Ranking the Big Ten's top 10 nonconference games in 2025
Ranking the Big Ten's top 10 nonconference games in 2025
Many Big Ten teams have opted to take a conservative approach to nonconference scheduling following the recent round of conference realignment and the expansion of the College Football Playoff to 12 teams. As a result, several programs don't have a power conference opponent on their out-of-conference slate.
For example, Penn State was originally scheduled to host Virginia Tech this season on the back half of a home-and-home series, but the first battle, supposed to take place in Blacksburg in 2020, was canceled due to COVID-19. After the initial matchup was canned, the two were unable to find a solution and removed the second game as well. Other schools face similar situations, while some just opted to make their nonconference schedule as easy as possible, valuing wins as they battle for a playoff spot.
Still, there are several high-quality battles slated for the 2025 season, including some highly anticipated Big Ten-SEC crossovers with bragging rights on the line. Here's a look at the top 10 nonconference matchups for Big Ten teams heading into the season.
No. 10: Nebraska vs. Cincinnati, Aug. 28
The Cornhuskers are coming off their first bowl appearance since 2016, finishing last season at 7-6 after defeating Boston College in the Bad Boy Mowers Pinstripe Bowl. Hopes are high that Matt Rhule can do what he's done at several previous stops, continuing to elevate a Cornhusker program that's failed to meet expectations in recent years. With star quarterback Dylan Raiola at the helm, Nebraska hosts Cincinnati, which made the move to the Big 12 two seasons ago and has struggled to compete. Though the Wildcats aren't a big brand, this matchup still represents a battle between power conference opponents, which has become increasingly rare in the modern era.
No. 9: Minnesota at Cal, Sept. 13
The Golden Gophers round out their nonconference slate with a trip to the West Coast to take on Cal, which enters its second season as a member of the ACC. The teams have met six times previously, most recently in 2009, with the Golden Bears holding a 4-2 advantage in the head-to-head series. Both teams went through ups and downs last season but earned bowl eligibility, leaving the potential for this to be an entertaining game. Both head coaches are looking to return their program to where it was a few years back, with Minnesota winning nine or more games in three of four seasons from 2019-2022 and Cal peaking at eight wins under Wilcox in 2019.
No. 8: UCLA vs. Utah, Aug. 30
Two former Pac-12 comrades will meet once more, this time with the Bruins in the Big Ten and Utah in the Big 12. The two have lots of recent history, and both are searching for better seasons after reaching just five wins in 2024. Though they now wear different conference patches on their jerseys, this regional rivalry could provide some fireworks in Week 1.
No. 7: Illinois at Duke, Sept. 6
Two traditional basketball powers will clash on the gridiron in early September, with the Fighting Illini and Blue Devils both looking to continue a recent string of football success. A few years ago, both programs would be viewed as bottom-dwellers within their conferences, but that's changed recently. Both teams average over seven wins across the last three seasons and are primed for more success in 2025. Bret Bielema and the Fighting Illini are coming off a 10-win campaign capped off with a Cheez-It Citrus Bowl victory over South Carolina, while the Blue Devils went 9-3 before losing to Ole Miss in the TaxSlayer Gator Bowl.
No. 6: Wisconsin at Alabama, Sept. 13
The Badgers have taken a step back during Luke Fickell's first two seasons leading the program, and a brutal conference slate leaves a bleak outlook in Madison. Still, if the Badgers show improvement and get a few bounces, they could give the Crimson Tide a run for their money in a clash between the two super conferences. Regardless of the apparent mismatch on paper, this matchup will be better than most throughout the early weeks of next season.
No. 5: Oregon vs. Oklahoma State, Sept. 6
The Ducks have been involved in some big nonconference matchups in recent years, including against Ohio State, Georgia and Auburn. This year, they'll host Oklahoma State from the Big-12, a team that struggled last year but had consistently put together solid seasons throughout the last couple decades. If the Cowboys can return to their 10-win ways that have become the norm under Mike Gundy, this could prove to be a major matchup and the first real test of Oregon's season.
