Allegations of impotency made by wife in divorce proceedings not defamatory: HC
A Bench of Justice S.M. Modak held that in a Hindu Marriage Act petition, the allegations of impotency are very much relevant.
The court dismissed the petitioner's complaint seeking a defamation case against his estranged wife and her family for alleging that he was impotent in the divorce proceedings initiated by her.
A copy of the order passed on July 17 was made available on Friday. The court held that the woman was justified in making these allegations to show that she had suffered cruelty in the marriage.
The allegations of impotency being a ground for divorce are necessary, it said.
"This court feels that when litigation between spouses arises in a matrimonial relationship, then the wife is justified in making those allegations to support her interest," the court said, adding the same cannot be held as defamatory.
The man had stated that his estranged wife had, in her pleas seeking divorce and maintenance and also in her FIR against him and his parents, claimed that he was impotent. These documents were part of the public record and hence defamatory.
The woman, her father and brother had moved the High Court seeking to quash a Sessions Court order, directing a Magistrate's Court to conduct an inquiry into the man's defamation complaint.
The woman, in her plea to the High Court, said that her husband's impotence was one of the grounds for dissolving the marriage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Man arrested for alleged attempt to extort and defame actor-director Balachandra Menon
The Kochi City Cyber Crime police have arrested a man accused in the case registered in connection with an alleged attempt to extort actor-director Balachandra Menon and tarnish him over social media. The arrested was identified as Sangeeth Luis, 46, a native of Kundara in Kollam and now residing at Ayyanthole in Thrissur. The police said he was an accused in several cases. He was under the surveillance of the police for a while and was arrested in the early-morning hours of Thursday (August 7, 2025). The incident pertaining to the case took place last September. He was declared an offender under the Kerala Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act and arrested on preventive grounds by the Kundara police in 2023, the police said. The police had arrested the other accused in the case, actor Minnu Muneer, 45, after she surrendered at the station on June 30, 2025. She surrendered at the Cyber Crime police station after the Kerala High Court dismissed her anticipatory bail plea and directed her to appear before the police. Later, she was released on bail as per the direction of the High Court. The case was registered on October 2, 2024. The accused were booked under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 351(2) (criminal intimidation), the IT Act Sections 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form), and the Kerala Police Act 120 (o) (causing, through any means of communication, a nuisance of himself to any person by repeated or undesirable or anonymous call, letter, writing, message, e-mail or through a messenger). According to the FIR, Ms. Muneer consistently made derogatory posts against the petitioner, posted the photo of the petitioner and instigated vulgar comments. The second accused allegedly made threatening calls to the petitioner on September 13 and 14, 2024. The alleged posts came shortly after the release of the Hema Committee report on the alleged atrocities against woman in the film industry.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Mumbai court denies Elgar Parishad case accused's plea to visit Delhi
A Special NIA Court in Mumbai has dismissed activist Gautam Navlakha's application seeking permission to travel to Delhi for 45 days, sharply criticising the repeated nature of such requests and calling it a "deliberate attempt to circumvent judicial restrictions".Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad case, had sought leave to visit Delhi between July 15 and August 30, citing multiple personal grounds. These included the deteriorating health of his 86-year-old sister, a reunion with his partner's family after five years, personal domestic matters, and medical for Navlakha, Advocate Wahab Khan argued that his client had previously complied with all conditions imposed by the court when allowed to travel and that the present request was genuine and limited in duration. However, the plea was opposed by Special Public Prosecutor Prakash Shetty, who contended that the gravity of the charges against Navlakha warranted a stricter Judge Chakor S Baviskar, while rejecting the application, noted that a similar request had been granted in November 2024 due to serious grounds. However, Navlakha's subsequent plea to permanently relocate to Delhi had already been denied by the court on June 19 this year."Only because that application [in 2024] was allowed, it does not automatically give license to Navlakha to claim the same liberty each and every time. It does not mean that, every now and then, Navlakha on the same grounds, for the same reason, should be granted permission," Justice Baviskar the court held that Navlakha's repeated applications on the same grounds appeared to be a calculated effort to achieve indirectly what had been denied directly. "Now, perhaps to give go-by to the intention and directions of the High Court... Navlakha ingeniously has found out the trick of moving such application after application with the same prayer on the same grounds to facilitate him to reside at Delhi. It is not at all expected," the order the court refrained from imposing costs on Navlakha, the judge made it clear that such tactics were unacceptable. "There is legal trite that, the thing which you cannot do directly, cannot do indirectly as well," he Elgar Parishad case, in which Navlakha is a key accused, pertains to alleged inflammatory speeches at a conclave held in Pune in 2017, which authorities claim triggered violence at the Bhima Koregaon war memorial the next day.- Ends
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Actor Shwetha Menon moves Kerala HC to quash FIR over alleged obscene content
KOCHI: Actor Shwetha Menon on Thursday approached the High Court seeking to quash the FIR filed against her for allegedly making financial gains through her roles in movies featuring vulgar and obscene content. Shwetha Menon is a candidate in the upcoming election for President of A.M.M.A (Association of Malayalam Movie Artists), to be held on August 15. The FIR charges offences under Sections 3 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, and Section 67(A) (Publishing or transmitting material containing sexually explicit acts) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Advocates Unni Sebastian Kappen and M Revikrishnan, representing Shwetha Menon before the High Court, submitted that the case is an abuse of the process of the court, as the allegations are ex facie absurd and improbable. The prosecution alleged that the accused, to secure monetary gain, appeared in several films and advertisements that contain obscene visuals. The complainant--Martin Menacherry of Ernakulam--claimed that the visuals of the accused in these films and advertisements, which are available in the public domain, are obscene and vulgar. By appearing in such advertisements and acting in films, the accused allegedly gained financial benefits.
