John Morgan jokes, curses, talks third-party gubernatorial run at Capital Tiger Bay Club
Trial attorney John Morgan took Tallahassee by storm on Wednesday as he joked, dropped f-bombs, and gave his 'no bullshit' take on politics in America and Florida.
But when it was done and over, he maintained he is 'serious' about a possible run for governor.
By his own reckoning, Morgan's extensive experience with helping to finance proposed constitutional amendments for medical marijuana in 2016, increases in minimum wage in 2020, and legalization of marijuana in 2024, have given him the campaign chops he needs if he does choose to run for governor.
Morgan also acknowledged he has plenty of name recognition due to his role as the founder and face of the Morgan & Morgan law firm.
He figures he can afford to wait and see how other candidates fare down the 'home stretch.' He likened it to running a sprint rather than a marathon.
'I'd rather have a three-month window than an 18-month window,' he said.
While Morgan was less than firm about his run for office, he said he is moving ahead with real plans to form a third party in the state. A new party is necessary, he said, because the existing parties have been hijacked by factions that he doesn't feel represent many of their members.
Republicans are controlled by supporters of Donald Trump as opposed to 'country club Republicans,' Morgan said, while Democrats are in the thrall of progressives and 'socialists' such as U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders. He said that both sides refuse to compromise.
He argued that the polarization in the country is because many people are angry over income inequality and it helped lead Trump supporters to riot on Jan. 6.
'We're stuck in the middle, and we don't have a voice, any voice, but yet, we have a lot to say, but we're paralyzed,' Morgan said. 'So my belief is this: I believe that we need a third party.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Morgan said he will choose the party's name through a competition he will sponsor with a cash prize for the winning entry. He said he has already brought in a lawyer to help draft the paperwork to launch the party.
In addition to discussing his political future, Morgan weighed in on Florida's current political events as well as its past.
He took repeated shots at DeSantis and said the 2023 insurance changes meant to lower property coverage rates were a 'a money grab' for the governor to run for president.
'And who lost? Every homeowner in Florida. There's going to be a day of reckoning. There's going to be a hurricane, and it's going to be bad,' he said.
Morgan facetiously spoke about DeSantis being a 'hard-working governor,' noting that he saw him at the Kentucky Derby in Churchill Downs on May 3 and a Formula 1 sprint event at the Miami Grand Prix later the next day.
'So, he's always working for us, constantly working for us and for our benefit,' Morgan said.
Morgan conceded being a 'billionaire' who lives in Maui during the winter. He says he 'smokes a lot of dope out there' because it's 'relaxing.'
He recalled earlier this year getting texts and videos of the governor invoking his name 'everywhere' and talking about his sway with members of the Legislature. Given the alleged influence he has over legislators, Morgan said he had a simple question for them: 'When the f— are they gonna start doing what I tell them to do?'
He declared the Democratic Party of Florida dead and put the blame squarely on former Tallahassee mayor and 2020 Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Andrew Gillum, who lost his bid for governor by 34,000 votes in 2018 to DeSantis.
Morgan also opined that the Legislature shouldn't meet every year but every other year instead.
'Because every time they meet they screw us over,' Morgan said.
He questioned whether Florida needs its Governor's Mansion, a lieutenant governor, or agriculture commissioner.
He predicted the latest effort to legalize marijuana in Florida will pass despite the constitutional ballot changes the Legislature recently passed and DeSantis signed into law.
