
Kittens Fight for Their Lives After Being Found Zip Tied to Shopping Cart
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Two newborn kittens have been left fighting for their lives after being found zip-tied together beneath a shopping cart at a shopping center in Santa Fe, California.
The kittens, tentatively named Frodo and Sam, were brought to the Helen Woodward Animal Center late on May 20, along with two siblings who tragically succumbed to their injuries.
The orange tabbies, still bearing their umbilical cords and crawling with fleas, were estimated by medical staff to be less than five days old. One of the kittens is recovering well, but the other sustained serious injuries to its rear left leg from the zip tie.
The kittens were rushed to safety by a regional manager from Blue Buffalo, a longtime supporter of the Center. Their survival, staff say, is nothing short of miraculous.
"That was our biggest concern at first," said Kendall Schulz, director of adoptions at the Center. "We were worried they hadn't eaten in hours, and wouldn't eat. But the moment we tried bottle feeding, they took to it right away."
The two kittens that survived, now being cared for by Helen Woodward Animal Center.
The two kittens that survived, now being cared for by Helen Woodward Animal Center.
Helen Woodward Animal Center
Kittens should stay with their mother until they are at least 8 weeks old, with many experts recommending waiting until they are 10-12 weeks old to separate them.
When separated too early, kittens can miss out on essential nutrients from their mother's milk, suffer from growth problems and suffer malnutrition.
There are also potential long-term effects on kittens separated too early, with studies showing that kittens taken from their mother too early may be increasingly vocal in stressful situations or at higher risk of developing compulsive behaviors or aggression.
Recent data from Shelter Animals Count shows that 1,944 animals were surrendered as of April 25, 2025, an increase of around 11 percent compared to the same time in 2024.
Currently, shelters are grappling with what is often known as "kitten season" which typically runs between March and October. Longer daylight hours trigger hormonal changes in unspayed female cats, leading to multiple heat cycles and increased pregnancies. As a result, shelters see an influx of kittens around these times.
Kittens Frodo and Sam are now in foster care and are beginning their long road to recovery.
"Finding fosters qualified to bottle feed is super important, because these little guys need to be fed every two hours," Schulz added. "Fortunately, we have an extensive network of qualified fosters who can drop everything and help out."
The Center encourages anyone with information about the case—or those interested in supporting the care of animals like Frodo and Sam—to reach out directly to them.
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
These Are the Best and Worst States for Aging in Place
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new report from Seniorly ranked the best and worst states for aging at home for seniors, and Florida surprisingly earned the lowest spot of all. "These findings reinforce what we already know," one expert told Newsweek, "aging well isn't just about personal health; it's also about where you live and what resources that place can provide." As millions of Americans turn 65 this year, more and more are hoping to continue living in their homes rather than move to assisted living facilities or retirement homes. In 2025, a record 4.2 million Americans will reach senior age, and 75 percent of older Americans said they wanted to stay living in their own homes in a recent AARP survey. Why It Matters Many Americans hope to stay at home to maintain their independence and remain in the communities where they've already built support systems. However, not all locations make this easiest for seniors, as cost of living, transportation, and access to high-quality health care all play a role in whether a senior is able to successfully live outside of a retirement home. Shirley Gooding, a physical Therapy Aid, helps William Rexroat, a WWII Navy veteran exercise during a physical therapy session at the Quincy Veterans Home February 17, 2005, in Quincy, Illinois. Shirley Gooding, a physical Therapy Aid, helps William Rexroat, a WWII Navy veteran exercise during a physical therapy session at the Quincy Veterans Home February 17, 2005, in Quincy, To Know Best States Utah took the best state spot for aging in place, as only 35 percent of seniors live alone. They also have relatively good weather, with just 10.1 inches of rain and snow each year on average. The state also had a significant level of smart home tech use at 37 percent. The top 10 state list for seniors was as follows: Utah North Dakota New Jersey Idaho Texas Nebraska California New Mexico Kansas Washington Seniorly's list was compiled using data on home health care quality and availability, emergency care services, housing costs, road safety, walkability, weather hazards and more. They also took into account the risk of isolation, as roughly 43 percent of U.S. seniors live alone. The top states generally had short ER wait times, with North Dakota coming in at second place, as well as a high level of meal deliveries for older Americans. Home care quality also mattered, with 31 percent of New Jersey's agencies earning a 4.5 or 5-star rating. Worst States Meanwhile, the worst states for aging in places were as follows: Florida Kentucky North Carolina Georgia Alabama Tennessee Mississippi Vermont Oklahoma Hawaii Many retirees may be surprised to find Florida ranked the lowest for aging in place. This is because of its limited access to home health aides, with 50 seniors per available aide. Floridians also deal with high housing costs, with 30.7 percent of older homeowners spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing. The state also experiences high precipitation of 53 inches annually, which could heighten safety risks for seniors. The other Southern states ranked low struggled for different reasons. Kentucky had one of the highest rates of fatal car crashes involving seniors, at 28.2 deaths per 100,000 drivers. Meanwhile, seniors in North Carolina spent an average of 195 minutes in the emergency room, longer than nearly all other states. "What is definitely eye-opening is how many Southern states ranked near the bottom," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "These are states with historically high poverty rates and heavy reliance on social insurance programs." What People Are Saying Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "Utah ranks first and Florida ranks last. Does that mean we should always retire in Utah and never in Florida? Not really. The bottom line is aging in place requires a network, and aging seniors need to be located where their network is located. Aside from being financially prepared for longevity, access to both skilled and non-skilled assistance is the key and is most likely to come from family and close friends." