‘No bra, no exam': Nigerian university sparks outrage over bra checks before exams
A Nigerian university has come under fire after a video showing female students being physically checked for bras before an examination went viral, triggering widespread condemnation and raising serious concerns about students' rights. The BBC, which reported on the incident, confirmed the footage was taken at Olabisi Onabanjo University (OOU) in south-western Ogun State.
(Also read: Man wears a bra to film 'viral reel' in Haryana market, shopkeeper thrashes him in front of crowd)
The video, widely circulated on social media, shows female staff members touching the chests of young women standing in line to enter an examination hall. The alleged purpose was to determine whether they were wearing bras—a requirement linked to the university's dress code policies.
The university has not issued an official statement regarding the footage. However, a student leader defended the practice, saying it was part of maintaining a 'distraction-free environment'. Despite the justification, he admitted that better methods should be employed to enforce the policy and acknowledged the criticisms labelling the practice as sexist and demeaning.
Haruna Ayagi, a senior official at the Human Rights Network, told the BBC that the policy could face legal repercussions. 'Unwarranted touches on another person's body is a violation and could lead to legal action. The university is wrong to adopt this method to curb indecent dressing,' he said.
In response to the backlash, Muizz Olatunji, president of the university's students' union, posted a statement on X (formerly Twitter), reiterating the institution's intent behind the dress code. 'The university promotes a dress-code policy aimed at maintaining a respectful and distraction-free environment,' he wrote, stressing that students were encouraged to dress modestly in line with institutional values.
He added that the policy was longstanding and that the union was working with university authorities to 'explore alternative approaches to addressing indecent dressing, focusing on respectful and dignified interactions between students and staff.'
Olatunji also shared the official dress code, which bans clothing 'capable of making the same or opposite sex to lust after the student in an indecent manner.'
Founded in 1982 as Ogun State University and renamed in 2001 after former state governor Olabisi Onabanjo, the institution is now at the centre of a growing controversy over students' rights, privacy, and gender-based policies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No bra, no exam': Nigerian university defends viral video of women being checked, says this will ensure 'distraction-free environment'
A Nigerian university came under fire for checking whether female students were wearing bras. A Nigerian university has come under immense criticism after a video of a female staff member checking whether a female student was wearing a bra before allowing her into the examination hall went viral. Olabisi Onabanjo University in Ogun State defended the policy of allowing no female student without a bra in the examination hall and said it is part of the institution's dress code aimed to promote modesty and maintain a "distraction-free environment". President of the students' union, Muizz Olatunji, however, has acknowledged that there is a need for an alternative method to enforce this dress code. Olatunji posted in X that checking the bra is not a new policy. Olatunji shared parts of what he said were the school's policies, which described indecent dressing as that which shows sensitive body parts 'such as breasts, buttocks, nipples and belly-buttons,' including 'any dressing that is capable of making the same or opposite sex to lust after the student in an indecent manner. ' After the video went viral, students of the university confirmed that it was shot at their school. Human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong described the OOU's bra policy as 'draconian' and 'arbitrary,' and one that 'might amount to some form of sexual harassment.' He told CNN that 'physically examining the bodies of students to determine whether they are wearing a bra or not is not only degrading but also undignifying.' 'There could be medical explanations for why certain students may not feel comfortable wearing a bra at a particular time,' he said, adding that enforcing the policy 'without exceptions, or without taking peculiarities into consideration is arbitrary,' and could lead to legal actions.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Brotherhood Is Dead? Why Muslim Nations Won't Unite Against Israel Despite Rising Tensions With Iran
New Delhi: Recent appeals by Pakistani leaders calling for Islamic solidarity in defense of Palestine and Iran have gained little traction across West Asia. Despite dramatic rhetoric, historical declarations and shared religious identity, real political unity continues to elude the Muslim world. Deep internal divisions, regional rivalries and competing alliances have left the Islamic bloc fractured – especially as the Israel-Iran conflict pushes the region closer to a broader confrontation. Back in 1974, during the second summit of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) held in Lahore, Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had made a stirring plea – declaring Pakistan's commitment to Islam and vowing support for Muslim causes worldwide, even if it meant bloodshed. At that time, most Arab nations had not recognised Israel, Iran had not undergone its Islamic revolution and regional alignments looked very different. Fast forward to 2025, the situation has drastically changed. Several Arab countries, including