South Korea special prosecutor seeks arrest warrant for ex-President Yoon, Yonhap says
SEOUL, June 24 (Reuters) - South Korea's special prosecutor asked a court on Tuesday to issue an arrest warrant for former President Yoon Suk Yeol, marking an intensifying investigation of the ousted leader over his botched bid to impose martial law, Yonhap News Agency said.
Yoon, who is already facing a criminal trial on insurrection charges for leading the martial law declaration, was arrested in January after resisting authorities trying to take him into custody, but was released after 52 days on technical grounds.
The martial law attempt shocked a country that had prided itself on being a thriving democracy after overcoming military dictatorship in the 1980s and triggered a snap presidential election to pick Yoon's successor amid bitter political infighting.
The new warrant is on a charge of obstruction, Yonhap said. Yoon had been under investigation by the police and the state prosecutors' office on a number of charges stemming from the failed attempt in December to impose military rule.
The special prosecutor's office could not be immediately reached for comment.
A lawyer who has represented Yoon during his impeachment and criminal trials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In January, Yoon initially resisted an attempt by investigators trying to execute a court warrant for his arrest, holed up in the presidential residence while his security service led by officials loyal to him barricaded the gates.
The special prosecutor was appointed just days after liberal President Lee Jae-myung took office on June 4 after winning the snap election called after Yoon's ouster in April and has launched a team of more than 200 prosecutors and investigators to take over ongoing investigations against Yoon.
Yoon is fighting the charges against him that include masterminding insurrection, which is punishable by death or life in prison, claiming he had declared martial law on December 3 to sound the alarm over the threat to democracy posed by then-opposition Democratic Party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
-copy.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Purple Heart veteran shot in action self-deports after old drug charge resurfaces: ‘Can't believe this is happening in America'
A U.S. Army veteran, awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in combat, has self-deported to South Korea after being informed he could no longer remain in America under President Donald Trump 's hardline immigration policies. Sae Joon Park, 55, a green card holder who has lived in the U.S. since the age of seven, departed on Monday following a removal order stemming from drug possession and failure to appear in court charges from over 15 years ago. Park attributes these past offenses to years of untreated post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which he developed after being wounded in action in Panama in 1989. 'I can't believe that this is happening in America,' Park told NPR in an interview before his departure. 'That blows me away, like a country that I fought for.' Having arrived in the U.S. from South Korea in the late 1970s, Park grew up in Los Angeles. Seeking direction, he enlisted in the U.S. Army after high school. 'I wanted direction and [to] better myself and maybe help serve the country,' he explained. At 20, he was deployed to Panama as part of the 1989 U.S. invasion to topple Manuel Noriega's regime. During a firefight, he was shot. 'I realized I was shot,' he recounted. 'So I'm thinking, 'Oh my God, I'm paralyzed.' And then thinking, 'Oh my God, I'm not just paralyzed. I'm dying right now.'' A bullet was miraculously deflected by his dog tag, saving his life. Upon his return to the U.S., Park received the Purple Heart. While his physical wounds healed, the psychological trauma persisted. Unaware at the time that he had PTSD, he did not seek professional help, leading him to turn to drugs to cope. "I had to find some kind of a cure for what I was going through," he told NPR. For much of his twenties and thirties, Park struggled with a crack cocaine addiction. An arrest for drug possession and a subsequent failure to appear in court led to charges that ultimately derailed his chances of naturalization or relief from deportation. 'I just couldn't stay clean,' he admitted. 'So finally, when the judge told me, 'Don't come back into my court with the dirty urine,' which I knew I would, I got scared and I jumped bail.' Although the U.S. offers expedited naturalization for veterans, Park was discharged before completing the required 12 months of service, and the Panama invasion was not officially recognized as a period of hostility, leaving him ineligible. Park served three years in prison starting in 2009, during which he lost his desire for drugs. After his release, he moved to Hawaii, found work, and focused on raising his son and daughter. Having completed his prison term, he was served with a removal order but was initially allowed to remain in the U.S. with annual check-ins with immigration officials. However, under the Trump administration, circumstances shifted this month. During a meeting with local Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials in Hawaii, Park was informed he would be detained and deported unless he left voluntarily. He was given an ankle monitor and three weeks to arrange his affairs. 'People were saying, 'You took two bullets for this country. Like you're more American than most of the Americans living in America,'' he told Hawaii News Now. After spending his final days with friends and family, including his 85-year-old mother, whom he believes he may never see again, Park booked a flight to South Korea – a country he barely remembers from his childhood. Under the watchful eyes of ICE agents at Honolulu airport, he shared tearful goodbyes with his loved ones. Despite the profound circumstances of his departure from the country he fought for, Park remains resolute. 'Even after everything I went through, I don't regret joining the military or getting shot,' he said. 'It's part of my life, my journey. It's made me who I am today.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
UK calls China a major challenge but an essential economic partner
