SHAREHOLDER ALERT Bernstein Liebhard LLP Announces A Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DV)
NEW YORK, June 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationally acclaimed investor rights law firm, announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors (the 'Class') who purchased or acquired the common stock of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. ('DoubleVerify' or the 'Company') (NYSE: DV) between November 10, 2023 and February 27, 2025, inclusive, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its senior officers. (the 'Complaint').
Should You Join This Class Action Lawsuit?
If you purchased or acquired DoubleVerify common stock, and/or would like to discuss your legal rights and options please visit DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit or contact Investor Relations Manager Peter Allocco at (212) 951-2030 or [email protected].
According to the lawsuit, Defendants made misrepresentations concerning the effectiveness of the Company's web advertisement verification and fraud protection services, as well as the Company billing practices.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the Class, you must file papers by July 21, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on other class members' behalf in directing the litigation. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff. If you choose to take no action, you may remain an absent class member.
All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses.
Since 1993, Bernstein Liebhard LLP has recovered over $3.5 billion for its clients. In addition to representing individual investors, the Firm has been retained by some of the largest public and private pension funds in the country to monitor their assets and pursue litigation on their behalf. As a result of its success litigating hundreds of class actions, the Firm has been named to The National Law Journal's 'Plaintiffs' Hot List' thirteen times and listed in The Legal 500 for sixteen consecutive years.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. © 2025 Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Bernstein Liebhard LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, New York 10016, (212) 779-1414. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Contact Information:
Peter Allocco
Investor Relations Manager
Bernstein Liebhard LLP
https://www.bernlieb.com
(212) 951-2030
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
29 minutes ago
- News24
New York pride launches ‘peer-to-peer campaign' as company funding declines amid Trump hostility
New York's pride parade has had a decline in corporate funding. The Trump administration attacked diversity, equity and inclusion policies in both government and the private sector. The parade will be held on 29 June. New York's pride parade, the highest-profile annual US LGBTQ gathering, is ramping up efforts to raise funds from individual community members, with corporate donations on the wane as Washington demonises diversity. Following US President Donald Trump's attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion policies in both government and the private sector, several companies have cancelled or curtailed their sponsorships of pride parades this year. NYC Pride's spokesperson Kevin Kilbride said 'just about 80% of the fundraising goal' for the city's largest pride parade group had been met. The parade itself will be held on 29 June and according to organisers could draw as many as two million attendees. 'That gap we're trying to fill with a community fundraising campaign. So in the middle of May, we launched a peer-to-peer campaign so folks can start their own fundraiser online, share it with their friends, and then have folks donate to that,' he said. The group was 'wanting to lean a little bit more into individual giving and support from the community', he said. The organisation behind the annual parade as well as several other community projects said it raised 'nearly $25 000 from almost 200 donors' in a matter of days. In years past, flamboyant floats sponsored by large corporations have paraded down Manhattan's Fifth Avenue alongside those organised by community groups. Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images And while many will still participate, some have quietly cut back their commitments. Muneer Panjwani, who runs Engage for Good, said 'there's been a massive pullback over the last year, specifically in corporations that have long supported pride events that have decided not to support anyone.' Panjwani's organisation connects companies to non-profits, and reports on the sums raised from 'checkout giving' - where consumers are given the option of donating while paying for goods in a store. 'While companies are pulling away their philanthropic dollars at the top level, from the bottom up, consumers are saying: 'We still care about this issue,'' he said. READ | Ghana pushes anti-LGBTQ+ bill as defence of 'family values' One of the most prominent brands that reportedly stepped back from its previously high-profile involvement with pride was discount department store Target. For a time, Target was reportedly asking to forego publicity and donate to New York Pride silently, but according to Kilbride, it has now reinstated its float at the parade. The retailer has come under fire and seen its share price dip after a boycott was organised online in response to it curtailing diversity programmes, citing 'the evolving external landscape'. 'We will continue to mark Pride Month... (by) sponsoring local events in neighbourhoods across the country,' a Target spokesperson told AFP. At Brooklyn's annual pride parade, progressive Democratic city councilman Chi Osse told AFP that 'pride started grassroots through community, and corporations bowing the knee at a president who thinks he's a king just shows us who they are to us.' Brooklyn's pride event is a smaller affair and has long been seen as a more radical gathering than its Manhattan sibling - albeit with a handful of its own corporate participants. John Senter/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images One of those leading the twilight parade's Sirens Women's Motorcycle Club contingent, Anya Glowa-Kollisch, said: 'It's great when companies are willing to say that they support equal rights.' 'But I think at the end of the day, it's a movement that's driven by people demanding their rights, and a lot of corporations just kind of do this because they think they should,' they said. 'So it's really valuable to have people in the community coming out and showing that this is who we are.'
