
Why Toronto residents still aren't safe from wildfire smoke indoors
air quality warning for Toronto
and much of the GTA, as thick smoke from wildfires in northern Ontario blanketed the city — pushing the Air Quality Health Index to 10+, or 'very high risk,' early Monday morning.
By the late afternoon, the warning was downgraded to a special statement, with an index of eight, or 'high risk.'
Smoke from wildfires in Ontario and Manitoba is still causing poor air quality and reduced visibility, according to the updated statement, with conditions
Torontonians are being urged to reduce strenuous outdoor activities and to stay inside when possible. But there's no escaping the smoke, even when indoors, experts tell the Star.
Most buildings are only able to keep about half — 40 to 60 per cent — of outdoor air pollutants from coming inside, according to the research of Jeffrey Brook, an associate professor at the University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health.
As climate change advances, I cannot grasp the hugeness of the calamity. What once was notable is becoming a habit, a toxic, sinister pattern.
As climate change advances, I cannot grasp the hugeness of the calamity. What once was notable is becoming a habit, a toxic, sinister pattern.
That means, on especially smoky days, indoor air quality can still reach dangerous levels for susceptible individuals, Brook and other experts previously told the Star. These can include young children, pregnant people, elderly individuals and those with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions like asthma.
'There's a lot of epidemiology research that says (pollutants released by wildfires) is a major killer,' Brook explained. 'It's one of the most
significant causes of premature mortality
in the world.'
And yet, our building codes and ventilation systems generally aren't designed to prioritize smoke and other pollutants, experts say. As the
climate crisis
makes wildfires a more common occurrence, policymakers are being urged to consider long-term solutions to a worsening issue.
There are three main ways smoke (and other air pollutants) can infiltrate our homes, according to Amy Li, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo.
The first is through any large openings, like a door left ajar or an opened window. 'This is why we often have the recommendation to close all windows and doors when we know the outdoor air is not good,' she explained.
The second pathway is less visible — leaks and cracks in a home's enclosure through which pollutants can enter. 'Buildings are not like a spaceship,' Li said. 'There will always be some amount (of pollutants) getting into the building.'
Health experts are not currently concerned about air quality in Toronto but warn prolonged exposure to moderate risk air may threaten health.
Health experts are not currently concerned about air quality in Toronto but warn prolonged exposure to moderate risk air may threaten health.
The third is through mechanical ventilation systems that funnel outside air indoors, said Jeffrey Siegel, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Toronto. This sort of system is present in 'most non-residential buildings,' he said.
It's why large commercial and institutional buildings, like schools, offices and community centres, are often more vulnerable to smoke, Li added, although it varies from building to building.
Older buildings also tend to have more cracks for pollutants to seep through and ventilation systems less able to keep smoke out, Li and Siegel explained. Meanwhile, single family homes and townhouses tend to be 'leakier' compared to highrise apartment complexes, Li said.
Buildings without air conditioning are also at greater risk if windows are kept open to regulate high temperatures, Siegel added.
The first rule of thumb is to close any doors and windows when it's smoky out. You might even consider taping windows shut if leaks are present, Li said. 'That's not as protective as would be ideal because of the leaks in buildings … but it will help,' Siegel added.
But this may not be an option if your residence has no air conditioning and you're weathering a period of extreme heat: 'The health effects of extreme heat can be more serious than the effects of wildfire smoke,' Siegel said.
If your home has a central forced air system with a MERV 11-rated air filter or better, Siegel recommends keeping your fan going continuously if possible. MERV, or 'minimum efficiency reporting values,' measures how efficiently a filter can capture particles; a MERV 13 to 15 rated filter is preferred, Siegel said.
Unlike many commercial buildings, most residences in Canada recirculate the indoor air instead of pumping in fresh air from the outside, Li said.
Siegel also recommended running portable air filters in crowded spaces, especially in areas with susceptible individuals.
