State changes NRI definition to smoothen admission process in professional courses
The NRIs, their children and wards were facing problems in getting admission in professional courses in the state. This is primarily because of existing definition of NRIs in the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fees) Act, 2015, which states 'Non-Resident Indian (NRI) is defined as someone who is not ordinarily resident under sub-section (6) of section 6 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and also includes individuals residing outside India under clause (w) of section 2 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, and their children or wards.'
A senior official from the state higher and technical education department said, 'The state government has changed definition and removed the clause (w) of section 2 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 from the definition. There was also no specific definition for wards in the existing act as far as the admission process is concerned. We have decided to incorporate the definition of ward from the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.'
However, other conditions for admission such as the number of reserved seats and the admission on merit will remain unchanged.
The NRI students get five percent reservation in government-run colleges while in deemed universities, the quota goes up to 15 percent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
St Xavier's cancels Stan Swamy lecture after ABVP objects
MUMBAI: St Xavier's College in Mumbai cancelled its annual Stan Swamy Memorial Lecture, scheduled for Saturday, following protests by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student wing of the right-wing Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Stan Swamy (HT Archives) (Diwakar Prasad/ Hindustan Times) The lecture, organised by the college's Department of Inter-Religious Studies (DIRS), was to be delivered virtually by Fr Prem Xalxo, associate lecturer at the Faculty of Theology in Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome. The topic this year was 'Migration for Livelihood: Hope Amidst Miseries'. In a letter to the college principal, the ABVP demanded the event's cancellation, objecting to it being held in memory of Father Stan Swamy, a Jesuit priest accused in the Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad case and charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Swamy was among several human rights activists, scholars, intellectuals and others jailed for alleged naxal activities as part of the case. A tribal rights activist, Swamy was arrested in 2020 and died in custody in July 2021 while awaiting trial. The ABVP alleged that Fr Swamy had links with banned organisations and said that honouring him through an academic platform could 'glorify' a person accused of anti-national activities. 'It is unfortunate that reputed institutions like St Xavier's are seen promoting such narratives,' said ABVP Mumbai Secretary Prashant Mali. 'We have immense respect for academic freedom, but when such events are used to whitewash the image of someone accused of working against the nation, it becomes unacceptable.' Mali added that the ABVP was not opposing the topic of the lecture but the choice of dedicating it to Swamy's memory. 'We have no objection to discussions on migration or livelihood challenges. But associating these discussions with the name of someone accused of aiding banned organisations sends the wrong message to students. Educational institutions must remain neutral and not allow themselves to be platforms for any ideology that goes against national interest,' he claimed. Following warnings from the student body, the college decided to cancel the lecture. Responding to the criticism, college rector Father Keith D'Souza said the DIRS was an extracurricular unit on campus that organises a variety of lectures and events throughout the year. He said the department's core aim was to promote dialogue and mutual respect. 'The underlying motive of the DIRS is 'respecting the other', in keeping with a foundational Indic civilisational attitude,' he said. Father D'Souza also stressed that Fr Stan Swamy had been accused but never convicted. 'As per Indian criminal jurisprudence, a person is innocent unless proven guilty. While we respect other perspectives and concerns, we hope to elicit a reciprocal attitude of respect from others as well,' he said.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
India plans tariff response to US over steel, aluminium levy
India may slap tariff countermeasures on select American commodities, a retaliation to Washington's move to impose a steep 50% duty in June on steel, aluminium and their derivatives from India, people aware of the matter have said. India plans tariff response to US over steel, aluminium levy To be sure, the levies on steel and aluminium have played out as a parallel trade dispute at the World Trade Organization, but its timing would make it the first Indian retaliation since Trump's July 31 announcement of the 25% tariff on all Indian goods entering the US when trade talks failed to reach a breakthrough and his subsequent penalties over Russian oil purchases announced on August 6. According to people aware of the matter, India has prepared legal grounds for the retaliatory action on steel and aluminium under World Trade Organization rules after the US rejected New Delhi's request for consultations over what India considers WTO-non-compliant safeguard measures disguised as national security actions. 'Washington is unwilling to address New Delhi's concerns through talks, which leaves India with little option other than to retaliate,' one person said. The steel and aluminium dispute dates back to February when the Trump administration imposed 25% tariffs on the metals, later doubling them to 50% in June. New Delhi intimated the WTO about the dispute and India's rights to take proportionate action on May 9 after at least $7.6 billion worth of Indian exports to the US were affected by the duties. 'The US is unjustly acting against India's economic interests even as the two countries are negotiating a bilateral trade agreement. India reserves the right to respond to unilateral and unreasonable actions of the US,' a second person said, adding that the beginning of the retaliation could be made with a 'proportional response to the US imposition of 50% tariff on Indian steel, aluminium and their derivatives'. America exports over $45 billion worth of merchandise to the Indian market, while India – prior to the Trump administration's wide variety of tariffs –exported $86 billion worth merchandise to US. How this balance changes is uncertain. Between February — when President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi resolved to expand bilateral trade to $500 billion and launch comprehensive trade negotiations — and the last two weeks, when Trump announced Indian exports will be slapped with 50% levy from August 28, the journey has been turbulent. The trade talks stalled, primarily over US seeking unfettered market access to economically sensitive sectors that New Delhi steadfastly refused, before appearing to be beset by the controversy around Russian oil purchases. 'These unilateral, unjustified and unreasonable actions of the Trump administration raise doubt about its intent to have a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement,' another person said. The escalating tariffs have effectively undermined bilateral trade negotiations, with India arguing that arm-twisting tactics make fair negotiations impossible. According to one of the people cited above, what has affected the retaliation calculus was Trump's comments on Thursday, when he rejected stepping up trade negotiations with India. 'No, not until we get it resolved,' the president said at the Oval Office when asked about increased trade talks. The broader trade relationship includes America's $13.62 billion in energy exports to India in 2024-25, plus significant trade in electronics, chemicals, and other goods, highlighting the scale of economic interdependence between the two countries. The US also maintains a services trade surplus with India of $102 million in 2024, with total bilateral services trade reaching $83.4 billion. US services exports to India totalled $41.8 billion, up 15.9% from 2023, while imports reached $41.6 billion, up 15.4%.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
EC delists 334 parties for failing to follow norms of registration
The Election Commission on Saturday said it has delisted 344 Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) for failing to comply with the conditions for registration as political parties under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. As per the Act, parties have to give details, including names, addresses and details of office-bearers, during the registration and have to inform the Election Commission if there are changes in the details. The parties will also be delisted if they don't contest any elections for six years. In an order passed on Saturday, the EC said these 334 parties were 'found to be non-existent at their registered address after a physical verification' and had also not contested any elections since 2019. In June, the EC had asked the Chief Electoral Officers (CEO) of states and Union Territories to verify if 345 RUPPs were meeting these conditions. 'CEOs conducted enquiries, issued show-cause notices to these RUPPs and provided each party an opportunity to respond… 334 RUPPs… have been found not complying with the above conditions…,' an EC statement said.
