Inside the secret love nest: Are Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce planning something bigger than we think?
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce have taken refuge in a $20 million rental home (Getty Images)
Pop icon
Taylor Swift
and NFL superstar
Travis Kelce
have been quietly spending quality time together, largely away from the public eye. Following her whirlwind Eras Tour and Kelce's Super Bowl heartbreak earlier this year, the couple has settled into a stunning waterfront mansion in Boca Raton, Florida — a retreat that's quickly become the heart of their blossoming romance.
A luxury rental that feels like home for the famous duo
The couple has taken refuge in a $20 million rental home that boasts six bedrooms, seven bathrooms, a private dock, home theater, pool with a cascading waterfall, and even a sleek bar — ideal for both relaxing and entertaining. Built in 2020, the residence offers modern opulence paired with the privacy celebrities crave.
Though neither Swift nor Kelce has officially confirmed their cohabitation, Travis sparked fan speculation with a cheeky remark about the property.
'We've got chimneys and we've got furniture,' he quipped, sending Swifties into a frenzy over his use of 'we.' When asked about interior design decisions, Kelce jokingly added, 'That's an executive decision by myself for the betterment of everyone.'
Taylor Swift's real estate empire continues to grow
While this Florida estate is a temporary nest, Swift's long list of properties means the couple has no shortage of glamorous options to call home. The singer's $150 million portfolio includes a 12,000-square-foot mansion in Rhode Island that features seven bedrooms and eight fireplaces — a spot famous for her star-studded Fourth of July parties.
The home is even slated for a $1.7 million renovation, according to The Providence Journal.
She also owns a lavish Tribeca penthouse in New York, complete with ten bedrooms and a dramatic staircase, as well as multiple properties in Nashville, including one she purchased at just 20 years old.
A relationship grounded in authenticity and mutual support
Since going public with their romance in September 2023, Taylor and Travis have won hearts with their candidness and clear affection for one another.
'That's my girl. That's my lady,' Travis said on the Bussin' With the Boys podcast. 'I'm proud of that… She really won me over.'
Recalling Taylor's down-to-earth presence during his game against the Bears, he shared, 'She was just like, 'I just want to be around the family and friends…' She wants to support me and do things like that.'
Also Read:
Taylor Swift accused of 'hiding out' with Travis Kelce as Caitlin Clark exposes their secret vacation life
It seems love, luxury, and loyalty define this power couple's new chapter — and they're just getting started.
Get
IPL 2025
match
schedules
,
squads
,
points table
, and live scores for
CSK
,
MI
,
RCB
,
KKR
,
SRH
,
LSG
,
DC
,
GT
,
PBKS
, and
RR
. Check the latest
IPL Orange Cap
and
Purple Cap
standings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump 2025 travel ban: Uncle Sam's new no-fly list just got bigger; this is what has been banned and barred
Image credits: Getty Images Donald Trump , the President of the United States of America on Wednesday signed a proclamation banning citizens of 12 countries across the globe from entering the United States. The move, which is a part of the POTUS' immigration crackdown launched earlier this year, is portrayed as a needed action to protect the country against "foreign terrorists" and other security threats. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said in a video posted on X. He also added that the list could be revised and new countries could be added. Who has been banned from the United States and who has been barred? Find out below! Banned from the United States of America Image credits: Getty Images These are the 12 countries that have been banned by Trump and whose citizens can not visit the US. Afghanistan Myanmar Chad Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen Partially restricted from the United States of America There are seven other countries whose entry to the US is partially restricted. These are: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela Welcomed to the United States of America Image credits: Getty Images According to The Guardian, Trump's new travel ban contains a unique exemption. Players, staff or associated families with clubs participating in the 2025 Club World Cup, the 2026 Fifa World Cup or the 2028 Olympics could be exempted from the US travel ban. Section 4 of the order, outlines the exemption stating, "any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role and immediate relatives, travelling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of the state" are not subject to the ban. The travel ban by the President is a reinstatement as earlier the Biden administration had repealed the ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen in 2021 calling it "a stain on our national conscience." Many countries such as Somalia and Venezuela have already responded to the travel ban. While the former pledged to work with the U.S. to address the security issues, the latter announced that living in the United States is a "big risk" and advised its citizens against being in the U.S.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Prince William finally spoke about his feud with Prince Harry: Here's what he said
The tale of a family feud is as old as the sun. There is no family that doesn't have differences. When people live and grow together, differences are bout to arise, what matters is if you resolve them or let them create a divide between you. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mostly, in the persistence of a family feud, people separate from each other and it rarely becomes a headline for anyone. But such separation in the royal family of England made headlines in 2020 when and his wife , the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back as senior royals and moved to California. Ever since the news of a feud between the prince and his father and brother has persisted. While Prince Harry has made numerous remarks on his willingness to reconcile with his father, both Harry and William have remained mum on the condition of their relations, until now. In a royal outing to the regiment once associated with Prince Harry, Prince William made a subtle dig at his estranged brother. The 42-year-old visited the Army Air Corps (ACC) in Wattisham, Suffolk on June 4th, 2025. This was the first time the royal was touring the regiment since becoming the colonel-in-chief of the Army Air Corps. It was when he was taking a water break with a group of British soldiers that he made a rare comment about his family feud. Image credits: Getty Images 'Is the pace of life good at the moment?' asked the Prince of Wales, as per Daily Mail. 