Haryana has become one of India's leading automobile manufacturing hubs: CM Saini
ANI
18 Jun 2025, 00:24 GMT+10
Gurugram (Haryana) [India], June 17 (ANI): Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini on Tuesday said Haryana has become one of India's leading automobile manufacturing hubs, producing nearly 50 per cent of all cars made in the country.
'The development of an internal railway yard by the Haryana Rail Infrastructure Development Corporation at Maruti underscores the state's commitment to 'Ease of Doing Business' and infrastructure development, CM Saini said. Reaffirming its vision to emerge as a logistics hub, the state has also partnered with various industry bodies and educational institutions to enhance workforce skills across Haryana, said CM Nayab Singh Saini.
Located at the IMT Manesar-based Maruti Suzuki plant, this terminal has been developed under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Gati Shakti National Master Plan, a visionary initiative aimed at creating a world-class logistics network across India. The total cost of this project is Rs 1 lakh 17 thousand 91 million. Haryana Rail Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited has a 55.4 per cent share, HSIIDC has a 19 per cent share and Gurugram Metropolitan Development Authority has a 5 per cent share in the project.
Models manufactured at MSIL's Gurugram and Manesar facilities will be dispatched to 17 hubs from this railway siding serving 380 cities across India. Port locations of Mundra and Pipavav, used by the Company for exports, will also be served.
The railway siding will have a dispatch capability of 450,000 vehicles at full capacity.MSIL has dispatched 2.5 million (25 lakh) vehicles cumulatively through railways since FY 2014-15. Its green logistics efforts align with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No. 13 on climate action, reinforcing the Company's vision for a cleaner, greener, and more sustainable future. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
AI firms getting GPU sops may see govt at the table
New Delhi: There's no free lunch for startups eyeing subsidized access to powerful graphics processing units (GPUs) under India's AI Mission. In return for the 'grant', the ministry of electronics and information technology (Meity) is considering picking up 2-4% stake in the startups as part of its GPU allocation strategy, three founders of startups that have been shortlisted for the programme by the ministry told Mint. Four startups–Bengaluru-based Sarvam and Gurugram's Soket AI Labs, and Noida's Gan AI–have been shortlisted by New Delhi to use government-licensed GPUs. The proposed move, which signals a shift from a purely subsidy-driven approach to one that seeks the Indian government's long-term participation in the country's AI ecosystem, has sparked debate among founders and investors. While startup founders are happy with the assurance that comes with the government's skin in the game, investors raised concerns about conflict of interest. A senior government official told Mint, requesting anonymity, that taking equity in the startups 'is one of the many methods through which the government is considering rolling out the GPU access". The ministry is currently in process of vetting these methods, and a final decision on how the funding will take place may be announced in the coming months. 'An equity stake model does not have to only be through sovereign funds—under National Quantum Mission, too, startup funding is being offered in exchange for equity stakes," the official said. Also read | Sovereign silicon: India targets indigenous 2nm, Nvidia-level GPU by 2030 To be sure, the government earlier this year announced the $1.2-billion AI Mission to offer a subsidized approach to access to GPUs, which are the lifeblood of AI firms. Reason: buying GPUs is expensive–Nvidia's chips cost up to $60,000 for a single GPU system–and beyond the capabilities of India's fledgling AI startups. So, the government has roped in Hiranandani Group's Yotta Data Services, Tata Communications and others to offer access to GPUs at their data centres at about one-fourth of the market rate, or as low as $0.8 per GPU per hour. Mint's email to Meity seeking comment from an official spokesperson did not receive responses until press time. Opinions divided Some investors feel the government's move may create a conflict with both private investors as well as taxpayers. Harshjit Sethi, managing director of venture capital firm Peak XV, said that as a result of the Centre's equity stake in these startups, 'the return to the taxpayer will come from the appreciation of this equity stake, in addition to the strategic imperative that we as India should have our own AI models from scratch". Peak XV led Sarvam's seed funding round, and co-led its $41-million series-A funding round in December 2023. Such a move could create conflict for private investors, who seek profitability in exchange for large-scale investments. Three other VC partners investing in deep-tech startups told Mint that such a move may raise questions of conflict, at least in the near-term. Read this | Home-made chips: India's GPUs set for year-end trials 'It's important that the government's involvement is structured in a way that doesn't limit startups' ability to pursue global commercial opportunities," said Vishesh Rajaram, managing partner of early-stage deep-tech-only VC fund Speciale Invest. However, Rajaram added that 'if done right, the government can play the role of a catalytic capital provider—nudging innovation towards public good". 'The question would then be, should you seek to raise a large funding round and pursue a venture that gives you closer control of the venture, or do you build for public equities and scale up your business after that?" a senior industry executive and investor at an early-stage tech-focused VC fund said. 