Samsung Galaxy S26's replacement seemingly confirmed
Today, the Galaxy S26 Pro replacing the S26 theory has picked up even more steam, as a device with the name Galaxy S26 Pro has been caught in the GSM Association's IMEI database. It has the model number SM-S942U1, and SM-S942 has so far been associated with the Galaxy S26.
Only now it seems that will be no more, as Samsung has in the meantime changed its mind about the name (there's also an IMEI entry under the Galaxy S26 name for a similar model number, but that's older).
What remains the biggest mystery is whether this Galaxy S26 Pro will be just an S26 under a different name, or if it will get some spec upgrades to warrant that Pro name. There have also been mumblings about a price hike compared to the Galaxy S25, which wouldn't surprise us. We'll let you know when we find out more. Samsung Galaxy S25
Via
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
29 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
I broke a Pixel Watch 2, but the Galaxy Watch 8 might have survived me
I must admit I wasn't a particularly big fan of the Galaxy Watch 8 redesign. At first, I was quick to declare it nothing but proverbial sand in the eyes of Samsung's devoted smartwatch fans, who expected a different set of upgrades (like better battery life). Instead, we got this redesigned squircle-shaped smartwatch that seemed a little too odd and unsmartwatch-like , but definitely reminded us of its close kinship with last year's Galaxy Watch Ultra. On top of it all, the older Galaxy Watch 7 left the impression of being more compact than the newly redesigned Galaxy Watch 8 despite real-life specs telling us otherwise. I can't say the new uniform design language has grown on me; it hasn't. It will probably take a couple of generations before I would be able to feel at home with this latest redesign. Samsung's new smartwatch might eventually grow on me, but it will take some time (Image by PhoneArena) But one aspect of the new Galaxy Watch 8 exterior might turn out to be an unexpectedly great boon for clumsy people like yours truly. When it comes to resilience and sturdiness, Samsung is killing it with the new Galaxy Watch 8 , which comes with both IP68 and MIL-STD 810H certifications, but it's the design itself that hints at superior endurance. But first, let me tell you a story of a domestic disaster that was totally preventable. Okay, normally you can't waterboard such information out of me, but I have to finally admit it was I who cracked the screen of our resident Pixel Watch 2. I should probably be pleading the Fifth, but in my defense, I was dealing with an emergency at the house and had to reach into a particularly tight alcove to turn off the water mains before Poseidon himself emerged from underneath the floorboards. The Pixel Watch sadly had to take one for the team when it met a rough concrete wall face first. Honestly, I'd offload the blame onto Google here: who in their right mind designs a wearable with a curved screen that welcomes danger glass-first? That's a nonfunctional design choice that Google deliberately made, and yet it's just one of the minor issues with the Pixel Watch 2 . The worst part here is that Google's Pixel Watches aren't very repairable, so once you crack the screen or damage the wearable in any other serious way, the only way to fix things is to, well, get a replacement. But I digress. Now, I imagine that if I had the Galaxy Watch 8 on my hand, the potential damage wouldn't have cracked the screen, because the exaggerated case of the smartwatch would have protected the display up top. Sure, that's my anecdotal thinking here, totally in the spirit of the "would've, could've, should've" mantra, but the more practical design of the Galaxy Watch 8 might actually spare klutzes like me from such totally avoidable accidents. The Galaxy Watch 8 definitely looks more dependable in terms of durability (Image by PhoneArena) I'm not a person who chooses wearables for their looks, which might be contrary to what most other people do. Appearances don't really matter to my inner grandpa; give me a functional smartwatch with a sturdy design and great battery life, and I'll be more loyal than a labrador with separation anxiety. An even better choice for those like me would be a newer version of Samsung's one-off Galaxy Watch 5 Pro from a couple of years back, which was one of the first decent rugged Wear OS smartwatches. I really do hope that Samsung hasn't forgotten this smartwatch offshoot after following Apple down the "Ultra" rabbit hole. Well, honestly, I probably wouldn't. It's a nice smartwatch with many features that pairs excellently with Galaxy phones, but I still can't imagine buying a smartwatch that only lasts a full day and requires constant charging. I simply can't force myself to be a slave to such watches, which is why I can't recommend the regular Apple Watches either. Either give me a week-long battery life (which is something the OnePlus Watch 3 does beautifully), or I'll continue checking the time on my microwave. When you switch to Total Wireless, keep your number & grab 3 mo. of 5G We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
One UI 8 beta coming to Galaxy S24 series, Galaxy Z Fold6 and Z Flip6 next week
Peter, 05 August 2025 Samsung started the public One UI 8 beta program on the Galaxy S25 series back in May – stable One UI 8 made its debut with the 2025 foldables. Next week, the company will expand the program to last year's flagships. Starting next week, owners of the following models in the US, the UK, India and South Korea will be able to sign up for One UI 8 beta through the Samsung Members app: Samsung Galaxy S24, S24+, S24 Ultra, S24 FE, Galaxy Z Fold6 and Z Flip6. Samsung Galaxy S24 • Samsung Galaxy S24+ • Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S24 FE • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Again, this is for the beta – the stable release is coming at a later date and will incorporate feedback from the beta program. This release is scheduled to roll out in September for the Galaxy S25 series and expand to other product lines in sequence. People with older phones will have to wait longer. For example, the following models will be able to join the One UI 8 beta starting in September: Note that we are assuming that the Galaxy S FE models are included in their respective S-series, since Samsung is already testing One UI 8 on the S24 FE. Also, we're not sure why the Galaxy A36 is on the list but the A56 is not – this is from the global press release, so it's not a regional thing. Looking at the Watch branch of the One UI 8 tree, the Galaxy Watch Ultra already received the stable update. The Galaxy Watch7 is still on the beta for some reason, though. Samsung is also testing older models and says that One UI 8 Watch will 'expand to more Galaxy Watch models beyond the Galaxy Watch8 series later this year'. Source Samsung Galaxy S24 128GB 8GB RAM € 440.28 € 440.28 256GB 8GB RAM € 535.00 Samsung Galaxy S24+ 256GB 12GB RAM € 651.99 € 651.99 512GB 12GB RAM € 710.00 Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 256GB 12GB RAM € 798.34 € 798.34 512GB 12GB RAM € 805.87
