logo
A breakdown of safety procedures ‘directly contributed' to an 82nd Airborne paratrooper's death

A breakdown of safety procedures ‘directly contributed' to an 82nd Airborne paratrooper's death

Yahoo01-07-2025
On Sept. 12, 2024, Army Spc. Matthew Perez made his way to the ramp of a C-17 and prepared to take part in a parachute jump at the Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Johnson, Louisiana. Perez, who was assigned to the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, had told his parents that he was nervous because he was going to be jumping with over 150 pounds of gear, more than he had ever jumped with.
As Perez, 20, pushed unsteadily out of the door of the aircraft, catastrophe struck. An incorrectly tied knot caused his main parachute not to open, according to a subsequent investigation.
Once he jumped from the plane — and investigators believe he may have tripped or fallen as he did so — Perez had just 7.6 seconds to realize the failure and pull his reserve parachute.
The Army's review of the jump found that Perez opened his reserve parachute roughly 100 feet from the ground but still hit at a high rate of speed, suffering major injuries. Perez was medically evacuated to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead shortly after midnight on Sept. 13.
Perez's wife Jessica, whom he had married that May, was pregnant at the time of his death. He had also adopted his wife's daughter.
'He was born at 27 weeks,' Perez's father Jose told Task & Purpose in 2024. 'He was a preemie. It was told to my wife that he was going to have a hard life, and he dealt with hard life, and […] he was strong. Like I said, he was built differently.'
The Army's investigation into Perez's death, which was obtained by Task & Purpose, uncovered a serious breakdown in safety procedures and inspections among 82nd Airborne jumpmasters and safety officials leading up to the incident. Investigators also found that the jumpmaster who most likely inspected Perez before the jump was not able to correctly describe to the investigating officer the proper way to check a critical knot in Perez's equipment that failed and led to his death, and the jumpmaster likely lied about where he was during the events leading up to the jump.
The investigating officer described the T-11 main parachute and its reserve chute as 'inherently flawed' because extension lines must be attached to the main parachute for jumps from C-17 aircraft, increasing the risk of someone making a catastrophic mistake during the process. And the reserve parachute does not open automatically if a paratrooper cannot pull the ripcord in time, according to the Army.
'Their operation requires paratroopers to strictly adhere to the policies and procedures for airborne operations,' the investigation says. 'In this airborne operation, those policies and procedures were not followed. Consequently, SPC Perez's death was likely preventable.'
The investigation found a failure between two vital pieces of Perez's equipment — a long yellow cord known as a 'static line' and a five-foot extension added to the line. Perez's static line, which automatically opens a paratrooper's parachute, required an extension for the jump. But somewhere in the pre-jump process, the two lines on Perez's parachute were 'most likely' improperly connected, and that flaw was not spotted. Once the connection between them failed, there was no hope that his main parachute could deploy.
Perez's family remains unsatisfied by the Army's explanation for their son's death. In the wake of the fatal jump, a company commander was fired and a handful of riggers and jumpmasters on duty during the training exercise were punished.
Jose Perez said he does not believe the Army has gone far enough.
'As a parent, it's never going to be enough,' Jose Perez told Task & Purpose. 'He don't get to hold his baby. He don't get to see us, talk to us. All of that is taken away.'
Investigators traced the direct cause of Perez's death to an improperly tied knot that should have connected a 5-foot extension to his static line, which are required for all jumps from C-17s.
When five-foot Universal Static Line Extensions are used, Army parachute rigging regulations mandate they be secured to the main static line using a girth hitch, a simple, time-tested loop-and-pull knot with countless uses in the military and beyond.
But at some point prior to Perez's jump, the extension was added to his parachute with an improperly tied knot, according to the investigation. Investigators said they could not determine exactly who was responsible for the fatal error or when it occurred and that no record was made of the addition in the parachute's Form 3912, a small logbook that stays with each parachute through its service life.
'The improper packing, rigging, modification, inspecting, or some combination thereof, of SPC Perez's T-11 M [parachute] directly contributed to his death,' the investigation found.
The investigating officer said he could not definitively determine when Perez's static line was adjusted, whether early in the evening or at the airfield just before the flight, said Army Col. Mary Ricks, a spokesperson for the 18th Airborne Corps.
'This is because there is no direct evidence that SPC Perez's 5' [Universal Static Line Extension] was replaced,' Ricks said in a statement to Task & Purpose. 'The [investigating officer] found the most likely cause for the improper girth hitch, however, is that it was adjusted at the [departure airfield].'
