Lottery.com regains Nasdaq compliance
Lottery.com (LTRY) received formal notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market confirming that the Company has regained compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1), which requires a minimum bid price of $1.00. The Company met this requirement by maintaining a closing bid price of $1.00 or higher for twenty consecutive business days from May 21 through June 18, 2025. Nasdaq has officially closed the matter. This confirmation marks more than just a technical compliance milestone-it underscores the momentum Lottery.com has built in recent weeks. In the 20-day period leading up to regaining compliance with Rule, Lottery.com's stock experienced exceptional market activity, with daily trading volumes frequently exceeding 30 million shares. On May 27, 2025, Lottery.com recorded trading volume of more than 166 million shares, ranking among the most actively traded stocks on Nasdaq that day. As part of this renewed momentum, the Company recently appointed actor and media executive Tamer Hassan as President of Sports.com Studios, further strengthening its media and entertainment vertical. The Company also continues to work with legal advisors, including Paul Hastings LLP, in its investigation into suspected illegal short selling and is prepared to take legal action against any parties found to have manipulated its stock.
Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>>
See today's best-performing stocks on TipRanks >>
Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Fed's Daly Says Muted Tariff Impact May Open Door to Cut in Fall
By Catarina Saraiva and Updated on Save Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly said she's seeing increasing evidence that tariffs may not lead to a large or sustained inflation surge, helping bolster the case for a rate cut in the fall. 'My modal outlook has been for some time that we would begin to be able to adjust the rates in the fall, and I haven't really changed that view,' Daly said Thursday in an interview on Bloomberg Television.
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Gave The World Infinite Content—Now What?
Tejas Manohar is the cofounder/co-CEO of Hightouch. Just a few years ago, generative AI (GenAI) felt more like a curiosity than a tool. We asked language models to write love letters in the style of tech bros or explain quantum physics to a 5-year-old. Visual platforms responded to prompts like "a dragon in a business suit, pixel art style" or "a Renaissance portrait of a barista." The results, while novel and amusing, were rarely practical for business. That has changed. By the end of 2024, GenAI outputs became sharper, more polished and increasingly indistinguishable from human-created work. In 2025, with tools like GPT-4, Midjourney, Runway and Canva AI becoming widely adopted, content creation is no longer the bottleneck it once was. Soon, marketing teams will be able to generate dozens of creative options in minutes. However, this shift introduces a new problem: With so much content, how do we decide what to use, for whom and when? Most marketers are now using GenAI to create assets. While Salesforce reports that 76% of marketers use AI to generate content, the processes for deploying that content haven't evolved. The typical workflow still involves pasting AI-generated copy into spreadsheets, testing a couple of variants, manually picking a winner and repeating it all. That might work in the short term, but it's not scalable. More importantly, it doesn't improve over time. More content is not the solution unless there's a system to decide which content to use and how. Imagine an orchestra where every musician trained at Juilliard, but there's no conductor. That's what marketing looks like in a GenAI world without decisioning. There's creativity, but no coordination. Marketers today face a flood of assets, but the bigger challenge is figuring out what to send, to which audience and when. These are not creation problems. These are decisioning problems. And we're still trying to solve them using tools and mental models—journey builders, marketing calendars and simple A/B tests—built for a world where content is scarce. Traditional workflows assume that you'll create a handful of subject lines, define a few segments and test some variations. But GenAI doesn't create one or two options—it creates hundreds. Suddenly, you're staring at thousands of possible combinations across messaging, timing, audience and channels. Marketers can't test every option. They can't manually orchestrate every journey, and they certainly can't rely on batch-and-blast methods anymore. A new approach is needed. For many organizations, AI decisioning has become a key part of their AI strategy. This new category of technology sits between content creation and content delivery. It enables marketers to deploy AI agents that make real-time decisions about which content to send to which user. These systems use reinforcement learning (the same type of machine learning behind self-driving cars and streaming recommendation engines) to optimize for business outcomes like conversions, retention or lifetime value. Think of how platforms like Google and Meta Ads operate. You set your goals, upload creative assets and the system optimizes combinations to deliver results. Now imagine that same model applied to email, push, in-app messaging and CRM. That's what AI decisioning aims to achieve, only this time with transparency and control built in. To adopt AI decisioning effectively, companies need to get the basics right first. That means clarifying goals, improving data access and identifying where manual decisions slow things down. Start small by pinpointing bottlenecks in your workflow, whether that's testing