A plane crashed on a doctors' hostel in India. Those who survived began treating the injured
Navin Chaudhary had just begun eating his meal when a loud bang startled him. He turned back to see a massive fire taking over the dining area where he and other trainee doctors had assembled for lunch.
The blaze approaching him, he rushed toward a window and jumped.
From the ground, looking upwards, the sight of the Air India plane's tail cone hanging from the burning building propelled Chaudhary and fellow medical students into action.
'There was fire and many were injured,' said Chaudhary.
He said he felt lucky to survive but knew he had a task at hand. He rushed to the hospital's intensive care unit, where the injured, most of whom had burns, were wheeled in on stretchers.
'I felt that as a doctor I could save someone's life,' he said. 'I was safe. So I thought, whatever I can do, I should.'
At least 270 died when the Air India flight crashed into the campus of a medical college in Ahmedabad shortly after takeoff on Thursday. Only one passenger among the 242 aboard survived. At least 29 others on the ground, including five medical students inside the hostel, were also killed.
Many believe that the death toll would have been higher if it had not been for the intervention of the trainee doctors and students who emerged from the smouldering hostel and rushed to save their colleagues.
Akshay Zala, a senior medical student, said the crash felt 'like an earthquake.'
'I could hardly see anything as thick plumes of smoke and dust engulfed everything. I was barely able to breathe,' he said.
Zala rushed to safety, running through dust and smoke. He cleaned and bandaged a wound on his left leg then joined others at the medical college's trauma center to treat the injured.
On Monday, the crash site teemed with excavators and workers clearing the debris. Officials inspected the building in search of clues that could enable the investigators to figure out what led to the tragedy.
Barely a kilometer (less than a mile) away, trainee doctors who survived one of India's worst aviation disasters were still working to identify the victims through DNA testing.
Indian authorities have so far handed over the remains of 47 victims The bodies of 92 others have also been identified through DNA matching and will be transferred to relatives soon.
College dean Minakshi Parikh said that many of the doctors who pulled their colleagues out of the debris, later that day went back to their duties to save as many lives as they could. 'They did that and that spirit has continued till this moment,' Parikh said.
Images of the hostel's dining area shortly after the crash showed parts of the aircraft and pieces of luggage strewn on the floor. Dining plates still containing food lay on the few dusty tables that were left intact by the impact.
'So that is human nature, isn't it? When our own people are injured, our first response is to help them," Parikh said. "So the doctors who managed to escape ... the first thing that they did was they went back in and dug out their colleagues who were trapped inside.'
'They might not even have survived because the rescue teams take time coming," she added.
___
Hussain reported from Srinagar, India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
Which is the safest seat on a plane? Here's what the experts say
The survival of Vishwash Kumar Ramesh in the Air India crash is being named the ' Miracle of Seat 11A ', and much has been made of the fact that he had been sat beside the exit row. But are some plane seats really safer than others? Airline manufacturers insist not. They say that observing seat-belt signs and taking the brace position are the two things that will increase your chance of survival in an accident. Studies, however, suggest that there could be some deeper science into which seats come with a higher probability of survival in the event of a crash. The benefits of sitting beside an emergency exit Full details of Vishwash Kumar Ramesh's survival are not known, although when interviewed by local journalists in the aftermath of the crash he described being surrounded by bodies before standing up and climbing out of the plane via the emergency exit. Seat 11A is a front-row economy class seat, located directly next to an emergency exit on an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. There are also emergency exits located at the front, middle and rear of the plane. The fact that Mr Ramesh was in seat 11A, directly next to an emergency exit, would have certainly improved his chances of survival having lived through the immediate impact of the crash. A University of Greenwich study, commissioned