No. 4: Iowa at Iowa State, Sept. 6
Though neither program is a blue blood, both could easily be ranked to begin next season, providing the potential for a big game. Though they took a slight step back in 2024, the Hawkeyes have won at least eight games every year since 2016, and there's little reason to believe that trend won't continue in 2025. Pair that with the Cyclones, who are coming off Big-12 championship game appearance, and this could be one of the biggest games in the long history of the rivalry.
No. 3: Michigan at Oklahoma, Sept. 6
It's fair to say neither team lived up to expectations last season, with the Wolverines following a national championship season by dropping to 8-5 in Sherrone Moore's first year as full-time head coach, while the Sooners fell from 10-3 in 2023 to 6-7 in 2024. Still, these are two blue bloods who've only met once before, an Oklahoma victory in 1976, making for a historic matchup. Both squads fully believe they can push for a playoff appearance this season, and a win in this game would go a long way toward that goal or be the reason one team falls short of it.
No. 2: USC at Notre Dame, Oct. 18
Despite recent headlines about their inability to come to an agreement on scheduling future matchups, the two blue blood programs are slated to clash in 2025. The Trojans suffered a down year in 2024 at 7-6, while Notre Dame made a run to the national championship game before running into the buzzsaw that was Ohio State. Both schools have stacked strong recruiting classes and are expected to compete for playoff bids, leading to a likely top-25 matchup. Additionally, these two always tend to play each other tough in one of the nation's most storied rivalries.
No. 1: Ohio State vs. Texas Aug. 30
In a rematch of last year's College Football Playoff thriller, the Buckeyes and Longhorns will clash in Columbus in a highly anticipated rematch, and easily the top nonconference game of the year. Per most betting sites, these teams have the two best odds to win the national championship this season. With star power across the board, huge name brands and an exciting rematch from last year's postseason, this game figures to be electric.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's holding up CFP expansion? SEC and Big Ten are at a potential impasse on these key issues
College Football Playoff executive director Rich Clark is waiting on the SEC and Big Ten to agree on a new playoff format just like the rest of us. (Photo) ASHEVILLE, N.C. — Deep within the Blue Ridge Mountains, the historical Biltmore Estate Hilltop Inn rises above an ocean of rolling greenery, its high stone walls and floor-to-ceiling windows all tucked between two giant peaks: Mount Mitchell and Mount Pisgah. The two mountains loom like sentries, dominating the blue skyline, unmistakable giants in this scenic land. Advertisement Inside the Biltmore, two goliaths within the landscape of college sports, the SEC and Big Ten, are at odds on the future of the industry's most valuable product: the College Football Playoff. Can these mountains be moved? Well, here this week, CFP leaders took steps toward a change to the playoff selection process — yet another chapter in what's already been a laborious journey toward potential expansion to 16 teams. The 10 FBS conference commissioners and Notre Dame's athletic director received a presentation from executive director Rich Clark and data analysts over adjustments to selection committee criteria in an effort to salvage the committee's role itself and appease both Big Ten and SEC leaders — the two entities that, according to a memorandum signed last spring, control future format decisions. Whether such a change brings the two conferences together on a format remains unclear. The two leagues must agree on a playoff model for it to move forward, Clark said on Wednesday from the Biltmore Inn, confirming what's been previously reported based on last spring's memorandum. Advertisement But, for now, they are at an impasse. The Big Ten wants a playoff where access is more like the NFL structure, determined through automatic qualifiers based on conference standings to limit the subjectivity of the selection committee. And the league also supports all four leagues — including the SEC and ACC — to play nine conference games as the Big Ten and Big 12 do. The SEC moved away from such a playoff format after its coaches publicly pushed back against it three weeks ago during the conference's spring meetings, instead now working toward a format that provides a bigger at-large pool, such as a 16-team model with five automatic qualifiers for conference champions and 11 at-large selections (5+11). However, in any 5+11 format, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, his coaches and athletic directors have been very clear: They want to see a change in the selection process to more heavily emphasize strength of schedule and strength of conference. Advertisement For the most part, that's what this set of CFP meetings centered around here this week. Clark, entering his second year as CFP executive director, presented, along with a data analyst from SportsSource Analytics, 'recommendations' on just how to adjust