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Here's why the Galaxy S26 Ultra's camera upgrade matters, but won't grant it the king's crown
When it comes to camera phones, nobody should disregard Samsung's upcoming Galaxy S26 Ultra… and Galaxy Ultra phones as a whole. They've proven to be tough, potent and capable. Yet, many choose to go with a phone made by another it because Samsung's Ultra flagships are too expensive for some?Yeah, money could definitely be a decisive factor. For example, the Galaxy S25 Ultra (12 GB of RAM, 256 GB storage – the baseline model) was launched at $1,300 some months ago. Not counting various trade-in offers or carrier-locked offers, I must say: $1,300 is a lot. A year ago I was able to get a Galaxy S24 Ultra rival from China (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 on board, same RAM and storage, plus four 50 MP cameras and a 1-inch sensor on its back) for about $750.I don't know about you, but a $550 difference is a lot in my book. Especially if I'm not getting a $550 difference in real-life usage. So, if I was on the lookout for a great camera phone right now, I'd definitely look into the possibility of getting the S25 Ultra… but I'd definitely the end of the day, it's not just money. People also pay attention to hardware numbers and specs. As popular and as good the Galaxy series may be, the truth is that Samsung doesn't offer the most impressive, cutting-edge hardware when it comes to photography and why I almost popped a champagne bottle yesterday, when I stumbled upon the following PhoneArena article title:I was so-o-o sure it's a new main camera sensor that was promised. Good that I didn't open that champagne bottle, though: it turns out that this huge upgrade is a new, brighter don't get me wrong – I'm all for brighter lenses (that's what a lens with a large aperture is called: "bright"). As a rule of thumb, the larger the aperture – the better. Bright lenses are always more refined, more expensive, more I can't wash away that foul taste in my mouth either: when will Samsung step in the 1-inch sensor territory? The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena When you hear about upgrades to a phone's camera, most people immediately think of more megapixels or bigger sensors. But in reality, smartphone photography is shaped by a combination of many things. Camera sensors in smartphones have evolved rapidly. While many flagship phones – especially from Chinese brands like Xiaomi and Oppo – have already adopted 1-inch-type sensors, Samsung has stuck with smaller sensors on its Ultra line. The S24 Ultra uses the 1/1.3" ISOCELL HP2 sensor, which is expected to be used on the S25 Ultra. While a 1/1.3" sensor is definitely large (in comparison to what mid-rangers pack), it's still smaller than a 1-inch sensors have clear benefits: better low-light performance, improved dynamic range, and more natural depth of field. Features like pixel binning, which merges multiple pixels into one for brighter, cleaner photos, help smaller sensors stay competitive. Autofocus systems have also improved, with technologies like Dual Pixel and laser focus enhancing accuracy. And of course, periscope lenses have become common for achieving long-range zoom without compromising phone many feel Samsung has fallen behind by not moving to a larger sensor. In 2025, a 1-inch sensor isn't groundbreaking – it's what I expect from Samsung in the future. That particular future is not happening in 2026, per current rumors. And while sensor size isn't everything, it's a key part of the equation, especially for a device marketed as the best camera phone money can buy. The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena That brings us to lenses and apertures. The aperture – measured by an f-number like f/1.4 or f/2.2 – tells you how wide the lens can open to let in light. The lower the number, the wider the opening, and the more light that hits the sensor. A brighter (lower f-number) lens can dramatically improve photo quality, especially in low-light situations. It allows for faster shutter speeds and lower ISO settings, both of which help reduce blur and noise. Again, reports suggest the Galaxy S26 Ultra will get a brighter main lens, likely improving indoor and night photography compared to the f/1.7 lens on the S25 Ultra. The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena The expected change on the S26 Ultra is a meaningful one – but only up to a point. A great lens matters most once you've crossed a certain threshold in sensor quality. If your sensor is still relatively small, the benefits of a brighter lens are limited. For example, the same APS-C sensor paired with an f/1.4 lens will outperform that same sensor with an f/2.2 lens, especially in low light. But if you shrink the sensor too far, even the best lens can't fully can a lens actually be too bright? In some cases, yes. While a wide aperture lets in more light, it can also reduce depth of field too much, especially on larger sensors – leading to parts of the subject being out of focus. It can also cause issues with lens aberrations or softness at the edges of the frame. In the end, Samsung's decision to upgrade the lens rather than the sensor isn't pointless – but it feels overdue. For a phone line that markets itself as a camera king, the hardware needs to reflect that ambition. A better lens is a good step. A bigger sensor would be a serious leap!
