2006 Mumbai train blasts: HC rubbishes reliability of prosecution witnesses
MUMBAI: Bombay HC Monday ripped apart the trustworthiness of the prosecution's witnesses in the 11/7 train blasts case and held that the special executive officer (SEO) who conducted the test identification parade — a primary step following the arrest of an accused — lacked the authority to do so.
The parade of various accused was conducted by two SEOs, one of whom ceased to hold the post in 2005. High court said the prosecution failed to bring any evidence on record to show that he continued to be the SEO when the test identification parade was conducted by him on Nov 7, 2006. Hence, the identification of three accused—all alleged planters—stands vitiated and is discarded, it stated.
However, prosecution witnesses can identify accused in court during the trial, but HC found such identification lacked the credibility it needed.
HC said the first of six categories of eyewitnesses produced by the prosecution against the accused were two taxi drivers who took two accused, both alleged planters, to Churchgate station; they identified the accused. A total of eight witnesses identified the accused in test identification parades and also in court. Apart from the two taxi drivers, four claimed to have seen the accused planting the bombs in the trains.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy the Dip: Top 5 Dividend Stocks with Growth Potential
Seeking Alpha
Read More
Undo
The seventh one claimed that he saw the accused preparing bombs, and the eighth said he saw the hatching of the conspiracy and identified the accused in court. One witness claimed to have seen the suspects after they alighted from the train. His statement helped in creating two sketches, but he was not asked to identify the accused in court, HC noted.
HC went through 44,000 pages of record
After more than six months of hearing in the 2006 serial train blasts case, and going through more than 44,000 pages of record, Bombay HC concluded that Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) had no case.
It said the prosecution failed to prove what kind of explosive was used: no importance could be attached to the claims of recovery of RDX, circuit boards and detonators, as prosecution failed to prove custody chain before analysis.
In a detailed analysis of the case and evidence on record, Bombay HC said while the 'prosecution has referred to al-Qaida Manual for many things, nothing is brought on record about it'.
Over two decades ago, bombs planted on first-class compartments exploded during peak evening commute at seven locations on Western Railway suburban network.
They ripped apart metal bogies and lives between Khar Road and Santacruz, Bandra and Khar, Jogeshwari and Mahim Junction, Mira Road and Bhayander, Matunga and Mahim Junction, and Borivli.
The prosecution case was of sophisticated explosive RDX being used, of accused being members of terror outfits like SIMI who received training in Pakistan, and of 15 wanted accused, mainly Pakistanis. While the trial court's special MCOCA judge, Y D Shinde, in 2015 said special public prosecutor Raja Thakare had rightly described the accused as 'merchants of death' and Thakare argued that the trial verdict could not be dislodged and the noose be confirmed, the HC noted the prosecution case had unravelled completely.
The dozen men were in prison all along since their arrests in 2006. While one of them died after the Covid pandemic in 2021, the 11 whose appeals were allowed joined on Monday via video-conferencing from prisons across the state, including Pune's Yerawada and the prisons in Nashik, Amravati and Nagpur.
