Chelsea 'hold talks with Mayor of London' over new stadium plans amid ownership power struggle
The issue of a new stadium for the west London club has been a discussion point for some time now, with the English giants' home of Stamford Bridge arguably falling behind their rivals'.
Stamford Bridge is currently the ninth-largest Premier League venue in terms of capacity at around 41,000 which puts Chelsea over 33,000 seats behind league leaders Manchester United at Old Trafford, and 7,000 behind newly-promoted Sunderland.
There have long been discussions about a new stadium for the Blues, and whether that would take in the form of a complete re-build, a revamp, or a relocation, with owners seemingly divided.
According to the Telegraph, Chelsea recently held discussions with officials at City Hall following London mayor Sadiq Khan's public invitation for the club to clarify whether it intends to redevelop Stamford Bridge or consider a move to Earl's Court.
Khan's comments, made in April, came in response to Chelsea chairman Todd Boehly hinting at internal disagreements with fellow co-owners Behdad Eghbali and Jose E Feliciano regarding the club's long-term stadium plans.
Todd Boehly recent suggested that there is a power struggle within the Chelsea board
Minority shareholder Hansjorg Wyss added to the speculation after Chelsea's 3-1 victory over Liverpool on May 5, describing Earl's Court as 'the best option we can even think of.'
He told Chelsea Fan TV: 'If it's going to happen, I don't know. There's a lot of obstacles. But, right now, we don't have one person who drives that project. That's what we need.'
Meanwhile, co-owner Boehly had earlier suggested that a move to a new stadium may have to wait until 2042.
He told Bloomberg: 'We have to think about the long term about what we're trying to accomplish. We have a big stadium development opportunity that we have to flush out, and I think that's going to be where we're either aligned or we ultimately decide to go a different way.
'We have 16-20 years to figure it out. Obviously, inside of London, it's really complex, but it's not as if we're building something in the middle of a rural environment.
'We have a lot of constituencies to make sure that we care about. Certainly, the Chelsea fanbase is one. But long term, I think we're going to be building something new, and we'll figure it out.'
Chelsea declined to provide an update on their stadium plans or confirm whether any meetings had taken place with the mayor's office.
A spokesperson for Sadiq Khan, who would be required to approve any redevelopment or relocation plans, told Telegraph Sport: 'The mayor works closely with all Premier League football clubs in London across a variety of matters.
'The mayor is unaware of any recent formal proposals from the club for the Earl's Court site. The mayor and TfL can only form a view once they have seen the details of any potential proposals.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
31 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Aston Martin DBX S Smashes Bentley's Goodwood Hillclimb Record As Quickly As It Was Set
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Bentley Bentayga Speed Loses Record To DBX S The annual Goodwood Festival of Speed is always one of the biggest highlights of the automotive calendar, and this year did not disappoint, with numerous reveals, dynamic debuts, and hillclimb runs. One of the most impressive ventures up Lord March's driveway during the timed shootout was that of the Bentley Bentayga Speed, which broke the old Bentayga W12's record to become the fastest internal combustion engine SUV ever to tackle the course. Unfortunately for Bentley's 641-horsepower SUV, the 717-hp Aston Martin DBX S was also in attendance, and it broke Bentley's record before the weekend was out. You can watch that record run from onboard at the bottom of this article. Aston Leaves A Big Gap To The Bentley The Bentayga Speed's expedition up the Goodwood Hillclimb was timed at 55.8 seconds, while the DBX S took just 53.12 seconds. A difference of over a second and a half is quite something for such a short course, and the onboard video suggests that there was still time to be made. The launch looked good, but the shift to second gear seemed a little delayed. At the first bend, Madgwick, there's some tire squeal, and as the DBX S goes onto the Fordwater 'straight,' some corrective steering is required. After clearing the right-hander before St. Mary's corner, the DBX S experiences some proper oversteer as the sharp left-hander tightens up before heading to the slowest part of the track, Lavant, before the kinked Lavant straight ahead of the finish line. It's not the cleanest lap it could have been, but that the Aston snatched the record anyway speaks to the potential of the super SUV. Bentley May Have Something To Say We can't ignore the fact that the Bentayga Speed's run was set in damp conditions, so it's reasonable to assume that a quicker time could be achieved in the same weather experienced by the DBX S. However, a difference of more than 70 horsepower is tough to overcome. Bentley's Ultra Performance Hybrid powertrain, also with a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8, generates 771 hp, but there has been no indication that this powertrain will be fitted to the SUV. If it is, perhaps the Bentayga will have a chance of reclaiming the record, but that extra power would also come with extra weight. Regardless, the next 12 months of gloating (at least) belong to Aston, and with more and more super SUVs going the hybrid route, the DBX S may own the ICE SUV record at Goodwood for all time. Oops! We're unable to load this content right now. View directly on Instagram About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile
Times
34 minutes ago
- Times
Heathrow's investment plan punctures the third runway myth
S ome flight delays go on for ages. Take the wait for Heathrow's third runway. Passengers have been hanging around for that since 1968, when Harold Wilson sent the nation off on an exciting trip to nowhere. Rachel Reeves is the latest to have a go, bizarrely making this unbuildable landing strip Britain's No 1 growth project. By now, it will cost £40 billion to £60 billion — or up to three times the airport's £20.5 billion regulatory asset base. And, given Heathrow has £17 billion net debts, no one yet knows how it will pay for it — or what regulatory changes will be required to stop passenger charges quadrupling to about £100 a ticket. That's before the fun to come, too, from a big rejig of flight paths, demolishing 750 homes and encasing all 12 lanes of the M25 in a tunnel, so bringing much of west London to a halt.
Times
34 minutes ago
- Times
Bungs for electric cars is politically misguided folly
Ministers have decided that the best way to tackle the sluggish sales of electric vehicles (EVs) is to spend millions on taxpayer funded subsidies to make the cars cheaper. The plans include a £640 million grant scheme to reduce down payments on EVs. Another £63 million will bankroll the installation of tens of thousands of new charging points across the country. This is an expensive and politically misguided folly. What possible justification is there for using public money to help someone buy an electric car? A subsidy simply provides a cash windfall to those who were going to buy one anyway. Such subsidies help only a fraction of car buyers yet taxpayers as a whole will foot the bill. This latest wheeze to boost the electric car market mirrors a system of cash handouts previously available to EV buyers before being axed by the Conservatives in 2022. At the time, ministers said the subsidies were no longer needed because they had 'successfully kick-started the electric car market'. Clearly not. Yet no lessons appear to have been learnt in government. The problem facing ministers is that sales of EVs to private buyers are not going as well as they had hoped. There are just over 1.5 million EVs on UK roads, compared with 19.2 million petrol and 11 million diesel vehicles. Many drivers have been put off by high upfront costs. Battery-powered vehicles typically cost thousands more than their petrol counterparts: the average price of a new EV in Britain is just under £50,000, more than double the cost of a typical petrol car at £22,000. Electric cars have also been plagued by high depreciation because their batteries degrade: the average used EV price has fallen by 46 per cent between 2021 and 2024, compared with 19 per cent for cars with an internal combustion. The car-buying public are no fools. The reluctance of millions of drivers to go electric quickly enough is putting the government's wider net zero strategy in jeopardy. A ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars is due to take effect from 2030. That deadline looks wildly optimistic as well as politically foolish. Ministers should go back to the drawing board. It is political madness to insist on policies that artificially distort the car market in a desperate effort to meet ideological net-zero goals. The government appears more concerned with wasting public funds on looking good rather than doing good.
