Donald Trump's mother: From a Scottish island to New York's elite
Mary Anne was one of tens of thousands of Scots who travelled to the US and Canada in the early years of the last century looking to escape economic hardship at home.
She first left Lewis for New York in 1930, at the age of 18, to seek work as a domestic servant.
Six years later she was married to successful property developer Frederick Trump, the son of German migrants and one of the most eligible men in New York.
The fourth of their five children, Donald John, as he is referred to on the islands, is now US president for the second time.
His mother was born in 1912 in Tong, about three miles from Stornoway, the main town on the isle of Lewis.
Genealogist Bill Lawson, who has traced the family tree of Mary Anne MacLeod back to the early 19th Century, says her father Malcolm ran a post office and small shop in his later years.
Economically, the family would have been slightly better off than the average in the township, he says.
However, life during and after World War One, in which 1,000 islanders died, was very hard and many young people were leaving the Western Isles.
The Isle of Lewis had also suffered the Iolaire disaster in 1919 when 200 servicemen from the island had drowned at the mouth of Stornoway harbour, coming home for the first new year of peace.
Mr Lawson says: "Mary Anne MacLeod was from a very large family, nine siblings, and the move at that time was away from the island.
"The move by Viscount Leverhulme to revive the island had gone bust and there was not much prospect for young people.
"What else could she do?"
Mr Lawson adds: "Nowadays, you might think of going to the mainland but in those days most people went to Canada. It was far easier to make a life in America and many people had relatives there."
The genealogist says President Trump's mother was slightly different in that her sister Catherine, one of eight members of the MacLeod family to have emigrated to America, had moved from Canada to New York.
When Catherine returned to Lewis for a visit in 1930, her 18-year-old sister Mary Anne went with her to look for work.
It appears that she found work as a nanny with a wealthy family in a big house in the suburbs of New York but lost the job as the US sank into depression after the Wall Street Crash.
Mary Anne returned briefly to Scotland in 1934 but by then she had met Fred Trump and soon returned to New York for good.
The couple lived in a wealthy area of Queens and Mary Anne was active with charity work.
Donald Trump still has three cousins on Lewis, including two who live in the ancestral home, which has been rebuilt since Mary Anne MacLeod's time.
All three cousins have consistently refused to speak to the media.
Speaking to the BBC in 2017 after Donald Trump's first presidential victory, John A MacIver, a local councillor and friend of the cousins, said: "I know the family very well.
"They are very nice, gentle people and I'm sure they don't want all the publicity that's around.
"I quite understand that they don't want to talk about it."
Mr MacIver said Mary Anne MacLeod was well-known and much respected in the community and used to attend the church on her visits home.
President Trump's mother became a US citizen in 1942 and died in 2000, aged 88.
But she returned to Lewis throughout her life and always spoke Gaelic, Mr MacIver says.
According to genealogist Bill Lawson, surnames are a relatively recent phenomenon on the islands and official records only go back to the early decades of the 19th Century.
His research took him back as far as John Roy MacLeod, which in Gaelic is Iain Ruaidh, named for a tendency to red hair.
Mary Anne Trump's paternal MacLeods came from Vatisker, a few miles further north of Tong.
Her great-grandfather Alexander Roy MacLeod and his son Malcolm were thought to have drowned together while fishing in the 1850s.
On Mary Anne's mother's side, the Smiths were among the families cleared from South Lochs area of Lewis in 1826.
The period of the Highland Clearances on the mainland had largely missed Lewis but after the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 some of the better lands for sheep-grazing on the island were cleared of tenants.
In most cases the displaced tenants were relocated elsewhere on Lewis rather than sent overseas.
According to Mr Lawson, all four lines of Mary Anne MacLeod's maternal ancestry had been moved to Stornoway parish from elsewhere on the island as a result of the Clearances.
His research also found another fishing tragedy when Donald Smith was drowned in October 1868 after his boat was upset in a squall off Vatisker Point.
His widow was left with three children, of whom the youngest, Mary - Donald Trump's grandmother - was less than a year old.
Mary succeeded her mother at 13 Tong, but it was the smallest of the crofts in Tong.
After her marriage to Malcolm MacLeod, they were able to acquire the Smiths' original croft of 5 Tong and move there.
Donald Trump's mother Mary Anne was the youngest of their 10 children.
Her businessman son Donald visited the house in which his mother grew up in 2008.
On that trip, he said he had been to Lewis once before as "a three or four-year-old" but could remember little about it.
It is estimated he spent 97 seconds in the ancestral home during his whistle-stop tour.
At the time, he said: "I have been very busy - I am building jobs all over the world - and it's very, very tough to find the time to come back.