Fatal jumps are relatively rare in the unit. Perez is the only 82nd Airborne Division paratrooper to die during an airborne operation within the past two years, Ricks said.
If Perez's line was switched before he donned the parachute, then the mistake would have had to be missed by at least one jumpmaster during a Jumpmaster Personnel Inspection, or JMPI, before he moved out to the flightline to board the C-17.
Investigators spoke to all of the jumpmasters on duty for the jump, but none of the soldiers said they had conducted Perez's JMPI, according to the investigation. Given those blanket denials, investigators said they could not rule out the possibility that Perez did not receive an inspection prior to the jump, but the investigating officer determined that 'it is more likely than not' that Perez was inspected.
If so, investigators wrote, at least one jumpmaster 'lied to me about his whereabouts during the critical period.'
The soldier who officials suspected of lying about Perez's JMPI — whose identity, like all witnesses in the investigation, was redacted — was 'admonished' by the division commander, Ricks said.
When quizzed on their general knowledge of parachute inspections, four of the jumpmasters inspected the 5-foot extension line 'in a different time or manner' than required by standard procedures, the investigation found. None of the jumpmasters said they had failed to inspect the line, according to the investigation.
One jumpmaster was unable to properly describe the correct way to inspect a girth hitch. Ricks confirmed to Task & Purpose that this jumpmaster is the one who most likely inspected Perez prior to the jump.
'This investigation revealed confusion among jumpmasters about the proper manner to inspect a 5-ft [extension],' the investigation says. 'This likely had grave safety implications for the overall [Joint Forcible Entry — Airborne] operation.'
After Perez's death, the investigative team looked at several parachutes that had been packed by soldiers with D Company, 189th Division Sustainment Battalion, which packs parachutes for the entire 82nd Airborne Division. That review uncovered an 'unacceptable rate' of problems ranging from minor to 'potentially catastrophic.'
'Based on our recent audit, these deficiencies are systematic and endanger the paratroopers of [the 82nd] Airborne Division if uncorrected,' the investigation says.
Riggers with the unit, the report found, may have removed and replaced the 5-foot extension lines for some of the paratroopers as they waited to load the C-17 at the airfield.
Investigators found that soldiers were unclear on the rules governing parachute preparation. Several of the soldiers did not know who was allowed to make changes to the 5-foot extension line, where in the preparation process such a change could occur, or what the unit's standard operating procedure is for rigger checks at the airfield.
Two soldiers, whose names were redacted, recalled previous incidents during which 5-foot extension lines were changed at the departure airfield prior to a jump. Another thought the line could be changed at the airfield if an air delivery officer gave permission to do so.
The investigation determined that by replacing the 5-foot extension at the airfield, the riggers had violated their unit's standard operating procedure.
But in response to a question from Task & Purpose on those procedures, Ricks said that the company's standard operating procedures at the time did allow certified riggers to replace the extension lines at the airfield, and that that replacement is allowed under the Army's technical manual for the T-11 parachute.
The night Perez died, one soldier told investigators, a member of the rigger check team was emotional after the accident.
'I spoke with her and she asked me 'what's going to happen to the person that packed it?'' the soldier recounted. 'And I just told her that I don't know. At any rate, she seemed very emotional and concerned. Last week, I was talking with [REDACTED] and he told me she asked, 'so wait, only riggers are supposed to change out static lines — not [jumpmasters]?' That concerned me, given this incident. It made me think there was something she knew or saw while on rigger checks at JRTC that she wasn't saying.'
Riggers in D Company told investigators that a lack of incentives available to soldiers in the unit can 'lead to burnout and low quality,' and that riggers who are out of the office for extended periods 'could use a refresher' when they return.
An Airdrop Systems Technician warrant officer — an advisor to senior leadership about airborne operations — told investigators that when soldiers at the rigger check facility are caught cutting corners, they are retrained. However, some leaders showed a reluctance to decertify soldiers because they might file a complaint with the Army's Inspector General's Office or Equal Employment Opportunity program.
Ricks said that prior to Perez's death, certified parachute riggers were allowed to replace extension lines 'for any technical or materiel concerns' for C-17 jumps. But 82nd Airborne officials now restrict such changes.
'As a result of this tragic training fatality, however, the [82nd] Airborne Division now limits this practice within the unit,' Ricks said. 'The Division's policy now requires replacement of the entire parachute and the first General Officer in the chain of command must approve any exception.'
Retired Army Lt. Col. Francesca Graham, a former jumpmaster, told Task & Purpose that replacing the extension line at the airfield was 'a very extraordinary thing to happen,' adding that if she were in a similar situation, she would have opted to replace the entire parachute instead of just the extension line.
