logo
Opinion - Government must confront the civil rights challenges of facial recognition

Opinion - Government must confront the civil rights challenges of facial recognition

Yahoo12-02-2025

Artificial intelligence, while present in virtually every aspect of our daily lives, is far from perfect. That matters especially when its application impacts civil rights.
Take, for example, facial recognition technology, a type of AI that can scan massive datasets of facial images to determine whether two images belong to the same person. The U.S. government, realizing this enormous power, has adopted, deployed and facilitated the proliferation of facial recognition across law enforcement, homeland security and even public housing.
Facial recognition shows us that when complex and evolving technology such as AI is deployed in the real world, as opposed to in a laboratory, technological flaws that might otherwise be interesting data points in a simulation can undermine the basic freedoms of the American people.
At my request, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights conducted a monthslong investigation into the federal government's use of facial recognition within the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security and Housing and Urban Development. Then we published a bipartisan report last fall acknowledging the technology's utility in solving crimes, combating terror threats and locating missing children.
However, the report also highlights the grave risks that facial recognition poses to the civil rights of all Americans. The report is significant not just for its contributions to an under-studied field, but also for the rare consensus it garnered at an agency evenly divided among Democratic and Republican appointees. This shows that the civil rights concerns about AI are not partisan.
Facial recognition technology is a system of interdependent components trained largely on images of white people, resulting in models that are worse at accurately recognizing non-white people in real-world settings. The facial recognition system can still interpret data from underrepresented groups, but with higher error rates.
The camera technology that facial recognition algorithms rely upon may capture drastically different images of the same person's skin tone depending on the camera quality, camera positioning and the environment's lighting. A facial recognition technology algorithm may then return a false positive match, meaning the system thinks two different people are the same, or a false negative hit, meaning the system thinks the same person is actually two different individuals.
In other words, facial recognition has flaws that are biased against and disproportionately harm people of color. This is also true for women and seniors.
It is critical to fully understand how these flaws in technology translate to real-world consequences. If law enforcement agencies rely on facial recognition that is not properly tested, and if they do not train agents in the proper use of facial recognition and disclose the use of facial recognition to defendants in criminal cases, a false positive match can ruin an innocent person's life.
Michigan citizen Robert Williams experienced this firsthand when he was wrongfully arrested in front of his family for the robbery of a Shinola store in Detroit after two blurry surveillance photos became the basis for a mismatched facial recognition result.
His case involved omissions of facial recognition use in the arrest warrant and an unreliable photo lineup procedure. It led to an unprecedented settlement by the Detroit Police Department requiring training on the risks of facial recognition, especially when used on people of color, and a significant rollback of the department's reliance on the technology.
But imagine the direct and collateral consequences for Williams and his loved ones if this exculpatory evidence had never emerged and he had been convicted and sentenced — or, more realistically, coerced under the weight of the criminal legal system to plead guilty.
A recent investigation by the Washington Post revealed that police departments across America frequently disregard their own internal policies intended to prevent these inaccurate identifications.
This is particularly alarming given the testimony of Assistant Police Chief Armondo Aguilar, who told the commission last spring that the ubiquitous Clearview AI software used by the Miami Police Department is only accurate 40 percent of the time prior to the human-level fact-check required by departmental guidelines. Even then, human reviewers can fall victim to 'automation bias,' the tendency to favor suggestions from automated systems and avoid contradictory information.
Facial recognition technology isn't just problematic in law enforcement. If public housing authorities use facial recognition to surveil their tenants, whose incomes afford them no meaningful alternative to such housing, those tenants must choose between housing and privacy, along with the risk of unfair consequences like eviction and the denial of entry due to false positive and false negative results.
Issues like these were central to a 2023 Washington Post investigation into the use of surveillance systems by public housing authorities, many equipped with facial recognition capabilities.
Facial recognition technology testing, training and deployment guardrails, as they exist today, are neither holistic nor standardized enough to account for the complex, real-world scenarios in which governments at the federal and local levels are deploying facial recognition.
To summarize, when the federal government deploys and heavily relies upon facial recognition technology in real-world scenarios without proper testing and oversight, such as in the form of a 'human-in-the-loop' to independently review search results, it can become the basis for false arrests, wrongful convictions and unfair housing practices, to say nothing of the privacy risks inherent in mass surveillance.
As AI proliferates due to its usefulness, we must be mindful of its ever-growing risks to civil rights and civil liberties. Several key recommendations to the federal government contained in the commission's report offer a framework for how governments at the federal and local levels, and even private actors, can guard against such harms.
First, facial recognition testing and training should be mandatory, standardized and involve real-world scenarios.
Second, public transparency in the use of facial recognition by a department or agency should be prioritized, such as posting use policies on their websites and informing criminal defendants when facial recognition has been used against them.
Third, individuals harmed by the misuse or abuse of facial recognition technology should have a statutory mechanism for redress of any harm suffered.
This moment in history presents a crucial opportunity for the U.S. government to meet this moment of immense technological potential with due consideration and protection for the civil rights and civil liberties of every American.
Mondaire Jones is a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and formerly a Democratic U.S. representative for New York's 17th Congressional District serving on the House Judiciary and Ethics committees.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted on federal charges from skirmish at New Jersey immigration center

