Walk the line? not in Delhi's obstacle-course footpaths, despite SC's push for accessibility
.
'The right to have unobstructed and
is guaranteed under Article 21,' the court stated, directing all states and Uts to establish guidelines ensuring safe and accessible walkways for pedestrians.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
However, a visit by TOI to several so-called disabled-friendly pavements in Delhi revealed a starkly different reality. Many footpaths remain inaccessible to visually impaired individuals due to obstructions, such as vendor stalls, poles and other physical barriers.
The overall condition of the footpaths is dismal—some have broken or missing tiles, while others completely lack tactile indicators like tactile paving, which are vital for the visually impaired to navigate safely.
In practice, disabled-friendly footpaths in Delhi are more myth than reality. There is a general lack of concern for accessibility needs. Many sidewalks are so damaged or poorly maintained that pedestrians are forced to walk on the road instead.
Near Akshardham, large portions of the pavement were blocked by cement barricades placed by the Delhi Police. Elsewhere, such as in West Vinod Nagar, cars were parked directly on the tactile paving, further endangering and inconveniencing those with visual impairments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Irretrievably broken down': Granting divorce, SC directs man to give ₹4 cr Mumbai flat to estranged wife
The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted divorce to an estranged couple, saying that their marriage is clearly "irretrievably broken down". The top court also directed the man to hand over his ₹4 crore Mumbai flat to his estranged wife. The top court cautioned that if the appellant does not comply with the aforementioned directions, then the divorce order shall not come into effect.(Vipin Kumar/Hindustan Times) An apex court bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria dismissed the criminal proceedings against the man under Sections 498-A (subjecting woman to cruelty), 406 (criminal breach of trust) read with Section 34 of IPC and observed that they were vague and inane with any specific instances, news agency PTI reported. The bitter relationship between the two for the last eight years without any let-up and multiple pending legal proceedings, clearly shows that their marriage had "irretrievably broken down". "We also allow the application filed under Article 142 of the Constitution of India dissolving the marriage between the appellant and the second respondent finding the marriage to have irretrievably broken down, in the best interest of both the parties and for doing complete justice," PTI quoted the top court bench. ALSO READ | Issue public apology to husband: SC to IPS officer who filed 15 cases in divorce battle The apex court also observed that the alimony claim was not justified, especially since the appellant is unemployed. The man, a former bank employee, was further directed to deposit the remaining dues to the housing society up to September 1, 2025, towards the apartment's maintenance charges. The bench said, "Appellant shall execute a gift deed on or before August 30, 2025 on any date informed by written notice; by the appellant to the respondent, with due acknowledgment taken. We have seen from the records that the draft of the deed was exchanged between the parties and both the appellant and the respondent 2 shall be present before the jurisdictional Registrar for execution and registration on the date notified." In case the estranged wife does not show up, the top court directed the jurisdictional registrar to acknowledge and record the man's presence. Following this, the parties should appear before the registrar on September 15, 2025 for the execution of the deed. The top court cautioned that if the appellant does not comply with the aforementioned directions, then the divorce order shall not come into effect. "However, if the respondent does not present herself on the date notified by the appellant and on such failure even on the date specified by us, the divorce shall come into effect," it added. The Supreme Court held that all proceedings, civil and criminal, initiated by both parties, which was now dissolved, stand to be closed. "There shall also be no further proceedings, both civil and criminal instituted, by the respective parties, on any aspect arising out of in relation to the marriage," the bench said.
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court should be sensitive in cases of sexual assault on helpless women: SC
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Tuesday underscored the need to remain sensitive in sexual assaults of helpless woman as it confirmed the punishment of a man in a POCSO case. Court should be sensitive in cases of sexual assault on helpless women: SC A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and N V Anjaria said the Chhattisgarh High Court was wholly justified in upholding and confirming the conviction and sentence awarded to the convict by the trial court. "The court should remain sensitive while dealing with the charges of sexual assault on the helpless woman," the bench said. The top court verdict referred to its previous decisions and said a rapist "not only violates the victim's privacy and personal integrity, but inevitably causes serious psychological as well as physical harm in the process". "Rape is not merely a physical assault and subsequently destructs the whole personality of the victim," the bench quoted its decisions as saying. The top court said the evidence of the survivor in the present case was entirely "probable, natural and trustworthy" who with lucidity narrated the whole incident about commission of offence against by the accused. "There exists no reason, much less compelling reasons, to disbelieve and discard her testimony," the bench observed. Similarly, the bench was convinced by the testimony of the brother, who supported the survivor's statement. "There was a consistency lent. The conduct of the victim, soon after the incident was quite natural, as she went to cousin sister's neighbouring house and through her, informed cousin brother and her parents who were away," the bench said. The incident occurred on April 3, 2018, when the 15-year-old survivor and her brother were inside their house. The parents had gone to a neighbouring village to attend the funeral ceremony of a family member. Finding the her alone, the convict entered the house and sent her brother to bring a pack of chewing tobacco and sexually assaulted the minor. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Loaned amount, obscene demand from friend leads to 31-year-old's murder
Rajkot: A dispute over Rs 10,000 and a subsequent obscene demand brought about a fatal end to a relationship, with a 31-year-old man allegedly murdered by his friend in Kutch district. The victim, Sabir Jam, was stabbed multiple times by his friend Arvind Sathwara (23), who had loaned him the amount. The incident occurred sometime after Aug 1 midnight in Hajapar village of Bhuj taluka but came to light on Monday. Investigation revealed that both friends had a gambling habit. Sabir allegedly made an obscene demand, telling Arvind that he couldn't repay the money, he should allow him to have relations with his wife. This provocation reportedly led to the fatal assault. The Paddhar police arrested Arvind on the complaint lodged by the deceased's brother, Rafiq who had expressed suspicion about his involvement. Around 7:30pm on Aug 2, Rafiq got a call from former village sarpanch Kanji Maheshwari, informing him about a dead body lying near a pond. Upon reaching the spot, Rafiq identified the body as that of Arvind. Tyre marks were also found at the spot. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo Investigation officer AG Parmar confirmed to TOI that both Sabir and Arvind were known to have gambling habits. On Aug 1, while the two were riding together on a motorbike, Sabir stopped the vehicle and demanded the return of his money. This enraged Arvind, who allegedly stabbed Sabir to death with a sharp weapon. Sabir's family expressed suspicion towards Arvind. During initial questioning, Arvind claimed that Sabir visited his home and that his wife gave him Rs 10,000. He also claimed he dropped Sabir at Chandia village afterward. However, CCTV footage exposed his lies. Upon further questioning, Arvind confessed to the crime.