data points that the selection committee uses. With assistance from a Google mathematician and university math professor, the presentation included the creation of a strength-of-record metric to more heavily weight a team's strength of schedule, conference strength and, in particular, non-conference games. In fact, commissioners heard from experts who encouraged the scheduling of more crossover games among the four power leagues — a way, presumably, to provide more data points of rating the league strength. Advertisement Commissioners gave Clark and the CFP staff feedback, about potentially rewriting some language of the protocol used by selection committee members. CFP leaders will now 'mull it over,' Clark said, before the group continues to meet throughout the summer in an effort to reach an expansion decision by Dec. 1 — the drop-dead date for 2026 expansion. Commissioners declined to comment on this week's meeting. Three of the four power conference commissioners, in fact, shuffled into an elevator together here after their meeting. As reporters fired questions toward them, the elevator doors closed. The fourth power league commissioner, Big Ten's Tony Petitti, did not attend meetings in person but was in attendance virtually. Clark spoke in their absence. The same format options that have existed continue to exist, he said. 'There are a lot of options. You've heard all of the options.' While not mentioning them, they are obvious. Advertisement 1) Remain at the same 12-team format: 5 AQs + 7 at-large, which isn't necessarily the preference, Sankey said a few weeks ago. 2) Expand to a 14-team event: 5 AQs + 9 at-large, which isn't as desirable as the next option. 3) Move to a 16-team field: 5+11 or the Big Ten's AQ-heavy proposal that grants twice as many bids to each the SEC and Big Ten (4 each) as the ACC and Big 12 (2). 'The format could be a lot different in 2026 or could be the same,' Clark said. Staying at 12 for 2026 is a grim reality for some, but it's a possibility, perhaps even a probability as negotiations creep closer to the Dec. 1 deadline. If the SEC and Big Ten do not agree on a format, there may not be a change at all. Advertisement When specifically asked about the Big Ten and SEC having to both agree on format, Clark said, 'They are obligated to come to an agreement on what the format is. They will determine that between the parties and will go forward from there. 'Rushing to a bad decision is not in any of our best interest,' he said later. 'They're looking at any and all options and understanding what the pros and cons are to those things rather than rush to something that may not suit us.' Would the Big Ten really block expansion to 16 if the rest of the 10 FBS conferences and Notre Dame agree on the 5+11 format? Perhaps. Illinois head coach Bret Bielema gestured toward that during an interview on Tuesday in Chicago. 'I don't think there's any way we could do a 16-team playoff if [the SEC] is not at nine [conference] games,' he said. Can these two mountains be moved? Asked that question here Wednesday, one CFP leader smiled and quipped, 'We'll get there.'
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Cleveland Browns' Mason Graham, Michigan alum, booed by Ohio State fans at youth camp
Cleveland Browns' Mason Graham, Michigan alum, booed by Ohio State fans at youth camp Ohio State loyalty runs deep in the Buckeye State. So even if you were a productive player in the state of Michigan, particularly with the Wolverines, chances are, even at the pro ranks, they won't accept you. Since the Cleveland Browns traded back in the 2025 NFL draft to the No. 5 pick and selected Michigan defensive tackle Mason Graham, there's been a lot of bellyaching and handwringing throughout the state of Ohio about the pick. Despite Graham being arguably the best defensive tackle each of the past two years, and single-handedly showing his might in the win over the Buckeyes this past year, he'll forever be tainted in the state due to his college ties. It became that much more apparent at a Cleveland Browns youth camp on Wednesday. Graham was present and was announced as a Michigan alum, and the young crowd of campers therefore gave him a not-so-warm welcome. He, of course, embraced it. Graham played for three years in Ann Arbor and is 3-0 against Ohio State -- even with the team that went to Columbus last year with a 7-5 record. He also won the Big Ten twice and the national championship in 2023. Of course, Graham could turn things around with a dominant showing in the NFL, much like former Ohio State linebacker Chris Spielman did during his time with the Detroit Lions. However, it's much more of an uphil battle for Graham in Cleveland, especially considering that he never lost to Ohio State in his career.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
CFP leadership says there's no leading contender for Playoff format in 2026