When paratroopers are at the departure airfield, they are rushing to get onto their aircraft, Graham said. That means anyone who makes changes to parachutes under such time pressure is more likely to make an error than the riggers and packers preparing parachutes much further in advance, she said.
'It's kind of one of those things where it's like, how much risk are you willing to take?' Graham said. 'Like for me, there were numerous times when a reserve parachute had an issue with it, and so as the jumpmaster doing the inspection, I was like: 'Go get a new reserve.''
Graham was also struck that none of the jumpmasters interviewed for the investigation was able to say conclusively who — if anyone — had inspected Perez. If Perez did go through a JMPI prior to the jump, then the jumpmaster 'didn't see a major defect,' she added.
'At the point that someone dies or there's an incident, people's memories get real sharp, real quick,' Graham said. 'One of those jumpmasters should have been able to say: 'Yes, I inspected this jumper.''
'There appeared to be leadership failures from start to finish at the jump,' Graham said.
Following Perez's death, a company commander was fired 'for the systemic failures of oversight with parachute rigging activities and quality control,' and is currently assigned to the 82nd Airborne Division's staff, Ricks said. Nine other officers, warrant officers, and noncommissioned officers were reprimanded, she said.
Eight jumpmasters and five riggers were decertified after the fatal jump, Ricks said. Being decertified means that jumpmasters can no longer perform their duties and have to undergo retraining, including the proper way to inspect the 5-foot inspection line.
All the soldiers who were decertified due to Perez's death have since been recertified after going through the refresher training and resumed their duties, Ricks said.
The 82nd Airborne Division has made a number of changes to make sure that the failures leading up to Perez's death do not happen again, including sending the decertified jumpmaster to a refresher course and retraining the riggers, Ricks said.
The Army Criminal Investigation Division, or CID, also investigated Perez's death, but closed its investigation after finding 'no probable cause […] to support any allegations of criminal misconduct,' Ricks said.
Jose Perez said leaders in his son's unit had told him and his wife that five — not eight — jumpmasters had been decertified. Ricks was unable to explain the disparity.
Both of Perez's parents said they are not satisfied with the information they have been provided about their son's death.
Perez's mother Vanessa said that she is frustrated by the redactions in the copy of the 240-page investigation that she and her husband were provided.
'There's full sentences, full paragraphs that we're not able to read, and we wonder why,' she said. 'At times, I'm going to be honest with you, I feel like they're hiding something.'
Perez, who carried a squad automatic weapon, weighed 340 pounds at the time of the jump, including his body weight and all his gear, the investigation found.
'He stressed it out to us how scared he was because of so much weight he had,' Vanessa Perez said. 'He expressed it to myself, my husband, his wife as well.'
But Ricks said it was not unusual for a machine gunner Perez's size to be carrying so much weight during a parachute jump.
'The T-11 Main and T-11 Reserve parachutes weigh a combined 53 pounds,' Ricks said. 'SPC Perez's combat equipment — which included his ruck, weapons case, and weapon — weighed 104 pounds. [Three hundred and forty] pounds combined pounds is within the acceptable range for jumping combat equipment, and the T-11 Main canopy is authorized and rated to be jumped at a total rigged weight of 400 lbs.'
The exercise marked Perez's ninth jump and fourth in full equipment and at night.
The investigation also determined that Perez's exit from the C-17 was 'weak,' possibly due to 'paratrooper fatigue and the weight of his combat equipment.' He likely tumbled through the air as a result. The report also faulted Perez for not keeping his hand over the ripcord for his reserve parachute when he left the aircraft and for waiting too long to pull his reserve.
But Graham said it was 'ludicrous' to blame Perez for not exiting the aircraft correctly, explaining that rather than jumping up and out as paratroopers are supposed to, he likely fell forward because of how much weight he was carrying.
'He's now tumbling in the air, which means that the static line is wrapping around him, and he has no idea what's going on,' Graham said. 'You're disoriented completely, and you probably have things wrapped around you as you fall forward.'
'It's a lot,' Graham said.
Jose Perez called the investigation's finding that his son waited too long to open his reserve parachute 'bullshit.'
'It's a training exercise — everyone should be coming home,' Jose Perez said. 'No one should die. Protocol should be: Everyone should come home.'
The Air Force fitness test may soon include 2-mile runs twice a year
'War Thunder' continues to live up to its reputation for OPSEC violations
Guardsmen sent to LA are 130 miles east of the city doing drug busts
Lightning Carriers: The Marines' secret weapon in the Pacific
Pentagon releases details of 'Midnight Hammer' strikes against Iran
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is inspiration or influence more powerful? 20 leaders reflect
Is inspiration or influence more powerful? 20 leaders reflect

