
America's public data needs rescuing from Trump
Now the Trump administration is disrupting our data infrastructure in unprecedented ways.
Data experts across the country are alarmed by these changes, but they're also seeing the opportunity for positive change. The months ahead will determine whether we end up with an unreliable, inaccurate and deeply flawed data ecosystem, or a new infrastructure that is better and stronger than what we had before.
The administration began making changes to America's data systems within a month of the inauguration. It began by deleting government websites and datasets, which an ad hoc army of 'data rescuers' scrambled to save.
In the last five months, the changes to data infrastructure have gone deeper.
The administration has cut staffing and funding for data-providing agencies, altered or dropped specific surveys and data collections, disbanded advisory committees for the Census Bureau and other agencies that collect data, laid the groundwork for major changes to long-established data programs and removed data relating to sexual orientation and gender identity.
On July 3, The Lancet published research finding that 114 of 232 federal public health datasets studied, or 49 percent, 'were substantially altered,' primarily in how they referred to gender and sex.
My nonprofit organization has just published a white paper on the current challenges and opportunities for America's data infrastructure. Drawing on more than 200 sources and numerous discussions with data experts, we found a growing movement to reinvent America's data infrastructure, not just preserve it.
Advocates are simultaneously trying to rescue datasets and data programs while also envisioning something greater: a national data ecosystem that is more accessible, accurate, complete and secure.
Here are some of the best emerging opportunities to shape America's data future.
Working with Congress. The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (the Evidence Act), which President Trump signed into law in 2019, embodied a strong bipartisan commitment to public data for public use. In May, Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.) introduced a bipartisan resolution to convene a new Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking like the one that shaped the Evidence Act. There is an opportunity to build on the Evidence Act by strengthening the processes required to alter major data collections, writing more precise specifications for the most high-value data programs, creating clear guidelines for making government data AI-ready and more.
Reinventing federal data governance. The president's budget for 2026 recommends consolidating three statistical agencies: Census, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Many statisticians support this proposal and see it as an opportunity to make further, long-needed changes. The American Statistical Association has launched a project on Modernizing the Federal Statistical System with recommendations to come by the end of the year. Other expert groups could explore additional opportunities for structural reform.
Working with the states. States already collect data for national statistics on health, education and more, but variations in methods and data quality can make that data hard to use. Ongoing efforts to standardize state data could make it more reliable and leave the country less dependent on federal data collections.
Forming new collaborations. People and organizations that care about America's data are working together in new ways. For example, the Population Reference Bureau has launched a Federal Data Forum to promote information sharing and collaboration. Several foundation collaboratives are supporting projects to improve national data sources, both across the board and in sectors including science and health. We have launched a U.S. Data Action Hub, with about 70 resources so far, to track the growing number of organizations and initiatives working to protect America's data.
Reinventing data advocacy. Advocates are realizing that they have to make a stronger case for public support to preserve, fund and improve vital data sources. America's Essential Data is compiling examples of data used by police officers, students, ranchers and business owners, among others. The Census Project has stepped up its advocacy for the American Community Survey, an indispensable resource for businesses and entrepreneurs as well as state, local and tribal governments. Other groups are advocating for funding to support labor statistics and health statistics. Efforts like these are creating new coalitions that can protect our current data infrastructure, push for future improvements and provide evidence for lawsuits to protect essential data, like the recently successful lawsuits brought by physicians and organic farmers.
Developing new data sources. Data scientists are exploring alternatives to the federal data that's now at risk. They're looking for new ways to analyze national and state administrative data, which tracks government transactions and records, to gain new insights into the population. Crowdsourcing and citizen science projects can engage the public in creating new data sources. And AI has opened new opportunities to create structured, usable data based on internet searches, mobile applications and social media.
America's data systems are facing a crisis, but like any crisis, this one can open up new possibilities. Federal data serves a huge constituency that ultimately includes every American.