time27 minutes ago

US Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted on federal charges from skirmish at New Jersey immigration center

TRENTON, N.J. -- U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver was indicted Tuesday on federal charges alleging she assaulted and interfered with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center while Newark's mayor was being arrested after he tried to join a congressional oversight visit at the facility. Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba announced the grand jury indictment in a post on X. 'While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve,' Habba said. In a statement, McIver said the charges amounted to the Trump administration trying to scare her. 'The facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation,' she said. McIver, a Democrat, was charged in a complaint by Habba last month with two assault charges stemming from the May 9 visit to Newark's Delaney Hall — a 1,000-bed, privately owned facility that Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses as a detention center. The indictment includes three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials. Habba said two of the counts carry a maximum sentence of up to eight years in prison. A third has a maximum sentence of one year. McIver's lawyer, former U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Paul Fishman, said in a statement that they would challenge the allegations 'head-on' in court. 'The legal process will expose this prosecution for what it truly is -- political retaliation against a dedicated public servant who refuses to shy away from her oversight responsibilities,' Fishman said. The indictment is the latest development in a legal-political drama that has seen President Donald Trump's administration take Democratic officials from New Jersey's largest city to court, tapping into the president's immigration crackdown and Democrats' efforts to respond. The prosecution of McIver is a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress for allegations other than fraud or corruption. At the same visit that resulted in McIver's charges, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested on a trespassing charge, which was later dropped. Baraka is suing Habba over what he said was a malicious prosecution. A nearly two-minute clip released by the Homeland Security Department shows McIver on the facility side of a chain-link fence just before the arrest of the mayor on the street side of the fence, where other people had been protesting. She and uniformed officials go through the gate, and she joins others shouting that they should circle the mayor. The video shows McIver in a tightly packed group of people and officers. At one point, her left elbow and then her right elbow push into an officer wearing a dark face covering and an olive green uniform emblazoned with the word 'Police' on it. It isn't clear from police bodycam video whether that contact was intentional, incidental or a result of jostling in the chaotic scene. The complaint says she 'slammed' her forearm into an agent then tried to restrain the agent by grabbing him. The indictment says she placed her arms around the mayor to block his arrest and repeats the charges that she slammed her forearm into an agent and grabbed the agent. New Jersey Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez had joined McIver at the detention center that day. They and other Democrats have criticized the arrest and disputed the charges as well. By law, members of Congress are authorized to go into federal immigration facilities as part of their oversight powers, even without notice. Congress passed a 2019 appropriations bill that spelled out the authority. McIver, 38, first came to Congress in September in a special election after the death of Rep. Donald Payne Jr. left a vacancy in the 10th District. She was then elected to a full term in November. A Newark native, she served as the president of the Newark City Council from 2022 to 2024 and worked in the city's public schools before that.

Hochul met with chorus of boos at Belmont Stakes while presenting winner's trophy: video
Hochul met with chorus of boos at Belmont Stakes while presenting winner's trophy: video

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hochul met with chorus of boos at Belmont Stakes while presenting winner's trophy: video