by the Civil Aviation Authority, checked the seating locations of 2,000 survivors in 105 accidents worldwide. They found that passengers who survived the immediate impact of a crash but were sitting more than six rows from the exit were less likely to live. Are wing seats marginally safer? Popular belief has it that sitting near the wings of an aircraft may increase your chance of survival, given that these seats are structurally reinforced. This could also have improved Mr Ramesh's chances of survival, given that seat 11A is located within the 'wing box' section of the plane. Professor Edwin Galea, Director of the Fire Safety Engineering Group (FSEG) at the University of Greenwich, told The Telegraph: 'The physically strongest part of the aircraft is the part of the fuselage where the wings are, called the wing box. It's where the wings join to the fuselage. That's the strongest part of the aircraft because there's the most structure there.' However, the fact that an aircraft's fuel supplies are stored within the wings could make this a more dangerous place to be sitting, depending on the circumstances of a crash. Is the back of the cabin really safer? Some studies suggest that you are most likely to survive an air crash if you are sitting towards the back of an aircraft. According to a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation of 20 crashes since 1971, that featured both fatalities and survivors, passengers sitting towards the rear of the cabin had a 69 per cent chance of survival. Those sitting at the front of the plane had a 49 per cent chance, while those sitting around the wing had a 59 per cent chance. This tallies with another study by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) which looked at crashes from 1985 to 2000 and found that survival rates were 62 per cent at the front of the cabin, 61 per cent in the middle, and 68 per cent at the back of the plane. Explaining these percentages, MIT aeronautics and astronautics professor John Hansman describes the front of the aircraft as being a bit like a 'shock absorber' in certain crash scenarios. MIT ran a real-world simulation of a Boeing 727 plane crash in 2012, with an aircraft full of dummy passengers in a remote part of the Sonoran Desert in Baja California, Mexico. The experiment was broadcast live in a Channel 4 programme called The Crash. The simulation found that all first-class passengers would have died in the crash, with the passenger in 7A catapulted 500ft from the plane. The people in the middle of the plane would have suffered broken bones, while the people in the back of the plane would have walked away alive. Why the middle seat is preferable A report by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) found that the middle seat comes with an increased chance of survival. Assessing disasters from 1985 to 2020, the FAA found that passengers sitting in the middle seats of the back row had a 28 per cent fatality rate, making it the safest place in the plane. It could be that passengers in the middle seat are partially protected by those either side of them, who will absorb some of the impact of the crash. In addition, aisle seats are more likely to suffer from falling debris from the overhead lockers during a crash, while passengers in window seats could experience the longest waits before evacuating an aircraft. A sense check from an aviation expert Professor Graham Braithwaite, Director of Aerospace and Aviation Cranfield University, stresses the incredible safety record of modern aircraft. 'All seats on modern jet aircraft are incredibly safe,' he told The Telegraph. 'The accident record is incredible, especially if you compare it to other modes of transport like driving. 'The design of the seat and even the fixtures around them must meet strict crashworthiness standards as well as flammability standards. The space around exits and the distance between a seat and an exit is also tightly controlled. 'We shouldn't forget the role of the cabin crew too – essential in an emergency where we know their commands can make all the difference. 'Passengers can contribute to their own safety by reading the safety card and listening to the crew briefing. In an evacuation, leaving their luggage behind will help their survival as well as those behind them. 'While today's accident would be very difficult to survive, it is unusual. The majority of aircraft accidents are survivable these days. This is partly because every time an accident happens, we take the time to investigate – not to apportion blame or liability but to learn lessons to prevent recurrence. 'This is cultural and something that has helped make aviation safe.'
