UK calls China a major challenge but an essential economic partner
China's attempts to spy, destabilize and disrupt Britain's economy and democracy have grown, but Beijing is still a vital economic partner for the U.K., the government said Tuesday.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said 'China's power is an inescapable fact' and freezing relations with the world's second biggest economy is 'not an option.' He spoke to lawmakers as he outlined findings from the government's ' China audit.'
'China is our third biggest trading partner, our universities' second largest source of international students. China will continue to play a vital role in supporting the U.K.'s secure growth,' Lammy said.
The Labour Party government pledged to conduct an in-depth examination of U.K.-China relations after it was elected almost a year ago, in an effort to balance the country's economic interests and its security. Many details of the review will remain classified for security reasons, Lammy said.
Its conclusions were summarized in a document outlining the U.K. government's broader national security strategy. It said that 'instances of China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years.'
Yet the government resisted pressure from China hawks in Parliament to label China a threat on a par with Russia. The security review called it a 'geostrategic challenge' but also an essential player in tackling major issues such as climate change, global health and economic stability.
'We will seek a trade and investment relationship that supports secure and resilient growth, and boosts the U.K. economy,' the government said. 'Yet there are several major areas, such as human rights and cybersecurity, where there are stark differences and where continued tension is likely.'
Opposition Conservative Party foreign affairs spokeswoman Priti Patel said the government was showing 'signs of naivety' about China. Another Conservative lawmaker, Harriet Cross, branded Beijing 'at best unreliable and at worst hostile.'
U.K.-China relations have chilled since the short-lived 'golden era' announced by then-Prime Minister David Cameron in 2015, after a series of spying and cyberespionage allegations, Beijing's crackdown on civil liberties in Hong Kong, a former British colony, and China's support for Russia in the Ukraine war.
There was no immediate comment from China on the review.
China was one of many challenges identified in a review that the government said marked 'a hardening and a sharpening of our approach to national security' in an increasingly dangerous world.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government has pledged, along with other NATO members, to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. The total includes 3.5% on defense and 1.5% on broader security and resilience.
The U.K. currently spends 2.3% of national income on defense and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
AB Foods postpones UK bioethanol plant closure decision by 24 hours
LONDON, June 24 (Reuters) - Associated British Foods (ABF.L), opens new tab said on Tuesday it will extend its deadline for deciding the fate of its under threat Vivergo bioethanol plant in Hull, northern England, by 24 hours, hoping the UK government will step in with a support package. "At the request of the government, ABF has agreed to postpone Vivergo closure decisions for 24 hours while discussions continue on the appropriate process for resolution of the issues facing the UK bioethanol industry," an AB Foods spokesperson said. The group's original deadline was June 25.
South Wales Guardian
32 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Welfare rebellion not a confidence vote, PM says as he remains defiant over cuts
Some 108 backbenchers have signed an amendment that would halt the Government's proposed changes – enough to threaten the Prime Minister's majority. But Sir Keir said on Tuesday he would 'press on' despite the prospect of a major revolt when the welfare Bill comes before the Commons in a vote set for July 1. Meanwhile, Kemi Badenoch said the Tories would lend the Government votes but only if Labour rules out tax rises in the autumn budget as well as reducing unemployment and lowering the welfare budget. Speaking in the Hague, where he is attending the Nato summit with toher world leaders, Sir Keir told reporters there was a 'clear moral case' for reforming the system. 'It's not a confidence vote. It's a vote about reforming our welfare system,' he told Sky News. 'It isn't working. It doesn't help people into work. Quite the contrary, it actually makes it harder for people to go into work. I think most colleagues do accept the case for reform, we've got to get on and make that reform.' The amendment was published on Tuesday's order paper and calls for a pause allowing for further scrutiny of the Bill and for support to be in place before any further cuts are made. The size of the revolt is enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs sided with rebels. Tory leader Mrs Badenoch said her party would offer support for the Bill but on the condition that the Government agree to take steps that 'align with our core Conservative principles'. She claimed the welfare budget would need to be slashed further, unemployment would need to come down and 'no new tax rises in the autumn'. Asked whether he would consider pausing his plans in light of the rebellion, the Prime Minister told reporters travelling with him to the Netherlands: 'We were elected to change what is broken in our country. 'The welfare system is broken and that's why we will press ahead with our reforms.' Today, I have co-signed an amendment with over 100 of my colleagues that would stop the welfare reform proposals from becoming law. I want to be clear this is not a decision I have taken lightly. In eight years as a councillor and almost a year as an MP, I have not broken the… — Josh Fenton-Glynn MP (@JoshFG) June 24, 2025 Sir Keir said: 'The additions to Pip each year are the equivalent of the population of a city the size of Leicester. 