logo
'Music to my ears': Trump hails Senate passage of 'big, beautiful bill'

'Music to my ears': Trump hails Senate passage of 'big, beautiful bill'

First Post11 hours ago
Shortly after the Republican-led Senate narrowly passed his sweeping domestic policy package on Tuesday morning, President Donald Trump hailed the development, calling it 'music to my ears' read more
President Donald Trump speaks during a roundtable at "Alligator Alcatraz," a new migrant detention facility at Dade-Collier Training and Transition facility, on Tuesday, in Ochopee, Fla. AP
Shortly after the Republican-led Senate narrowly passed his sweeping domestic policy package on Tuesday morning, President Donald Trump hailed the development, calling it 'music to my ears.'
According to The Guardian report, while hosting a roundtable at Florida's controversial new migrant detention center, nicknamed 'Alligator Alcatraz', President Trump was informed mid-event that the Senate had just narrowly passed his sweeping domestic policy package.
'Wow, music to my ears,' The Guardian quoted Trump as saying as he reacted to the development.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'I was also wondering how we're doing, because I know this is primetime, it shows that I care about you,' he added.
The president also praised Vice President JD Vance, who cast the decisive tie-breaking vote in the Senate.
'He's doing a good job,' Trump remarked.
Asked about Republican holdouts in the House who are unhappy with the Senate's revisions to the bill, Trump responded, 'It tells you there's something for everyone. … It's a great bill. There is something for everyone, and I think it's going to go very nicely in the House. Actually, I think it will be easier in the House than it was in the Senate.'
Earlier in the day, Trump's domestic policy package was passed with a 51-50 vote, after Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote.
Three Republican senators joined all Democrats in opposing the bill.
The Senate vote came after a grueling overnight session that stretched over 24 hours, during which lawmakers considered dozens of amendments.
GOP leaders delayed several votes as they scrambled to sway holdouts, eventually securing support through a sweeping catch-all amendment that also passed 51-50.
Republican Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, and Susan Collins of Maine broke ranks to join all 47 Democrats in voting against the final bill.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Nicknamed the 'big, beautiful bill' by Trump, the revised legislation now returns to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson will face pressure to push it through before the July 4 deadline set by the president.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Religious Beliefs vs LGBT books: How conservative parents won bigly
Religious Beliefs vs LGBT books: How conservative parents won bigly

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Religious Beliefs vs LGBT books: How conservative parents won bigly

The US Supreme Court has ruled that parents can generally stop their children from attending school lessons that go against their religious beliefs, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. This case came from Maryland, where some parents objected to LGBTQ-themed books being taught in elementary schools. The court sided with the parents, saying they have the right to decide what their children learn if it clashes with their religion. Conservative groups see this as a big win. Eric Baxter, lawyer for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, said public schools should serve parents, not force children 'into conformity.' However, progressive parents and many teachers worry this will hurt schools' ability to teach tolerance. Erica Watkins, who runs a progressive parent group in Oklahoma, said ''parents' rights' has been overused and weaponized to undermine teachers.' How did this movement grow? The push for parental rights took off in 2021 when Terry McAuliffe, a Democratic candidate for Virginia governor, said in a debate, 'I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 코인 투자금 300만원 있다면 '이렇게'해라 나스닥터 더 알아보기 Undo His Republican rival, Glenn Youngkin, used this to win the election, sparking a nationwide conservative movement demanding more control over schools. Groups like Moms for Liberty, formed in Florida in 2021, grew quickly. They trained school board candidates and wore shirts reading 'We do not co-parent with the government.' Co-founder Tiffany Justice told WSJ that parents are becoming 'more emboldened.' What happens next? Former President Donald Trump backed Moms for Liberty during his 2024 campaign, saying, 'I'm for parental rights all the way.' He also praised Friday's court ruling. Conservative lawyers believe the ruling will help parents fight other school policies, such as rules about students' pronouns and names. Luke Berg from Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty said it's hard to see how parents will lose such cases if they cite religious reasons. But school officials are worried about how to handle students who opt out. Zachary Schurin, a lawyer for Connecticut schools, said teachers will have to find staff to supervise these students during lessons they skip. Could progressives use this too? Some progressive parents are using parental rights laws to opt out of lessons they disagree with. In Oklahoma, Erica Watkins encouraged parents to pull their children out of new social studies classes that question the 2020 election results. In another case, parents argued that bans on gender-transition care for minors violate their rights to raise their children as they see fit. The Supreme Court rejected one such case in Tennessee but did not rule directly on parental rights. 'As a parent, I know my child better than any government official ever will,' said Samantha Williams, a mother involved in the Tennessee lawsuit. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

EAM Jaishankar meets US Secy of Defence Pete Hegseth, discusses advancing bilateral defence partnership
EAM Jaishankar meets US Secy of Defence Pete Hegseth, discusses advancing bilateral defence partnership