ASHEVILLE, N.C. — The College Football Playoff staff recommended updating the strength of schedule metrics used in the selection process and hopes to have a new format in place by the fall. But CFP talks this week reached a reset on what that format will be for 2026 and beyond. 'I wouldn't say there's a leading contender right now for them, but they're taking a good look and a fresh look at it,' CFP executive director Rich Clark said Wednesday. Advertisement The CFP management committee, composed of 10 FBS conference commissioners and Notre Dame's athletic director, met twice over two days at a resort hotel overlooking the Blue Ridge Mountains in northwest North Carolina. After the full group was done, the Power 4 commissioners met on their own to further discuss the direction of a playoff format for 2026-31. Though expansion from 12 teams seems likely in the next iteration of the Playoff, Clark made a point to say nothing is off the table. 'The format could be a lot different in '26 or it may be the same,' Clark said Wednesday. How best to pick the teams seems up for debate more so than the number of teams in the field. The Big Ten's long-supported plan to populate the field with automatic qualifiers — determined by league standings and play-in games — hit a roadblock when the Big 12 proposed a 16-team bracket with 11 at-large bids. The 5-11 model caught the attention of SEC coaches and administrators and sent CFP officials pivoting to examine the selection process. Clark said CFP staff met with data provider SportSource Analytics and some outside sources, including a mathematician from Google, to examine the statistics they provide the committee — with a focus on strength of schedule. 'Because some of these metrics were, I'd say, put into place with a whole different look in the way college football was laid out, with the way conferences were structured and things like that,' Clark said. 'So you have to step back and go, OK, how are we structured now? And look at it from that lens. I wouldn't say it's dramatic, but it's a refresh.' Clark said staff also met with athletic directors who served on the committee last year to talk about process. The CFP is still committed to using a committee to select the teams, despite some skepticism — especially in the Big Ten — about whether a subjective process is the best way to compare and contrast teams that play vastly different schedules. Advertisement 'There were no real discussions about changing priorities,' Clark said. 'We're looking at them and making sure we're viewing them through the right lens given where college football is today.' Clark said there is still time for discussion before a decision needs to be made. A firm deadline is Dec. 1, when TV partner ESPN needs to be notified. But Playoff leaders would like to be done well before that. 'By the fall, though, we want to have a decision,' Clark said. 'That's the preference for all of us so that we can get things put into place and the conference can make some decisions based on what the format is going to be.' Clark cautioned, though, that the decision would likely be for six years, and 'rushing to a bad decision is not in any of our best interests.' For 2025, the 12-team CFP bracket introduced last year will still be in effect, but with a tweak to the way teams are seeded, no longer reserving byes for the top four conference champions. Changes to the CFP format no longer need unanimous approval from the 11-member management committee. The SEC and Big Ten can shape the future without consensus from the group, but there remains some question about just how much power those conferences have to push through a format that has no support from the rest of the group. And whether it is advisable to do so. 'They're obligated to come to an agreement on what the format is,' Clark said. 'So they'll determine that between the parties, and then go forward from there.' Further complicating the CFP discussions is a local issue. The Big Ten is leery about signing off on a format heavy on at-large bids while the SEC — and the ACC — both play eight-game conference schedules. Big Ten (and Big 12) teams play nine conference games annually, and leaders in the conference believe those extra guaranteed losses can work against their teams in a race for at-large bids. Advertisement The SEC is still wavering on expanding from eight conference games to nine. Again, it comes down to being wary that their already rigorous schedules won't be properly rewarded in the selection process. The SEC put three teams in the 12-team CFP last year, with Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina all just on the outside in the selection committee's final ranking. The Big Ten's push for multiple automatic qualifiers from each power conference would substantially minimize the selection committee's role to mostly just seeding. The Big 12 and ACC have pushed back on a plan to reserve two playoff spots each for them and four each for the Big Ten and SEC. Five months of minimal progress led everybody back to the drawing board, looking for new solutions, but the management committee did come to some other decisions. The commissioners approved player availability reports for Playoff games that will mimic what the Big Ten and SEC use during the regular season, Clark said. The commissioners also approved instituting sports wagering monitoring beginning next season. 'How we do it is now up to the staff to really figure out what the details of that will be,' Clark said.
