
EU brings Turkiye into its security fold
https://arab.news/y4x7j
Turkiye has long insisted on being a part of Europe's defense programs and having a say in how Europe shapes its security. Yet, for decades, European states viewed Turkiye mostly through the lens of its EU membership bid and political disagreements. But today, geopolitical matters — especially growing security threats — are shifting that perspective.
Now, both Ankara and Brussels recognize that they face similar security concerns. This growing sense of mutual insecurity was highlighted this month, when Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler said that European allies must not only spend more on defense, but also do so wisely — by including Turkiye's fast-growing defense industry in their planning.
Although many EU states have long been hesitant to increase their defense spending, US President Donald Trump pushed them to rethink and open their wallets. One major step was last month's creation of a €150 billion ($173 billion) EU defense fund, known as the Security Action for Europe scheme, which is aimed at strengthening its arms industry.
A few years ago, the idea of integrating Turkish defense companies into Europe's security systems might have seemed unrealistic. But several factors have changed that. Turkiye's falling-out with the US over the F-35 program, increasing regional threats, Russia's aggression in Ukraine and Europe's doubts about long-term US security commitments have all helped bring Ankara and the EU closer together and make EU-Turkiye defense cooperation more appealing. The combination of these factors has created a major shift in their relationship, which is now reflected in more regular meetings between Turkish and European defense officials.
Turkiye has been building strong bilateral defense ties with individual EU countries for some time
Dr. Sinem Cengiz
Turkiye has been building strong bilateral defense ties with individual EU countries for some time. The recent cooperation between Italy's Leonardo and Turkiye's Baykar — the company behind the well-known Bayraktar drones — is a significant example.
Ankara is already joining several EU defense initiatives, such as the European Sky Shield Initiative. It is also involved in joint projects — like making ammunition with Poland, supplying military vehicles to Romania and working on naval programs with Portugal. This bilateral cooperation signals a new type of partnership between Turkiye and the EU states that goes beyond traditional parameters.
Turkiye's success in building a strong defense industry — especially with its popular Bayraktar TB2 drone — has impressed many in Europe and boosted Ankara's leverage. Turkiye also has key strategic advantages. It has NATO's second-largest army and a central position near the Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East — areas where Europe needs security support. Its ability to help counterbalance Russian influence adds to its importance. With these advantages, Turkiye not only wants to sell its defense products to EU states, it wants a real seat at the table, shaping Europe's defense strategy and becoming part of the continent's industrial defense base.
However, this potential partnership comes with some challenges. Not all EU countries are on the same page when it comes to Turkiye's integration into Europe's defense programs. The main challengers are Greece and Cyprus. Their concerns are not related to today's security realities, but rather to long-standing issues in Turkish-Greek relations.
Despite these divisions, the insecurity caused by the broader global uncertainty is pushing many EU countries to move ahead with defense partnerships with Turkiye. They are trying to persuade Greece to accept closer cooperation with Turkiye in this field, emphasizing the bigger picture: a stronger and more self-reliant European security system.
Thus, the pros of integrating Turkiye into EU defense programs are related to Turkiye's geographical position, its military strength, growing defense industry and mutual security concerns in a time of global instability. On the other hand, the cons and challenges are related to the fragmented EU approach. While some member states prioritize security and pragmatism, seeing Turkiye as essential for regional stability, some have long-standing issues with the country. Moreover, some remain wary of certain Turkish foreign policy moves that clash with EU interests, such as in Libya, the Eastern Mediterranean and Syria.
Genuine political will and a clear sense of mutual benefit is required to achieve strategic goals in the defense realm
Dr. Sinem Cengiz
Given these challenges, genuine political will and a clear sense of mutual benefit is required to achieve strategic goals in the defense realm. What is meant by mutual benefit is that, while the EU keeps talking about the importance of Turkiye's role in European security, it is not offering any commitments relating to Ankara's membership of the bloc.
