logo
Domestic violence services are in jeopardy, providers say

Domestic violence services are in jeopardy, providers say

Yahoo09-05-2025

K.C., a stay-at-home mother in North Canton, Ohio, knew her husband had hidden multiple guns around their home. He never pointed the weapons at her, but he routinely invoked them to silence her during arguments.
"I was always living in fear, walking on eggshells, having to do everything to make him happy and just not saying anything to upset him," said K.C., who asked to be identified only by her initials because of safety concerns.
In 2023, days after her husband sexually assaulted her, K.C. said that she discovered a loaded pistol in the closet and two shotguns in the attic. With no family or friends to turn to, she started calling domestic violence shelters, eventually finding a room at the Hope and Healing Resource Center in Akron.
"It literally was my saving grace," K.C. said. "If I didn't have Hope and Healing—a place to go, a place of refuge—I would be on the streets."
Now, services like these are on the chopping block, a potential casualty of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal government, The Trace reports. Domestic violence groups, already stretched thin, warn that looming cuts to federal grants, coupled with a dwindling federal workforce, are likely to gut resources for survivors seeking to escape abusers.
After the Trump administration imposed a widespread pause on federal grants and loans in January, the Office of Violence Against Women, or OVW, abruptly scrubbed its website of grant opportunities and told organizations not to bother finalizing applications.
OVW is one of the largest sources of federal grants to combat domestic abuse. Between 2021 and 2025, the office doled out $2.2 billion to support crisis hotlines, provide mental health counseling, and help survivors secure housing. Federal judges have ordered the Trump administration to resume funding to existing grantees, but the president has appealed those rulings, putting the program's future in limbo.
"We may be able to breathe in this moment, but we're also holding our breath simultaneously," said Anastacia Snyder, the executive director of Catalyst, a domestic violence group in Northern California. "What this did was sow the seeds of fear and chaos into the fabric of our services."
Adding to the uncertainty is the Republican spending package Congress passed in March. Pushed through with some Democratic support to avert a government shutdown, the package empowered the Trump administration to cancel or redirect federal dollars. Domestic violence groups are now bracing for the possibility that Trump will stop the OVW funding once the existing grants expire at the end of the fiscal year in September.
"You have to reapply every year for those awards," said Jennifer Pollitt Hill, executive director of the Maryland Network Against Domestic Abuse. "Without those federal funds, most agencies will cease to exist entirely."
The Justice Department, which oversees the OVW, declined to comment.
Domestic violence groups say the funding uncertainty has them weighing layoffs, reduced hours, and shelter closures.
Artika Roller, the executive director of Cornerstone Advocacy Service in Minnesota, said her group may have to close its shelter, displacing approximately 30 survivors. "If those services are not available for victims and survivors, then they may have to make decisions of staying with someone that is doing harm," she said.
The turmoil coincides with a Trump administration push to establish a process for people with criminal convictions, including those for domestic abuse, to legally own guns again. Federal law bars gun ownership by people found guilty of felonies or certain misdemeanor domestic violence crimes. But a rule the Justice Department proposed in March would allow the attorney general to restore gun rights based on a person's "past criminal activity and their subsequent and current law-abiding behavior." On April 3, The New York Times reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi had approved allowing the actor Mel Gibson to own guns again after he pleaded no contest in 2011 to misdemeanor battery against a former girlfriend.
Domestic violence advocates have decried the proposed rule. "It's taken us decades to get to the place where we recognize the risk associated with firearms, and I cannot fathom making a decision that would undo that," said Anna Harper, the executive vice president of Emerge Center Against Domestic Abuse in Tucson.
About 75 percent—$7 million—of the Emerge Center's annual budget comes from federal funding, Harper said. That money supports a range of services, including a program in which the center works with police and the local domestic violence court to monitor gun-related cases. An OVW grant pays for court advocates to shepherd the survivors through the legal system and create safety plans when their abusers are about to regain access to guns.
Harper now says she might have to lay off the advocates. "When we talk about intervening and domestic violence fatalities," Harper said, "those advocates and the services they provide are really critical."
While groups are seeking to court new donors, Leeann Luna, the CEO of Monarch Services, a domestic violence group in Santa Cruz County, California, said there is not enough private funding to go around. "Unfortunately, it's really tricky because, while we are creating partnerships and relationships for funding with, say, private foundations, it still isn't going to rise to the amount that the federal government gives us," she said.
Even if the White House renews the grant programs, Luna said the administration's staffing cuts could hinder groups' access to the money. "All of these grants are reimbursement-based," she said. "If he (Trump) continues to let people go, is that going to then impact our ability to receive payment in a timely manner, or even at all?"
Several advocates expressed concern about federal funding losses jeopardizing efforts to disarm abusers. In January, researchers at the University of California, San Diego, published a study showing that 85 percent of men who self-reported committing domestic abuse also owned a gun. Previous research has found that abusers with access to firearms are five times more likely to kill their partners.
OVW has funded programs to help survivors obtain court orders to temporarily remove guns from their abusers. But Jennifer Wagman, co-associate director of UCLA's Center for Gender and Health Justice, said many survivors are still unaware of the process, and even when such orders are issued, enforcement is lackluster.
"These funding cuts can make an already challenged system even less effective," Wagman said.
At the Hope and Healing Survivor Resource Center, where K.C. received help, CEO Teresa Stafford-Wright, said her group was trying to reapply for funding for its court program when the grant opportunities disappeared from OVW's website. Now, she is worried about keeping that program running.
"We are already at capacity with the work that we're doing with the funding that we have," Stafford-Wright said.
K.C. credits Hope And Healing with landing her a job and an apartment for her and her kids. Without federal funding, she said, other survivors won't get the help they need.
"Nobody should continue to live in abuse," she said. "Pulling funding definitely would alter the dynamics and enable abusers to continue the cycle over and over."
This story was produced by The Trace and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue
Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue

Newsweek

time21 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's net approval rating is negative on a range of issues except immigration, a new poll shows. According to political analyst and statistician Nate Silver, writing in his Silver Bulletin Substack, Trump has a net negative approval rating on trade, the economy and inflation but a slightly positive rating on immigration. Why It Matters Taking the temperature of the nation, approval ratings are good measures of the public's response to Trump's policies and his actions as president. In the first few months of his second term, Trump's popularity has fluctuated, with some polls more favorable than others. Sustained backlash to his policies could persuade the president to change his approach. Trump, who made immigration a central part of his campaign, has vowed to crack down on border security, carry out mass deportations and end federal benefits for people residing in the country illegally. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What To Know Silver aggregated dozens of recent polls and found that Trump's approval rating on immigration was +2.5 percent. The president did not fare as well on other issues, with a -9.5 percent approval rating on trade, -11.3 percent on the economy and -17.5 percent on inflation. May polling conducted by Verasight U.S. for Strength in Numbers found similar results, with Americans disapproving of the president's handling of all the policy areas they were asked about except border security. That poll also found that 49 percent disapproved of his immigration policy, while 47 percent approved. Overall, Silver found that when analyzing the polls, Trump had a -5.4 net approval rating. An RMG Research/Napolitan News poll, conducted between May 14 and 21 among 3,000 registered voters, showed Trump's approval rating at 48 percent, with 50 percent disapproving. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Other polls have found a more positive response to the president. According to a recent Rasmussen survey, 53 percent of respondents said they approved of Trump, while 46 percent said they disapproved. What People Are Saying Scott Lucas, a professor in international politics at University College Dublin, previously cautioned against reading too much into any one poll, telling Newsweek: "Opinion polls have their own biases." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 20: "We are, together, going to make America bigger, better, stronger, wealthier, healthier, and more religious, than it has ever been before!!!" What Happens Next The midterm elections, scheduled for November 2026, may offer a clearer indication of voters' attitudes toward the president's policies.

Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl
Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl

Politico

time28 minutes ago

  • Politico

Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl

Sen. Chris Murphy is launching a new PAC aimed at taking on President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress — the latest sign the Connecticut Democrat is eyeing higher office, according to plans that were first shared with POLITICO. Murphy will announce Monday that his group, American Mobilization Project, is doling out $400,000 to organizations that oppose cuts to Medicaid and register young people to vote. Two of the early recipients of his funds are based in battleground states. In an interview, Murphy said that his PAC is unique because it is not focused on funding campaigns and instead is looking to mobilize people against Trump's agenda. 'All of us have to realize that if we don't act aggressively right now to organize and mobilize, we may not have our democracy in 2026,' said Murphy. 'I'm a believer that the only thing that is ultimately going to stop Trump's corruption and his destruction of democracy is mass mobilization.' Murphy's PAC expects to spend upwards of $2 million in the 2026 midterm cycle, an aide to the senator said. In the wake of Trump's reelection, Murphy has worked to grow his profile and staked out ground as one of the Democratic Party's most outspoken critics of the president's efforts to bend institutions to his will. Murphy has appeared on numerous podcasts, held town halls across the country and churned out a steady stream of content on social media. In the run-up to presidential campaigns, would-be candidates often launch new PACs or outside groups, which can be used to expand their visibility, build their email lists and cultivate political relationships. But Murphy insists his recent moves are not designed to lay the groundwork for a future presidential bid. He has argued that it's no guarantee that there will even be a race for the White House in 2028, in fact. 'I don't think it's a foregone conclusion there's going to be an election in 2026 or 2028 for anybody to run in if we don't do the work right now,' he said, adding, 'I hope that this PAC is going to act very differently than everybody else's PAC because it's not about banking money or using money for a political campaign or for other people's political campaigns. It's about mobilization.' The first recipients of contributions from Murphy's PAC include Georgia Youth Justice and Project 26 Pennsylvania. His group is also backing the Committee to Protect Health Care's work organizing doctors and nurses to support Medicaid in Michigan, Louisiana and Utah. Murphy is far from the only Democrat who has positioned himself as a future leader of the party as it struggles to find its way back to power. Several potential 2028 candidates have traveled to critical battleground and early-voting states in recent weeks. Last week, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz both visited South Carolina to attend a key Democratic dinner.