An alleged planter, Naved Khan, from Nagpur prison, told court he suffered 'needlessly for 19 years' and while lives were lost, innocents could not be hanged either.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Epstein case: 'Ex-girlfriend' Ghislaine Maxwell interviewd by DOJ deputy; 'answered all the questions truthfully, honestly, says her lawyer
US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche held a meeting with convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyer in Tallahassee, as pressure mounts on the justice department to disclose more about its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The meeting lasted several hours, with Blanche posing extensive questions and Maxwell responding to each of them, according to her lawyer David Oscar Markus. 'Productive day today with the Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell,' he said, as quoted by CNN. 'She never invoked a privilege. She never declined to answer. She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability,' Markus added, though he declined to reveal the content of the conversation. Blanche later confirmed he would return tomorrow to continue the interview. 'The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time,' he posted on X. The meeting comes just weeks before Maxwell is due to testify before the US Congress under subpoena. The House Oversight Committee has ordered her to appear on 11 August, calling her testimony 'crucial' to understanding the federal government's failings in the Epstein case, including controversial plea deals and prosecution gaps. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Maxwell, a British socialite and former girlfriend of Epstein, is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2022 for grooming and trafficking underage girls in partnership with the disgraced financier. She has since filed an appeal. Blanche had earlier acknowledged that Maxwell was never before approached by federal investigators willing to hear her out. 'That changes now,' he said, signalling a shift in the justice department's posture under President Donald Trump's directive to release all 'credible evidence' related to Epstein's crimes. Her lawyer also said that past prosecutors had avoided direct talks and welcomed the administration's new approach. 'The truth should not be feared or ignored,' Markus said. 'We're grateful someone is finally listening.' Maxwell's possible testimony before Congress could mark a turning point in the saga, depending on whether she decides to fully cooperate. 'She's taking this one step at a time,' Markus said. 'If she chooses to testify before Congress, and not plead the Fifth, she will speak the truth—as she always said she would,' he added The renewed attention to Maxwell's case comes amid mounting scrutiny over the handling of Epstein-related investigations and growing calls for transparency. A federal judge in Florida last week refused to unseal grand jury records from the early 2000s, rejecting a request by the Trump administration to make them public. Meanwhile, political tensions continue to rise following a Wall Street Journal report highlighting past links between Trump and Epstein. The US president filed a defamation lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and the newspaper.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Top Justice Dept official grills Epstein accomplice Maxwell
A top US Justice Department official spent hours on Thursday grilling Ghislaine Maxwell , the imprisoned accomplice of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein , as President Donald Trump struggles to tamp down a furor over his handling of the explosive case. David Markus, Maxwell's attorney, said the former British socialite answered every question she was asked during a day-long meeting at a courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Design Thinking MCA MBA Data Science CXO Data Analytics Finance Cybersecurity Operations Management Digital Marketing Product Management Leadership Public Policy Data Science Healthcare others Project Management Others Technology Degree healthcare Management PGDM Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Duration: 22 Weeks IIM Indore CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 25 Weeks IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India Starts on undefined Get Details "She never invoked a privilege. She never declined to answer," Markus told reporters. "She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly, and to the best of her ability." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Connect Hearing Is Looking For People Who Want To Hear Better in North Bay Connect Hearing Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said he would continue interviewing Maxwell on Friday and "share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time." Markus said he was not going to comment on the "substance" of the meeting with Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer for his hush money trial and two federal criminal cases. Live Events Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of recruiting underage girls for Epstein, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial in his own sex trafficking case . Earlier this week, Blanche said if Maxwell has "information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say. "No one is above the law -- and no lead is off-limits," he said. Trump, 79, was once a close friend of Epstein and The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the president's name was among hundreds found during a DOJ review of the so-called " Epstein files ," though there has not been evidence of wrongdoing. Trump filed a $10 billion defamation suit against the Journal last week after it reported that he had penned a sexually suggestive letter to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003. Maxwell is the only former Epstein associate convicted in connection with his activities, which right-wing conspiracy theorists allege included trafficking young models for VIPs. The meeting with Maxwell marks another attempt by the Trump administration to defuse anger among the Republican president's supporters over what they have long seen as a cover-up of sex crimes by Epstein, who was a wealthy financier with high-level connections. - 'Corrupt deal' - Democratic Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said the meeting between Maxwell and a Justice Department official who used to be Trump's own lawyer smacks of a "corrupt deal so that she can exonerate Donald Trump." Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse said it raises a number of troubling questions. "Is he really going as (deputy attorney general) or is he going de facto as Trump's personal criminal attorney, Tom Hagen style?" the senator said in a reference to the Corleone family lawyer in "The Godfather." "Will he promise her a pardon for silence, or for a Trump-friendly tale?" Whitehouse asked. Many of the president's core supporters want more transparency on the Epstein case, and Trump had promised to deliver that on retaking the White House in January. But he has since dismissed the controversy as a "hoax" and a "witch hunt" and the DOJ and FBI released a memo this month claiming the Epstein files did not contain evidence that would justify further investigation. Epstein committed suicide while in jail and was not murdered, did not blackmail any prominent figures, and did not keep a "client list," according to the July 7 FBI-DOJ memo. Seeking to redirect public attention, the White House has promoted unfounded claims in recent days that former president Barack Obama led a "years-long coup" against Trump around his victorious 2016 election. The extraordinary narrative claims that Obama had ordered intelligence assessments to be manipulated to accuse Russia of election interference to help Trump. Yet it runs counter to four separate probes between 2019 and 2023 -- each of them concluding that Russia did interfere and did, in various ways, help Trump. Epstein was found hanging dead in his New York prison cell while awaiting trial on charges that he sexually exploited hundreds of victims at his homes in New York and Florida.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Canadian hockey players found not guilty in controversial sexual assault case after years amid witness inconsistencies
Ontario Court acquits five Canadian hockey players in high-profile sexual assault case (Getty Images) Five former Canadian junior hockey players were acquitted of sexual assault charges tied to a 2018 incident in London, Ontario. The judgment, delivered by Justice Maria Carroccia, concluded a lengthy and high-profile trial that had become a national conversation on consent, memory, and the legal threshold for criminal responsibility. Judge cites insufficient evidence and inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony After an eight-week trial that captured the attention of the nation, Justice Carroccia found Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, and Carter Hart not guilty. The former Canadian World Junior team members had been accused of sexually assaulting a woman, referred to as EM, in a hotel room following a Hockey Canada gala. Carroccia spent hours detailing her reasoning, underscoring contradictions in EM's testimony, including discrepancies about who bought drinks and conflicting accounts provided to police and Hockey Canada investigators. 'She went to great lengths to emphasize how intoxicated she was,' said Justice Carroccia. However, the judge added that surveillance footage and witness testimony did not corroborate the level of impairment EM described. Two videos shown during the trial, one taken without her knowledge, showed EM appearing composed, smiling, and providing verbal consent — though the judge clarified that the videos alone did not legally establish consent under Canadian law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo The ruling emphasized the importance of establishing credibility and reliability in a complainant's account, something the Crown, in the judge's view, failed to do. 'The Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts,' she concluded. Emotional fallout, public protests, and future implications The courtroom was packed, with additional rooms opened for the overflow crowd. As the not-guilty verdicts were read, visible signs of relief were seen among the players and their families. Yet, outside the courthouse and on social media, a different emotion pulsed — frustration, sorrow, and disbelief. EM did not appear in person but watched the hearing virtually. Her lawyer, Karen Bellehumeur, expressed disappointment: 'She's really never experienced not being believed like this before… She agreed to do everything asked of her by the criminal justice system… yet it was not enough.' Protesters gathered outside with signs in support of EM, warning the outcome could cast a chilling effect on future survivors of sexual assault. One protester stated, 'This verdict will influence how sexual assault cases are viewed in Canada for the next decade.' The NHL, where four of the players had active contracts at the time of the charges, reiterated that they remain ineligible to play until the league completes its internal review. Meanwhile, the NHLPA called the eligibility ruling 'inconsistent' with standard procedures and advocated for the players' return. Crown prosecutor Meaghan Cunningham acknowledged the verdict but stood by the complainant: 'A successful prosecution is not measured solely by guilty verdicts. Our goal was a fair trial — fair to both EM and the accused.' An appeal is still being considered, with a 30-day window to file. As legal teams retreat and the headlines begin to fade, the emotional and cultural resonance of the case is expected to linger, not just within the hockey community but across the broader conversation on consent and justice. FAQs Q1: Who were the five hockey players acquitted in the sexual assault case? Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, and Carter Hart were acquitted by an Ontario judge. Q2: What was the main reason for the acquittal? The judge ruled the complainant's testimony lacked sufficient credibility and consistency to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Q3: Will the players return to the NHL? They remain ineligible pending the NHL's internal review of the court's findings. Also Read: Isaac Howard isn't enough: Edmonton Oilers still active in trade market to give Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl the help they need For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
