Which is the safest seat on a plane? Here's what the experts say
Airline manufacturers insist not. They say that observing seat-belt signs and taking the brace position are the two things that will increase your chance of survival in an accident.
Studies, however, suggest that there could be some deeper science into which seats come with a higher probability of survival in the event of a crash.
The benefits of sitting beside an emergency exit
Full details of Vishwash Kumar Ramesh's survival are not known, although when interviewed by local journalists in the aftermath of the crash he described being surrounded by bodies before standing up and climbing out of the plane via the emergency exit.
Seat 11A is a front-row economy class seat, located directly next to an emergency exit on an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. There are also emergency exits located at the front, middle and rear of the plane.
The fact that Mr Ramesh was in seat 11A, directly next to an emergency exit, would have certainly improved his chances of survival having lived through the immediate impact of the crash.
A University of Greenwich study, commissioned by the Civil Aviation Authority, checked the seating locations of 2,000 survivors in 105 accidents worldwide. They found that passengers who survived the immediate impact of a crash but were sitting more than six rows from the exit were less likely to live.
Are wing seats marginally safer?
Popular belief has it that sitting near the wings of an aircraft may increase your chance of survival, given that these seats are structurally reinforced. This could also have improved Mr Ramesh's chances of survival, given that seat 11A is located within the 'wing box' section of the plane.
Professor Edwin Galea, Director of the Fire Safety Engineering Group (FSEG) at the University of Greenwich, told The Telegraph: 'The physically strongest part of the aircraft is the part of the fuselage where the wings are, called the wing box. It's where the wings join to the fuselage. That's the strongest part of the aircraft because there's the most structure there.'
However, the fact that an aircraft's fuel supplies are stored within the wings could make this a more dangerous place to be sitting, depending on the circumstances of a crash.
Is the back of the cabin really safer?
Some studies suggest that you are most likely to survive an air crash if you are sitting towards the back of an aircraft.
According to a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation of 20 crashes since 1971, that featured both fatalities and survivors, passengers sitting towards the rear of the cabin had a 69 per cent chance of survival.
Those sitting at the front of the plane had a 49 per cent chance, while those sitting around the wing had a 59 per cent chance.
This tallies with another study by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) which looked at crashes from 1985 to 2000 and found that survival rates were 62 per cent at the front of the cabin, 61 per cent in the middle, and 68 per cent at the back of the plane.
Explaining these percentages, MIT aeronautics and astronautics professor John Hansman describes the front of the aircraft as being a bit like a 'shock absorber' in certain crash scenarios.
MIT ran a real-world simulation of a Boeing 727 plane crash in 2012, with an aircraft full of dummy passengers in a remote part of the Sonoran Desert in Baja California, Mexico. The experiment was broadcast live in a Channel 4 programme called The Crash.
The simulation found that all first-class passengers would have died in the crash, with the passenger in 7A catapulted 500ft from the plane. The people in the middle of the plane would have suffered broken bones, while the people in the back of the plane would have walked away alive.
Why the middle seat is preferable
A report by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) found that the middle seat comes with an increased chance of survival. Assessing disasters from 1985 to 2020, the FAA found that passengers sitting in the middle seats of the back row had a 28 per cent fatality rate, making it the safest place in the plane.
It could be that passengers in the middle seat are partially protected by those either side of them, who will absorb some of the impact of the crash. In addition, aisle seats are more likely to suffer from falling debris from the overhead lockers during a crash, while passengers in window seats could experience the longest waits before evacuating an aircraft.
A sense check from an aviation expert
Professor Graham Braithwaite, Director of Aerospace and Aviation Cranfield University, stresses the incredible safety record of modern aircraft.
'All seats on modern jet aircraft are incredibly safe,' he told The Telegraph. 'The accident record is incredible, especially if you compare it to other modes of transport like driving.
'The design of the seat and even the fixtures around them must meet strict crashworthiness standards as well as flammability standards. The space around exits and the distance between a seat and an exit is also tightly controlled.
'We shouldn't forget the role of the cabin crew too – essential in an emergency where we know their commands can make all the difference.
'Passengers can contribute to their own safety by reading the safety card and listening to the crew briefing. In an evacuation, leaving their luggage behind will help their survival as well as those behind them.
'While today's accident would be very difficult to survive, it is unusual. The majority of aircraft accidents are survivable these days. This is partly because every time an accident happens, we take the time to investigate – not to apportion blame or liability but to learn lessons to prevent recurrence.
