
Thailand: New Insurgent Attacks on Civilians Despite Pledge
Barisan Revolusi Nasional (National Revolutionary Front or BRN) insurgents have frequently targeted civilians, both Thai Buddhists and Malay Muslims, since the outbreak of armed insurgency in January 2004.
On May 5, 2025, the BRN issued a statement expressing regret for recent attacks. While reaffirming the right to self-determination for Malay Muslims, the armed separatist group said that it "has no policy of targeting civilians" and "remains committed to international human rights and humanitarian law." Human Rights Watch has repeatedly condemned BRN laws-of-war violations.
"The BRN took an unprecedented step by publicly pledging not to target civilians, after terrorizing people in Thailand's deep south for more than two decades," said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "But a pledge is not enough. The BRN needs to stop committing war crimes ."
There were 57 insurgent attacks in April, resulting in 18 deaths and 50 injuries from the Buddhist Thai and Malay Muslim populations in Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat, and Songkhla provinces.
On April 22, BRN insurgents shot dead Pongkorn Chumapan, 16, and wounded Pokanit Morasin, 12, in an attack on a pickup truck taking Buddhist monks and novices from Wat Kura temple to collect alms in Songkhla province's Sabayoi district.
Pol. Lt. Wattanarom Chumapan, Pongkorn's father, told Human Rights Watch that his "son and his cousins were ordained as novices during their school break to study Buddhism and accumulate good karma. But they were targeted in this brutal attack."
"I picked up my son, together with other novices and monks, from the temple to collect alms that morning," he said. "My pickup truck had just left the temple's gate when I heard gunshots coming from the roadside jungle. They sounded like M-16 assault rifles. I'm a police officer. I could tell."
He said the bullets hit his son and another novice: "I grabbed my pistol and fired back at the two assailants until they retreated. I could see them escaping on a motorcycle, dressed as Muslim women and covering their faces."
The BRN considers Buddhism emblematic of the Thai state's occupation of Malay Muslim territory. At least 23 Buddhist monks and novices have been killed and more than 30 injured during the conflict, most while collecting alms.
Victims of the BRN's violence in May included teachers, police officers, older people, and children.
On the morning of May 28, Pol. Sgt. Abdulloh Makaseng, 30, was shot dead when insurgents attacked the Chanae district police station in Narathiwat province. Later that day, insurgents opened fire into a community sport event in Narathiwat province's Tak Bai district, seriously wounding Muhammad Sukri Ha, 37, and Sainuddin Jehbueraheng, 34, both teachers. On May 2, in Chanae district, insurgents fatally shot Sa-Nga Saeng-Yoi, 76, a blind Buddhist Thai, and critically wounded her son while they were returning home from the hospital on a motorcycle. On the same day, in Tak Bai district, six insurgents opened fire with assault rifles into a Buddhist Thai neighborhood. They killed Sasita Jankong, 9, a Buddhist Thai, and two older relatives.
Civilians have also been victims of BRN insurgents' indiscriminate shootings and bombings.
The laws of war , applicable to the armed conflict in Thailand's southern border provinces, prohibit attacks on civilians and civilian objects, including reprisals, or attacks that fail to discriminate between combatants and civilians. Anyone who commits serious violations of the laws of war with criminal intent is responsible for war crimes .
Abuses by both BRN insurgents and Thai authorities have long fed a cycle of violence and impunity, Human Rights Watch said.
Phra Kru Kositasudabhorn, a prominent Buddhist monk and peace advocate from Pattani province, told Human Rights Watch that the April 22 attack on novices in Sabayoi district appeared to be in retaliation for the killing of an Islamic religious teacher, allegedly by Thai security forces, in Narathiwat province on April 18. "As long as that killing remains unresolved, Buddhist Thais will still be at risk," he said. "Buddhist novices and monks are especially vulnerable. Government officials should understand that insurgents use [state-sponsored] abuses and heavy-handed tactics to recruit new members and justify their violence."
Claims by insurgents that attacks on civilians are lawful because the victims are part of the Thai state or that Islamic law, as they interpret it, has no justification under international law. The office of Sheikhul Islam, Thailand's central Islamic council, issued a statement on May 6, 2025, condemning the attacks on civilians "in the strongest terms" and stating that there is no justification for such heinous crimes, which are also serious religious offenses.
Thai authorities have imposed special security legislation in the southern border provinces. Under the Executive Decree on Government Administration in Emergency Situations and under martial law, Thai security forces can arrest and hold suspected BRN members for up to 37 days without effective judicial oversight, which has led to deaths in military custody.
On May 22, representatives of the Internal Security Operations Command, Region Four, which is responsible for counterinsurgency operations in the southern border provinces, told a Thai parliamentary committee that such arrests and detentions served as deterrence even when authorities did not have sufficient evidence to press charges.
Jaringan Mangsa Dari Undang-Undang Darurat, a human rights group, reported at least 41 arbitrary arrest cases of Malay Muslims from January through April.
The mother of Nasri Tugae, 22, told Human Rights Watch that her son was arrested under martial law on April 23: "Soldiers raided my house, accusing Nasri of being involved in the killing of a Buddhist novice [on April 22]. We tried to explain that my son was away on that day to apply for his passport in Yala province. But they did not listen."