Fast Company

time15 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Is inspiration or influence more powerful? 20 leaders reflect

At their core, both inspiration and influence aim to move people—but how they do so, and what follows, can vary dramatically. For leaders, choosing between (or balancing) the two can shape not only how others respond, but also how trust, motivation and lasting impact are built. Some see inspiration as the deeper force, igniting internal purpose, while others view influence as the practical key to decision-making and action. Below, 20 members of Fast Company Executive Board share how they view the distinction between inspiration and influence, and which they believe carries more weight in effective leadership. 1. MOTIVATION DRIVES LASTING SUCCESS. Ninety percent of great leadership is about inspiring your team and helping them move in the right direction. I've learned that forcing people to go where they don't want to be rarely works. Real success comes from tapping into what motivates them. That's why I'll always choose inspiration over influence as my leadership approach. – Andy MacMillan, Alteryx 2. EMOTIONAL CONNECTION LEADS TO MEANINGFUL ACTION. Order of operations is important. In my organization, we influence people to take action on climate change. We start with inspiration, typically the beauty of nature and the joy of time skiing, biking, and hiking outside. That emotional spark influences action. The win isn't in how we move people. It's the progress we make on big challenges. – Erin Sprague, Protect Our Winters 3. INSPIRATION MOVES PEOPLE FORWARD WITH PURPOSE. I believe inspiring others is more meaningful than merely influencing them. Influence can shift behavior, but inspiration stirs the soul. It plants something lasting. Influence may win attention, but inspiration earns trust, action, and belief. The difference: Influence moves people. Inspiration moves them forward. One is power. The other is purpose. – Sudhir Gupta, FACTICERIE 4. INFLUENCE DRIVES SCALABLE OUTCOMES. Inspiration gets applause. Influence gets outcomes. One moves sentiment. The other moves decisions. At scale, leadership isn't only about lighting a spark. It's about aligning people to act with clarity and accountability. Inspiration matters, but without influence, it doesn't stick. Influence is what scales. – Mike Capone, Qlik 5. INFLUENCE AND INSPIRATION FUEL EACH OTHER. In my experience, it is not a question of one being more meaningful than the other. Instead, I see it as a symbiotic relationship, with one fueling the other. I believe true influence often starts with inspiration. People who feel moved by a vision and see a clear path to achieve it don't just follow—they help lead the way. And that drives action and results. – Jeffrey Whitford, MilliporeSigma 6. INSPIRATION SPARKS OTHERS TO GROW. For me, it's about inspiring others. Influence feels transactional—changing perceptions through action. Inspiration comes from authentic leadership that sparks others to grow on their own. Influence drives compliance; inspiration builds lasting commitment by helping people find their own path. – Barry Lowenthal, Inuvo, Inc. 7. TRUE INSPIRATION DRIVES LASTING COMMITMENT. Inspiring people is more meaningful—it lights a spark and taps intrinsic motivation. Influence can change behavior short-term, but inspiration drives lasting growth. They overlap, but true inspiration builds enduring commitment. – Stephanie Harris, PartnerCentric 8. INSPIRATION FUELS CREATIVITY AND COLLABORATION. Inspiring others is more meaningful because it fuels lasting engagement and creativity. While influence can guide actions, inspiration empowers people to contribute fully, embrace diverse ideas, and collaborate more effectively. It's the difference between directing a team and truly motivating one to grow, experiment, and innovate together. – Dominick Passanante Panasonic Connect 9. LEADING BY EXAMPLE CREATES GENUINE IMPACT. Leading by example is the most effective way to inspire others. When you demonstrate the behaviors and actions you expect from others, you create a powerful model for them to follow. This approach fosters genuine inspiration, which is more impactful than simply trying to convince someone, which can feel like a tactic. – Ruchir Nath, Dell Technologies 10. INSPIRATION GIVES TEAMS MORE FREEDOM. I prefer inspiring others, but I combine this with influencing when I sense that the team needs clearer direction setting. In my view, inspiring is a higher-leverage behavior than influencing, since it gives more freedom and responsibility to my team to choose