‘Satan's Spit': Man jailed for spraying chilli substance at Bunnings
The Northam store, in Western Australia's Wheatbelt region, was evacuated on Anzac Day last year amid fears of a dangerous chemical spill.
Two children were among the 15 people affected, with 11 taken to hospital for treatment.
They suffered burning sensations in their eyes and nose, sore throats and coughing.
CCTV footage shows father of three Paul Andrew Hart enter the store wearing a black T-shirt, shorts and thongs.
Shortly after, staff and customers are seen coughing, and covering their mouths and noses as they head for the exit.
Hart, 52, claimed he intended to spray 'Liquid Ass' as a joke, but instead used 'Satan's Spit', which was also in his pocket.
But WA District Court Judge Felicity Zempilas said the footage showed him look down at the pepper spray twice, including just before he used it.
'Even if you had taken a bottle of Satan's Spit and a bottle of fart spray, it would have been immediately clear to you which one you had in your hand on either of those occasions when you looked at it, because those bottles appear totally different,' she said.
The incident cost Bunnings an estimated $16,000 in lost earnings and $3048 in workers' compensation.
'You knew what kind of substance you'd released and you were waiting to observe its impacts,' Judge Zempilas said.
'I find that you intended, for whatever reason, to annoy others in the store that day, with this noxious substance.'
The online product description of Satan's Spit says it is one of their 'hottest and most dangerous products'.
'Spray with caution, as it can travel through the air and get in eyes. Use in small doses,' the description reads.
Hart was arrested the next day and told police he had bought the product six weeks earlier but had not used it or read the label.
He said he had woken up that day from distressing dreams, and began drinking alcohol in the morning before going to the shops.
One victim said she suffered an asthma attack and was embarrassed at having to go through the decontamination shower process at the hospital.
Another person described the ordeal as 'traumatic'.
A teenage victim said of the incident: 'It stole my peace.'
'She's still grappling with the fear and the humiliation and the trauma,' Judge Zempilas said.
Hart pleaded guilty to wilfully and unlawfully, with intent to injure or annoy, cause poison or other noxious thing to be administered to or taken by another.
Judge Zempilas sentenced Hart to 16 months in prison. He must serve eight months behind bars before he can be eligible for parole.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
How WA Police has improved procedures for domestic violence calls since murder of Lynn Cannon
The brutal murder of Perth mother Lynn Cannon by her estranged husband in 2022 prompted a review of how WA Police respond to family violence incidents. A coronial inquest this week found police had failed to recognise the imminent risk he posed to Ms Cannon, and downgraded the priority assigned to a call from her family, even though the family specifically warned them he had threatened to kill her. The report found police took more than an hour to arrive at her husband's Landsdale home, by which time Ms Cannon had died. Ms Cannon's family said the flawed system has now been exposed, and they do not want it to happen again. Police said they have implemented new procedures to try to prevent a similar tragedy. Here is what has changed. Police Commissioner Col Blanch said yes. The review police conducted following Ms Cannon's death examined their call-taking and dispatch procedures to identify gaps and inefficiencies, and how to better respond to similar incidents in the future. Commissioner Blanch insisted police risk assessment methods have now been overhauled. For instance, at the time, police took into account the fact that her estranged husband, Paul Cannon, did not have a criminal history of violence when deciding how to prioritise the incident. But Commissioner Blanch said that should not determine whether there was a risk. "In this case, it was a break-up," he said. "There was escalating violence and there were family members that knew that that risk was increasing. "They're the things that we look at today, and that's why it would have a much greater priority when police deploy today." Commissioner Blanch said no. Family and domestic violence call-outs accounted for some 65,000 police jobs in 2023. Lynn Cannon's case was originally allocated a Priority 2, following her sister Christine Holmes's call to police. That required police to attend the scene within 12 minutes — but the officer on duty downgraded it within two minutes to a Priority 3, which required police to attend the scene in 60 minutes, and police were then sent to Ms Cannon's home instead of Paul Cannon's house, where she actually was. Mr Blanch said a similar downgrade would not happen today because one person could no longer make that call, and only a senior sergeant or above could authorise a downgrade. A downgrade could also only be approved "if circumstances of the incident changed". The coronial inquest was told that police had now revised the definitions for incident types and dispatch priorities. According to police, that would mean the information provided by Ms Holmes, that there was a risk of injury to Ms Cannon, would likely cause a call taker to give the job a Priority 2 response. Police must now also inform callers of their approximate response time and tell them if the matter is downgraded and there is a new response time. This would have been vital for Ms Cannon's family, who advised the inquest that if they had known the police response time would be so long, they would have sent a family member to check on her. WA Police now have dedicated family violence sergeants, whose role is to oversee and review all family violence tasks to ensure "these incidents are correctly classified and prioritised". Coroner Sarah Linton found in her inquest report that information sharing between agencies and consistency in their responses were key parts of changes underway in WA's family and domestic violence system. This is critical because it will allow police and other agencies to create a more comprehensive picture of