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "There's a clear relationship between income and aging outcomes. The wealthier the state, the more likely it is to support aging in place through quality care, better roads, and stronger support systems. These findings reinforce what we already know: aging well isn't just about personal health, it's also about where you live and what resources that place can provide." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "What's most surprising about these rankings are how perceptions do not always equal reality with America's aging population. Florida has been for decades perceived as a haven for retirees; however, in the years following the pandemic, housing costs have risen dramatically and the state has been slow to adopt the home health measures other states have to better medically serve their communities." What Happens Next From 2025 to 2050, the number of people aged 65 and older is expected to skyrocket from 63.3 million to 82.1 million. "States like Utah benefit from more seniors being less alone and having more access to smart home features that assist in the aging process," Beene said. "At the end of the day, aging isn't just about saving some tax dollars. It's about the overall quality of life."


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Cities Most at Risk for Rise in Heart Attacks as Canadian Wildfires Burn
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some residents of several major cities in the Midwest could face an increased risk of heart attack and stroke as smoke from Canadian wildfires continues to descend into the United States this week. "Exposure to particulate matter air pollution causes inflammation in the lungs. This can manifest as worsening of respiratory symptoms, particularly in people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Dr. Scott Budinger, the chief of pulmonary and critical care in the Department of Medicine at Northwestern University, told Newsweek. "[E]ven more importantly, exposure to particulate matter air pollution acutely increases the risk of heart attacks or strokes," he added. Why It Matters The widespread drift of wildfire smoke from Canada into U.S. metropolitan areas carries significant public health implications. Medical research has documented an association between exposure to fine particulate pollution (PM2.5) and acute increases in heart attacks, strokes, and other cardiovascular events. Vulnerable groups, particularly people living with coronary artery disease, histories of heart attacks or strokes, and chronic respiratory illness, are at elevated risk. With urban centers housing millions, the threat is not only environmental but medical, affecting emergency room capacities and potentially increasing mortality rates. Previous wildfire smoke events, such as those seen in 2023, have already demonstrated the potential for widespread air quality degradation and related health emergencies across city populations. What To Know Smoke from Canadian wildfires has degraded air quality across the Upper Midwest for over a week. The smoke has even reached the U.S. Gulf Coast, where it had less of an impact on physical health. At least eight states were under air quality alerts on Thursday morning, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AirNow map showing the current Air Quality Index as "unhealthy" in areas such as Chicago, Illinois, and Lansing and Grand Rapids, Michigan. This AQI is unhealthy for everyone to breathe. A map from the U.S. EPA's AirNow shows cities with unhealthy air quality as of Thursday morning at 11 a.m. Eastern time. A map from the U.S. EPA's AirNow shows cities with unhealthy air quality as of Thursday morning at 11 a.m. Eastern time. AirNow The less severe but still impactful Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups AQI was much more widespread, stretching across parts of Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, and into the Northeast, including Maine and New York. Wildfire smoke contains high concentrations of PM2.5—fine particulate matter that can enter the lungs and bloodstream. Exposure is linked to worsening symptoms in those with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but acute cardiovascular risks, including heart attacks and strokes, may be even more pronounced. City populations face greater danger when air pollution is trapped near the surface during stagnant weather conditions. In some instances, people were asked to monitor themselves for symptoms such as coughing during the poor air quality event. If coughs persist for more than seven days or are accompanied by shortness of breath, people should visit their doctor or seek more urgent care if necessary. People are urged to remain indoors and keep their windows closed to prevent exposure. What People Are Saying Dr. Scott Budinger, the chief of pulmonary and critical care in the Department of Medicine at Northwestern University, told Newsweek: "People who have known blockages in their arteries or a history of heart attacks or strokes and people with chronic lung diseases like asthma and COPD should avoid exposure. They should also be vigilant about taking all of the prescribed medications for their disease." Budinger added: "You can reduce the risk of exposure by staying indoors with the windows closed. Indoor levels of particulate matter air pollution are typically much lower than those outside in a heated or air conditioned home or business—as much as 10 times less. For example, it might be better to take a walk in a health club or mall rather than outside if the particulate levels are high." An air quality alert issued in Michigan: "It is recommended that, when possible, you avoid strenuous outdoor activities, especially those with heart disease and respiratory diseases like asthma. Monitor for symptoms such as wheezing, coughing, chest tightness, dizziness, or burning in nose, throat, and eyes. Reduce or eliminate activities that contribute to air pollution, such as outdoor burning, and use of residential wood burning devices." What Happens Next Air quality alerts remained in effect in many cities in the Upper Midwest through the end of the week, with meteorologists forecasting that wildfire smoke could persist for several more days. Public health officials continue to advise at-risk populations in major cities to closely monitor advisories, limit outdoor activities during high-pollution periods, and use indoor air filtration.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Parents Can Choose Genetic Makeup of Their Children With New IVF Option
