
El Salvador Judge Orders Prominent Critic of President Bukele to Remain in Jail Before Trial
A judge in El Salvador ordered Tuesday that a lawyer and well-known critic of President Nayib Bukele remain in jail as his prosecution on charges of money laundering proceeds, in a blow to critics pushing back against the government. Enrique Anaya was detained by police earlier this month on money laundering allegations just days after calling Bukele a dictator on live TV. His arrest has been the subject of an outcry by human rights defenders.
'Unfortunately the result was not what we had hoped for,' Anaya's attorney, Jaime Quintanilla, said, adding that the case would now proceed into an investigative phase. He said they expected to hear more in the coming weeks. Upon Anaya's arrest, authorities did not provide details about the allegations against him, despite posting a photo of the constitutional lawyer in handcuffs surrounded by armed police.
Advocates, legal experts and international watchdogs have warned that Bukele has grown emboldened by his alliance with former US President Donald Trump. He has moved to silence critics through recent arrests and a new foreign agents law that sent chills through nongovernmental organizations that receive overseas funding. Anaya's June 10 arrest was just the latest example. Another judge issued a similar decision against prominent human rights attorney Ruth Leonora López earlier this month. That judge ordered López, another outspoken Bukele critic, held for six months on charges of illegal enrichment.
Anaya's legal team insists that he is innocent and that the detention was purely political. Quintanilla, his lawyer, said it also violated his rights because he was not brought before a judge within 72 hours of his arrest, as required by the country's constitution. Rather, he was held for 14 days and instead appeared to be detained under emergency provisions that Bukele has used to crack down on the country's gangs and detain alleged gang members with little access to due process. Tuesday was the first time Anaya appeared before a judge.
Quintanilla said this was illegal because Anaya was accused of a crime unconnected to gang violence. He had appealed to the country's Supreme Court using a habeas corpus petition, which was partially granted Saturday, leading to Tuesday's hearing. He had hoped that Anaya would be set free, but the detained lawyer was walked out of court in handcuffs surrounded by police. He nodded to reporters with his cuffed hands held to his chest.
Speaking to reporters during a break in the hearing, Quintanilla said he could not share further details about what occurred in the courtroom because the case is sealed, but said that prosecutors presented charges, the defense responded, and the judge ultimately allowed Anaya to speak. 'He (Anaya) obviously described what he has suffered during his detention, what has happened to him and matters specific to the case that cannot be disclosed,' Quintanilla said.
The defense attorney said Anaya's medical condition is critical and blamed it on overcrowding and confinement. He mentioned that Anaya suffers from a chronic illness but did not provide further details.
Bukele has long faced criticism of what watchdogs say are clear human rights violations. But with recent moves by the Bukele administration, they see a worrisome escalation by the popular president, who enjoys extremely high approval ratings due to his gangs crackdown. By suspending fundamental rights, Bukele has severely weakened gangs but also locked up 87,000 people for alleged gang ties, often with little evidence or due process. A number of those detained were also critics.
Bukele and his New Ideas party have taken control of all three branches of government, stacking the country's Supreme Court with loyalists. Last year, he ran for reelection despite a constitutional ban, securing a resounding victory.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail in Tennessee on Wednesday only to be taken into immigration custody. The Salvadoran national, whose mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in the fight over President Donald Trump's immigration policies, has been in jail since he was returned to the US on June 7, facing two counts of human smuggling. On Sunday, US Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail ahead of that trial. On Wednesday afternoon, she will set his conditions of release and allow him to go, according to her order. However, both his defense attorneys and prosecutors have said they expect him to be taken into custody by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement as soon as he is released on the criminal charges. In addition, federal prosecutors are appealing Holmes' release order. Among other things, they expressed concern in a motion filed on Sunday that Abrego Garcia could be deported before he faces trial. Holmes has said previously that she won't step between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. 'It is up to them to decide whether they want to deport Abrego Garcia or prosecute him.' Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. At his detention hearing, Homeland Security Special Agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April of this year. Holmes said in her Sunday ruling that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children. However, Holmes referred to her own ruling as 'little more than an academic exercise,' noting that ICE plans to detain him. It is less clear what will happen after that. Although he can't be deported to El Salvador–where an immigration judge found he faces a credible threat from gangs–he is still deportable to a third country as long as that country agrees to not send him to El Salvador.


Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
El Salvador Judge Orders Prominent Critic of President Bukele to Remain in Jail Before Trial
A judge in El Salvador ordered Tuesday that a lawyer and well-known critic of President Nayib Bukele remain in jail as his prosecution on charges of money laundering proceeds, in a blow to critics pushing back against the government. Enrique Anaya was detained by police earlier this month on money laundering allegations just days after calling Bukele a dictator on live TV. His arrest has been the subject of an outcry by human rights defenders. 'Unfortunately the result was not what we had hoped for,' Anaya's attorney, Jaime Quintanilla, said, adding that the case would now proceed into an investigative phase. He said they expected to hear more in the coming weeks. Upon Anaya's arrest, authorities did not provide details about the allegations against him, despite posting a photo of the constitutional lawyer in handcuffs surrounded by armed police. Advocates, legal experts and international watchdogs have warned that Bukele has grown emboldened by his alliance with former US President Donald Trump. He has moved to silence critics through recent arrests and a new foreign agents law that sent chills through nongovernmental organizations that receive overseas funding. Anaya's June 10 arrest was just the latest example. Another judge issued a similar decision against prominent human rights attorney Ruth Leonora López earlier this month. That judge ordered López, another outspoken Bukele critic, held for six months on charges of illegal enrichment. Anaya's legal team insists that he is innocent and that the detention was purely political. Quintanilla, his lawyer, said it also violated his rights because he was not brought before a judge within 72 hours of his arrest, as required by the country's constitution. Rather, he was held for 14 days and instead appeared to be detained under emergency provisions that Bukele has used to crack down on the country's gangs and detain alleged gang members with little access to due process. Tuesday was the first time Anaya appeared before a judge. Quintanilla said this was illegal because Anaya was accused of a crime unconnected to gang violence. He had appealed to the country's Supreme Court using a habeas corpus petition, which was partially granted Saturday, leading to Tuesday's hearing. He had hoped that Anaya would be set free, but the detained lawyer was walked out of court in handcuffs surrounded by police. He nodded to reporters with his cuffed hands held to his chest. Speaking to reporters during a break in the hearing, Quintanilla said he could not share further details about what occurred in the courtroom because the case is sealed, but said that prosecutors presented charges, the defense responded, and the judge ultimately allowed Anaya to speak. 'He (Anaya) obviously described what he has suffered during his detention, what has happened to him and matters specific to the case that cannot be disclosed,' Quintanilla said. The defense attorney said Anaya's medical condition is critical and blamed it on overcrowding and confinement. He mentioned that Anaya suffers from a chronic illness but did not provide further details. Bukele has long faced criticism of what watchdogs say are clear human rights violations. But with recent moves by the Bukele administration, they see a worrisome escalation by the popular president, who enjoys extremely high approval ratings due to his gangs crackdown. By suspending fundamental rights, Bukele has severely weakened gangs but also locked up 87,000 people for alleged gang ties, often with little evidence or due process. A number of those detained were also critics. Bukele and his New Ideas party have taken control of all three branches of government, stacking the country's Supreme Court with loyalists. Last year, he ran for reelection despite a constitutional ban, securing a resounding victory.


Arab News
12 hours ago
- Arab News
Major UK supermarket chain to stop sourcing Israeli products
LONDON: One of Britain's largest supermarket chains will stop sourcing Israeli products following a sustained Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign. The Co-operative supermarket said the decision was made due to Israeli human rights abuses and violations of international law. It comes into effect this month. In May, a motion at the Co-op annual general meeting calling for an end to trade with Israel received overwhelming support. The supermarket board's decision covers 17 'countries of concern,' including Israel. Co-op will now launch a phased approach to begin removing products sourced from the 17 countries. The BDS campaign, led by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, saw the Co-op board commit to a 'sourcing policy aligned with established co-operative values, upholding human rights and the rule of law to promote fair trading and peace.' The supermarket will now avoid sourcing products from countries where 'there is consistent behavior which would constitute community-wide human rights abuses or violations of international law.' Through the new policy, Co-op believes it 'can make a difference directly or indirectly to those affected and would alleviate suffering.' Israel is a major exporter of fruit and vegetables to the UK, and its products are widely stocked at British supermarkets, including as ingredients in larger items. A number of Israeli farms operate facilities in the occupied West Bank, in settlements that are illegal under international law. PSC hailed Co-op's decision as a 'major victory.' It follows the 'Don't Buy Apartheid' campaign that the organization conducted this year, urging a widespread boycott of Israeli products in British shops, restaurants and venues. Ben Jamal, PSC director, said: 'This is a seismic victory for the Palestinian solidarity movement in this country, which demands that the government, institutions and corporations end all economic, political and military support for the state of Israel, which is conducting a live streamed genocide in Gaza after decades of military occupation and imposing a system of apartheid on Palestinians. 'The Co-op, as befits its history, has shown great moral courage and ethical principle in deciding that it cannot ignore voices from the British public calling out Israel's gross human rights abuses and violations of international law — and even more importantly, it cannot economically support that regime through doing business in Israel. 'This beacon of leadership must now be taken up by all other supermarket chains which continue to sell Israeli goods, despite knowing they are supporting its war crimes.'