'That's not a system that can be left unreformed, not least because it's unsustainable and therefore you won't have a welfare system for those that need it in the future.' The Prime Minister earlier told his Cabinet 'we will reform welfare' because the Government must take 'hard, honest choices,' according to Downing Street, which declined to say whether any minister had expressed concern over the Bill. The Cabinet 'collectively' supports the Government's agenda, a Number 10 spokesman said. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, is locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the plans. Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including Treasury committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier and work and pensions committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams. Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed, while Labour London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan added pressure by coming out against the plans on Tuesday afternoon. The mayor said: 'Having looked at the analysis of the Government's plans, the impact on London will be substantial, and for too many disabled Londoners it will destroy their financial safety net. 'The Government must urgently think again.' (1/2) With a heavy heart, I have written to the Prime Minister to tender my resignation as a whip. Whilst I will continue to support the government in delivering the change the country so desperately needs, I cannot vote in favour of the proposed reforms to disability benefits. — Vicky Foxcroft 💙 (@vickyfoxcroft) June 19, 2025 Under the proposals in the Bill, eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, will be limited along with the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). However, the legislation published last week will give existing claimants a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, in what was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion-a-year. Downing Street declined to explicitly rule out offering further concessions when asked on Tuesday what would be done to reassure uneasy backbenchers before a vote scheduled for next week. 'We'll talk to them over the next week but the Government believes this is a good package of reforms,' a Number 10 spokesman said. 'We hope that colleagues will engage positively over the next few days.' Number 10 said the Government recognised the 'strength of feeling' surrounding the issue but rejected suggestions the plans were 'dead on arrival'. It refused to say whether it was confident that the Bill would make its way through Parliament when asked by reporters on Tuesday. 'We are focused on delivering last week's Bill and engaging, talking to colleagues … as to why this reform is so important,' the spokesman said.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Spy chiefs handed £600m to tackle China ‘threat'
Spy chiefs have been handed an extra £600 million to fight the 'threat' of China, David Lammy has announced, after an audit into the UK's vulnerability to Beijing. The review, which began after the election last year, found that Chinese spying, interference in the UK's democracy and attempts to undermine the economy had increased in recent years. In Tuesday's national security strategy, ministers promised 'greater robustness and consistency' in the way the UK dealt with China but acknowledged the desire for a 'trade and investment relationship' with the world's second-biggest economy. Mr Lammy referred to China explicitly as a 'threat', a term that Downing Street later refused to support. The 'China audit', which examined the extent of the UK's relationship with Beijing, recommended increasing the Government's ability to engage with the Asian economic superpower while increasing 'resilience' against risks. The Foreign Secretary said on Tuesday that Britain would increase its intelligence budget by £600 million in light of the findings. He said that ministers 'understand that China is a sophisticated and persistent threat ' - an apparent shift from the Government's previous description of it being a 'challenge'. But he also told MPs that in the past decade, China has delivered a third of global economic growth, becoming the world's second-largest economy and, together with Hong Kong, the UK's third-largest trading partner. 'Not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all,' he said. 'China's power is an inescapable fact.' Mr Lammy said the audit painted a 'complex picture' but 'the UK's approach to China will be founded on progressive realism, taking the world as it is, not as we wish it to be'. A Downing Street spokesman later refused to repeat Mr Lammy's description of China as a 'threat' – reopening a debate about the use of the word, which had plagued Conservative prime ministers over the last five years. 'Potentially huge consequences' Sources close to the Foreign Secretary insisted there was no disagreement between him and No10 on the issue, and that Downing Street had advanced sight of the statement in which he used the word 'threat' several times. A summary of the audit's findings - including guidance for colleges and universities - which rely on Chinese students and partnerships for vital funding - was laid out in the national security strategy. 'The challenge of competition from China - which ranges from military modernisation to an assertion of state power that encompasses economic, industrial, science and technology policy - has potentially huge consequences for the lives of British citizens,' it said. 'Cap in hand to China' Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, said the Government 'has gone cap in hand to China to bail out its terrible handling of the British economy', and pointed to the decision to 'call in' a planning decision on the new Chinese 'super embassy' in London. The controversial plan will see China open a new site in East London, which opponents claim will allow them to hack telecom cables. Angela Rayner, who is responsible for planning, is reportedly poised to approve the application but has declined to comment in public about it.