the risks facing a victim-survivor. A professor of social work at Curtin University, Donna Chung, and Centre for Women's Safety and Wellbeing chief executive Alison Evans advised the coroner during the inquest. In Paul Cannon's case, there was no recorded history of prior violence. In their report to the coroner, Professor Chung and Dr Evans pointed to "the importance of obtaining anecdotal history from family members" and other people in the victim-survivor's support network. The coroner found "weight needs to be given to this historical knowledge". Professor Chung is helping WA Police establish an algorithm that creates a risk score for potential perpetrators to inform the urgency of calls. The idea is to create a database centred on the actions and information of perpetrators, and Professor Chung said the software would need information to be shared from different agencies, including health. "We use the information that we've got available but also keep advocating for specific items of data to be shared with police so that police can more quickly identify who of those are most likely to cause harm," she said. In the conclusion to her coronial inquest report, Ms Linton stated: "Every person in the community has a role to play in putting an end to family and domestic violence." She said each person must "be able to say with confidence": As former corruption and crime commissioner John McKechnie noted, it would take a "fundamental change in the community attitude to domestic violence". That means recognising, as the coroner said, that domestic violence is a matter of grave national concern and that WA consistently has one of the highest recorded rates of family and domestic violence in the country. Dr Evans said driving cultural change was vitally important, but should not distract from helping women manage the violence being directed towards them. "It is mostly boys and men, by a vast majority, who are causing the harm to women," Dr Evans said. "There is quite a focus on how we work with men and boys to ensure that they have attitudes and demonstrate behaviours that are respectful towards women and children. "But even if we put all of our resources and effort into that cultural change, that will take time, and in the meantime, we can't be leaving women and children to be managing men who are using violence towards them. 'We must not take our eye off what women and children are currently living with."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Perth Royal Show organisers won't reveal Working with Children Check rules after sex offender scandal
Perth Royal Show organisers are refusing to confirm if Working with Children Checks will be mandatory for exhibitors at this year's event, following revelations a convicted child sex offender was spotted there last year. Last year, the ABC revealed a convicted child sex offender was seen by his former victim's mother at a popular pavilion performing a demonstration for children. She called on show organisers to tighten their screening processes and implement Working With Children Checks (WWCC) for all workers and volunteers, including commercial exhibitors. Following the incident, the Royal Agricultural Society of WA (RASWA) pledged to work with WA Police and the Working with Children Screening Unit to review its practices. But now, less than two months out from this year's Perth Royal Show, RASWA has declined to say whether exhibitors will now be required to have the WWCC clearance, other than to say they are "fully compliant" with the relevant legislation. RASWA also told the ABC they were compliant with the legislation last year, when the paedophile was identified. A working with children check is compulsory in Western Australia for people engaging in child-related work. But it's not clear whether all exhibitors, workers and volunteers at the Perth Royal Show are captured by the current rules, although "children's entertainment" is defined as child-related work by the WA legislation. The convicted child sex offender working at last year's Perth Royal Show would not have been eligible for a WWCC clearance in WA due to the serious nature of his historical offending. In a statement, the RASWA told the ABC they had "implemented increased screening and background checks" this year, but declined to provide any detail on what this involved. RASWA said registered sex offenders were "prohibited" from working and volunteering at the show but again failed to detail how they would prevent this from happening. The organisation said it does require the WWC checks or national police clearance for people who work or volunteer directly for their organisation but failed to clarify, when asked directly, whether this policy also applied to commercial exhibitors who run stalls and demonstrations. RASWA said "background checks are just one strategy in place to ensure a safe and secure environment for all attendees". The statement said some of the details were "operationally and commercially sensitive" but they also deployed: The RASWA also declined a request for interview with the ABC. Adverts for some positions at the Royal Show seen by the ABC, including for ride operators, showbag sellers and Sideshow Alley attendants, state applicants must have no criminal history and be able to provide police clearance "if requested". The Perth Royal Show saw 438,000 attendees last year, with the state government providing free tickets to around 145,000 children under 15. The ABC approached the Agriculture and Child Protection ministers to ask whether they had been briefed on the outcome of RASWA's review into its screening processes. A state government spokeswoman said WWCCs were an "important tool to protect children" but only individuals engaging in child-related work as defined by the Working with Children (Screening) Act were required to hold the clearance. "The State Government supports efforts by the Royal Agricultural Society of Western Australia to strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure the safety of children remains the top priority," the statement said. "Organisations and individuals who allow or engage in child-related work without a valid WWC Check can face penalties of up to $60,000 and five years jail." The organisers' failure