She said he was taken to Ingkayuth Camp in Pattani province for interrogation: "My son was scared when I told him that there were allegations about him all over social media, saying he was a murderer. My son was held for 26 days. Now he was released without charge. My son was treated unfairly. Where is justice? Something like this will only make Muslims trust officials less."
There is an entrenched culture of impunity for state-sponsored abuses in the southern border provinces, Human Rights Watch said. There has been no successful prosecution of those responsible for extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and torture of suspected BRN members. The 20-year statute of limitations of the Tak Bai crackdown, which left 85 dead and several hundred injured, ended in October 2024, preventing further legal action.
"Insurgent atrocities and retaliatory government abuses have sowed distrust between the Thai Buddhist and Malay Muslim communities," Pearson said. "Both sides should end abuses, hold abusers accountable, and commit to respecting human rights as they negotiate an end to the conflict."
Source: Human Rights Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Excessive force against LA protesters detailed in rights report
LOS ANGELES: A Human Rights Watch report has accused law enforcement of using excessive force and deliberate brutality against protesters and journalists during demonstrations in June. The protests were sparked by anger over immigration raids targeting undocumented migrants in Southern California. Scores of people were injured as officers deployed hard foam rounds, flash-bang grenades, pepper balls, and tear gas at close range. 'Law enforcement brutal, excessive, and unnecessary force against people standing up for human rights and those reporting on the protests,' said Ida Sawyer of Human Rights Watch. The largely peaceful demonstrations erupted on June 6 following increased Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity. While mostly non-violent, the protests occasionally turned chaotic, prompting Trump to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Human Rights Watch documented 65 cases of injuries but warned the actual number could be much higher. One officer reportedly shot three people at close range with kinetic impact projectiles, causing severe pain. 'Before shooting one of them in the groin, the officer said: 'I'm going to pop you, as you are taking up my focus,'' the report stated. Injuries included broken bones, concussions, an amputated finger, and severe eye damage. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department denied indiscriminate use of less-lethal tools. 'Such tools are used only when all de-escalation efforts have been exhausted,' the department said. Officers are required to report force incidents and undergo a review to ensure compliance with policy. An AFP photographer was among journalists injured, struck by a rubber bullet while covering protests. The US Constitution protects free speech and peaceful assembly while restricting excessive force. California also has laws limiting less-lethal weapons during protests and safeguarding press rights. - AFP


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Vietnam president hosts welcome ceremony for King and Queen of Bhutan
State President Luong Cuong and spouse greeting King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck of Bhutan and the Queen at the official welcome ceremony in Hanoi on Aug 19. — VNA/VNS HANOI: State President Luong Cuong and his spouse Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet hosted a red-carpet welcome ceremony in Hanoi on Tuesday for King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck and Queen Jetsun Pema Wangchuck of Bhutan, who are on a state visit to Vietnam from Aug 18 to 22. The ceremonial welcome included a military honour guard inspection, the playing of both countries' national anthems, and the presentation of flower bouquets by local children. Following the ceremony, President Luong Cuong and King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck held talks, discussing orientations for future cooperation. This is the first state visit to Vietnam by the King and Queen of Bhutan since the two countries established diplomatic relations in 2012, marking an important milestone in bilateral relations. It demonstrates the importance Bhutan attaches to the friendship and cooperation with Vietnam, as well as to the latter's role and stature in the region. The visit also exemplifies Vietnam's foreign policy of independence, self-reliance, and multilateralisation and diversification of external relations for peace, cooperation, and development. Both sides have enjoyed a strong friendship since the establishment of diplomatic ties. Viietnam has consistently valued its relations with Bhutan, regarding the latter as a pioneer in pursuing green growth and maintaining high 'happiness' indicators. Meanwhile, Bhutan considers Vietnam a priority partner for strengthening relations with and is keen to learn from Vietnam's development experience. High-ranking leaders from both countries have regularly exchanged congratulatory messages on important national anniversaries and maintain mutual visits at all levels. The countries' appointment of ambassadors shortly after establishing diplomatic ties gave strong momentum to bilateral cooperation. Tourism is seen as a highlight of bilateral relations, with an increasing number of Vietnamese travellers drawn to Bhutan, known for its pristine landscapes, Buddhist heritage, and Gross National Happiness, and Bhutanese visitors showing growing interest in Vietnam's people, heritage, and scenic attractions. While investment and trade cooperation remains modest, more and more Vietnamese businesses are coming to operate in Bhutan. Vietnam currently maintains one registered investment project in the field of interior design and construction in Bhutan. Both countries recognise significant untapped potential for enhanced cooperation in agriculture, tourism, culture, education, science and technology, digital transformation, and green development. At multilateral forums, they have maintained close coordination and mutual support, particularly within the UN, Asean Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA), Asian Parliamentary Assembly (APA), as well as in regional and international issues of mutual concerns. — Vietnam News/ANN


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Twenty years on, Aceh and Jakarta continue managing peace
