logo
Opinion - Government must confront the civil rights challenges of facial recognition

Opinion - Government must confront the civil rights challenges of facial recognition

Yahoo12-02-2025

Artificial intelligence, while present in virtually every aspect of our daily lives, is far from perfect. That matters especially when its application impacts civil rights.
Take, for example, facial recognition technology, a type of AI that can scan massive datasets of facial images to determine whether two images belong to the same person. The U.S. government, realizing this enormous power, has adopted, deployed and facilitated the proliferation of facial recognition across law enforcement, homeland security and even public housing.
Facial recognition shows us that when complex and evolving technology such as AI is deployed in the real world, as opposed to in a laboratory, technological flaws that might otherwise be interesting data points in a simulation can undermine the basic freedoms of the American people.
At my request, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights conducted a monthslong investigation into the federal government's use of facial recognition within the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security and Housing and Urban Development. Then we published a bipartisan report last fall acknowledging the technology's utility in solving crimes, combating terror threats and locating missing children.
However, the report also highlights the grave risks that facial recognition poses to the civil rights of all Americans. The report is significant not just for its contributions to an under-studied field, but also for the rare consensus it garnered at an agency evenly divided among Democratic and Republican appointees. This shows that the civil rights concerns about AI are not partisan.
Facial recognition technology is a system of interdependent components trained largely on images of white people, resulting in models that are worse at accurately recognizing non-white people in real-world settings. The facial recognition system can still interpret data from underrepresented groups, but with higher error rates.
The camera technology that facial recognition algorithms rely upon may capture drastically different images of the same person's skin tone depending on the camera quality, camera positioning and the environment's lighting. A facial recognition technology algorithm may then return a false positive match, meaning the system thinks two different people are the same, or a false negative hit, meaning the system thinks the same person is actually two different individuals.
In other words, facial recognition has flaws that are biased against and disproportionately harm people of color. This is also true for women and seniors.
It is critical to fully understand how these flaws in technology translate to real-world consequences. If law enforcement agencies rely on facial recognition that is not properly tested, and if they do not train agents in the proper use of facial recognition and disclose the use of facial recognition to defendants in criminal cases, a false positive match can ruin an innocent person's life.
Michigan citizen Robert Williams experienced this firsthand when he was wrongfully arrested in front of his family for the robbery of a Shinola store in Detroit after two blurry surveillance photos became the basis for a mismatched facial recognition result.
His case involved omissions of facial recognition use in the arrest warrant and an unreliable photo lineup procedure. It led to an unprecedented settlement by the Detroit Police Department requiring training on the risks of facial recognition, especially when used on people of color, and a significant rollback of the department's reliance on the technology.
But imagine the direct and collateral consequences for Williams and his loved ones if this exculpatory evidence had never emerged and he had been convicted and sentenced — or, more realistically, coerced under the weight of the criminal legal system to plead guilty.
A recent investigation by the Washington Post revealed that police departments across America frequently disregard their own internal policies intended to prevent these inaccurate identifications.
This is particularly alarming given the testimony of Assistant Police Chief Armondo Aguilar, who told the commission last spring that the ubiquitous Clearview AI software used by the Miami Police Department is only accurate 40 percent of the time prior to the human-level fact-check required by departmental guidelines. Even then, human reviewers can fall victim to 'automation bias,' the tendency to favor suggestions from automated systems and avoid contradictory information.
Facial recognition technology isn't just problematic in law enforcement. If public housing authorities use facial recognition to surveil their tenants, whose incomes afford them no meaningful alternative to such housing, those tenants must choose between housing and privacy, along with the risk of unfair consequences like eviction and the denial of entry due to false positive and false negative results.
Issues like these were central to a 2023 Washington Post investigation into the use of surveillance systems by public housing authorities, many equipped with facial recognition capabilities.
Facial recognition technology testing, training and deployment guardrails, as they exist today, are neither holistic nor standardized enough to account for the complex, real-world scenarios in which governments at the federal and local levels are deploying facial recognition.
To summarize, when the federal government deploys and heavily relies upon facial recognition technology in real-world scenarios without proper testing and oversight, such as in the form of a 'human-in-the-loop' to independently review search results, it can become the basis for false arrests, wrongful convictions and unfair housing practices, to say nothing of the privacy risks inherent in mass surveillance.
As AI proliferates due to its usefulness, we must be mindful of its ever-growing risks to civil rights and civil liberties. Several key recommendations to the federal government contained in the commission's report offer a framework for how governments at the federal and local levels, and even private actors, can guard against such harms.
First, facial recognition testing and training should be mandatory, standardized and involve real-world scenarios.
Second, public transparency in the use of facial recognition by a department or agency should be prioritized, such as posting use policies on their websites and informing criminal defendants when facial recognition has been used against them.
Third, individuals harmed by the misuse or abuse of facial recognition technology should have a statutory mechanism for redress of any harm suffered.
This moment in history presents a crucial opportunity for the U.S. government to meet this moment of immense technological potential with due consideration and protection for the civil rights and civil liberties of every American.
Mondaire Jones is a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and formerly a Democratic U.S. representative for New York's 17th Congressional District serving on the House Judiciary and Ethics committees.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles

time11 minutes ago

In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles

The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'