The EU's often ambiguous approach raises questions about its sincerity and how it perceives Turkiye. European heavyweights such as Germany — which sees Turkiye's support to Europe's security as significant — often seem to turn a deaf ear and a blind eye when it comes to the issue of Turkish membership.
Turkiye's experience with the 2016 migrant deal with the EU further deepens this skepticism. At the time, the agreement had raised hopes in Ankara that Turkiye's role within the EU framework would be strengthened. However, several factors have made both sides doubtful about the other's direction.
According to Ankara, inclusion in EU defense planning not only strengthens its own economy and geopolitical standing, but it also increases its bargaining power in other policy areas with the EU. From Turkiye's perspective, defense ties could serve as a steppingstone to resetting broader relations with the EU after years of political friction. There are now even larger expectations that are likely to guide the Turkiye-EU defense partnership. Thus, if a new era is to begin, lessons from the past must guide the new EU approach so that this momentum will not end up as a missed opportunity.
• Dr. Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkiye's relations with the Middle East. X: @SinemCngz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Germany sees limited financial leeway on next EU budget, policy paper shows
Germany wants the European Union's next seven-year budget to keep a lid on spending, according to a policy paper seen by Reuters on Saturday, with Berlin arguing members do not have room to boost the scope of their contributions. The German economy, Europe's largest, has contracted for the past two years and forecasts for 2025 are modest. That has dragged on growth in much of the bloc and meant the German government is entering the budget talks cautiously. 'For the foreseeable future, member states' financial leeway will remain limited. There is no basis for increasing the (EU budget's) volume relative to GNI (Gross National Income),' the policy paper from the bloc's biggest budget contributor says. The government did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Negotiations are just starting on the next EU budget period from 2028 to 2034, which covers a sum of about 1.2 trillion euros ($1.4 trillion). EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said last month the budget must be more flexible and focused. Budget talks are contentious within the 27-nation EU, pitting the biggest net budget contributors against poorer net beneficiaries and traditional sectors like agriculture against the need to develop cutting-edge new technologies. The German paper said the next budget should reinforce EU security and defense powers as well as competitiveness. 'The EU and its member states must assume greater responsibility for security and defense,' it said, noting that the budget must continue support for Ukraine. The document also underlined Germany's aversion to jointly issued debt, saying repayments to the so-called Next Generation EU (NGEU) program, a pandemic recovery scheme financed by jointly backed bonds, should begin as of 2028. 'The federal government rejects a perpetuation of this extraordinary and temporary instrument; an extension is legally excluded,' it said.


Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Iranian media claims Israeli pilots captured, IDF denies
The Iranian army has claimed they have downed a third Israeli F-35 fighter jet since Israel's attacks began on Friday. State Iranian media, Tehran Times, reported that one pilot is believed to have been liquidated and another captured by Iranian forces. However, the Israeli Defense Forces denied the claims dubbing the news "fake". "This news being spread by Iranian media is completely baseless" the IDF's Arabic spokesperson Col. Avichay Adraee said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Friday the launch of "Operation Rising Lion" against Iran in an effort to deter the Iranian threat of nuclear weapons to Israel. Netanyahu confirmed the operation will continue until the mission is accomplished.

Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
France increases security around Jewish, US sites
France is boosting security, including around Jewish and US sites on its territory, because of the conflict between Israel and Iran, the interior minister said in a domestic order sent on Saturday. 'Special vigilance' must be given 'to all sites that could be targeted by terrorist or malicious acts by a foreign power,' Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said in a dispatch to French regional security chiefs that was seen by AFP. He said security should be heightened around 'places of worship, schools, state and institutional buildings, sites with high traffic', including 'festive, cultural or religious gatherings.' The order applied also to 'Israeli and US interests as well as to establishments in the Jewish community', the order said. Israel and Iran are engaged in open conflict, firing missiles at targets at the other since Friday, to deadly effect. The exchange of fire started when Israel launched massive attacks on Iran, killing senior military commanders and several nuclear scientists, and targeting some of its arch-foe's nuclear sites. Iran retaliated with missile launches, some of which struck Israel's main city, Tel Aviv.