'This is a question that will need to be answered by the founders, in order to judge if a government-owned stake could raise conflicts." For others, though, the decision is to favour access to these pricey GPUs rather than protecting their stakes. Abhishek Upperwal, founder and chief executive of Soket AI Labs, said that the startup is leaning towards offering an equity stake to the Centre for access to 2,000 GPUs to train its 120-billion-parameter large language model (LLM). 'The rationale is that if the government is a stakeholder in the business, this allows us to reduce our dependence on venture capital funding—since in exchange for a minority stake, we're getting to reduce our operating costs significantly." However, this could come at the cost of focusing on public utilities, rather than a commercial business model in the near term. 'The government owning a stake is to largely ensure that public funds are used to train AI models for public utilities—here, the Centre will play the role of a mentor, and not a client," Upperwal said. Also read | No GPUs, no problem: Ziroh Labs can run AI models just with CPUs Access to ample funds is what startups believe could push them to find the government's ask of equity stakes reasonable. Industry estimates said that access to 2,000 GPUs for one year, which Upperwal's Soket AI Labs has requested for, will amount to $2.5-10 million for one year depending on consumption, even at Meity's subsidized procurement rates. Barring Sarvam, neither of the other three startups have raised such funding yet. 'Access to high capital funding from early-stage VCs in India is difficult—which is why we're happy with an equity stake model with the government. It also ensures that we're a part of the effort that the Centre is putting to develop the overall ecosystem, and we'll play a part in this in the long run. We've been looking to raise funding for two years, but building a new foundational AI architecture requires lengthy research and development (R&D) investments—which most VCs in India are not keen toward," Soket's Upperwal said. Industry veterans said that citizens will also likely need to find value in the AI applications in question, for the Centre's equity investments to qualify as a justified use of public taxpayer's money. 'Questions would arise on the use of public funds for startup investments. Globally, sovereign funds invest in commercial ventures, and use profits for public benefits and utilities. In this case, the use of public funds would come in building India's own AI ecosystem," said Kashyap Kompella, AI analyst and author. And read | Nvidia's Blackwell GPU may reach Indian shores as early as October
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian consumers are looking beyond colas. Jeera spices up this craving
New Delhi: Jeera or cumin, a staple spice in Indian kitchens, has triggered a battle among India's beverage makers. These companies are scaling up the production of cumin-infused drinks as the market for alternatives to colas swells. Coca-Cola, DS Group, Bisleri, and Reliance Consumer Products, alongside numerous regional brands, offer such spicy drinks. PepsiCo is reportedly eyeing an entry in the category dominated by bottles priced ₹10-20 apiece. "The unorganized segment for jeera-based beverages is estimated at ₹1,500–2,000 crore, and the per capita aerated beverage consumption in India remains 3–4 times lower than in several other Asian markets," said Nadia Chauhan, joint managing director and chief marketing officer, Parle Agro. 'That clearly signals untapped potential for growth. With strong consumer familiarity, functional relevance, and a flavour profile that aligns with Indian food habits, this category is poised for accelerated expansion," she said. "We believe it can double in size over the next three years." India's bottled beverage market is still dominated by fizzy colas. Think tank ICRIER estimates it to more than double from ₹67,100 crore in 2019 to ₹1.47 trillion by 2030. Still, the country is a vast market for traditional beverages like nimboo pani masala and aam panna, often made and consumed at home. Beverage makers have spotted an opportunity as jeera-based drinks become a popular alternative, particularly as a meal accompaniment due to their perceived functional benefits. Also read | Campa, Smoodh and now, Amul Tru: India's ₹10 beverage market is starting to get crowded Parle Agro, which launched Dhishoom for rural and small-town markets in 2012, rolled out the drink nationally last year. Compared to the scale of flagship brands such as Frooti, Appy Fizz or Smoodh, Dhishoom is still early in its journey but will carve out a differentiated space over the next 12-24 months, Chauhan said. The company expects this business to double over the next three years. Lahori Zeera, owned by Chandigarh-based Archian Foods Pvt. Ltd, plans to add six co-bottling units this fiscal. Earlier this year, Archian Foods secured ₹200 crore from Motilal Oswal Wealth. The company, founded by three cousins in 2017, plans to use these funds to expand manufacturing, transition to third-party bottling, and scale up distribution. Ethnic flavours There is a strong desire among Indian consumers for novel and ethnic flavours in non-alcoholic beverages. According to a 2023 research by market intelligence firm Mintel, 45% of Indians are interested in trying ethnic Indian flavours in packaged non-alcoholic drinks, and 41% are interested in global flavours. New flavours motivate 38% of carbonated soft drink consumers to try different beverages. Cumin is an emerging and popular flavour in both non-alcoholic beverages and yogurt drinks. Mintel sees a potential for further innovation. Smaller, homegrown brands such as Jeeru and Bindu have already established a niche in the category. Lahori Zeera aimed to target this market. 