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Hundreds of student doctors oppose assisted dying Bill
Hundreds of student doctors have come out against the assisted dying Bill. More than 300 medical students from universities across the country, including Oxford, Cambridge, Manchester, Edinburgh and London, have said they are against Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's Bill. Writing to MPs ahead of the Commons vote on the Terminally Ill Adults Bill on Friday, the students said the legislation 'risks offering death in the place of care' and 'places vulnerable patients in danger'. The Bill will allow adults in England and Wales who are terminally ill with fewer than six months left to live to seek assistance to end their lives. The group raised concerns about the uncertainties of predicting life expectancy and how the Bill will judge someone capable of making the decision to end their life. In a letter on Monday, the medical students said: 'We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' It comes after the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Pathologists voiced concerns over the Bill. Around 1,000 doctors from across the NHS wrote to MPs earlier this month to warn that the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. The students told MPs: 'Being asked to take a life – even under legal framework – poses a deep moral conflict for many clinicians. 'It risks long-term emotional harm, burnout, and attrition from an already overstretched workforce. Medical school does not prepare us for this burden, leaving a future generation of doctors unsupported and exposed.' They added: 'We write not only as future doctors, but as the next generation of advocates for patient care and safety.' The letter cited 2023 research that showed in up to four in 10 cases of terminal illness medical professionals were wrong with predicted life expectancy. The students also raised concerns about a 'complete lack of standardisation' of proposed drugs for ending a patient's life, adding: 'This lack of guidance is alarming and not consistent with good medical practice.' Emma Lewell-Buck, the Labour MP for South Shields who opposes the Bill, said: 'Existing doctors and those who will soon qualify are united in their opposition to this dangerous Bill. 'Not only will this Bill fundamentally change their role, it will also change the fabric of our society as a whole.' The Bill passed a vote in the Commons last year with a majority of 55, but in recent months more than a dozen MPs are believed to have switched from supporting or abstaining on the vote to opposing it. But Ms Leadbeater, the Labour MP for Spen Valley, has said she remains confident the Bill has sufficient support to pass through to the House of Lords.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
‘Like an earthquake': Inside the doctors' hostel hit in Air India tragedy
Navin Chaudhary's lunch was interrupted by a deafening explosion. Turning, he saw flames engulfing the dining area where he and his fellow trainee doctors were eating. As the fire advanced, Mr Chaudhary escaped through a window. From the ground, he saw the tail cone of an Air India plane jutting out of the burning building. Driven by a sense of duty, Mr Chaudhary and his fellow medical students sprang into action. "There was fire and many were injured," he recalled. He immediately went to the hospital's intensive care unit, where a stream of injured people, many suffering from burns, were being rushed in. 'I felt that as a doctor I could save someone's life,' he said. 'I was safe. So I thought, whatever I can do, I should.' At least 270 died when the Air India flight crashed into the campus of a medical college in Ahmedabad shortly after takeoff on Thursday. Only one passenger among the 242 aboard survived. At least 29 others on the ground, including five medical students inside the hostel, were also killed. Many believe that the death toll would have been higher if it had not been for the intervention of the trainee doctors and students who emerged from the smouldering hostel and rushed to save their colleagues. Akshay Zala, a senior medical student, said the crash felt 'like an earthquake'. 'I could hardly see anything as thick plumes of smoke and dust engulfed everything. I was barely able to breathe,' he said. Mr Zala rushed to safety, running through dust and smoke. He cleaned and bandaged a wound on his left leg then joined others at the medical college's trauma centre to treat the injured. On Monday, the crash site teemed with excavators and workers clearing the debris. Officials inspected the building in search for clues that could enable the investigators to figure out what led to the tragedy. Less than a mile away, trainee doctors who survived one of India's worst aviation disasters were still working to identify the victims through DNA testing. College dean Minakshi Parikh said that many of the doctors who pulled their colleagues out of the debris later went back to their duties to save as many lives as they could. 'They did that and that spirit has continued till this moment,' Ms Parikh said. Images of the hostel's dining area shortly after the crash showed parts of the aircraft and pieces of luggage strewn on the floor. Dining plates still containing food lay on the few dusty tables that were left intact by the impact. 'So that is human nature, isn't it? When our own people are injured, our first response is to help them," Ms Parikh said. "So the doctors who managed to escape ... the first thing that they did was they went back in and dug out their colleagues who were trapped inside.'