The Star previously outlined how to make an affordable filter
using a fan, air filters, duct tape and cardboard.
If possible, Li recommends upgrading your home's filtration system. Consult with a professional first, especially if your home's ventilation system is old, as a high-efficiency filter might overwhelm the system and lead to drops in pressure, she said.
Finally, those at high risk can consider wearing a well-fitted respirator or mask, like an N95 mask, while indoors when it's especially smoky, Siegel explained.
TORONTO - The Canadian Ophthalmological Society is urging people to take care of their eyes as wildfires burn across Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
TORONTO - The Canadian Ophthalmological Society is urging people to take care of their eyes as wildfires burn across Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
Until recently, building filtration systems have placed less emphasis on keeping wildfire smoke and other environmental pollutants out, Brook noted. And while the COVID-19 pandemic saw a shift toward improving HVAC systems in buildings like schools,
experts and advocates have noted it's not sufficient
to keep up with the increasing prevalence of wildfires.
Almost any upgrades to a building will also make it more resistant to wildfire smoke, Siegel said, from installing new windows to heating, ventilation and air-conditioning retrofits.
The problem is many of the buildings where these improvements are needed most, like schools, are unable to implement them due to budget and funding limitations, he continued.
'It's an important area that we should be thinking about for investment, because the issue isn't just wildfire smoke,' Siegel said. 'We have increasing ambient air pollution just because of urbanization. We have a lot more construction, a lot more traffic, a lot of major roadways with schools and other buildings near them.'
There's another hurdle. Brook noted that improved ventilation, air-conditioning and filtration systems may end up contributing to the climate crisis.
For urbanites, there's a new way to mark the calendar: the day the smoke reaches the city.
For urbanites, there's a new way to mark the calendar: the day the smoke reaches the city.
'If you just start expending more energy to make the indoor air clean, it can becomes a vicious cycle of more emissions if our energy is coming from dirty sources,' he said.
'We have to think, what's our long-term strategy?' Brook continued. 'Why have we stopped talking about how we're going to meet carbon emission targets? How are we going to upgrade our housing and clean air while not increasing our energy usages?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
Our Malady: Lessons In Liberty From A Hospital Diary by Timothy Snyder — Review
Health care should be a right, not a privilege, for the sake of our bodies, and for the sake of our souls. Emergency room visit. getty This summer, I have been deeply immersed in the many fascinating books written by Timothy Snyder, the inaugural Temerty Chair in Modern European History at the University of Toronto. Professor Snyder, who is currently on indefinite leave from his faculty position at Yale University, is an American historian specializing on 20th century atrocities, mainly those committed by the Nazis and the Stalinists. Amongst all his books – all brilliantly written – this particular book stood out to me because most people don't think so intensely about the intersections between history, politics, human rights and healthcare, including, as it turns out, the author himself. This changed abruptly after Professor Snyder fell ill in Germany just prior to the start of the pandemic in December 2019. He was released from hospital, undiagnosed, the following morning but ended up in hospital again a week or so later after returning to the United States, where an appendectomy seemed to correct his problems. He was released less than 24 hours after the surgery. A week later, he was back in hospital in Florida, suffering from a complex array of confusing symptoms. Were they related to the appendectomy or were they caused by something else entirely? No one knew. After this, Professor Snyder, who maintains a demanding schedule, was in and out of a number of hospitals in several states and European countries, but a diagnosis and an effective treatment remained elusive. Meanwhile, Professor Snyder became progressively, inexplicably, sicker. A few months later, he was gravely ill. Despite having health insurance, access to healthcare and a lot of support from family and friends, Professor Snyder almost died. Certainly, most Americans without healthcare in this situation would have died. I know