problems to work on, and in turn, find the best solutions. – Max Azarov, Novakid Inc. 11. ADVOCATES EMERGE FROM INSPIRED TEAMS. Inspiring others is more meaningful long-term because it builds trust, fosters intrinsic motivation, and creates sustainable change. Inspiration allows individuals to operate with a sense of ownership, creativity, and resilience. There is a difference: inspiration fuels purpose, while influence drives action. And while they can overlap, inspiring others builds advocates, not just followers. – Justin Rende, Rhymetec 12. EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP BALANCES BOTH IN CONTEXT. Great leaders know that both inspiration and influence matter, and they skillfully apply each based on the situation. Inspiration fuels culture and empowers people to do extraordinary things, while influence focuses on alignment and decision-making. It's not necessarily either-or but depends on the goals and context, focusing on driving business outcomes. – Jani Hirvonen, Google 13. BELIEF SPARKS MEANINGFUL CHANGE. In my opinion, inspiration is more meaningful because it's rooted in belief, not persuasion. It sparks ownership and purpose. Influence can shape decisions, but inspiration helps others move forward with conviction. Being able to positively inspire someone is a privilege—and one of the most fulfilling aspects of leadership. – Eddy Azad, Parsec Automation Corp. 14. INTERNAL MOTIVATION DRIVES INNOVATION. Inspiration creates lasting change by motivating people from within. Influence can be temporary, so when you can get people to choose to act rather than being persuaded, you're building authentic commitment. I've seen teams transform when connecting emotionally to our mission of creating meaningful experiences. That internal motivation drives innovation far beyond what external influence achieves. – Jaime Bettencourt, Mood Media 15. TRUE LEADERSHIP ENABLES FREE THOUGHT. The direct answer to this question is inspiring and enabling. Inspiring people, to me, enables free thought and critical thinking. Influencing people, to me, is my imposition of my thought process on others. I look to have an open forum of thought which allows for understanding and learning, not an influencing approach allowing for just my thoughts. – Richard McWhorter, SRM Private Wealth 16. INFLUENCE BUILDS COMPLIANCE; INSPIRATION BUILDS MOMENTUM. Inspiration sparks that intrinsic action where people move because they actually have the desire to do so. Influencing shapes behavior, often without belief. One builds momentum, the other compliance. Both matter, but inspiration ultimately scales better. Especially with agentic AI, we need systems and people that opt in with intention and don't just follow by default. – Unnat Bak, Revscale™ 17. MEANINGFUL INFLUENCE CAN POSITIVELY SHIFT SOMEONE'S PROFESSIONAL PATH. Mentorship is very important to me, so I would lean toward influencing because it implies helping someone change direction. It's important to me to encourage and positively shift people's professional paths through workforce development, training, and mentoring, shifting their trajectory positively through meaningful influence. – Larry Brinker Jr., BRINKER 18. INSPIRATION CONNECTS PEOPLE TO THEIR INNER COMPASS. Inspiring someone drives a deeper, more impactful, and sustained impact. It awakens an inner knowing or compass that is more enduring. (Influence pushes from outside or external reference points.) True leadership happens when people connect to their own wisdom, not your agenda. Answers aren't in more external strategies, but often in accessing what's available and beneath the noise. – Dr. Camille Preston, AIM Leadership, LLC 19. INSPIRATION FOSTERS A CULTURE OF AUTHENTIC ENGAGEMENT. Inspiration elevates people—it makes them feel seen, capable, and connected to something bigger than themselves. When people are inspired, they own the outcome. They don't just follow; they lead, grow, and pass that spark on to others. It fosters a culture of authentic engagement, which is vital in modern, decentralized, and hybrid workplaces. – Britton Bloch, Navy Federal Credit Union 20. DURING PERIODS OF CHANGE, PEOPLE NEED INSPIRATION TO COME ON THE JOURNEY. Inspiring others is more meaningful, especially during periods of great change or disruption, when people need to be inspired to come along on the journey. Influence gets things done, but inspiration taps into hope and purpose. It's the difference between moving someone and truly motivating them. Influence is practical; inspiration is higher order. Great leaders know when and how to do both. – Dan Priest, PwC

