Earle-Sears accepts CNN invitation to Virginia governor's debate
Her Democratic opponent, former US Rep. Abigail Spanberger, has not yet responded to CNN's invitation.
The election is one of two governor's races across the nation in the year immediately after the presidential election and could serve as a bellwether ahead of next year's midterms. Earle-Sears is seen by many in her party as an underdog against Spanberger, who won the endorsement Wednesday of the Virginia Police Benevolent Association even as the law enforcement group backed Republicans for lieutenant governor and attorney general.
CNN's forum will take place live in late September or early October with questions posed directly by voters and moderated by network anchors.
'Winsome Earle-Sears is not afraid to answer tough questions and face Virginians head-on. This debate is an opportunity for voters to see the difference between a leader with a clear plan and a career politician who would rather talk around the issues,' Earle-Sears campaign spokeswoman Peyton Vogel said.
Spanberger's team declined to comment on the nationally televised CNN debate or her future plans, but pointed to a regional debate that the campaign accepted and Earle-Sears declined.
'Abigail formally accepted the statewide 'People's Debate' more than a month ago with AARP Virginia, Virginia State University, WTVR-Richmond, WJLA-Northern Virginia, and WTKR-Norfolk confirming her participation for September 16 at Virginia State University. Unfortunately, her opponent just declined to participate in this statewide debate,' said Samson Signori, Spanberger's campaign manager.
Earle-Sears' team cited a scheduling conflict with her official schedule on Sept. 16 but say they are eager to debate Spanberger and hopes she accepts CNN's invitation.
Since 2015, CNN has moderated or co-moderated more than 190 town halls, 13 presidential primary debates and two general election debates.
'CNN has extended an invitation to Lieutenant Governor Earle-Sears and Representative Spanberger to participate in a live CNN Gubernational Town Hall Debate this fall,' a CNN spokesperson said in a statement. 'Lieutenant Governor Earle-Sears has accepted our invitation, and we look forward to hearing from Representative Spanberger.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who's in the meeting with Trump and Putin at the Alaska summit
The Alaskan summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin has turned into an expanded bilateral meeting, a White House official confirmed. The ongoing summit between the world leaders -- who have been known to previously meet without any other government officials or aides in the room, only interpreters -- was initially expected to be a one-on-one meeting. MORE: Trump-Putin meeting live updates But earlier Friday, as Trump arrived, it was announced he would be joined by Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a White house official said. The U.S. side also included Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine. Putin was to be joined by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and his foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov, a Kremlin spokesperson told Russian state media. The leaders have convened face-to-face Friday in Anchorage for a high-stakes summit as the U.S. seeks a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war. For an expanded working lunch, the president was set to be joined by Rubio, Witkoff, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, according to a White House official. MORE: Ahead of summit with Trump, a look at Putin's notable meetings with 5 US presidents The summit marks Putin's first visit to the U.S. in 10 years. One key party who will not be in attendance Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson is Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump said Thursday he hopes the summit will lead to a second meeting that would include Zelenskyy.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Transgender runner Evie Parts sues NCAA and Swarthmore College for removal from track team
Long-distance runner Evie Parts sued the NCAA and Swarthmore College as well as members of its athletic department on the grounds they illegally removed her from the track team because she is a transgender athlete. Parts' lawsuit said the NCAA's ban on transgender athletes in women's sports did not have legal grounds because it's not a governmental organization and therefore does not have jurisdiction over Pennsylvania state law or the Title IX federal statute. She was removed from the team on Feb. 6, the day the NCAA issued its new policy on transgender athletes. Swarthmore men's and women's track coach Peter Carroll, athletic director Brad Koch and athletics officials Christina Epps-Chiazor and Valerie Gomez also were named in the lawsuit. According to the complaint, they sent Parts into 'such a depressive state that she engaged in self-harm and in one moment told a friend that she wanted to kill herself.' 'We stand by the allegations in the complaint,' said Susie Cirilli, an attorney who, with the law firm Spector, Gadon, Rosen and Vinci, represent Parts. 'As stated in the complaint, the NCAA is a private organization that issued a bigoted policy. Swarthmore College chose to follow that policy and disregard federal and state law.' Swarthmore did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The NCAA chose not to comment. The NCAA changed its participation policy for transgender athletes to limit competition in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth. That change came a day after President Donald Trump signed an executive order intended to ban transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. Pennsylvania's state Senate approved a bill by a 32-18 margin on May 6 to ban transgender athletes from competing in women's and girls' sports at the collegiate and K-12 levels. But the state's Democratic-controlled House of Representatives isn't expected to vote on the bill. Parts joined the Swarthmore track team in the fall 2020 before then taking off the following four winter and spring seasons. She went back to the Division III team in 2023 to compete in the indoor and outdoor track seasons and in cross country. When the NCAA issued its ban, the lawsuit states, Parts was told by Epps-Chiazor and Gomez that she could compete with the men's team or as an unattached athlete. She would only receive medical treatment, the complaint says, if she competed on the men's team. Also, according to the lawsuit, Carroll and his staff were not allowed to coach Parts, she could not travel with the team, was not allowed to receive per diem or food and had to pay her way into meets. Parts also couldn't wear a Swarthmore uniform. Swarthmore 'fully reinstated' Parts on April 11, the lawsuit says, and she competed on the women's team until graduating in May. Parts won the 10,000 meters in April at the Bill Butler Invitational. ___ AP sports:


TechCrunch
27 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Sen. Hawley to probe Meta after report finds its AI chatbots flirt with kids
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) said he intends to investigate whether Meta's generative AI products exploit, deceive, or harm children, after leaked internal documents showed the company's chatbots were allowed to have 'romantic' and 'sensual' chats with children. 'Is there anything – ANYTHING – Big Tech won't do for a quick buck?' Hawley wrote in a post on X announcing the investigation. Hawley chairs the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, which he says will commence a probe into whether Meta's tech harms children, and 'whether Meta misled the public or regulators about its safeguards.' Reuters broke the story after viewing the guidelines, titled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards.' The document noted, among other things, that chatbots were permitted to hold romantic conversations with an eight-year-old that said, 'Every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' A Meta spokesperson told TechCrunch that such examples are inconsistent with Meta's policies and have since been removed. 'It's unacceptable that these policies were advanced in the first place,' Hawley wrote in a letter addressed to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, saying that Meta acknowledged the veracity of the reports and 'made retractions only after this alarming content came to light.' 'We intend to learn who approved these policies, how long they were in effect, and what Meta has done to stop this conduct going forward,' Hawley wrote. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Hawley has asked Meta to produce the guidelines, including every draft, redline, and final version, as well as lists of every product that adheres to those standards, other safety and incident reports, and the identities of individuals responsible for changing policy. Meta has until Sept. 19 to provide the information, the letter says. Others have endorsed the investigation, including Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). 'When it comes to protecting precious children online, Meta has failed miserably by every possible measure,' Blackburn told TechCrunch. 'Even worse, the company has turned a blind eye to the devastating consequences of how its platforms are designed. This report reaffirms why we need to pass the Kids Online Safety Act.'