By thinking creatively and working together, we can preserve the country's most important data resources, improve what needs to be made better and ultimately create the robust, reliable data ecosystem America deserves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Justice Department files complaint against judge who blocked deportations
In a social media post, the attorney general accused District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg of making "improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration." The U.S. Department of Justice has intensified its scrutiny of the judiciary by filing a formal misconduct complaint against one of President Donald Trump's least-favorite federal judges. Attorney General Pam Bondi said on July 28 that she directed her agency to file the grievance because James Boasberg, the 62-year-old chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, made "improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration" in March. "These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that," Bondi wrote on X. Boasberg is the judge who initially blocked the deportation flights of hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members the Trump administration carried out under the Alien Enemies Act. When the administration ignored his order to bring the flights back, Boasberg began contempt proceedings, which were later halted by an appeals court. The Supreme Court eventually vacated the temporary ban on the deportations. Read more: Trump shipped them to El Salvador. Their families say their only crime was a tattoo. President Donald Trump said on social media in March that Boasberg was a "Radical Left Lunatic" and called for his impeachment. John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, intervened, issuing a rare public statement that said in part: "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision." Read more: Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes Trump after president calls for judge's impeachment In Bondi's complaint, Chad Mizelle, her chief of staff, accused Boasberg of attempting to improperly influence Roberts and other judges during a conference on March 11. Mizelle said that Boasberg expressed concerns about the Trump administration disregarding federal court rulings, and those alleged remarks violated rules that judges have to follow about not discussing pending cases in public. Then-President George W. Bush first nominated Boasberg in 2002 to serve on the primary trial court for Washington, D.C. Boasberg advanced to the federal bench in 2011 thanks to a lifetime appointment from then-President Barack Obama. An assistant to Boasberg declined to comment. Contributing: Reuters


The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Press freedom group files ethics complaint against FCC chair
The Freedom of the Press Foundation has filed an ethics complaint against Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, arguing the close of ally of President Trump has 'engaged in egregious misconduct,' and calling for him to be disbarred. In the organization's complaint, filed with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals' Office of Disciplinary Counsel on Monday, cites Carr's public statements and actions in the weeks leading up to the agency's recent approval of the Paramount, Skydance merger. 'Everyone from U.S. senators to CBS employees to a dissenting FCC commissioner has said the settlement appears to have been a bribe to grease the wheels for Carr's FCC to approve the merger,' the complaint reads. 'Even putting Paramount aside, Carr has pursued numerous other frivolous and unconstitutional legal proceedings and threatened more of them in furtherance in his efforts to intimidate broadcast licensees to censor themselves and fall in line with Trump's agenda.' The organization's complaint was first reported in journalist Oliver Darcy's media newsletter Status. Carr had in the weeks leading up to the merger publicly blasted CBS News over its coverage of the Trump administration and indicated he believed the '60 Minutes' interview that sparked a lawsuit against the network from President Trump could hold up FCC approval of the $8 billion deal. Paramount, CBS's parent company, earlier this month agreed to pay Trump's foundation $16 million and its new parent company made several concessions as part of its merger agreement with Skydance. Carr praised those promises, including the appointing of an ombudsman to monitor CBS coverage for objectivity, in announcing the agency had approved the deal last week, saying 'Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly. It is time for a change.' 'Carr's actions brazenly violate legal and ethical standards that govern the practice of law and public officials, undermining the First Amendment, the FCC's credibility and the laws he is trusted to administer,' the complaint said. 'His abuse of his office to force an unwarranted settlement of a private lawsuit, is shameful and warrants disbarment.'


The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Wiley Nickel suspends NC Senate bid, endorses Cooper
Former Rep. Wiley Nickel (D-N.C.) is ending his campaign for North Carolina's Senate seat and endorsing Roy Cooper, a day after the former governor launched his much-anticipated bid. Nickel said in a statement on X on Tuesday that working alongside Cooper while he served in the state Senate and in Congress was an 'honor,' and Cooper's 'steady, bipartisan leadership' has made a difference. 'And for many of us, including me, he's been an inspiration to step up and serve,' Nickel said. 'I proudly endorse Roy Cooper for US Senate and look forward to doing everything I can to help him flip this Senate seat from red to blue.' Nickel's decision was expected after Democrats notched a major recruitment win in getting their ideal candidate to run for the seat held by retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Cooper brings a long background in North Carolina politics and a track record as a popular former two-term governor. Nickel entered the race months earlier, before Tillis announced he wouldn't seek another term in office, but Democrats' eyes had been on Cooper, seeing him as their best chance of flipping the seat. Cooper said in his announcement video that he 'never really' wanted to go to Washington, D.C., and only wanted to serve the people of North Carolina in his own state, but the times required him to run. Nickel served one term in the House before he decided against running for reelection after redistricting made his district much more conservative leaning. He said in his statement that he still has 'a lot of work left to do.' 'Public service is part of who I am and you'll hear more from me soon,' he said. Semafor reported that Nickel is considering a bid for district attorney in Wake County. The Republican primary to try to succeed Tillis is still forming, but Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley is expected to enter the race soon with backing from President Trump. This would come after Trump's daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, decided against running for the seat despite speculation that she would. With Trump's support and Whatley being one of the top GOP officials in the country, he would be a clear favorite for the Republican nomination. The race for the seat is also expected to be tight in the battleground state. Democrats haven't won a Senate seat in North Carolina since 2008, but they've had more success on the state level and are hoping Cooper is the right candidate to finally get over the hurdle.