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A U.S.-based biotech company has unveiled a new in vitro fertilization (IVF) option that allows parents to select embryos based on genetic markers tied to health and longevity. DNA testing and analysis company Nucleus Genomics has announced the world's first genetic optimization software that "helps parents pursuing IVF see and understand the complete genetic profile of each of their embryos." Why It Matters The company says it can analyze the genetic makeup of embryos to test for up to 900 conditions including diabetes, cancer, and heart disease. By choosing embryos with the lowest risk profiles, parents can theoretically boost their children's chances of living longer and healthier lives. But the practice also raises ethical concerns about choosing embryos based on probabilities. "Nucleus Embryo is the first-ever genetic optimization software that helps parents give their children the best possible start in life—long before they're even born," the company said on X, formerly Twitter. Composite image of a fetus and the brain. Composite image of a fetus and the brain. Getty/Newsweek What To Know Prospective parents can upload up to 20 embryo DNA files from their IVF clinics for over 900 genetic analyses spanning cancers, chronic conditions, appearance, cognitive ability, mental health, and other conditions. The company then provides clients with a detailed report, which shows their embryo's results. "Sort, compare, and choose your embryos based on what matters most to you," Nucleus Genomics said. Demo pictures of the process provided by the company shows that the tests will also reveal what eye color and hair color the child is likely to have. A screengrab from Nucleus Genomics showing an in vitro fertilization option that allows parents to select embryos based on genetic markers tied to health and longevity. A screengrab from Nucleus Genomics showing an in vitro fertilization option that allows parents to select embryos based on genetic markers tied to health and longevity. Nucleus Genomics It tests for markers for common conditions like type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and high blood pressure, and genetic contributions to various cancers (e.g., breast, colorectal, ovarian). It also covers mental health risks, such as depression and anxiety disorders, as well as physical traits like eye color, hair color, height, BMI, and even IQ-related markers. The test offers a comprehensive genetic profile, allowing prospective parents to compare multiple embryos on these different attributes before choosing one for implantation. "Life span has dramatically increased in the last 150 years," Kian Sadeghi, the company's founder and chief executive, told the Wall Street Journal. "DNA testing to predict and reduce chronic disease can make it happen again." The 25-year-old told the Journal he sees no distinction between individuals using DNA tests to understand their own risks and those screening and ranking embryos to select one likely to live a longer life. "It is the same underlying motivation," Sadeghi said. "It is about living a longer, healthier life." "The longevity movement is about taking medicine back and putting it in the people's hands," Sadeghi added. "Why would that not apply now to the most intimate, personal, emotional, sensitive decision you will make? Picking your baby." A screengrab of analysis by Nucleus Genomics showing a detailed report of prospective embryo results. A screengrab of analysis by Nucleus Genomics showing a detailed report of prospective embryo results. Nucleus Genomics What People Are Saying Nucleus said on its website announcing Nucleus Embryo: "My parents are immigrants from Iran who came to America with nothing but a conviction that me and my siblings would have more. But when my 15-year-old cousin suddenly died in her sleep from a preventable genetic disease, my family was powerless to save her. "My parents, grieving the loss of my cousin, were also terrified. What if my siblings and I were at the same risk? That was the first time I understood what generational health meant. "Our users don't just do Nucleus for themselves—they do it for themselves and their loved ones. Now, I'm proud to say that care can start before a child is even born." Other users on social media questioned the ethics of the technology. One thread, viewed more than 3 million times, said, "Holy s***. It's happening…you don't just pick a child. You rank them by longevity potential." Emma Waters, a policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation, responded to tweets about the project. "'I only wanted you because you were a girl and the right kind of healthy. I destroyed the other 19 human embryos that your father and I created.' "Don't worry, it's 'not eugenics,' it's only science." 'I only wanted you because you were a girl and the right kind of healthy. I destroyed the other 19 human embryos that your father and I created.' Don't worry, it's 'not eugenics,' it's only science. — Emma Waters (@emlwaters) June 5, 2025 Asked for her definition of eugenics, she said, "The selection or rejection of a living human being based on certain traits or conditions. I.e., choosing which embryos live and which ones are destroyed based on factors like health, sex, and IQ." What Happens Next Polygenic embryo screening is largely unregulated in the U.S., and it is likely to remain that way for the foreseeable future.