I would have. Cover art for Our Malady: Lessons in Liberty and Solidarity by Timothy Snyder (2020, The Bodley ... More Head, London) The Bodley Head, London Throughout the entire ordeal, Professor Snyder kept a hospital diary where he recorded his symptoms, the test results and treatments provided, events and conversations, his dreams and he even drew pictures. This diary, which Professor Snyder refers to several times as 'a rant', was the basis of his book, Our Malady: Lessons in Liberty from a Hospital Diary (2020; Penguin Press / The Bodley Head). Despite its small size (168 pages, including 20 pages of notes in the back), Our Malady is a timely and gripping examination of the state of the healthcare system in the USA as compared to healthcare systems in several European countries. As you might guess: the USA does not measure up very well. 'Americans helped to establish health care as a human right around the world,' Professor Snyder laments (p. 41). 'Why then is health care not seen as such in the United States? Why are Americans not protected by the agreements that our government signed? Should we accept that citizens of other democracies enjoy a right that we are denied, and live longer and healthier lives than we do? Many of us seem to find that acceptable. Why?' The answer lies in the chokehold that the health insurance industry wields over Americans' access to healthcare and over the authority of medical doctors to provide adequate and necessary care to their patients. Without any relevant medical training or apparently, even any empathy, insurance agents often make medical decisions based on what's best for their insurance company's bottom line, rather than what's best for the patients; effectively prioritizing profits over people. 'When money becomes the only goal, values disappear, and people imitate the oligarchs,' Professor Snyder warns (p. 139). 'We do this now when we admire oligarchs' fantasies of immortality rather than ask why our own lives must be shortened. When we indulge the daydreams of the ultra-wealthy, we create what Plato called 'a city of the rich' and 'a city of the poor'.' Can you guess which of Plato's 'cities' all of us live in? Professor Snyder interweaves his thoughts about the U.S. healthcare system with his personal story of serious illness as he develops his ideas on democratic values, love of family, and even the meaning of life. Only by formally recognizing equal access to healthcare as a human right, by elevating the authority of doctors and of truth, and by planning for our children's future can everyone be truly free. Foremost, the author argues that we must see the provision of health services as a human right because without good health, any other ideas about freedom that we might have cease to have any value. This thoughtful and important book is a quick read and an incisive analysis of the profoundly flawed medical system in the United States. It presents a powerful and well-written proposition in support of the re-evaluation and reform of the healthcare system in the USA to make it more humane and effective for everyone involved, by removing the profit motive. What does a health insurance company do, anyway, except collect its subscribers' money and deny these same people access to healthcare when they become ill? Although this cri de coeur is largely based on Professor Snyder's participation as a patient in the US healthcare system, I find myself increasingly worried about what I see happening in Britain, where some of my family live, as that country appears to be moving towards abandoning the NHS in favor of privatized, for-profit medicine. Don't do this to your country , to your communities, to your families, to yourselves, I want to shout. This is a grotesque mistake. This will not end well . Throughout the entire book, Professor Snyder writes passionately about how prioritising profit over human lives in health care makes us all more unhealthy and more unfree. 'America is supposed to be about freedom, but illness and fear render us less free,' Professor Snyder observes (p. 17). 'The word freedom is hypocritical when spoken by the people who create the conditions that leave us sick and powerless. If our federal government and our commercial medicine make us unhealthy, they are making us unfree […] Rather than pursuing happiness as individuals, we are together creating a collective of pain.' Highly recommended. © Copyright by GrrlScientist | hosted by Forbes | Socials: Bluesky | CounterSocial | LinkedIn | Mastodon Science | Spoutible | SubStack | Threads | Tumblr | Twitter


USA Today
14 hours ago
- USA Today
Could Caitlin Clark miss the rest of 2025 due to injury? Here's the latest.
