WWII veteran turns 100, reveals the secrets of a long, healthy life
He also said the smartphone has been one of the most significant inventions in his lifetime — plus shared his tips for living a long and healthy life.
John Fife, who lives in Clevedon, in North Somerset in the U.K., turned 100 on Dec. 26, 2024, news agency SWNS reported.
Eating This Breakfast Food Could Help You Live Longer, Study Suggests
He celebrated first with family and friends at a hotel — and second with friends and neighbors in the lounge at Coleridge Court, a McCarthy Stone Retiring Living development, as SWNS noted.
He said, "I feel very fortunate that I still enjoy good health and am able to get out and about."
Read On The Fox News App
Born and educated in Edinburgh, Fife said he was called up for national service with the Royal Air Force in 1943.
He trained as a wireless operator and air gunner in the RAF, SWNS said.
He then served with Coastal Command Air/Sea Rescue until he was demobilized in 1946.
To Live Longer, Do These 5 Things Every Day, Says A Brain Health Expert
After leaving the military, Fife got married and started a career in the civil service with the Post Office Savings Bank in two different locations.
He, his wife and their two sons moved to Glasgow in 1966 where, following the separation of the Savings Bank from the Post Office, he worked on setting up a new headquarters for the Savings Bank, known today in the U.K. as National Savings & Investments, the same source noted.
During this time, he received special recognition for his services.
"In 1970, I was presented to Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to the headquarters of the new Department," Fife said, as SNWS reported.
He retired from the Civil Service in 1984 and moved to Clevedon to be nearer his sons.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
So how does he keep active even today?
"I start each day with a fixed goal, such as a long walk or going to church, and I love completing jigsaws," he said, as SWNS reported.
For more Health articles, visit foxnews.com/health
He said he's also "made new friends and started new activities since moving to Coleridge Court in 2022."
When asked for his secrets of living a long life, Fife was quite clear.
"Make a decision to do things and carry them out and do what you can to help the less fortunate," he said.
He said medical advances throughout his years on Earth have been extraordinary — and also named the smartphone as probably the most significant development he's witnessed in his 100 years.Original article source: WWII veteran turns 100, reveals the secrets of a long, healthy life
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Skimping out on your lunch break? Here's how many employed Americans actually stop to eat
More than half of Americans skip lunch in order to work more, according to a recent survey. The poll of 2,000 employed Americans, with a quota of 1,000 working parents with school-aged kids, revealed that 55% forgo eating lunch on hectic days to be more productive. Advertisement Respondents also admitted to completely forgetting to eat lunch two days out of the work week, on average. In fact, more than four in 10 workers (43%) rely on reminders to eat a midday meal, with women being significantly more likely than men (63% vs. 48%) to need a reminder to eat during the workday. Commissioned by Buddig for National Sandwich Month in August and conducted by Talker Research, the survey found that although 63% of working Americans eat a full, substantial meal for lunch most days, a significant number (37%) confessed to eating more of a snack for lunch, or grazing on little snack foods throughout the day in place of a meal. 7 More than four in 10 workers (43%) rely on reminders to eat a midday meal, according to reports. Martin Barraud/Caia Image – Advertisement More than one in 10 (13%) also admitted they'll typically work and eat lunch at the same time on a regular workday, instead of taking a break from their tasks to eat. Looking at differences between subgroups, men (91%) are more likely than women (85%) to pause their work to eat lunch, and hybrid workers (94%) are more likely than remote (85%) and in-person employees (87%) to take a true lunch break. A third of employed Americans (33%) also revealed that they'll usually eat their midday meal at their desk or workstation, with remote workers being more guilty of this (41%) than hybrid (38%) and in-person (28%) respondents. On average, workers eat lunch at 12:48 p.m., and their typical lunch hour is actually only 35 minutes, on average. Advertisement 7 More than half of Americans skip lunch in order to work more, according to a recent survey. SWNS / Buddig for National Sandwich Month 7 37% of respondents confessed to eating more of a snack for lunch, or grazing on little snack foods throughout the day in place of a meal. SWNS / Buddig for National Sandwich Month For those who step away from their work to eat, many (43%) multitask during their downtime, with women being more likely than men (51% vs. 33%) to multitask while eating lunch. And multitaskers most commonly check social media (70%), text (64%), and make phone calls (55%) during their lunch hours, even though most respondents (84%) agreed that taking offline lunch breaks, sans screens or technology, is good for their health. Advertisement 'While it can be tempting to power through your workday and skip taking a lunch, it's important to give yourself a break and eat a full, substantial meal,' said Amy Krider, senior brand manager at Buddig. 'Not only do we need all the energy we can get from a filling meal to do our best work, we also need little breaks from our screens and tasks during the day as well for our health and wellness.' On a typical workday, 62% of employed Americans usually bring lunch from home, a third (33%) will buy it, and 5% are lucky enough to have their meal provided by their employer. 