United News of India

time19 minutes ago

  • United News of India

EAM Jaishankar meets US Secy of Defence Pete Hegseth, discusses advancing bilateral defence partnership

Washington/New Delhi, July 2 (UNI) External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar met with US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth during which they discussed advancing the bilateral defence partnership and building on growing convergences and capabilities. In a post on X, the EAM said: 'Great to meet @SecDef Pete Hegseth in Washington DC today. 'Had a productive conversation on advancing the India-US defence partnership, building on growing convergences of interests, capabilities and responsibilities.' A US Department of Defense readout, said the two met at the Pentagon, 'to discuss the close cooperation between the two countries, weapons sales and the upcoming signing of the framework for the new defense partnership." Almost right at the beginning of the administration, President [Donald J.] Trump and Prime Minister Shri [Narendra] Modi set a strong foundation for our relationship, which we're building on here today: productive, pragmatic and realistic," Hegseth said. "And our nations boast a rich and growing history of cooperation driven by a shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific." The secretary said both the U.S. and India are mutually aware of the security concerns in the region, and both nations have the ability to counter that threat together. He also touched on U.S. efforts to provide India with the tools needed to counter threats in the Indo-Pacific region. "The United States is very pleased with the successful integration of many U.S. defense items into India's inventory," Hegseth said. "And building on this progress, we hope we can complete several major pending U.S. defense sales to India, expand our shared defense industrial cooperation and coproduction efforts, strengthen interoperability ... between our forces, and then formally sign a new 10-year Framework for the U.S.-India Major Defense Partnership ... which we hope to do very soon." During a meeting in February between Trump and Modi, the two leaders announced plans to pursue new procurements and coproduction arrangements for Javelin antitank guided missiles and Stryker armored vehicles. Also discussed was procurement for six additional P-8I maritime patrol aircraft. India has already integrated into its own military weapons, such as the C‑130J Super Hercules, C‑17 Globemaster III and P‑8I Poseidon aircraft, as well as the CH‑47F Chinook, MH‑60R Sea Hawk and AH‑64E Apache. India also utilizes the Harpoon antiship missiles, M777 howitzers and MQ‑9B Sky Guardians. Also in February, President Trump and PM Modi pledged to increase military cooperation with enhanced training, exercises and operations. Hegseth and Jaishankar discussed participation in the next India-U.S. Defense Acceleration Ecosystem Summit, where the two nations will continue to build on U.S.-India defense industrial cooperation and produce new innovations in technology and manufacturing. "We're eager to work alongside you to realize our shared goals," Hegseth said. "They're deep and ongoing." Jaishankar said India's relationship with the U.S. is already strong, but more can be done. "We believe that our defense partnership is today truly one of the most consequential pillars of the relationship. It's not built merely on shared interests, but we believe really deepening convergence and of capabilities, of responsibilities," EAM Jaishankar was quoted as saying. "And what we do in the Indo-Pacific, we believe, is absolutely crucial to its strategic stability." UNI RN

Donald Trump says Israel has agreed on terms for 60-day ceasefire in Gaza
Donald Trump says Israel has agreed on terms for 60-day ceasefire in Gaza

Scroll.in

time21 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Donald Trump says Israel has agreed on terms for 60-day ceasefire in Gaza

United States President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that Israel has agreed to the 'necessary conditions' to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Palestinian militant group Hamas. Trump said that during this period, 'we will work with all parties to end the War'. 'The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring peace, will deliver this final proposal,' the US president said in a social media post. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better – It will only get worse.' Hamas has not yet responded to Trump's announcement. ( @realDonaldTrump - Truth Social Post ) ( Donald J. Trump - Jul 01, 2025, 6:25 PM ET ) My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will… — Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸 TRUTH POSTS (@TruthTrumpPosts) July 1, 2025 Israel's military offensive in Gaza began in October 2023 after Hamas killed 1,200 persons during its incursion into southern Israel and took hostages. Israel has been carrying out unprecedented air and ground strikes on Gaza since then, leaving over 55,000 persons dead. Tel Aviv has also enforced a severe blockade on humanitarian aid, which United Nations officials say has brought the population to the verge of famine. Although the blockade was partially eased on May 19, allowing limited aid to enter, UN Secretary-General António Guterres described the amount as merely a ' teaspoon ' compared to what is urgently required. Efforts to reinstate a brief ceasefire that took effect in January had stalled due to major disagreements between Hamas and Israel. Tel Aviv demands that the Palestinian militant group disarm, disband and release all remaining hostages, while Hamas insists Israel must withdraw its forces and agree to end the war. On May 29 as well, the White House said that Israel had agreed to a United States-proposed ceasefire with Hamas. Hamas had, however, said that the proposal would only result in 'the continuation of killing and famine' in Gaza. Nevertheless, the head of Hamas in Gaza, Khalil al-Hayya, said on June 5 that the group had not rejected the proposal, but had sought changes that would lead to the war ending, Reuters reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store