"But this just seemed an appropriate time, because I have the plane... I'm very glad I did, and I will be back again."
He was accompanied by his eldest sister Maryanne Trump Barry, a US federal judge, who regularly visited her cousins on Lewis before her death in 2023.
Mr Lawson says: "If you want to celebrate anyone, you should perhaps celebrate Maryanne, who has done a lot of work for the island.
"Donald arrived off a plane and then disappeared again. One photoshoot, that was it.
"I can't say he left much of an impression behind him."
Donald Trump and the Scots: A not-so special relationship
A quick guide to Donald Trump
Police Federation seeks legal advice ahead of Trump visit
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
'Trump Accounts' Are The Next Generation's First Steps Toward Financial Independence
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 03: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (C) is congratulated by his ... More fellow Republicans after signing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act during an enrollment ceremony in the Rayburn Room at the U.S. Capitol on July 03, 2025 in Washington, DC. The House passed the sweeping tax and spending bill after winning over fiscal hawks and moderate Republicans. The bill makes permanent President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, increase spending on defense and immigration enforcement and temporarily cut taxes on tips, while at the same time cutting funding for Medicaid, food assistance for the poor, clean energy and raises the nation's debit limit by $5 trillion. (Photo by) On July 4th, Congress signed into law H.R.1 – more commonly known as 'One Big Beautiful Bill' – one of the most sweeping policy reforms from the White House in recent memory, and among the most controversial. A seismic shift in U.S. fiscal policy, the bill ushers in significant tax cuts and Medicaid cuts, as well as increases to funding for immigration enforcement and the debt ceiling. The coverage and debate over the legislation have obscured arguably one of its most impactful components – the introduction of savings accounts for all children born in the U.S. over the next four years. The administration is calling these accounts 'Trump Accounts.' Title aside, this initiative has the potential to fundamentally change how – and how many – Americans invest for their children's futures. As believers in the power of long-term investing, I have long been a proponent of baby investment accounts (see: How Newborns Can Invest Like Warren Buffett). Here are the basics: While financial and tax experts may quibble with some of the provisions relative to other types of savings, the bill offers several clear benefits. Universality Education savings accounts already existed before Trump Accounts. State-based 529 plans offer tax-free accounts, but there are no federal contributions. 'Baby bonds' have been proposed and discussed for years, usually with means-tests and invested in bonds. Each of these types of plans would support some children with an education savings account. In contrast, every baby gets a Trump Account. The newborn's family does not have to be financially savvy or 'in the know' to make this happen. While a lack of a means test can be debated, it made passage in Congress a simpler task and will make the administration of these accounts much simpler. Strength of Public Equities Another distinctive feature of Trump Accounts is that they will be invested in equities, not bonds or a mix of investments, allowing all children with them to participate in the growth of the equity market. To get a rough sense of the numbers, let's model the outcome if this program had been implemented 18 years ago. If a baby born in 2006 had invested a $1,000 government contribution at the end of that year (not great timing, right before the Global Financial Crisis), they would have had almost $6,000 by their 18th birthday in 2024. That is substantially higher than the $1,575 they would have had if they had invested in 10-year Treasuries. Contributions from families and employers Beyond the initial $1,000, the option to add an additional $5,000 each year through a combination of parents' contributions or via their employers could end up being the secret to this initiative's success. Recall the earlier example of a child born in 2006. If they had not only received their initial $1,000 but also an additional $5,000 contribution each year, they would have had $360,000 by the time they turned 18 (not adjusted for inflation or rising costs over that timeframe). That amount of money is transformational, providing an ability to get an education without loans, buy a home, or save for a comfortable retirement down the road. And a financially strong cohort – particularly in the wake of a generation of Americans that are saving less, buying fewer homes, and having fewer children – would make the economy stronger in turn. The obvious criticism – and a fair one – is that not every family can afford to contribute $5,000 on a yearly basis. But could their employers contribute $2,500? That amount would mean the 18-year-old had roughly $185,000 – a life-changing number. And why stop there? Friends and extended family could make contributions as birthday gifts. State or local governments could also contribute to some or all of their newborns like California does through CalKIDS. What about philanthropic organizations in targeted areas? Making contributions a common practice would make the accounts more likely to achieve their purpose. The contributions will make all the difference. It's also one of the key areas for marketing. If the perception around 529 plans is any indication, there is a lot of work to do in this regard – May 2025 study from Edward Jones found that 52% of Americans don't know about 529 plans, and 38% feel they are not saving enough for their educational goals. With all the communications firepower of the White House, they'd be well-served to be talking up this program a lot more. The success of Trump Accounts will ultimately depend on whether families actually embrace them. Without active participation and better information and awareness, these accounts risk becoming little more than a short-lived handout. And they only are slated to apply to babies born by 2028. It remains to be seen if this administration, or the ones to come, will follow through and make this program thrive. But for the sake of the future of the next generation of Americans, I hope they do.
Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Trade Group Says US Biofuel Policies Will Boost Costs
Biofuel policies ranging from President Donald Trump's tariff wars to proposed US blending requirements threaten to spike costs for refineries and ultimately Americans at the gas pump, a key oil trade group tells congressional leaders.
CBS News
a minute ago
- CBS News
Six months in, young people have soured on Trump's job handling — CBS News analysis
Since Donald Trump took office for his second term, his job ratings have markedly declined — and more with young people than any other age group. What has made so many young Americans change their minds so quickly? For context, President Trump's electoral performance with voters under 30 improved a lot in 2024: While he lost this group to former Vice President Kamala Harris, it was by a much smaller margin than in 2020. And men under 30 ended up splitting roughly evenly between Trump and Harris. These trends prompted some observers to marvel at how conservative Gen Z had become, especially young men, and to wonder whether it marked a durable change. About half a year on from Inauguration Day, many young people have changed their minds on Trump. It looks more like many young voters gave him the benefit of the doubt when he took office, but their evaluations of him quickly started to sink. Among Americans ages 18-29, his job approval rating has fallen from a high of 55% just after he was inaugurated to 28% now. That means that half of his former approvers now disapprove. In percentage-point terms, the size of that drop is more than double what we've seen in any other age group. Among young people, it's the less partisan and politically engaged who have seen the steepest drops. For example, about half of independents under 30 approved of Mr. Trump in February, but that has dropped to about one in five now. The same is true of young people who didn't vote in the 2024 election. Party identifiers and '24 voters have fallen off, too, but not to the same extent. There are also differences by gender, with young men starting out more approving of Mr. Trump than young women were. Women's ratings of the president had already begun dipping by March, while it was not until April — and the downturn in the U.S. stock market — that young men's ratings started to decline. Both have fallen steadily since then, but a faster drop among young men in the last few months has meant the gender gap in approval of Mr. Trump has shrunk. (See the bottom of this article for statistical details on estimating these smaller subgroups.) CBS News polling over the past few months offers several clues as to what young people are unhappy about these days. A majority now say Mr. Trump is doing different things than he promised during the 2024 campaign. That's a reversal in sentiment from early February, when seven in 10 said he's doing what he said he would. And it's young men who have been the most likely to flip on this question. On top of that, the administration is experiencing low points on several economic evaluations: Instead of marking a permanent rightward shift, Mr. Trump's better-than-expected performance with young voters last year is beginning to look more like a temporary reaction. Indeed, less partisan voters tend to be more responsive to short-term forces, like the economic conditions that drove many at the ballot box in 2024. And when Trump was inaugurated, many young people hoped he would turn the economy around, with his initial ratings likely reflecting some optimism. This honeymoon period quickly faded. His 18-29 rating is now below Joe Biden's when he left office. Looking ahead to 2026, Republicans' electoral success may depend on both the president's numbers and youth turnout. If views of Mr. Trump's job handling don't improve over the next year, they could be a drag on GOP congressional candidates. And while young voters are less likely to turn out in non-presidential years, both the 2018 and 2022 midterms saw record numbers go to the polls, including voters under 30. In fact, in 2022, young voters turned out at a rate that came close to saving the Democrats' majority. In a tight contest, they could be pivotal again. In order to more precisely estimate trends in approval among young people, I aggregated our polls and ran a statistical model that controls for respondents' race, education level, 2024 vote, and survey date. Why take this approach? All polls have a margin of error, and the margin of error is greater for subgroups within the poll, as a function of sample size and routine weighting. So, even though young people are represented proportionate to their share of the population, estimating what percentage of them approve of the president naturally comes with a higher margin of error. It's driven by random variation in which types of young people respond to a given poll, and margins of error grow as you slice data more thinly — for instance, in disaggregating young people by gender. Since a single poll can only do so much, we can combine data across polls to boost sample sizes and gain confidence in our estimates. Aggregating surveys yields sample sizes of over 1,200 men and 1,300 women under 30 to analyze. And the model smoothens out poll-to-poll randomness within these subgroups. The modeled estimates for any given time point are consistently within range of the unmodeled survey data, typically within a few points. And importantly, they tell the same story: both young men and young women's views of Trump have worsened, and the gender gap has decreased.