Indiana Fever superstar guard Caitlin Clark might not return to the basketball court any time soon, even if her most recent injury prognosis isn't bad. The Fever put out a statement on Thursday updating her status after she sustained a new groin injury last week, one that specifically didn't put a timetable on her return to action this season. "Following a July 15 injury to her right groin, Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark underwent further medical evaluations earlier this week. The team can confirm that no additional injuries or damage were discovered through the evaluations," the statement read. "Clark will continue working with the Fever medical team on her recovery and rehabilitation, with the priority on her long-term health and well-being. There is no timetable available for Clark's return, and no additional details will be provided at this time. Any further updates will be shared as they become available." On one hand, it's very good that Clark's latest evaluations didn't reveal any significant damage. On the other hand, this is the third time Clark has missed multiple games because of an injury this season. She will be absent for her third game in a row on Thursday when the Fever take on the Las Vegas Aces, a stretch already compounded by her missing last weekend's WNBA All-Star festivities. Not to be too doom-and-gloom as we don't know for sure, but it's entirely plausible that Clark won't play again in the regular season, even if this recent injury wasn't severe. With the focus being on her long-term health and well-being, the franchise may feel it wise to risk any further injuries that could linger into the future. While it's also very plausible she may play again soon, the team not putting a timeframe on her return feels foreboding, at least in terms of 2025's prospects. If the Fever made the playoffs, perhaps that's a reasonable timeline for her return? The ambiguity points to many different outcomes, but none necessarily immediate. Fever fans shouldn't take Thursday's update as a worst-case scenario, but they also shouldn't take it lightly. If the franchise really is focused on Clark's long-term health over short-term gains, the odds of her playing again this season might just depend on how her recovery goes and what the risks for further injuries are. Obviously, Clark not returning to the court would be catastrophic for the Fever's WNBA title chances, but it might be what's best for her and her long-term career with the franchise. With Indiana not quite at the level of elite teams like the New York Liberty, the Minnesota Lynx and the Phoenix Mercury, you really could see a world where Indiana makes the difficult decision to eventually shut her down for the season out of precaution. We'll see what happens as the season rolls on, but Thursday's update certainly puts an uncomfortable pall over the team concerning whether or not Clark will take the court again this season. It's absolutely possible Clark returns, but it doesn't sound like a guarantee like it did with her past injuries this season.


USA Today
15 hours ago
- USA Today
Indiana Fever release statement updating Caitlin Clark injury status
The Indiana Fever provided an important injury update for their star point guard on Thursday. Caitlin Clark has missed the last two regular-season games and the All-Star game with a right groin injury. It's the third different soft tissue injury Clark has dealt with this season, leading to her being in and out of the lineup all year long. Clark has already been ruled out for Thursday night's game against the Las Vegas Aces, and the Fever provided an update on her injury and recovery process on Thursday. In a statement released on X, the Fever put out a highly-anticipated update on Clark's injury and the additional testing that happened earlier this week. "Caitlin Clark underwent further medical evaluations earlier this week, which confirmed that no additional injuries or damage were discovered. Clark will continue working with the medical team on her recovery and rehabilitation, with the priority on her long-term health and well-being. There is no timetable available for her return," the Fever's statement read. It's good and bad news for the star guard. It's great that the testing from earlier this week found no additional injuries. Now, the Fever and Clark know they're just dealing with that right groin injury and can put together a treatment and recovery plan based on that. The bad news is that there is still no timetable for Clark's return as of now. While this isn't surprising news, as that treatment plan is probably still being worked on, it's unfortunate for the rest of the team and the fans that Clark's return timeline is still up in the air. The most important thing for Clark and the Fever is her long-term health, as mentioned in the statement released by the team. If keeping her out of game action for a while ensures she fully recovers, then that's the right move for all parties. In the meantime, the Fever will have to find ways to win games without their point guard, which has proved to be a challenge this season. They're 4-7 without Clark this season, including the Commissioner's Cup final, and they're 9-5 with her playing. Indiana (12-12) continues their season on Thursday when they host the Las Vegas Aces (12-11). Tip-off is scheduled for 6 p.m. CT on Amazon Prime Video. Contact/Follow us @HawkeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Iowa news, notes and opinions. Follow Zach on X: @zach_hiney