logo
Frederick City Council members seek budget cuts for potential decrease in tax rate

Frederick City Council members seek budget cuts for potential decrease in tax rate

Yahoo13-05-2025

Some Frederick City Council members are looking to cut parts of the proposed fiscal year 2026 budget for a possible property-tax-rate cut.
The cuts could reduce the budget proposed by Mayor Michael O'Connor by $8.3 million or more, according to City Council President Katie Nash.
O'Connor's current budget proposal asks for $238 million in expenditures.
The council is slated to consider the budget on Thursday. Nash said the vote on the budget and tax rate would likely be delayed, however.
Nash and Council Member Ben MacShane both said they would support cuts with the possibility of a tax-rate decrease, though discussions over what could be cut are ongoing.
'We need to be aware of the fact that its hard for many of our residents to cover their expenses here in Frederick,' MacShane said in an interview on Monday.
Nash, MacShane and Council Member Donna Kuzemchak are looking at possible cuts to a proposed $8.5 million reserve fund the mayor proposed to combat cuts to federal grants, as well as a $1.8 million proposal to increase the pay of some city employees based on tenure.
Nash said she was looking to cut $6.5 million of the $8.5 million reserve, and put that $6.5 million toward decreasing taxes.
Nash and MacShane said they were interested in making the cuts to allow a decrease in the tax rate, but Kuzemchak had reservations.
Nash in an interview on Monday said the cuts could amount to a tax cut of 5 cents per $100 of assessed property value or more.
The city's tax rate is currently 73.05 cents per $100 of assessed property value, and the mayor's proposed budget maintains this tax rate.
For a property worth $100,000 under the current property tax rate, a property owner would pay $730.50 in city taxes.
With a 5 cent cut, the same property owner would pay $680.50 in property taxes to the city, a $50 decrease.
This would be the first time the tax rate decreased since the city dropped the tax rate from 73.2 to 73.05 cents per $100 of assessed value in fiscal year 2014, according to the Frederick County website.
Kuzemchak said in an interview on Monday that she is also looking at cuts, though she is unsure of whether the saved money should contribute toward a tax cut or a reserve.
She said the cost of cutting the tax rate does not just affect this year. If the rate does not go back up in the future, it amounts to millions in lost revenue for the city.
Everything from roads to parks to libraries is affected, Kuzemchak said.
While Kuzemchak described the amount saved by city taxpayers in the event of a potential tax cut as small, Nash said it is important to consider that property values have been going up.
Council Member Kelly Russell wrote in an email to the News-Post on Monday that she supports the mayor's current proposed version of the budget.
Council Member Derek Shackelford did not respond to a request for comment on Monday.
Allen Etzler, a spokesman for the city, said O'Connor has heard council members' concerns and, in response, is drafting a budget amendment that he expected to share this week.
THE CUTS
The mayor proposed an $8.5 million unallocated reserve as part of the budget.
Frederick Director of Budget and Administration Katie Barkdoll said the fund would automatically be put forward in the event the city loses funding for a project or service.
With potential cuts in federal grant funding under the budget-slashing administration of President Donald Trump, the city could lose millions in funds typically directed toward large-scale projects, like an effort to redesign downtown sidewalks, or toward programs that assist the unhoused and provide meals to children.
Nash said she wanted to look at other cuts across the budget, such as the inclusion of funds to hire six new city employees, with the idea of storing some money away in a separate reserve fund with certain limitations on it.
This could be a fund that requires council discussion approval to be spent, she said.
This is in contrast to the mayor's reserve fund that Kuzemchak, Nash and MacShane have described as spendable at the mayor's discretion.
O'Connor has previously said he would be willing to go to the council to discuss priorities for the reserve fund in the event of federal grant cuts.
Kuzemchak, MacShane and Nash previously voiced their opposition to a tenure-based pay increase proposal for city employees.
The $1.8 million measure aims to increase the pay of around 269 city employees, with a focus on alleviating what Barkdoll described as 'compression' in the city's pay scale.
City Director of Human Resources Karen Paulson said in a March meeting that the city has about 640 full-time and about 100 part-time employees.
This 'compression' in this instance refers to some employees being paid less than or close to the rate of an employee tenured for a shorter period of time.
The pay proposal would see longer tenured employees paid more, and is meant to bring tenure into employee pay, Barkdoll said.
Nash previously said it was a bad year to budget for proposals like this. MacShane previously said he did not support a pay increase based only on tenure.
Kuzemchak said employees are already paid well and are set to receive other pay increases.
The budget separately proposes increases of up to approximately 5.5% for all city employees, accounting for merit and inflation-based adjustments.
'I adamantly support the restructured pay scale that begins to restore equitable pay across [a] wide and varied spectrum of our employees,' Russell wrote in an email on Monday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.
Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.

New York Times

time40 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.