7 A third of employed Americans (33%) also revealed that they'll usually eat their midday meal at their desk or workstation. goodluz – Three-quarters of workers (75%) said that sandwiches are their go-to lunch meal, and 70% of those with school-aged kids said their kids also include sandwiches among their lunchtime favorites. Looking closer at mealtime menus for both parents and kids, working Americans cited sandwiches (64%), salads (45%) and hamburgers (33%) as their most common lunch staples, and those with kids in school said their children will eat sandwiches (58%), pre-made meal kits (36%) and pizza (30%) most often. Health-wise, the quality of working parents' meals falls a bit behind their kids'. While 83% of parents with school-aged kids said their children's lunches are healthy, only 74% could say the same for themselves. 7 Three-quarters of workers said that sandwiches are their go-to lunch meal, according to the survey. SWNS / Buddig for National Sandwich Month 7 While 83% of parents with school-aged kids said their children's lunches are healthy, only 74% could say the same for themselves. SWNS / Buddig for National Sandwich Month Advertisement The results also revealed that hybrid workers reported eating the healthiest lunches (79%) compared to remote (71%) and in-person (65%) workers. And surprisingly, those whose lunches are catered by their employers reported having healthier lunches (75%) than those who bring homemade lunches (72%) and buy lunch (62%). 7 rh2010 – 'Busy work schedules mean that many don't have time to pack healthy, protein-filled lunches,' said Krider. 'And working parents have the added struggle of making sure their kiddos get nutritious, filling meals while at school. That's where the classic sandwich can come in handy. Protein-filled and versatile, it's included among respondents' favorite lunch meals for a reason.' Advertisement Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 employed Americans with a quota of 1,000 parents of school-aged children; the survey was commissioned by Buddig and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between July 15 and July 18, 2025.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Woman's snoring was symptom of rare form of cancer: 'Don't ignore it'
A mother in the U.K. who began snoring for the first time in her life was stunned to learn the unexpected symptom was a sign of a rare and potentially life-threatening cancer. "I started snoring, which I'd never done before," she recalled. "I was waking myself up, breathing through my mouth rather than my nose." Claire Barbery, 51, initially brushed off the blockage on one side of her nose, blaming it on the after-effects of Covid-19 or irritation from frequent testing while working at a care facility, as reported by SWNS. Doctors Reveal Key Signs Of Lyme Disease As Tick Season Intensifies Across Us It wasn't until the persistent congestion worsened and she started snoring in her sleep that she sought medical advice. "I very nearly canceled that appointment because I didn't want to be wasting NHS time," Barbery said, per SWNS. "There's nothing wrong, I thought. But looking back, that decision could have cost me my life." Read On The Fox News App Barbery tried using a steroid spray without success before being referred to an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist in January 2023. After undergoing scans and a biopsy, she was diagnosed with olfactory neuroblastoma, a rare type of cancer that develops in the upper part of the nasal cavity. Doctors discovered a 5-centimeter tumor that had already begun eroding the bone at the base of Barbery's skull. Forget 10,000 Steps — Research Reveals The Real Number You Need For Better Health It was a dangerous and complex case requiring urgent intervention. The surgery was performed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham by consultant surgeon Shahz Ahmed, a skull base specialist, SWNS reported. The procedure, which was featured in the Channel 5 documentary "Surgeons: A Matter of Life or Death," involved removing the tumor along with Barbery's olfactory bulbs, leaving her with a permanent loss of smell. "Claire had a very rare form of cancer that needed to be removed," Ahmed said in the report. "Untreated, it could have metastasized and spread into the neck and the rest of the body." Because the tumor had already spread through the skull base into the bottom of the brain, the surgery posed serious risks due to the proximity to vital structures. "The key worries were operating between the left and the right eye," Ahmed said. "The main blood supply to the brain is in very close proximity, so the risk of seizures, stroke, injury to the brain and loss of life were all very real." The surgery was a success and there were no complications. Following the procedure, Barbery underwent six weeks of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She is now under regular medical monitoring and continues to recover, gradually returning to work and enjoying time with her husband and daughters, SWNS reported. Now living in Newquay, Cornwall, Barbery is using her experience to advocate for awareness of head and neck cancers. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter She recently partnered with the Get A-Head Charitable Trust to raise awareness for World Head and Neck Cancer Day. "If you know your body, then you've got to push," she said. "If there's something wrong, don't ignore it." According to SWNS, Barbery's case is a reminder that even minor or unusual symptoms, like snoring, can sometimes be signs of something far more serious. For more Health articles, visit Looking back, Barbery said she's grateful she went to the appointment she almost canceled. "Even then, I didn't want to waste anyone's time," she admitted. "But that decision ended up saving my life."Original article source: Woman's snoring was symptom of rare form of cancer: 'Don't ignore it' Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Daylight saving time: Will this be the last time we ‘fall back?'