Ukraine-Russia peace talks to resume in Istanbul after surprise drone attack

time30 minutes ago

Ukraine-Russia peace talks to resume in Istanbul after surprise drone attack

LONDON -- Ukrainian and Russian delegations are set to meet again in Istanbul, Turkey, on Monday to take part in the next round of U.S.-brokered peace talks intended to end Russia's 3-year-old invasion of its neighbor. Revived talks so far have failed to reach a peace deal, or even achieve a sustained ceasefire, despite pressure on both sides by President Donald Trump's administration. The last meeting between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul in mid-May was the first direct contact between the two sides since spring 2022. Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Sunday, according to a readout published by the State Department -- which said the call took place "at Russia's request." "Secretary Rubio reiterated President Trump's call for continued direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to achieve a lasting peace," the State Department said. The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the two men "exchanged views on various initiatives concerning the political settlement of the Ukrainian crisis." Ukraine is calling for a full 30-day ceasefire during which time peace negotiations can take place. Russia has refused the request, with President Vladimir Putin and his top officials retaining maximalist war goals dating back to the opening days of the Russian invasion. Among the Kremlin's demands are the annexation of four Ukrainian regions -- plus the retention of Crimea, which Russia seized in 2014 -- Ukrainian demilitarization and a permanent block on the country's accession to NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Sunday social media post that Kyiv's delegation will be led by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov. The president set out Ukraine's goals for the meeting. "First -- a full and unconditional ceasefire," he wrote. "Second -- the release of prisoners. Third -- the return of abducted children. And in order to establish a reliable and lasting peace and ensure security, preparation of the meeting at the highest level." Zelenskyy and his government have repeatedly accused Putin of intentionally sabotaging peace talks since Trump returned to office in January, having promised on the campaign trail to end the war within 24 hours. Trump's threat of further sanctions on Russia do not appear to have softened the Kremlin's war goals. Zelenskyy and his European backers have pushed Trump to increase pressure on Putin by introducing new sanctions on Russia and providing Ukraine with more military support. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine-Russia envoy, hinted at the president's growing frustration with Moscow, telling ABC News last week that the president has "seen a level of unreasonableness that really frustrates him." In a phone conversation with Trump in May, Putin said Russia would provide a "peace memorandum" outlining a possible settlement. Moscow is yet to provide the document. Vladimir Medinsky -- a Putin aide and long-time member of Russia's negotiating team -- said Sunday that the Russian team had received Ukraine's version of the peace memorandum. Since the last round of talks in Istanbul, Trump has hit out at Putin -- calling him "absolutely crazy" -- and again criticized Zelenskyy, saying of the Ukrainian leader, "Everything out of his mouth causes problems, I don't like it, and it better stop." Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament representing Zelenskyy's party and the chair of the body's foreign affairs committee, told ABC News, "Russia's primary goal is to avoid sanctions by pretending that it negotiates." "Putin is not interested in negotiations and ceasefire, because he hopes to start an offensive during summer," Merezhko added. "On the one hand, he imitates negotiations to avoid Trump's sanctions and simultaneously to demonstrate that Russia is not politically isolated. Yet, on the other hand, Putin hopes that if Trump will decide to withdraw from the negotiations, he will leave Ukraine without military support, one-on-one with Russia." The talks come a day after Ukraine launched one of the most stunning attacks of the war. In what a source in the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) told ABC News was an operation one and a half years in the making, operatives used attack drones concealed in containers carried by trucks to attack strategic bomber bases deep inside Russian territory. Moscow has used long-range bombers and their cruise missile armaments to attack Ukrainian cities throughout the full-scale invasion. The SBU claimed to have hit more than 40 military aircraft in the attacks, which targeted multiple air bases thousands of miles from Ukrainian-controlled territory. Russia's Defense Ministry framed the operation as "a terrorist attack," claiming that the strikes were "repelled" in three regions, but noting that several aircraft caught fire at airfields during the attacks in Irkutsk and Murmansk -- videos of which the SBU published. Also on Sunday, Russian authorities reported the collapse of two railway bridges and derailment of two trains in regions bordering Ukraine, which they blamed on "explosions." At least seven people were killed, authorities said. In an address on Sunday, Zelenskyy called the Ukrainian drone attack a "brilliant operation" and said Russia "suffered truly significant losses." The president framed the attack as a defensive measure. "We will defend ourselves by all means available to us," Zelenskyy said. "Not for a single second did we want this war. We offered the Russians a ceasefire. Since March 11, the U.S. proposal for a full and unconditional ceasefire has been on the table. It was the Russians who chose to continue the war." "Pressure is truly needed -- pressure on Russia that should bring it back to reality," Zelenskyy added. "Pressure through sanctions. Pressure from our forces. Pressure through diplomacy. All of it must work together." Meanwhile, long-range drone and missile attacks continued overnight into Monday morning. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 80 drones and four missiles into the country overnight, of which 52 were shot down or neutralized. The air force reported impacts in 12 locations. Russia's Defense Ministry said it shot down 162 Ukrainian drones over nine Russian regions overnight.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store