‘Primal Intelligence' Review: Why Brains Are Better
‘Primal Intelligence' Review: Why Brains Are Better

Wall Street Journal

time16 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

‘Primal Intelligence' Review: Why Brains Are Better

The Army recruit looked out over the obstacle course of logs and ropes. Between him and success was a simple rule: Ring the bell at the end of the course before time expires. If he doesn't, he fails—and he can pack his bags. There was just one problem: He simply wasn't fast enough. He didn't want to quit, and he didn't want to fail; he needed a plan. So when the clock started, the recruit ran around the obstacles, ringing the bell in record time. This isn't the way to make friends in the military—or at least, not usually. 'At any other military school,' writes Angus Fletcher, 'the recruit would have been disciplined for insubordination.' But this was the Army special-operations unit—where Rangers and Green Berets, among others, are trained—and he'd reminded his superiors of something important, even crucial: In the real world, there are many paths to a goal, and those who succeed tap into something beyond black-and-white rule-following. They have creativity and flexibility; they have something that Mr. Fletcher, a professor of English at Ohio State's Project Narrative, calls primal intelligence, a 'natural cleverness that AI can't replicate.' It evolved with us and it's something that artificial intelligence is 'mechanically incapable' of mastering. Curious, intriguing and accessible, Mr. Fletcher's 'Primal Intelligence: You Are Smarter Than You Know' begins with a colonel on a mission. 'He'd parachuted onto a thousand targets, from coconut Pacific reefs to concrete Persian palaces to moonlit bullet alleys,' and in March 2021 he 'dropped into Ohio State.' His objective: investigate a rumored discovery about the 'primordial brainpower that drove intuition.' If true, then the Army wanted it, because each year the new recruits seemed to be getting worse and worse at the kind of thinking that keeps people alive on the battlefield. As Mr. Fletcher describes it, primal intelligence is part of our lost nature and a key to activating intuition, imagination, emotion and common sense. The colonel called it the answer to making soldiers think faster, act wiser and even heal from trauma more quickly. It's hard not to be skeptical of something that makes such enormous promises. Yet in 2023 the Army awarded Mr. Fletcher the Commendation Medal for his research on retraining the human mind.