content, segmenting audiences or managing channels. Silos are a major hurdle. When teams like marketing, data and product work in isolation, decisioning falls flat. Aligning around shared goals, metrics and timelines helps break down these walls and ensures AI systems have the inputs they need to be effective. The best way to begin is with a focused use case, such as optimizing subject lines or send times. Prove value quickly and then scale. AI decisioning is not about replacing everything at once; it is about creating a system that learns and improves over time. Used together, these technologies form a closed-loop system. GenAI generates content while AI decisioning systems select the right assets for each user based on performance data. As results come in, those insights feed back into the content generation process, allowing both creation and decisioning to improve continuously. GenAI acts as the input layer, creating at scale. AI decisioning functions as the optimization layer, learning what works and when. Combined, they create a flywheel where content fuels decisions and decisions enhance future content. But none of this works without human oversight. Marketers still need to be involved. AI systems must be transparent, auditable and accountable. Teams need to know how decisions are made, what experiments are running and have the ability to approve content and manage risks. In the coming months, content bottlenecks will fade as GenAI becomes even more integrated into daily workflows. But that's only the first step. The true differentiator will be how effectively teams can deploy the content they generate to drive meaningful results. The winners in the next era of marketing won't be the ones who generate the most creative assets. They'll be the ones who build systems that know what to do with them and can adapt in real time. So keep prompting and creating. But remember: the next meaningful shift in marketing won't just come from creation—it will come from smarter decisioning. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walgreens (NASDAQ:WBA) Exceeds Q2 Expectations
Pharmacy chain Walgreens Boots Alliance (NASDAQ:WBA) reported Q2 CY2025 results topping the market's revenue expectations , with sales up 7.2% year on year to $38.99 billion. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.38 per share was 11.3% above analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy Walgreens? Find out in our full research report. "On March 6, 2025, WBA entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by entities affiliated with Sycamore Partners. The merger is currently expected to close in the third or fourth quarter of calendar year 2025, pending shareholder and regulatory approvals and other conditions to closing. Upon completion of the transaction, WBA common stock will no longer be listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, and WBA will become a private company." Revenue: $38.99 billion vs analyst estimates of $36.59 billion (7.2% year-on-year growth, 6.5% beat) Adjusted EPS: $0.38 vs analyst estimates of $0.34 (11.3% beat) Operating Margin: 0.1%, in line with the same quarter last year Free Cash Flow Margin: 0.9%, similar to the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $9.78 billion Primarily offering prescription medicine, health, and beauty products, Walgreens Boots Alliance (NASDAQ:WBA) is a pharmacy chain formed through the 2014 major merger of American company Walgreens and European company Alliance Boots. A company's long-term sales performance is one signal of its overall quality. Any business can put up a good quarter or two, but the best consistently grow over the long haul. With $154.6 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, Walgreens is a behemoth in the consumer retail sector and benefits from economies of scale, giving it an edge in distribution. This also enables it to gain more leverage on its fixed costs than smaller competitors and the flexibility to offer lower prices. However, its scale is a double-edged sword because it's harder to find incremental growth when you've penetrated most of the market. To expand meaningfully, Walgreens likely needs to tweak its prices or enter new markets. As you can see below, Walgreens grew its sales at a sluggish 3.8% compounded annual growth rate over the last six years (we compare to 2019 to normalize for COVID-19 impacts). This shows it failed to generate demand in any major way and is a rough starting point for our analysis. This quarter, Walgreens reported year-on-year revenue growth of 7.2%, and its $38.99 billion of revenue exceeded Wall Street's estimates by 6.5%. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to decline by 1.6% over the next 12 months, a deceleration versus the last six years. This projection is underwhelming and indicates its products will see some demand headwinds. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. Same-store sales is a key performance indicator used to measure organic growth at brick-and-mortar shops for at least a year. Walgreens has been one of the most successful retailers over the last two years thanks to skyrocketing demand within its existing locations. On average, the company has posted exceptional year-on-year same-store sales growth of 6.7%. Note that Walgreens reports its same-store sales intermittently, so some data points are missing in the chart below. We were impressed by how significantly Walgreens blew past analysts' revenue expectations this quarter. We were also happy its EPS outperformed Wall Street's estimates. No guidance was provided due to the impending acquisition of the company. Zooming out, we think this was a solid quarter. The stock remained flat at $11.40 immediately after reporting. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