'This is cultural and something that has helped make aviation safe.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
New study finally busts health myth of much-loved tropical fruit
Two new clinical trials have countered conventional dietary wisdom by revealing that eating mango instead of carbohydrates like bread can improve blood sugar levels for type 2 diabetes. Around 830 million people have diabetes across the world, the World Health Organisation has said, with 90 per cent diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, meaning the body has become resistant or doesn't produce enough insulin. In India, this amounts to an estimated 77 million adults, while another 25 million are prediabetic. Speaking to the BBC, one Mumbai -based diabetologist said he frequently gets asked if patients can eat mangoes, a fruit that is central to Indian life. "Mangoes, with their rich sweetness and diverse varieties, are a staple of Indian summers, and it's understandable why people want to indulge," says Rahul Baxi. However, there are a number of misconceptions with some believing mangoes should be strictly avoided, while others think the fruit might 'reverse diabetes'. A pilot study involving 95 participants found that three Indian mango varieties, the Safeda, Dasheri and Langra, produced similar or lower glycemic responses than white bread over two hours of glucose testing. A glycemic response refers to how a food or meal affects your blood sugar (glucose) levels after you eat it. Over a period of three days, continuous monitoring of people with and without type 2 diabetes found that post-meal sugar fluctuations were significantly smaller when swapping bread for a mango. Experts say this could be beneficial to the body, with Dr Sugandha Keha, the author of both studies, stating: "These studies show that within prescribed diets, consumption of mangoes are not detrimental to blood glucose and may even be beneficial." A second week trial reinforced these findings, finding that the 35 adults with type 2 diabetes who replaced bread with 250g of mango showed improvements in their insulin resistance, fasting glucose, weight and waist circumference among other positive outcomes. "We showed the benefits of small doses of mangoes in place of carbohydrates (bread) in breakfast in two detailed studies for the first time, laying to rest all speculations regarding adverse metabolic effects of its consumption," says Prof Anoop Misra, senior author and study lead. "But the key is moderation and clinical supervision - this is not a licence for unlimited mango feasts." In India, mangoes occupy cultural, social and even diplomatic influence and are a feature of everyday life. There are over 1,000 varieties grown across the country, while baskets of mangoes are often given to visiting dignitaries as a sign of welcome and respect. In terms of moderation, it is advised that any mango should be part of a person's daily limit of calories. "If your daily limit is 1,600 calories, any calories from mango should be part of that total, not extra. A 250g mango - about one small fruit - has roughly 180 calories. As in the study, you'd replace an equivalent amount of carbs with mango to get the same results," Professor Misra said.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Mangoes and diabetes: Indian trials debunk sweet myths
As summer sweeps across India, one of the most common questions a leading Mumbai-based diabetologist hears from his patients is: "Can I eat mangoes?""Mangoes, with their rich sweetness and diverse varieties, are a staple of Indian summers, and it's understandable why people want to indulge," says Rahul this simple question, he says, comes loaded with misconceptions - ranging from the belief that mangoes should be strictly avoided, to the opposite extreme where some think eating mangoes in excess might "reverse diabetes". The reality lies somewhere in between, but the confusion doesn't end with the season. "In fact, many patients return for follow-up visits post-mango season, often with elevated glucose levels, and sometimes, the culprit may just be overindulgence in this beloved fruit," says Dr constant dilemma has left many people with diabetes wary of the "king of fruits". Yet, new research suggests that mangoes might not be the villain they're sometimes made out to new Indian clinical trials are turning conventional dietary wisdom on its head, suggesting that controlled mango consumption instead of carbohydrates (in the form of bread) may actually improve blood sugar and metabolic health in people with type 2 1 diabetes occurs when the pancreas produces little or no insulin, while in type 2, the body becomes resistant to insulin's 2 diabetes makes up over 90% of global cases, according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). It's the eighth leading cause of disease burden worldwide, projected to rank second by 2050. Though not fully understood, it's strongly linked to excess weight, age, ethnicity and family history. In India, an estimated 77 million adults have type 2 diabetes, while nearly 25 million are prediabetic and at high risk of developing the condition, according to the World Health Organization. Yet amidst the challenges, new findings offer a surprising ray of hope - especially for mango lovers.A pilot study soon to appear in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition and involving 95 participants found that three popular Indian mango varities - Safeda, Dasheri and Langra - produced similar or lower glycemic responses than white bread over two hours of glucose testing. (A glycemic response is how quickly and how much a food raises blood sugar levels after eating.)Continuous glucose monitoring of people with and without type 2 diabetics over three days showed that, in participants with diabetes, post-meal sugar fluctuations were significantly smaller after eating a mango. This low