the Far North District Council sold to Doubtless Bay Water in 2000, supplied fewer than 30 homes and businesses along Kāeo's main street. Doubtless Bay Water pulled out in 2008, saying the scheme was not viable. It was then bought for a token sum by Wai Care Environmental Consultants, which operated it ever since. Publicity around the 10-year boil water anniversary prompted the national water authority, Taumata Arowai, to visit Kāeo on July 23 with a list of expectations and a deadline for meeting them. Aldridge said he was under a self-imposed "gagging order" until early September and could not discuss progress until then. However, he said there would be a positive announcement to make after that time, and a public meeting would be organised. Melinda Sando, acting head of operations at Taumata Arowai, said staff had met the supplier and developed a plan for achieving safe drinking water. "The supplier has agreed to provide the authority with a plan of how expectations will be met within an agreed timeframe. "The time required to do this will be dependent on access to funding, installation, and commissioning of the equipment." Taumata Arowai staff did not inspect the plant during their visit. Sando said the authority took a "balanced approach" by helping suppliers achieve safe drinking water in a way that worked for them, while also taking public health concerns into account. "Noncompliance has been long-standing for many New Zealand drinking water suppliers and this will require financial investment to resolve. Long-term under-investment means change can't happen overnight, especially for smaller suppliers. "Becoming compliant costs communities money and it can take time to get the equipment and install it." Taumata Arowai would not provide details on the agreed timeframe for improvements. The Far North District Council said it did not want to take over the Kāeo water supply. Head of infrastructure Tanya Proctor said the council's preference was for the current owner-operator to work with Taumata Arowai on a solution. "The council has not considered taking over the Kāeo water supply nor has it allocated budget in the current LTP (Long-Term Plan) for this activity." Proctor said the council was waiting for further advice from the authority. Aldridge said part of the treatment plant was located on council road reserve. RNZ asked the council if that was the case but had not received a response by publication time. Under the Water Services Act 2021, Taumata Arowai had the power to order the council to take over the water supply. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Media Council upholds complaint against RNZ over inaccurate Rocket Lab report
Photo: RNZ / Diego Opatowski The NZ Media Council has upheld a complaint by Rocket Lab Ltd against Radio New Zealand (RNZ), ruling that a May 2025 article inaccurately linked the aerospace company to Ukraine's war effort, breaching journalistic standards of accuracy, fairness, and balance. The article, titled "Rocket Lab-launched satellites to help Ukraine in war against Russia," claimed that satellites launched by Rocket Lab for Japanese company iQPS would be used to support Ukraine's military intelligence. Rocket Lab strongly refuted this, stating the claim was false and damaging, and that neither they nor iQPS had any involvement in supplying military capabilities to Ukraine. Rocket Lab's complaint highlighted that RNZ relied solely on a single source and failed to seek comment from Rocket Lab, iQPS, or the New Zealand Space Agency before publication. iQPS had publicly denied providing data to foreign entities weeks earlier, a statement RNZ overlooked. Rocket Lab said the article's implication of involvement in military operations could have serious reputational and commercial consequences. RNZ retracted the article within five hours of receiving the complaint on 22 May and later issued an apology. However, Rocket Lab argued that the apology was only added after repeated requests and that RNZ's efforts to notify content-sharing partners were inadequate. The article remained live on NewstalkZB's website for eight days until Rocket Lab intervened directly. The Media Council acknowledged RNZ's swift removal of the article, however, despite this, there was no immediate acknowledgement of error in the original take down notice or apology and the Council found the original reporting to be a serious breach of Principle (1) - Accuracy, Fairness and Balance. The Council noted that the article lacked basic verification and failed to meet the standards expected of responsible journalism. While RNZ's take-down notice was a rare and significant step, the Council concluded that the seriousness of the error means that the article still warranted being found to be in breach. The full Media Council ruling can be found here: Media Council - Rocket Lab against Radio New Zealand .