(NEXSTAR) — It can be hard to imagine the dark, cold nights of November when you're in the throes of August, but believe it or not, we're not far from those drearier days. That means we're also not far from the biannual tradition you either appreciate, despise, or otherwise forget about: the changing of the clocks for daylight saving time. You don't have to rush to check your calendar; we're several weeks from November 2. But not long ago, it seemed the U.S. may have been gearing up to treat it like any other Sunday. Within the last several months, bills to 'lock the clocks' have been introduced, a Senate committee hearing has been held, and even President Donald Trump has weighed in on the discussions. Nonetheless, introduced bills have stalled, no more hearings have been held, and the need to set your clocks (in most states) back an hour remains. 'Tariff rebates' proposed: How would they work? So what does the future of the biannual changing of the clocks look like for the U.S.? So far, a lot like its past. More than a century ago, the U.S. temporarily observed permanent daylight saving time — setting the clocks forward an hour without setting them back a few months later — during World War I. It lasted roughly a year and returned during World War II. That then set off decades of states and cities deciding what time to observe without much guidance. There was a brief reprieve from the chaos when Congress passed the Uniform Time Act in 1966, formalizing when the country was on daylight saving time and standard time. A few years later, we tried permanent daylight saving time during an energy crisis, only for it to lose favor and be ditched. Since the mid-1970s, we've changed our clocks twice annually. Most recent efforts targeting the practice — primarily led by Congressmen from Florida — have focused on putting the country back on permanent daylight saving time, a move many health experts disagree with. As in years past, the Senate and House bills to do as such have received bipartisan support and been passed off to committees, only to stall out. What would change if daylight saving time became permanent? The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation did hold a hearing in April that examined 'the various issues around whether the country should continue 'springing forward' and 'falling back' each year with time.' Witnesses who support permanent daylight saving time and an alternative, permanent standard time, shared their opinions, and the bill advanced out of committee. It still needs a revote in the Senate, a spokesperson told Nexstar. 'Americans are sick and tired of changing their clocks twice a year — it's an unnecessary, decades-old practice that's more of an annoyance to families than a benefit to them,' Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) previously said while introducing his Sunshine Protection Act alongside Senator Patty Murray (D-WA). Representative Vern Buchanan (R-FL) introduced companion legislation in the House. 'President Trump and the American people are on board with locking the lock, and now it's time we pass the Sunshine Protection Act to make Daylight Saving Time permanent.' 'It's clear that Americans want to do away with changing their clocks twice a year, and my bill will end this outdated practice,' Rep Buchanan said in a statement to Nexstar. 'We've had very promising conversations with House leadership, Energy and Commerce committee members and the Trump team about holding hearings and acting on my bill this Congress. It's clear that public support and political headwinds are on our side, and I look forward to my bill becoming law.' Some states, meanwhile, have taken it upon themselves to enact legislation that would put them on permanent daylight saving time — in most cases, however, they need Congress's approval. Only two states observe year-round standard time, an option afforded them by Congress' 1966 Uniform Time Act. States cannot opt for permanent daylight saving time. In most cases, the states standing on that side of the clock have introduced or passed measures calling on Congress to enact permanent daylight saving time or outlining conditions in which the state would observe daylight saving time permanently, typically based on actions by Congress or neighboring states. Why experts say keeping standard time is 'undeniably' better for us A House bill to give states the power to observe daylight saving time all year has been introduced and referred to committee. Multiple other states, however, have seen legislation introduced during their current legislative sessions to observe permanent standard time or exempt it from daylight saving time. Such bills in Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, and Virginia have failed to pass already this year. Legislation to observe permanent daylight saving time in Mississippi, Texas, and Virginia was also unable to pass. Some states have not considered clock-locking legislation, either this year or in recent history. That includes Michigan, New Hampshire, and New Mexico. In the last five years, no related proposals have been brought forth in the District of Columbia or Rhode Island.
