Red Sea Attack: Cargo Ship Hit By Rockets Sinking, Crew Preparing For Exit, Says UK Maritime Agency
Elon Musk, a former ally of US President Donald Trump, said Saturday he had launched a new political party in the United States to challenge what the tech billionaire described as the country's "one-party system." "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," Musk, who had a bitter falling out with Trump after leading the president's effort to slash spending and cut federal jobs, posted on X. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." WATCH.
46.9K views | 1 day ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
‘No power can dictate India': Jagdeep Dhankhar's bold message amid Donald Trump claiming credit for India-Pak ceasefire
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar boldly asserted that no power on the planet 'can dictate India on how to handle its affairs', and that all the country's decisions are taken by its leadership. Dhankhar made the remarks while addressing the officer trainees of the Indian Defence Estates Service (IDES) 2024 batch at the Vice-President's Enclave, on Friday, July 19. The Indian Vice President's comments come amid the mounting pressure from the Opposition for answers following US President Donald Trump's claims of brokering a "ceasefire" in the recent India and Pakistan conflict. 'Don't be guided by narratives outside. All decisions in this country, a sovereign nation, are taken by its leadership. There is no power on the planet to dictate to India how to handle its affairs,' the vice president said, according to ANI. The POTUS has repeatedly claimed that he played a key role in negotiating a ceasefire between the two arch enemies – India and Pakistan – on May 10, and even tying it to a trade deal offered to both the neighbours by him. 'We stopped a lot of fights, very, very big one was India and Pakistan. We stopped that over trade," Trump had told Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu while meeting over the Israel-Hamas conflict. India, however, has pushed back, firmly stating that the decision to de-escalate came through direct military-level talks— between India and Pakistan's Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs)—with no foreign involvement. Adding to his series of claims, Trump also claimed earlier this week that five fighter jets were shot down during the conflict between India and Pakistan in May, without explicitly mentioning whose jets were downed. Stating that Operation Sindoor — as part of which India retaliated to Pakistan's attack in Pahalgam on April 22 — 'is not over,' Dhankhar claimed that 'there will be challenges' to create divisiveness. 'There will be challenges. Challenges will be to create divisiveness. For example, we have seen global conflagrations -- two of them in particular, you know them. These have become open-ended. Look at the devastation of property, human lives, and their misery. And look at our calibration. We taught a lesson -- taught it well. We chose Bahawalpur and Muridke, and then brought it to a temporary conclusion. 'Operation Sindoor' is not over -- it continues,' said the Vice President.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How Harvard is reshaping itself under pressure from Trump and internal dissent
President Alan Garber leads Harvard through post-DEI and antisemitism scrutiny Harvard University, one of the most prestigious institutions in the United States, is undergoing significant internal restructuring amid increasing political and cultural pressure. The shift is occurring under the leadership of Alan Garber, the university's 31st president, who stepped into the role following the resignation of Claudine Gay. President Donald Trump, in his ongoing critique of elite universities, has focused his attention on Harvard, accusing the institution of fostering antisemitism and liberal bias. The criticism intensified after the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, with Trump threatening to withdraw nearly $7 billion in federal funding unless action was taken. According to The Atlantic, Garber was informed by government officials that the Department of Education was examining Harvard's practices, leading to growing tension between the university and the administration. A new president and a divided campus Alan Garber, a trained economist and physician, was previously Harvard's provost and a relatively quiet figure in public discourse. His presidency began at a moment of institutional upheaval, marked by mounting criticism from both the federal government and student activists on campus. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo According to The Atlantic, Garber told Harvard's governing board that he believed 'the MAGA critique is not entirely wrong,' referencing criticism of elite institutions by supporters of President Trump. The transition in leadership followed intense scrutiny of former President Claudine Gay's handling of campus unrest and her remarks before Congress regarding antisemitism. As reported by The Atlantic, Gay's resignation was influenced by accusations of plagiarism and failure to curb antisemitic rhetoric among students, further complicating Harvard's internal dynamics. Federal scrutiny and external pressure President Trump's administration has placed elite institutions like Harvard under federal review for alleged violations of civil rights. The Department of Education opened investigations into the university's response to antisemitism following complaints filed after the October 7 attacks. These investigations are part of a broader initiative by the Trump administration to challenge the ideological direction of higher education institutions. The financial implications are substantial. As The Atlantic reported, Garber received a call from federal officials indicating that Harvard's eligibility for nearly $7 billion in federal funding might be reconsidered if reforms were not made. This development contributed to mounting pressure within the university's leadership circles to act swiftly and visibly. Restructuring DEI and academic review Garber initiated a comprehensive review of Harvard's Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. The initiative, led by law professor Vicki Jackson, was described as a reassessment of the university's institutional approach to diversity and inclusion. According to The Atlantic, Garber clarified that this review did not signal a retreat from DEI, but rather a reflection on how to ensure 'inclusion and belonging' are pursued in a politically sustainable way. In parallel, Garber launched a working group on antisemitism, headed by Raffaella Sadun from Harvard Business School. The group was tasked with delivering a set of actionable recommendations by the end of the spring term, in an effort to reassure Jewish students and counter perceptions that the university was indifferent to antisemitism on campus. Tensions with faculty and student groups The internal changes have not been without conflict. Faculty members have raised concerns about perceived concessions to political pressure. As The Atlantic reported, Garber faced criticism from some faculty who viewed his actions as appeasing the federal government at the expense of academic independence. Student groups have also voiced frustration, particularly in response to administrative policies affecting campus speech and demonstrations. Harvard has grappled with ongoing protests and sit-ins, many related to the Israel-Palestine conflict and broader demands for institutional transparency and accountability. Looking ahead Despite the challenges, Garber remains committed to steering Harvard through its current period of transformation. His leadership comes at a moment when elite universities across the US are being asked to redefine their missions in the face of increasing scrutiny. As The Atlantic noted, Garber's approach reflects a calculated effort to protect Harvard's institutional integrity while navigating the demands of a deeply polarized political environment. The coming months are expected to test his ability to balance federal expectations, internal reforms, and the university's traditional commitment to academic freedom. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How to Clean Your Smart TV the RIGHT Way
Internet Revives Katie Johnson's 2016 Lawsuit Vs Trump; Grok Asked To Fact Check A resurfaced tweet about Katie Johnson's 2016 lawsuit against Donald Trump has reignited outrage online, amassing over 7 million views. Johnson had alleged Trump raped her in 1994 when she was just 13 at a party hosted by Jeffrey Epstein. Although the case was dropped before the election, allegedly due to death threats, it included supporting affidavits and briefly resurfaced before being withdrawn again. Now, with Trump under scrutiny for past ties to Epstein and backlash from his own supporters demanding transparency, the debate over the 'Epstein Files' is back in full force. 7.3K views | 1 day ago