JAKARTA: 'If you run, you are shot. If you don't, you are beaten,' a 20-year-old Acehnese man said about life in the region, as reported by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in 2003, two years after president Megawati Sukarnoputri declared martial law to maintain order in the province following years of failed peace negotiations. For over five decades, states of emergency that involved domestic military deployment were unfortunately the norm rather than the exception for the people of Aceh. Of the eight Indonesian presidents since 1945, three declared a state of emergency in the country's westernmost province, including two in response to the armed struggle for independence with the formation of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) in 1976. The first emergency in Aceh, which lasted nine years, was declared by first president Sukarno in 1953 as part of his efforts to suppress the Darul Islam rebellion, an insurgency group that aimed to establish an Islamic state in the region. International reports during this time told of rampant abuses by the military in counterinsurgency operations, which disrupted daily life and raising tensions among the Acehnese population. A second emergency was declared in the 1970s, when the central government moved to suppress local grievances following the discovery of vast oil and gas reserves in the province's north. Massive extractive operations funneled wealth to Jakarta while the average Acehnese lived in relative poverty, further fuelling local resentment against the government and leading to GAM's founding by Hasan di Tiro. During its peak in the late 1990s, GAM had some 15,000 active fighters in its rank and file, although other estimates put the figure at around 35,000, including civilian volunteers. GAM continued to expand its separatist campaign and in 2001, president Megawati Soekarnoputri declared the third state of emergency. Under Megawati's order, Jakarta deployed large-scale military operations that frequently involved indiscriminate violence, according to HRW, including extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, beatings, arbitrary arrests and detentions, as well as significant limitations on the movement of Acehnese people. Despite the government's best attempts to censor any information coming out of Aceh during this time, testimonies from witnesses who had fled abroad painted a picture of widespread human rights abuses. I t was only after the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami that the two sides began to look for a long-term solution to the Aceh conflict. The natural disaster, which claimed 250,000 lives across 14 nations, laid bare the province's fragility and made it unmistakably clear that peace was no longer simply desirable, but essential for the survival of Aceh and its people. 'The tsunami was definitely one of the big factors that contributed to GAM's eventual decision to trust the peacemaking process with the Indonesian government,' Munawar Liza Zainal, a former member who represented GAM at the Helsinki peace talks, told The Jakarta Post on Aug 2. 'We could not trust [the Indonesian side] to sit down with [them] at the time,' he added. Over the next seven months, negotiators, mediators and local leaders worked tirelessly to translate a fragile ceasefire into a durable settlement, the stakes crystal clear for everyone at the table: Peace could not be measured in signed documents or military withdrawals, but in whether ordinary Acehnese people could lead normal lives. On Aug 15, 2005, when an agreement granting Aceh self-governance was finally signed 8,400km away in Helsinki, its impact was no less than extraordinary for the millions of citizens still recovering from decades of violence and disasters. 'The day that agreement was signed, peace descended on Aceh. It's astounding, really, how quickly the hostilities stopped,' Munawar recalled, adding: 'peace was people in Aceh having the privilege of sitting still in a hut by a farm, and of entering their places of worship safely'. Far from the European venue where negotiators brokered the deal, the people of Aceh started to measure peace in quieter, everyday moments: sipping coffee at a local stall without fear, traveling freely or having an innocent gathering with their neighbors. 'The anecdotes of how peace has triumphed in Aceh are simple,' Hamid Awaludin, who led the government's negotiation team, told the Post. 'Before the accord, coffee shops in Aceh would open only at 10am and close at 4pm, because everyone was scared. Now people can get coffee from 6am all the way to 1am. This is how we know the peace process has succeeded,' he said. The fact that children in Aceh could go back to school again was also worth celebrating, Hamid said, noting that more than 1,000 schools were burned during the conflict. 'Peace is no woman losing her husband to war. Peace is having people once labelled as traitors by the state working as governors,' he added. The memory of that bloody and tragic history was still fresh when earlier this year, a new scuffle broke out between the Aceh provincial administration and the government over a development that many feared could lead to a return to conflict in the region. In April, the Home Ministry issued a regulation transferring the four islands of Mangkir Gadang, Mangkir Ketek, Lipan and Panjang from Aceh's Singkil regency to North Sumatra's Central Tapanuli regency and triggered pushback from Aceh officials, who cited legal and historical evidence of their jurisdictional precedence over those areas. As protests began erupting across Aceh in June, Jusuf Kalla, the former vice president who handled the process that led to the 2004 Helsinki peace talks, called for all parties to refer to the agreement signed the following year. 'There's an article in the Helsinki agreement, No. 114, which says that any issues relating to Aceh's borders should refer to the boundaries set on July 1, 1956,' Kalla told reporters in July. On June 17, President Prabowo Subianto took a decisive move in siding with the Aceh administration, and the four disputed islands were returned to the province based on 'findings discovered in old documents', according to House of Representatives Deputy Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad. Following his decision, Prabowo underlined the need for harmony to maintain the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). 'I believe in the principle that we are all one. The concept of NKRI will always remain as our core foundation, and if there is a need for us to reaffirm our mutual understanding, alhamdulillah [praise be to God], I think the resolution has been very swift and good,' he said in a statement. - The Jakarta Post/ANN