Skift
35 minutes ago
- Skift
Online Travel Agency Flight Sales Jumped in May – Leisure and Corporate Bookings Fell
Online travel agencies have a tremendous marketing edge over leisure agencies, and corporate travel agencies might be feeling the pinch of macro uncertainties. U.S. travel agency sales of airline tickets fell 5% overall in May, according to new data from the Airline Reporting Corp. (ARC). But while total sales declined, online travel agencies bucked the trend with growing flight bookings. ARC, which tracks U.S. travel agency transactions, reported Wednesday that online travel agency (OTA) sales rose 8% year over year last month. Meanwhile, flight sales through traditional leisure agencies dropped 5%, and corporate trav
E&E News
36 minutes ago
- E&E News
‘Fight of our lives': Lobbying intense on climate law credits
The morning after the Senate Finance Committee released a new megabill text that would roll back tax credits for renewable energy development, the solar industry's top lobby group hosted a rally in the shadow of the Capitol. 'Time to storm the Hill!' Abigail Ross Hopper, CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said Tuesday. Lobbyists and industry leaders have been in a mad dash to rescue some of the energy tax incentives in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Advertisement The House's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' passed last month, would roll back many of the credits dramatically. And a Senate draft is not much better for sources like wind and solar. SEIA's rally included workers and leaders for dozens of companies before marching to meet with lawmakers and aides. It was the group's eighth lobbying day this year. 'We are in a fight for our lives,' Hopper told the crowd, saying that 330,000 jobs are at stake. Trade groups and other advocates have been releasing studies warning about the legislation's potential harms to projects and employment, particularly in red states. The legislation's real effects remain a moving target because Republican leaders have promised to keep tweaking their tax, energy and border spending package. 'We are not at the end. We had that language come out of the Senate Finance [Committee] last night, but we are not finished,' she said. 'I would not ask you to travel here, take time away from your families, take time away from your businesses, if I thought that this was done. This is not done. You have the opportunity today … to tell these legislators what this means to you.' Hopper told reporters that the Finance Committee draft represented 'some steps toward progress, but it is far from acceptable.' 'A real frenzy' Companies and groups thought Republicans and President Donald Trump would ease from targeting climate law credits because of their economic impact. The House bill was a wake-up call, said Mike Carr, a lobbyist at Boundary Stone Partners who represents companies in solar, batteries and related fields. 'I think there was a general assumption that … they weren't going to pull the rug out from it,' Carr said. 'And the House bill really did pull the rug out from a lot of this.' Since the House passed its bill, it's been all hands on deck, Carr said. 'There's been a real frenzy since then, trying to help people understand how much is on the line, how many jobs could potentially be lost in various sectors.' Other major organizations fighting for the energy incentives include the American Clean Power Association and the American Council on Renewable Energy. 'While the Senate Finance Committee proposal eliminates poison pills from the House legislation, abrupt changes to the clean energy tax credits unnecessarily penalize companies that are making good faith investments under current law,' ACP CEO Jason Grumet said in a statement. The Edison Electric Institute thanked the Finance Committee for its work but made it clear that it sees room for improvements. 'Financial certainty and access to cost-effective financing are critical tools for electric companies as they continue to make needed investments to meet rising customer demand and to expand generation capacity,' said Pat Vincent-Collawn, the group's interim CEO. The group had taken a dimmer view of the House version, particularly around sourcing requirements, the short timeline for ending credits and tax credit transferability. Big business groups like the American Petroleum Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have been mostly supportive of the congressional Republicans' efforts, but have also been pushing for longer timeframes for some tax credits, including for hydrogen and carbon capture. Before the Senate bill was released, the Chamber wrote in a post that the group would 'continue to urge policymakers to preserve pro-growth tax policies that enhance U.S. energy competitiveness and security, including credits for clean hydrogen production and carbon oxide sequestration, as well as technology-neutral credits to help meet the country's rapidly growing demand for electricity generation.' Republican group Republicans launched a new group called Built for America this month to advocate for the energy incentives from a conservative viewpoint. The $2 million campaign, led by former West Virginia Lt. Gov. Mitch Carmichael and former Trump campaign adviser Bryan Lanza, is putting advertisements in conservative platforms like Fox News and Truth Social, which is owned by the president. 'Trump country is booming. We're building, hiring and winning in America, because energy tax credits put America first,' one of the ads says. Another group called Advanced Energy United launched a six-figure campaign of its own targeting a handful of Senate Republicans with digital ads. That group is backed by major technology firms like Microsoft, automakers like Ford and other firms like NRG. 'Repealing these tax credits would devastate local economies, raise energy costs, and hand the keys of energy leadership to China — and the Senate now has a choice to make,' Harry Godfrey, the group's managing director for federal priorities, said in a statement. New lobbyists hired A number of companies and associations have retained new lobbyists in recent months to fight for the credits they support, according to disclosures filed with Congress. They include battery maker Energizer Holdings, chemical manufacturer Johnson Matthey, the Hydrogen Jobs Now Coalition, battery recycler Ecobat and the Clean Energy Buyers Association. The far-right House Freedom Caucus pointed to news that Energizer had retained a slate of Democratic lobbyists from Washington Council Ernst & Young. 'This should tell Republicans everything you need to know: The Swamp isn't even hiring Republicans to lobby on preserving the #GreenNewScam IRA tax subsidies,' the caucus wrote on X. Those pushing to terminate the tax credits have their advocates too. Pro-fossil fuel activist Alex Epstein has been involved, and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) called him an 'enormous help' in rolling back the credits in the House bill. Epstein was disappointed in the Senate Finance Committee draft. 'Sad update' he wrote on X, outlining his view of the changes. 'Nothing is set in stone yet, there's still time for Congress to do the right thing. Tell your Senator,' he added.