fluctuation glycemic response could be beneficial to the body in the long run, researchers say."Mangoes are a much-loved fruit and maligned for its possible glucose and weight-elevating effects," said Dr Sugandha Kehar, first author of both studies."These studies show that within prescribed diets, consumption of mangoes are not detrimental to blood glucose and may even be beneficial,"A second, eight-week randomised trial published in the Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders - conducted at Delhi's Fortis C-DOC with Indian Council of Medical Research funding - has reinforced the findings. Thirty-five adults with type 2 diabetes who replaced their breakfast bread with 250g of mango saw improvements in fasting glucose, haemoglobin A1C test (HbA1c) which measures average blood sugar levels, insulin resistance, weight, waist circumference and HDL cholesterol. These markers are key indicators of diabetes control and overall metabolic health."We showed the benefits of small doses of mangoes in place of carbohydrates (bread) in breakfast in two detailed studies for the first time, laying to rest all speculations regarding adverse metabolic effects of its consumption," says Prof Anoop Misra, senior author and study lead."But the key is moderation and clinical supervision - this is not a licence for unlimited mango feasts." I asked Prof Misra what eating mangoes in moderation meant."If your daily limit is 1,600 calories, any calories from mango should be part of that total, not extra. A 250g mango - about one small fruit - has roughly 180 calories. As in the study, you'd replace an equivalent amount of carbs with mango to get the same results," he told Baxi says he tells his patients something similar."If glucose levels are under control, I do allow and even encourage my patients to enjoy mangoes in limited quantities - about half portion which gives 15g carbohydrates - once or twice a day."Dr Baxi tells his patients: portion control is key - mangoes should be eaten between meals, not as dessert. Pair them with protein or fibre, and avoid combining with other carbs or sugary forms, such as juices and its metabolic impact, the mango occupies a far larger place in Indian life - a fruit that opens doors both literally and figuratively, carrying cultural, social and even diplomatic significance."Mango diplomacy" is a familiar phrase across the subcontinent, where carefully chosen crates of the fruit can grease political deals, strengthen alliances or smooth over tense negotiations. Mango festivals pop up across Indian cities, celebrating the fruit's cultural and economic significance. The fruit is, at once, a favourite indulgence and a quietly powerful social currency. "Most Indians have a personal favourite mango and parochial regional loyalties have long fuelled heated ranking debates," says Pushpesh Pant, a Delhi-based historian and culinary expert."Good mangoes are not just to be eaten; they are adornments like jewellery. The rules of the mango push the best produce towards those willing to pay the highest price," writes Sopan Joshi in Mangifera indica: A Biography of the Mango, a magisterial account of the fruit and its are more than 1,000 varieties of mango grown in India. Joshi writes India's mangoes vary by region: northern and eastern varieties like Langra, Dasheri, Chausa and Himsagar are intensely sweet, while southern types offer a subtle sweet-sour flavour. The Alphonso of western India owes its signature taste to a unique balance of sugar and central is the fruit to Indian life that the calendar year itself often begins with the mango flowering. Poet Ghalib called the mango a "a sealed glass of honey", and hundreds of books have been written celebrating its indulgence, part icon, the mango continues to delight and inspire - now with a surprising nod from science.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
FDA warns lead could be leaching into food from this cookware
The Food and Drug Administration has warned lead could be leaching into food from certain imported cookware. The FDA had tested cookware products from the Indian company Saraswati Strips and found them to leach lead into food when used for cooking, according to a new warning. The affected product is called a kadai or karahi, which is a deep pan, similar to a wok. These pans were made from aluminum, brass, and aluminum alloys known as Hindalium/Hindolium or Indalium/Indolium. The FDA does not authorize the use of lead in cookware so it has advised retailers not to sell the pans and consumers not to use them. The pans have been sold at Mannan Supermarket in Queens, New York. Lead is toxic to people of any age or health status, but 'young children, women of child-bearing age, and those who are breastfeeding may be at higher risk for potential adverse events after eating food cooked using these products,' the administration warned. Low levels of lead exposure can cause children to experience trouble learning, low IQ, and behavior changes, the FDA says. Higher levels of lead exposure can cause people to experience fatigue, headache, stomach pain, vomiting and neurological changes, according to the administration. The FDA advised consumers to throw away any cookware that could leach lead into food, either when cooking or when used for food storage. The administration explicitly says not to donate or refurbish the affected cookware. People who are concerned about lead exposure should contact a health care provider, the FDA warned. The administration is working to remove the cookware from the U.S. market as it has yet to identify and contact the distributor to initiate a recall. Saraswati Strips says on its website it manufactures cookware 'from finest quality aluminum' that is 'subjected to stringent process controls at all stages of production for absolute hygienic performance rendering them completely safe for cooking and storage purposes.'