to provide more detail to parents comes amid heightened focus on the country's working with children screening process, after a man who had worked for about 20 childcare centres in Melbourne's south-west was charged with more than 70 child sex offences. A subsequent investigation by the ABC found that man held a Working with Children clearance, prompting Victoria to strengthen its laws around how the scheme is administered. Institute of Child Protection Studies director Professor Daryl Higgins said mandatory working with children checks were important and would "remove any doubt" at events involving families and potentially unaccompanied children. "[Royal agricultural shows] should have the same responsibilities as every kind of child-serving organisation in Australia," he said. "That means that all staff and all volunteers need to be appropriately screened, but also … inducted and kept accountable for supporting and following child-safe policies." Professor Higgins urged states and territories to adopt a nationally consistent Working With Children Check regime and to legislate child safety standards, part of the recommendations handed down by the Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse. "The important thing about legislating child-safe standards is that it makes it really clear who does need to have working with children checks," Professor Higgins said. "It applies to any organisation who is running services for children, and so it kind of takes that guesswork out of it." ACT for Kids, a support service for children and families who have experienced trauma, agrees WWCC should be mandatory for any adults who may have unsupervised contact with children. "I think it's important that employers and organisations take responsibility for kids' safety," executive director Tom McIntyre said. "One way of doing that is, as part of an employment arrangement … check the person's appropriateness to work with children, who are obviously vulnerable in those situations." Body Safety Australia, a national organisation providing training and education aimed at preventing child abuse in care and educational settings, says WWCC are only one mechanism to prevent harm and for organisations like Royal Shows, applying them could be complicated. "The question is … whose care is the child in? If the child is in the care of their parent or guardian whilst they're attending something, then the parent or guardian is responsible for the child in that space, chief executive Deanne Carson said. "But if the child is in a care of an entertainer or somebody who is working at a festival or a show, then absolutely that person should be properly vetted." She also called for all states and territories to mandate child-safe standards, outside of WWCC legislation. "I think when we look at big child events like royal shows across the country, we need to think about all of the ways that we can strengthen child safety in those spaces," Ms Carson said.
ABC News
18 hours ago
- ABC News
E-rideable inquiry hears police commissioner Col Blanch call for stricter regulations on buying e-bikes
WA's Police Commissioner has called for stronger regulations around the import and sale of electric-powered bikes, in the wake of a fatal crash allegedly involving one. Commissioner Col Blanch was appearing before a parliamentary inquiry into how Western Australia regulates devices including e-scooters and e-bikes, which have exploded in popularity in recent years. The probe was set up following the death of pedestrian Thanh Phan who was allegedly struck by an e-scooter in Perth's CBD. The scope was expanded after the death of a 59-year-old woman, who was allegedly hit by an unlicensed, high-powered electric motorbike in Edgewater last month. Commissioner Blanch said devices like that could reach speeds up to 110 km/h and while electrically-powered, were "not an e-rideable in any way, shape or form". "It's a straight up vehicle, and I don't think young people should be able to walk in, without licensing it, and purchase it anywhere," he told the inquiry. Commissioner Blanch said higher-powered electric rideables should not be able to be imported "unless they can be licensed like any other vehicle". A common concern raised in more than 160 submissions to the inquiry was a perceived lack of police enforcement of current rules. Commissioner Blanch acknowledged those difficulties, saying officers often used drones, helicopters or planes to try to find people speeding — but it was not always safe to pull them over. "Because if we did try to chase them to give them an infringement and they fell whilst that chase [was occurring] or the police officer did or we hit a pedestrian, I think the community would say, well, was that applicable to that issue?" he told the inquiry. "We very much have strong policy around when we do enter into a pursuit … and generally it is a high-harm individual who's committing serious crimes. "When it comes to the speeding of an e-rideable … our air assets are the most effective because we can identify and generally track them back to their residence and then we send police around to take action." Earlier the committee heard from two of the state's top trauma doctors, who said serious injuries from e-rideables are a daily occurrence in hospitals across the state. State trauma director Stephen Dunjey told the committee men and adolescents were bearing the brunt of those serious injuries. "There's a lot of behaviour that's placing kids at risk at the moment, it doesn't feel like it's being addressed as well as it could be," he said. Both he and Royal Perth Hospital's head of trauma, Dieter Weber, agreed speed, drug and alcohol use and not wearing a helmet were key risk factors. Dr Weber said while there had been data collection of serious injuries presenting to the state's trauma service, there was limited understanding of less serious injuries handled in emergency departments or by GPs. "Minor concussion, it's not minor," he said. "These patients don't go back to work on the Monday, and they struggle. "It's really alarming what these patients experience." Both encouraged better data collection within the health system, which they said would be assisted by the transition to electronic medical records.