How to Wash a Heated Blanket Safely
How to Wash a Heated Blanket Safely

CNET

time44 minutes ago

  • CNET

How to Wash a Heated Blanket Safely

Crawling into a warm bed after a long, hard day is hard to beat, but it isn't always a given. As we work our way towards the fall, you're probably already looking forward to getting your electric heated blanket out of the closet. And if you don't already own one, now is the time to start shopping for one. But like other blankets, they do need some upkeep -- and things get more complicated when there is electricity involved. One obvious question has probably already sprung to mind. Whether you're a first-time heated blanket buyer or a long-time fan, knowing how to properly wash one is vital. Most electric blanket manufacturers recommend washing the blanket before use, so you need to have your ducks in a row right off the bat. But don't worry, you aren't alone in wondering how to wash your blanket: Reddit users share the same concerns, having tried various cleaning hacks and ruining a few blankets along the way. Here's everything you need to know so you can use your heated blanket without worrying. If you're looking for more information about sleep, check out the wellness editors' favorite sleep tips and how to take a nap without ruining your sleep. Can you wash a heated blanket? Generally speaking, yes. Most electric blankets are machine washable and can even be dried in the dryer. But before you go toss yours in the next load of laundry, take a moment to read the blanket's care instructions. Different blankets may have different washing instructions. For example, Sunbeam, a blanket manufacturer, recommends presoaking the blanket and then washing it in cold water and mild soap on delicate for two minutes. Another blanket maker, Sleepme, makes electric blankets with weighted inserts. They recommend removing the insert, then washing only the outer cover on a gentle cycle. Materials you'll need to wash your heated blanket Depending on the care instructions, here are some things you may need to wash your electric blanket. Washer Dryer or drying rack/clothesline Laundry detergent Clean cloths (if needed for stain treating) How to wash an electric blanket Washing a heated blanket isn't difficult, but there are usually some things you'll need to do to prepare the blanket for the washing machine. Here are step-by-step instructions to follow. 1. Remove the cords The electric blankets cords are what allow the electricity to travel from the outlet into the blanket. Electrical cords should not be submerged in water. Damaging the cords could cause the blanket to malfunction or stop working entirely. It's best to remove all connected cords to ensure the blanket isn't damaged. 2. Review the blanket's washing instructions Somewhere on the blanket or in the information that came with it, there will be washing and drying instructions. They will usually indicate if the blanket can be machine washed or should be hand washed, what washing machine cycle to use, how to dry and even sometimes soap specifications. It's important to read these before laundering the blanket. If the washing instructions indicate that the blanket must be hand washed, skip ahead to step four. 3. Run on a delicate cycle Most electric blankets should be washed on a delicate or gentle cycle. This helps to eliminate dislodging or damaging the wiring inside the blanket. 4. Wash by hand Though most heated blankets can be washed in a washing machine, there may be some that must be hand washed. In that case, remove the cords, and fill your washing tub with cold water and gentle detergent. After you've soaked the blanket for a bit, use your hands to wash the blanket, similar to how a washing machine agitates. When you're satisfied with the amount of washing done, drain and refill the tub with water to rinse the blanket. Do this until all soap is gone from the blanket. Squeeze excess water out and either lay flat to dry or dry in the machine on low if the care instructions indicate you can do so. 5. Dry the heated blanket Most electric blankets can be tumble dried on low in the dryer. Be sure to dry your blanket according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. If the blanket must be air-dried, try laying it between two towels to soak up excess water and then lay or hang it flat to dry. You might be tempted to wring out excess water by twisting the blanket, but do not do this as it may cause damage to the internal often should you wash a heated blanket? How often you should wash your electric blanket depends on how much the blanket is used. As a general rule, you should wash the blanket when you think it needs it. You may need to wash it infrequently if it is on a bed that doesn't often get used, or if you're a nightly user, you might prefer to get in a routine of washing the blanket each time you wash your other bedding. If you plan to pack away the blanket, wash it before putting it in storage. When you shouldn't wash a heated blanket Do not wash a heated blanket that still has any cords attached. Additionally, if the blanket's care instructions suggest hand washing instead of machine washing, do not wash the blanket in the washing machine. How to get rid of stains on a heated blanket If you use your electric blanket a lot, it's inevitable that, eventually, you'll need to treat a stain or two. In most cases, a regular washing process will do, but when it won't, try mixing some laundry detergent and warm water and pretreating. Using a clean cloth, apply the soapy water mixture to the stain. You can either leave that setting and then wash the blanket following its care instructions or rinse the stain-treated area with another damp cloth and then air dry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store