News Analysis National Guard troops in Los Angeles on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has formally asked the Trump administration to remove them. It is the fight President Trump had been waiting for, a showdown with a top political rival in a deep blue state over an issue core to his political agenda. In bypassing the authority of Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, a Democrat, to call in the National Guard to quell protests in the Los Angeles area over his administration's efforts to deport more migrants, Mr. Trump is now pushing the boundaries of presidential authority and stoking criticism that he is inflaming the situation for political gain. Local and state authorities had not sought help in dealing with the scattered protests that erupted after an immigration raid on Friday in the garment district. But Mr. Trump and his top aides leaned into the confrontation with California leaders on Sunday, portraying the demonstrations as an existential threat to the country — setting in motion an aggressive federal response that in turn sparked new protests across the city. As more demonstrators took to the streets, the president wrote on social media that Los Angeles was being 'invaded and occupied' by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs,' and directed three of his top cabinet officials to take any actions necessary to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Mr. Trump told reporters as he headed to Camp David on Sunday, although it was unclear whether any such incidents had occurred. 'That happens, they get hit very hard.' The president declined to say whether he planned to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which allows for the use of federal troops on domestic soil to quell a rebellion. But either way, he added, 'we're going to have troops everywhere.' Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted on social media that 'this is a fight to save civilization.' Mr. Trump's decision to deploy at least 2,000 members of the California National Guard is the latest example of his willingness and, at times, an eagerness to shatter norms to pursue his political goals and bypass limits on presidential power. The last president to send in the National Guard for a domestic operation without a request from the state's governor, Lyndon B. Johnson, did so in 1965, to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. Image President Donald Trump in New Jersey on Sunday. On social media, he, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times But aides and allies of the president say the events unfolding in Los Angeles provide an almost perfect distillation of why Mr. Trump was elected in November. 'It could not be clearer,' said Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker and ally of the president who noted that Mr. Trump had been focused on immigration enforcement since 2015. 'One side is for enforcing the law and protecting Americans, and the other side is for defending illegals and being on the side of the people who break the law.' Sporadic protests have occurred across the country in recent days as federal agents have descended on Los Angeles and other cities searching workplaces for undocumented immigrants, part of an expanded effort by the administration to ramp up the number of daily deportations. On social media, Mr. Trump, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. They have shared images and videos of the most violent episodes — focusing particularly on examples of protesters lashing out at federal agents — even as many remained peaceful. Officials also zeroed in on demonstrators waving flags of other countries, including Mexico and El Salvador, as evidence of a foreign invasion. 'Illegal criminal aliens and violent mobs have been committing arson, throwing rocks at vehicles, and attacking federal law enforcement for days,' wrote Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. Mr. Newsom, whom the president refers to as 'Newscum,' has long been a foil for Mr. Trump, who has repeatedly targeted California and its leader as emblematic of failures of the Democratic Party. 'We expected this, we prepared for this,' Mr. Newsom said in a statement to The New York Times. 'This is not surprising — for them to succeed, California must fail, and so they're going to try everything in their tired playbook despite the evidence against them.' Image Law enforcement officers and members of the California National Guard engaged protesters in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday. Credit... Gabriela Bhaskar/The New York Times On Sunday, the governor sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally requesting that Mr. Trump rescind the call-up of the National Guard, saying federal actions were inflaming the situation. He was echoed by other Democratic officials, who said the mounting demonstrations were the result of Mr. Trump's own actions. The president and his aides 'are masters of misinformation and disinformation,' Senator Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat, said in an interview. 'They create a crisis of their own making and come in with all the theatrics and cruelty of immigration enforcement. They should not be surprised in a community like Los Angeles they will be met by demonstrators who are very passionate about standing up for fundamental rights and due process.' Republicans defended Mr. Trump's moves, saying he was rightfully exercising his power to protect public safety. 'The president is extremely concerned about the safety of federal officials in L.A. right now who have been subject to acts of violence and harassment and obstruction,' Representative Kevin Kiley, Republican of California, said in an interview. He added: 'We are in this moment because of a series of reckless decisions by California's political leaders, the aiding and abetting the open-border policies of President Biden.' Trump officials said on Sunday that they were ready to escalate their response even more, if necessary. Tom Homan, the president's border czar, suggested in an interview with NBC News that the administration would arrest anyone, including public officials, who interfered with immigration enforcement activities, which he said would continue in California and across the country. Image Protesters in Pasadena, Calif., on Sunday. Credit... Alex Welsh for The New York Times Mr. Trump appears to be deploying against California a similar playbook that he has used to punish universities, law firms and other institutions and individuals that he views as political adversaries. Last month, he threatened to strip 'large scale' federal funding from California 'maybe permanently' over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. And in recent days, his administration said it would pull roughly $4 billion in federal funding for California's high-speed train, which would further delay a project that has long been plagued by delays and funding shortages. 'Everything he's done to attack California or anybody he fears isn't supportive of him is going to continue to be an obsession of his,' Mr. Padilla said. 'He may think it plays smart for his base, but it's actually been bad for the country.' White House officials said there was a different common denominator that explains Mr. Trump's actions both against institutions like Harvard and immigration protests in Los Angeles. 'For years Democrat-run cities and institutions have failed the American people, by both choice and incompetence,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement. 'In each instance,' she added, 'the president took necessary action to protect Americans when Democrats refused.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store