Gov. Kathy Hochul was met with a chorus of boos Saturday as she made an appearance at the 157th Belmont Stakes in Saratoga Springs – with one observer on hand calling the moment 'awkward.' Video obtained by The Post shows people in the crowd jeering the New York Democrat as she presented the trophy to the winning team of the race, Sovereignty. Harry Tutunjian, a former Troy mayor who was at the race, told The Post he wasn't surprised by the icy reception for Hochul. 'Her popularity is not good, especially in upstate New York,' said the ex-pol, who recorded the moment on his phone. 'The boos were for her, but the minute the trophy was hoisted in the air the place started cheering,' Tutunjian, a Republican, added. 'It was not because they were unhappy with the winner, or the trainer or the jockey. They were unhappy with the governor.' An attendee, who was in the grandstand at the finish line when Hochul presented the trophy, also noticed the lack of support for the Democrat. 'When Hochul was introduced, there was a smattering of boos. I didn't hear a single person clap,' the horse racing fan said. 'It was awkward.' The governor's office declined comment. Hochul had said in a social media post it was her honor to present the winner's trophy this year. 'The Belmont Stakes is a New York tradition, and we're keeping that tradition going in Saratoga while the new Belmont Park is under construction,' she wrote on Saturday. The state and New York Racing Association are currently redeveloping Belmont Park to the tune of a $455 million capital construction project. Hochul announced last week the park in Elmont on Long Island has been selected to host the 2027 Breeders' Cup World Championships.

Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more
Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more