China's attempts to spy, destabilize and disrupt Britain's economy and democracy have grown, but Beijing is still a vital economic partner for the U.K., the government said Tuesday. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said 'China's power is an inescapable fact' and freezing relations with the world's second biggest economy is 'not an option.' He spoke to lawmakers as he outlined findings from the government's ' China audit.' 'China is our third biggest trading partner, our universities' second largest source of international students. China will continue to play a vital role in supporting the U.K.'s secure growth,' Lammy said. The Labour Party government pledged to conduct an in-depth examination of U.K.-China relations after it was elected almost a year ago, in an effort to balance the country's economic interests and its security. Many details of the review will remain classified for security reasons, Lammy said. Its conclusions were summarized in a document outlining the U.K. government's broader national security strategy. It said that 'instances of China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years.' Yet the government resisted pressure from China hawks in Parliament to label China a threat on a par with Russia. The security review called it a 'geostrategic challenge' but also an essential player in tackling major issues such as climate change, global health and economic stability. 'We will seek a trade and investment relationship that supports secure and resilient growth, and boosts the U.K. economy,' the government said. 'Yet there are several major areas, such as human rights and cybersecurity, where there are stark differences and where continued tension is likely.' Opposition Conservative Party foreign affairs spokeswoman Priti Patel said the government was showing 'signs of naivety' about China. Another Conservative lawmaker, Harriet Cross, branded Beijing 'at best unreliable and at worst hostile.' U.K.-China relations have chilled since the short-lived 'golden era' announced by then-Prime Minister David Cameron in 2015, after a series of spying and cyberespionage allegations, Beijing's crackdown on civil liberties in Hong Kong, a former British colony, and China's support for Russia in the Ukraine war. There was no immediate comment from China on the review. China was one of many challenges identified in a review that the government said marked 'a hardening and a sharpening of our approach to national security' in an increasingly dangerous world. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government has pledged, along with other NATO members, to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. The total includes 3.5% on defense and 1.5% on broader security and resilience. The U.K. currently spends 2.3% of national income on defense and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
China spies on us, but we can't do without them... David Lammy lays out 'national security' strategy saying UK must be 'realistic' - as Tories accuse Labour of going 'cap in hand' to Beijing
China is a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' but freezing the UK's relations with Beijing is 'not an option', Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs today. In a statement to the House of Commons, Mr Lammy outlined the findings of the Government's examination of the UK-China relationship. The 'China audit' recommended increasing Britain's 'resilience and readiness' towards the Asian superpower and the Government's ability to engage with Beijing. As part of Labour 's national security strategy, a summary of the audit set out how 'China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years'. But it also noted how ministers are seeking a 'trade and investment relationship' with China to boost the UK economy. Mr Lammy told MPs that in the past decade China has delivered a third of global economic growth, becoming the world's second largest economy. Together with Hong Kong, it is the UK's third largest trading partner, the Foreign Secretary added. 'Not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all,' he said. 'China's power is an inescapable fact.' Mr Lammy said the audit painted a 'complex picture' but 'the UK's approach to China will be founded on progressive realism, taking the world as it is, not as we wish it to be'. The Foreign Secretary faced claims that the Government was going 'cap in hand' to China to bail out the British economy. Tory shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'It has taken the Government a year to produce this audit, which seemingly fails to set out any kind of serious strategic framework. 'I think it's fair to say we know why: because the Government – and in fact the Foreign Secretary has touched on this – has gone cap in hand to China to bail out its terrible handling of the British economy. 'It is setting up its closer economic ties with China while knowing very well that British businesses here are struggling, not just when it comes to competing against China, but actually struggling to absorb the weight of Labour's own regulatory costs in this country.' Mr Lammy was also forced to assure MPs that there are 'no grubby deals' with China on any issue, including the proposed 'super-embassy' in London. Former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith told the Foreign Secretary: 'I'll give him a quick audit now of exactly what should have been. 'China threatens Taiwan, has invaded the South China Sea, it's having massive disputes with the Philippines, genocide, slave labour, organ harvesting, transnational repression, taxes Hong Kong dissidents here, Hong Kong dissidents under threat constantly, cyber-attacks on the UK, supports Myanmar in their oppressive military regime, supports Russian's invasion of Ukraine, it also supports North Korea and Iran and has trashed the Sino-British treaty on Hong Kong, it has arrested Jimmy Lai, it has sanctions on UK MPs and it thieves all the IPs on private companies. 'What a record to balance, what? Against some potential trade?' He added: 'In the course of this embassy decision, it was said quite clearly in the media that China would not apply again after the refusal of Tower Hamlets (Council), unless they received assurances from the UK Government. 'Can he now tell me that they have not received any assurances, or have they received private assurances that they will get what they want and get this embassy?' Mr Lammy responded: 'Let me just express respect for (Sir Iain's) experience in relation to the China threat and also that he is subject to sanctions that I have consistently raised with China, noting that recently it lifted sanctions against members of the European Parliament and I pressed them recently to do the same. 'Let me assure him that there are no grubby deals on any issues and certainly not in relation to the embassy – and I reject any suggestion of anything other.' The China audit underlined the need for 'direct and high-level engagement and pragmatic cooperation where it is in our national interest', signalling further high-level talks with Beijing. 'In a more volatile world, we need to reduce the risks of misunderstanding and poor communication that have characterised the relationship in recent years,' the strategy said. 'China's global role makes it increasingly consequential in tackling the biggest global challenges, from climate change to global health to financial stability. 'We will seek a trade and investment relationship that supports secure and resilient growth and boosts the UK economy.' But the strategy acknowledged 'several major areas, such as human rights and cyber security, where there are stark differences and where continued tension is likely'. The report noted: 'Instances of China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years. 'Our national security response will therefore continue to be threat-driven, bolstering our defences and responding with strong counter-measures. 'We will continue to protect the Hong Kong community in the UK and others from transnational repression.' The China audit recommended 'an increase in China capabilities across the national security system'. 'That includes creating the basis for a reciprocal and balanced economic relationship, by providing guidance to those in the private or higher education sectors for which China is an important partner,' the strategy said.