Egypt, Jordan, the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan, have normalised ties with Israel. Iran and Saudi Arabia, long-time regional rivals, still eye each other warily despite recent diplomatic breakthroughs. Once envisioned as a force for collective action, now appears largely symbolic in conflicts involving Israel. The current war between Israel and Iran, now entering its second week, has revealed the limitations of any pan-Islamic response. While Iran continues to launch missile and drone strikes in retaliation for Israeli attacks on its nuclear and military infrastructure, most Muslim-majority nations have responded with caution, if at all. Pakistan's defense minister recently urged Muslim nations to unite against Israeli aggression. However, the response has been tepid. Internal fractures remain. Gulf nations, for instance, fear both Iran's regional ambitions and Israel's growing influence. Some host American military bases and rely on the US for defense support. This limits their ability and willingness to openly oppose Tel Aviv. A vocal critic of Israel, Turkey maintains diplomatic ties with it and has cooperated with the United States in the past. Even President Erdogan, who condemned Israel's recent actions and warned of catastrophic consequences, has walked a tightrope – navigating between nationalist rhetoric and realpolitik. Experts point out that religious identity alone is not enough to drive geopolitical unity. Talking to BBC, former Indian ambassador Talmiz Ahmad said that the rivalry between Iran and Israel is rooted in strategic competition, not faith. Alignments in West Asia, he said, are based more on national interest than any religious solidarity. He added that Pakistan's renewed calls for Islamic unity stem in part from its geopolitical repositioning. After years of strategic alignment with the United States, Pakistan is now seeking to strengthen its ties with Turkey and Iran. Still, the military, political and economic constraints of these alliances limit how far they can go in confronting Israel or the United States. Meanwhile, the Palestinian issue, often cited as a unifying cause, no longer serves that purpose effectively. The ground realities in Gaza and the West Bank have changed. Preoccupied with domestic challenges and wary of regional instability, Arab states have shifted priorities. With Iran facing increasing isolation, and Israel's military campaign showing no signs of slowing down, concerns are mounting over what a weakened Tehran might mean for the regional balance of power. Analysts argue that if Iran suffers a strategic defeat, it could mark a turning point in West Asia, further empowering Israel and cementing U.S. influence across the Gulf. Russian and Chinese interests would also be impacted. Having already lost influence in Syria after Bashar al-Assad's exit, Moscow faces the risk of being pushed out of West Asia entirely. Beijing, heavily reliant on Gulf oil, could see itself more beholden to American allies in the region. Islamic unity, in this context, remains an elusive goal – undermined by long-standing rivalries, complex alliances and shifting strategic interests. The war between Israel and Iran may be religiously charged in rhetoric, but on the ground, it is a geopolitical contest where common faith is overshadowed by national interest.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
How a leaked call with a Cambodian leader landed Thai PM in a political storm
Thailand Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's 10-month-old government is teetering after a leaked phone call between her and Cambodian leader Hun Sen triggered public outrage and led to the exit of a key coalition partner. In the audio, Paetongtarn, 38, refers to Hun Sen, a longtime family friend, as 'uncle' and appears to dismiss a senior Thai military commander's handling of a simmering border dispute. 'I would like to apologise for the leaked audio of my conversation with a Cambodian leader which has caused public resentment,' she said Thursday, as calls for her resignation intensified. Bhumjaithai, the second-largest party in the ruling coalition, quit on Wednesday, seriously weakening the Peu Thai-led government's grip on parliament. The coalition now hangs by a thread, with two more partners meeting Thursday to assess their position. As per a report by BBC, critics were quick to pounce on Paetongtarn's perceived deference to Hun Sen and her comments about the Thai military, which she said 'just wanted to look cool and said things that are not useful.' Paetongtarn defended the conversation as a 'negotiation technique,' but the optics have been damaging. The Shinawatra family's deep ties with Cambodia's ruling Hun family—her father Thaksin and Hun Sen are longtime allies who refer to each other as 'godbrothers'—have long fuelled suspicions among Thai nationalists. Hun Sen, who said he had shared the audio with 80 politicians, later posted the full 17-minute clip on Facebook. Thailand's foreign ministry, in a letter to Cambodia's ambassador, expressed 'deep disappointment' over the leak of what it described as a 'private telephone conversation.' The leak, it warned, 'will severely affect ongoing efforts for both sides to resolve the problem in good faith.' Border tensions flared last month after a Cambodian soldier was killed in a clash, plunging diplomatic ties to their lowest point in over a decade. Cambodia retaliated with sweeping bans on Thai imports, from produce to electricity and even Thai dramas, while both countries imposed new restrictions at the border. Paetongtarn, the youngest PM in Thai history and only the second woman to hold the office (after her aunt Yingluck), rose to power last August after her predecessor Srettha Thavisin was ousted by a court ruling.