'The idea was to appeal to a more local taste palette and create mass-connect," said Nikhil Doda, co-founder & chief financial officer at Archian Foods. Read this | Hot summer forecast to boost consumer durables, beverage sales in India Over 90% of Lahori Zeera's business comes from the ₹10 price point. The brand is currently available in 17-18 states and plans to partner with at least six co-packing units or third-party bottlers this fiscal year. Demand, said Doda, has outstripped supply. 'This year, we will switch to an asset-light model; we are going into a co-bottling model similar to what other big brands do. That will help us bridge the gap between demand and supply and fast-track growth," he said. 'People from the industry, existing bottlers who vouch for the brand, are ready to invest." Noida-based DS Group, which sells candies and spices, launched its Catch Jira drink in mid-2016. 'Jeera is known to enhance flavour and aroma in food preparation, but it is also perceived to be a digestive, which is driving the consumer interest in the beverage segment," said PS Bedi, business head, drinks, DS Group. In 2018, Coca-Cola relaunched Rimzim jeera beverage, a brand it acquired from Parle in the 1990s. However, the category hasn't scaled beyond select markets for the beverage major. Read this | Bisleri to double sales in two years; not selling business: Jayanti Chauhan 'It is available in the rural markets of Gujarat, Karnataka, and a few rural parts of Northern India. Based on consumer insights, jeera flavoured drinks are being consumed and are gaining popularity among older consumers," a company spokesperson said. 'Rooted in indigenous taste preferences, it offers a refreshing addition to Coca-Cola's beverage portfolio in India." PepsiCo declined to comment on its future product pipeline. But those in the beverage industry said the company is planning a beverage under its Nimbooz refreshment brand. Bisleri also declined to comment. Pricing challenge While the market is growing, the ₹10 price point remains a challenge due to high taxation on sugary, aerated drinks. It is absolutely not sustainable as the category attracts goods and services tax of 28% and a 12% cess—a total of 40%, said Bedi from DS Group. Local retailers Mint spoke to said they typically sell the product in bulk or packs of 24 priced at ₹240. Parle Agro and Lahori Zeera remain committed to this price point. 'Frooti is nearly 40 years old and continues to be available at ₹10. We've also successfully built Smoodh at that same entry point in the dairy category," said Chauhan. Doda of Lahori Zeera said the ₹10 price point drives significant volumes. 'Having said that, competition has become intense," he said. 'The category has attracted more big boys." And read | Competition a positive force, keeps us sharp: Coca-Cola president Murphy
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Consumer court orders BDA to refund Rs 8 lakh for delay in handing over flat
Bengaluru: The IV Addl District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ordered Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) to refund Rs 8.03 lakh, with 18% interest, to a Marathahalli resident here, who waited for nine years for possession of a flat that BDA had promised to deliver in a year's time. On March 21, 2025, the Commission ordered BDA to refund Rs 8.03 lakh, along with an interest of 18% from the date the first payment was made, Rs 1 lakh for service deficiency, Rs 25,000 for mental agony, and another Rs 10,000 in litigation costs. The complainant, Suryaprakash H R, 70, had booked a 1BHK flat at Gunjur village under the housing scheme for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) on March 7, 2014, making an initial payment of Rs 1.12 lakh. According to Suryaprakash, BDA had allotted him a 1BHK flat in Gunjur through draw of lots, and On December 3, 2014, he was told to pay the remaining amount of Rs 7.87 lakh within six months. To fulfil this, Suryaprakash took out a housing loan of Rs 8 lakh, which was released to BDA in four instalments. However, thereafter, BDA neither issued a firm date for registration, nor did it respond to the complainant's repeated inquiries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 지금 시작하세요 [자세히 보기] 임플란트 더 알아보기 Undo Worse still, the allotment-related file could not be traced at the BDA office by its officials. Construction halted midway When Suryaprakash visited the project site in 2016, he found only the first and second floors had been built, with no further progress. On December 22, 2016, he wrote to the chief minister, who in turn directed the BDA commissioner to act. A letter from BDA's chief engineer confirmed that construction had been entrusted to Deepak Cable India Ltd., but due to non-completion, the contract was cancelled and re-tendered. As the delays dragged on, Suryaprakash and other EWS allottees staged a hunger strike in front of the Gunjur BDA project. On January 5, 2019, they submitted a joint representation to BDA and again approached the CM on June 15, 2019. The CMO yet again forwarded the complaint to the BDA commissioner, but work remained incomplete. Frustrated with his runs from pillar to post, on Jan 28, 2023, Suryaprakash issued a legal notice to BDA, followed by a representation to the deputy CM on October 26, 2023. The BDA deputy secretary replied on April 3, 2024, acknowledging receipt of Rs 4.73 lakh, but alleging that Rs 3.13 lakh was due. Suryaprakash countered the claim, saying he had already paid 95% of the sale amount. On June 13, 2024, he finally filed a consumer complaint, seeking a full refund. Unjustified act The BDA's legal counsel contested the claim, saying Rs 1.16 lakh was still due, and that possession was withheld because of that. The Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission observed that the elderly complainant was a valid allottee who had paid 95% of the flat cost by August 2015. Rejecting BDA's claim that possession was withheld due to the pending amount, the consumer court observed that it did not justify the delay, and ruled that BDA had failed to provide proper civic amenities, parking facility, and sanitary connections at the Gunjur project, making the residential units uninhabitable.