'Families okay? See you enough?' he continued after one soldier said it was "a mixed bag" 'Some of them might not want to see you that much,' the prince added. 'It's a mixed bag sometimes.' While it remains unclear if the comment was a veiled dig at his younger brother, the remark surely came at a time when his feud with Harry is ongoing. Prince Harry was the former in charge of the regiment visited by William. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Willian took charge of it in May 2024 after he was named as the colonel-in-chief of the ACC by his King Charles. Harry, 40, trained as an ACC pilot in 2009 and later served with the British Army's combat aviation arm in 2012 and 2013 during his second tour of Afghanistan. It is believed that he would have been named as the colonel-in-chief of the ACC had he not stepped down from the royal duties with his wife.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Taylor Swift Now Owns All The Music She Ever Made. Why That Wasn't The Case
On Friday, Taylor Swift announced she now owns all the music she has ever made. This reported US$360 million acquisition includes all the master recordings to her first six albums, music videos, concert films, album art, photos and unreleased material. The purchase of this catalogue from private equity firm Shamrock Capital is a profoundly happy event for Swift. She has expressed how personal and difficult it was not to own these works. In her announcement, Swift acknowledged that it was due to her fans purchasing her rerecorded music (known as 'Taylor's Version') and the financial success of the record-breaking Eras Tour which enabled this purchase. The story behind 'Taylor's Version' and why she didn't own the catalogue to her original six albums is due to copyright, music industry practices and contractual terms. Let's break it down. What's in a music catalogue? When it comes to valuing a music catalogue, it largely comes down to two types of rights: master rights and publishing rights. Master rights are rights pertaining to the ownership of the actual sound recordings – the final recorded version. These are called 'masters' because they're the original source from which all copies are made. Under traditional music industry contracts, record labels usually hold ownership of masters and associated materials. This can be music videos, tour videos, unreleased works, photographs and album covers. Through licensing, the label controls the use of this material and retains the majority of the royalties. In return, the label provides the artist with financial backing, recording resources and marketing. Publishing rights, on the other hand, relate to the underlying composition – the music and lyrics. The rights to music publishing usually belong to the songwriter, regardless of who performs the song. Publishing rights govern how a song can be used and who earns royalties from that use. For example, a song may be played on a streaming platform, covered in a live performance or licensed for a commercial or film. Swift's contracts Swift was 15-years-old when she was signed to Scott Borchetta's Big Machine record label. The agreed contractual terms were typical of the music industry. In exchange for the financial support to make, record and promote her subsequent albums and tours, Big Machine held the rights to Swift's master recordings and associated materials in her first six albums. Her relationship with the label lasted 13 years. As a songwriter, Swift retained separate publishing rights to her songs (the music and lyrics) from her first six albums, which she licensed through Sony/ATV Music Publishing. In 2018, Swift was reportedly offered to re-sign with Big Machine, in a deal which would involve her 'earning' the rights to one original album for each new one she produced. Swift did not renew her contract and moved to Republic Records (Universal Music Group), who allow her to own her masters. She also moved to Universal Music Publishing Group for her music publishing. Subsequent sales In June 2019, Big Machine's catalogue was sold to Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings, for a reported US$330 million, with US$140 million representing Swift's catalogue. Swift described this as her ' worst case scenario ', as she had a tumultuous history of alleged bullying from Braun. She also alleged she found out about the acquisition at the time it was announced to the world, without being given the opportunity to purchase her catalogue. Throughout 2019 and 2020 it was reported she attempted to regain ownership, but negotiations fell through. In October 2020, Swift's catalogue was sold to Shamrock Capital, a private equity firm, for an estimated US$300+ million. In recent years, private equity firms have been purchasing music catalogues as profitable long-term financial assets, rather than for artistic or cultural reasons. These events led Swift to rerecord her first six albums, branding them 'Taylor's Version'. Four have been released. She was able to create new versions of her songs, with their own intellectual property rights attached. As owner of these new masters, she has control over where these songs are used, and she receives a greater portion of the income from the streams, downloads and licensing. The decision was enormously successful. Mobilising her fans' support via social media, they prioritised purchasing 'Taylor's Version' over the original masters, diluting the value of the originals. Successful futures Swift has repeatedly emphasised the need for artists to retain control over their work and to receive fair compensation. In a 2020 interview she said she believes artists should always own their master records and licence them back to the label for a limited period. This would mean the label could monetise, control and manage the recordings for a certain time, but the artist retains the ownership. They eventually gain back full control, rather than handing over permanent rights to the label. Swift's experience has sparked conversations within the industry, prompting emerging artists to approach record labels with caution and advocate for fairer deals and ownership rights. Olivia Rodrigo negotiated her contract with Swift's saga as a cautionary tale. Purchasing her catalogue and masters gives Swift autonomy about how the rights to all of her music is used. Her fans are likely to continue to support her and purchase both the originals and 'Taylor's Version', so the value of her original albums may rise. And, in the long-run, her new acquisition will likely make her much wealthier. (Author: Wellett Potter, Lecturer in Law, University of New England)