Watch These AMD Price Levels as Stock Jumps to Highest Level Since January
Watch These AMD Price Levels as Stock Jumps to Highest Level Since January

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Watch These AMD Price Levels as Stock Jumps to Highest Level Since January

Advanced Micro Devices shares closed at their highest level since January on Monday, lifted by optimism that trade discussions between the U.S. and China could lead to reduced export curbs. After breaking out from a descending broadening formation last month, AMD shares have traded mostly sideways just below the closely watched 200-day moving average. Investors should monitor major overhead areas on AMD's chart around $123, $145 and $175, while also watching a key support level near $ Micro Devices (AMD) shares will likely remain in focus after hitting their highest level since January on Monday, lifted by optimism that trade discussions between the U.S. and China could lead to reduced export curbs. Chipmakers rallied after White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on CNBC early Monday that officials from Washington and Beijing intended to discuss the release of rare earth minerals to the U.S. and the expansion of Chinese access to American-made semiconductors during talks between the two countries taking place in London this week. In April, AMD cautioned its results would be affected by charges of roughly $800 million related to tightening restrictions on sales of its chips to China, while rival AI behemoth (NVDIA) warned it would take a potential $5.5 billion charge related to limits on exports of its H20 chip. AMD shares gained nearly 5% on Monday to close at around $122. The stock has risen nearly 60% from its early April-low, putting it back to where it started 2025, as investors assess whether the company can make further inroads into the booming AI chip market. Investors will learn more about AMD's plans for artificial intelligence at the company's "Advancing AI" event on Thursday, which features a keynote address from CEO Lisa Su. Below, we take a closer look at AMD's chart and use technical analysis to identify major price levels that investors will likely be monitoring. After breaking out from a descending broadening formation last month, AMD shares have traded mostly sideways just below the closely watched 200-day moving average (MA). More recently, the stock's price has nudged toward the May high, a move that has coincided with the relative strength index indicating strengthening price momentum. It's also worth pointing out that the shares registered their highest trading volume in nearly a month on Monday, indicating growing interest in the chipmaker's stock. Let's identify three major overhead areas on AMD's chart to monitor if the shares continue to trend higher and also locate a key support level worth watching during possible retracements. The first overhead area to monitor sits around $123. This area may provide resistance near the May swing high, which also closely aligns with last year's prominent early-August sell-off swing low. A decisive close above the 200-day MA could spark a rally toward $145. The shares may run into selling pressure in this location near a trendline that connects a range of corresponding trading activity on the chart between April and December last year. Further buying could see the stock's price test higher overhead resistance around $175. Investors who have accumulated shares at lower levels may decide to lock in profits in this region near notable peaks that developed on the chart in May and October 2024. During retracements in the stock, investors should keep a close eye on the $108 level. This area on the chart would likely attract buying interest near last month's pullback low and the stock's early-February trough. The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our warranty and liability disclaimer for more info. As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities. Read the original article on Investopedia

Gavin Newsom Dares Donald Trump to Arrest Him: 'Get It Over With'
Gavin Newsom Dares Donald Trump to Arrest Him: 'Get It Over With'

Newsweek

time22 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom Dares Donald Trump to Arrest Him: 'Get It Over With'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Gov. Gavin Newsom told U.S. President Donald Trump to "just get it over with, arrest me" as the pair clashed over immigration raids in the city and how to handle the disorder that erupted from the protests against them. Trump had said he would arrest Newsom if he were the White House border czar Tom Homan, calling it a "great thing". Homan had earlier said those harboring illegal immigrants would face the law, and the Democratic governor of California is not excluded from that risk. Newsom called it a "sober and serious moment" in remarks to MeidasTouch, a liberal activist media group, on Monday evening. "This is why I told the president, just get it over with, arrest me, move on. If you need some head to scalp, do it with me, but stop messing with these kids," Newsom said. "Stop messing with four-year-olds. Kids in elementary school. We've got kids. We have hundreds of graduations down here. "Kids are not going to their own graduations, families, grandparents, here legally. Mixed status families in some cases, scared to death to go to a graduation. People are scared to walk down the streets." Newsom said he was aware of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) running "checkpoints, checking people's IDs" in Los Angeles. "We've never seen this kind of deployment in so many accents," Newsom said. "It's mass panic out here in the nation's largest county, in the nation's largest state. Good, hardworking people, decent people. These are not the criminals. These are not the thugs." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store