The matchup in New Jersey's race for governor is officially set — and Tuesday's primaries also laid down big indicators about the state of both political parties after the first major intraparty contests since the 2024 election. Republican Jack Ciattarelli, a former state legislator, easily won his party's primary with President Donald Trump's endorsement, underscoring Trump's significant sway over the GOP electorate. U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the crowded Democratic primary, pitching herself as the candidate with the best shot at holding on to the governorship and steering past ideological and antiestablishment sentiment simmering in her party. She defeated candidates who were to her left and to her right. The race to replace term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, one of two governor's races this year, is expected to be competitive. Trump lost the state by 6 percentage points in November, a 10-point swing in his direction compared with his 2020 margin. Here are five takeaways from Tuesday's primaries: Sherrill won as many Democratic voters were weighing which candidate would be most electable and as each Democratic candidate pitched a different path forward for the party. Sherrill's victory suggests some Democratic voters want to dust off the party's successful playbook from the 2018 midterm elections, when she flipped a longtime Republican-held House seat. In that campaign and in her primary run this year, Sherrill stressed her background as a Navy helicopter pilot and a former federal prosecutor and pitched 'ruthless competence' as a counter to Trump. 'It just seems so obvious to me what the path forward is. It's effectively govern,' Sherrill recently told NBC News. 'And this is what I've been doing since 2018 when I first ran, right? ... I say to people, 'What's keeping you up at night?'' 'I tell people it's not maybe the sexiest tagline, but ruthless competence is what people in New Jersey want to see in government,' Sherrill added later. 'And that's what I've always provided, and that's what I think stands in stark contrast to the most incompetent federal government we've probably ever seen in this nation.' Still, while Sherrill won with over a third of the vote, the results revealed a fractured party. Two candidates who pitched themselves as more progressive, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, won a combined 36% of the vote. Two of the more moderate candidates, U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney, got 20% combined, while teachers union president Sean Spiller won 10%. After having come just 3 percentage points shy of defeating Murphy in 2021, Ciattarelli made one thing clear in his bid four years later: He's all in on Trump. Like many prominent Republicans, Ciattarelli wasn't always on board — he criticized Trump as a 'charlatan' in 2015. And while he embraced Trump during his previous bid for governor, he didn't campaign with him. That led Ciattarelli's opponents, including his top competitor, former radio host Bill Spadea, to try to frame him as insufficiently loyal to Trump. (Spadea had voiced criticism of Trump before he fell back in line.) But Trump's endorsement of Ciattarelli cemented his front-runner status, helping hasten the end of the campaign. And in a nod to Ciattarelli's past criticism, Trump tried to inoculate him from any attempt to undercut his Trump bona fides. 'Jack, who after getting to know and understand MAGA, has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!),' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post announcing his backing. Tuesday's result suggests that Trump's seal of approval was good enough for most GOP primary voters. By late Tuesday evening, Ciattarelli was carrying all of the state's 21 counties. Ciattarelli's vote share was at 67% by late Tuesday evening, compared with just 22% for Spadea. State Sen. Jon Bramnick, who had been critical of Trump, had won just 6%, followed by two other candidates who had each won less than 3% of the vote. Ciattarelli thanked Trump in his victory speech for his 'endorsement and strong support,' making a joke about his being a 'part-time New Jersey resident.' (Trump owns a home and a golf course in Bedminster.) But Ciattarelli spent most of his speech focused on a general election argument, not on shoring up his base — indicative of the line he'll have to walk in a state Trump lost three times, even after the improvement he showed last year. Both parties are grappling with antiestablishment sentiment, wondering how to handle it, channel it or just avoid getting run over by it. But Tuesday's results were also a reminder that political institutions still have some staying power. New Jersey's traditional political machines were dealt a blow last year following a lawsuit from Democrat Andy Kim during his Senate run, when a court ordered that county parties could no longer give advantageous ballot positions to their preferred candidates. That diminished the sway those parties had Tuesday, but they still demonstrated some power. Ciattarelli was the only Republican who competed for county party endorsements. Fulop didn't compete for Democratic county party endorsements, and Gottheimer sat some out, as well. Some county parties split between the candidates, with Sherrill earning the most endorsements from 10 of the 21 counties. While Sherrill was carrying 15 of the state's 21 counties late Tuesday, Gottheimer was winning his home county, Bergen, which endorsed him. Sweeney, the only candidate from South Jersey, fared far better in the six counties that backed him. He was winning 40% of the vote in Gloucester County while garnering 7% of the statewide vote. The county party endorsements were no guarantee of victory: The Essex County Democrats, for example, endorsed Sherrill. But as of late Tuesday evening, she was trailing Baraka in Essex County, where he is mayor of Newark, the state's largest city. Even in that instance, though, the party endorsement may have helped Sherrill cut Baraka's margins in his home base. Tuesday night's victory speeches were also important table-setters, indicative of how each party is looking to frame the general election. And New Jersey's general election this year may foreshadow much of what we see on the campaign trail around the country in the 2026 midterms. Outside of a quick thanks to Trump, Ciattarelli kept his focus tightly on Sherrill and New Jersey Democrats in his victory speech. He criticized her as 'Phil Murphy 2.0,' arguing that she has 'enabled every extremist and costly idea Phil Murphy has put forth,' and he even revived a key criticism of Murphy from his 2021 campaign. He also criticized Sherrill's focus on Trump as a deflection. 'Mark my words: While we focus on these key New Jersey issues, my Democratic opponent will do everything in her power. Trust me ... if you took a shot every time Mikie Sherrill says 'Trump,' you'd be drunk off your ass every day between now and Nov. 4,' he said. 'But every time you hear her say 'Trump,' I want you to know what it really means: What it really means is Mikie doesn't have a plan to fix New Jersey,' he continued. During her victory speech, Sherrill leaned heavily on her biography but also emphasized a dual mandate — a fight against New Jersey Republicans and also against Trump, a recipe that Democrats have successfully leaned on in past midterm elections. Calling Ciattarelli a 'Trump lackey' who shouldn't lead the state, Sherrill criticized 'Trump and MAGA Republicans in D.C. [who] want to raise your taxes and take away your health care and education dollars.' 'This country is too beautiful to be beholden to the cruelty and self-interest that Jack and Trump are trying to hoist on her,' she said. 'The future is built on hard work and hope, and here in New Jersey, we're known for our grit, our tenacity — maybe a little bit for how loud we are — but it's going to take a strong voice to cut through the noise from Washington and deliver for the people,' she said. 'So I stand here tonight doing just that. And as a mom of four teenagers, you guys know I'm not going to put up with the incompetent, whiny nonsense coming from aggrieved MAGA Republicans.' Tuesday's results showed how money matters in campaigns — and how it has its limits. On the Democratic side, Sherrill won despite having been outspent by some of her opponents whose outside groups dropped millions of dollars on the race. The largest outside spender was Working New Jersey, a super PAC funded by the state's teachers union, which Spiller leads. The group had spent a whopping $35 million on the race as of May 27, according to the latest campaign finance reports, while Spiller's campaign had spent $342,000. As of late Tuesday, Spiller had about 10% of the primary vote. Gottheimer and Fulop were also boosted by outside groups that spent millions of dollars on the airwaves. (Gottheimer drained his congressional account to fund the outside group supporting him.) Sherrill got support on the airwaves from One Giant Leap PAC, which spent less than either Gottheimer's or Fulop's groups but spent most of its funds in the final weeks of the race. Ciattarelli and an aligned outside group, Kitchen Table Conservatives, outspent the other Republicans. And Ciattarelli touted his strong fundraising as proof that he would be a formidable general election candidate. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store