'It's sickening, because what it means is politicians want to have total control so they can take care of their special interests — cable companies, the fire companies, the sugar people. They don't want us to have a say, because they know we, the people, are dangerous. We're dangerous when we get to vote, and they don't want that,' he said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Unsettling and unprecedented.' DC mayor criticizes Trump's police takeover
The mayor disputed Trump's justification for declaring a crime emergency, noting that crime has been trending down in the city after spiking in 2023. President Donald Trump's move to assert control over Washington D.C.'s police force is "unsettling and unprecedented" the city's mayor said, while also indicating she will cooperate with federal authorities. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser disputed Trump's justification for declaring a crime emergency in her city calling it a subjective 'so-called emergency' and noting that the capital's crime rate has been trending down after a post-pandemic increase that peaked in 2023. 'We're not experiencing a spike in crime but a decrease in crime,' Bowser said during an Aug. 11 press conference following Trump's announcement earlier in the day, where he initiated a dramatic federal takeover of the city's police force and also deployed the D.C. National Guard. Yet the mayor acknowledged Trump's authority under the Home Rule Act, which gives the federal government certain powers over DC governance. Trump cited the law in an executive order declaring he was using emergency powers to seize control of the city's Metropolitan Police Department. 'The Home Rule charter requires the mayor to provide the services of MPD during special conditions of an emergency, and we will follow the law,' Bowser said. Potential legal issues surrounding the federal takeover are 'under review,' Bowser added, but she added that the 'plain language' of the Home Rule charter authorizes the president to take certain actions and says 'the mayor shall comply.' Trump has long criticized Democrat-run D.C. as dangerous and threated to take control of the city, a federal enclave under jurisdiction of the U.S. government. The District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973 gave the city local governance, including an elected mayor and city council, but allows for federal intervention. Trump's move marks a dramatic escalation from rhetoric to federal control of a major municipal police force. He also is deploying 800 National Guard members. While many Democrats are uneasy about the executive action and call it unjustified, Bowser said there could be benefits. 'The fact that we have more law enforcement presence in neighborhoods, that could be positive,' she said. The mayor has taken a less combative approach to Trump during his second term after clashing with him in his first term. Asked if her tenor toward Trump would change with his recent move, Bowser said 'my tenor will be appropriate for what I think is important for the District, and what's important for the district is that we can take care of our citizens.' Bowser said concerns about Trump's actions they should be channeled into achieving statehood for DC and obtaining local control over the DC National Guard. Contributing: Joey Garrison
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Stocks slump as Wall Street braces for inflation spike
Stocks closed with losses Monday as Wall Street braces for the first federal inflation report released after President Trump ousted the head of the agency responsible for producing it. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed with a loss of 201 points, falling 0.5 percent Monday. The S&P 500 index and Nasdaq composite each fell 0.3 percent. The dip comes one day before the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is set to release the latest reading of the consumer price index (CPI), which is expected to show inflation rising in July. Economists expect prices to have risen by 0.2 percent in July — 0.3 percent without food and energy included — to hit a core annual inflation rate of 3 percent, according to consensus estimates. 'The data, due tomorrow, probably will show that goods prices rose at an above-trend pace, albeit no faster than in June. Meanwhile, services prices likely increased moderately overall, boosted by a rebound in airline fares, partly offset by a fall in hospital services prices,' wrote Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen of Pantheon Economics in a research note. After winning the 2024 election with the promise to bring prices down, Trump is facing increasing backlash from voters and concerns from fellow Republicans as his tariffs keep up pressure on inflation. Wall Street will pay close attention to the report and Trump's reaction to it after the president's explosive response to the July jobs report. The federal jobs report for July showed the U.S. gaining just 73,000 jobs last month and included stunning revisions to the initially reported employment gains for May and June. The net result showed the U.S. gaining barely more than 100,000 jobs over the past three months, roughly a third of what economists say is necessary to prevent unemployment from rising. Trump responded by accusing the BLS — a nonpartisan agency of statisticians — of manipulating the jobs data to benefit Democrats, but he provided no evidence to support his claim. The president also fired former BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, sparking an outcry from her Democratic and Republican predecessors, along with scores of economists. Despite Trump's claims to the contrary, revisions to employment and inflation data are normal aspects of how the BLS maintains the most accurate data on the economy. The White House has also failed to show any evidence of political manipulation of data at the BLS, and economists say it would be nearly impossible to skew the jobs report in that manner. 'These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals. There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number,' said former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. Any doubts about the credibility of U.S. jobs or inflation data could pose serious consequences for the country's reputation and financial dominance. 'This is much more dangerous than the pressure on the Fed,' Cato Institute research fellow Jai Kedia told The Hill. 'The labor and inflation statistics are the bedrock of every other federal institution that's trying to work on the economy.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
What's next as Trump takes over DC police, deploys National Guard
President Trump on Monday announced he was putting the Washington, D.C., police department under federal control and deploying the National Guard in what he portrayed as a crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. 'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our capital back,' said Trump, who has long floated plans to overhaul the District, which is governed by a council of elected representatives and a mayor. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore,' the president told a packed White House press briefing room. With D.C. police now under federal control, here's what to expect next. Bondi, DEA chief to run point Trump's declaration of taking over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) delegates authority of the city's police force to Attorney General Pam Bondi. A few hours after Trump's announcement, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said she would follow the executive order and had reached out to Bondi to meet. Trump also announced he was designating Terry Cole as MPD's interim federal commissioner. Cole was confirmed just under three weeks ago to lead the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Trump at his press conference lauded Cole as the 'most highly recommended person' and 'one of the top in the country.' 'He better be. Terry, if not, I'm going to get rid of you so fast,' Trump joked. MPD Chief Pamela Smith said she was in contact with federal partners, telling D.C. residents the announcement meant residents should expect an 'enhanced presence' in the city. One expert thinks it could have longlasting efforts on the department – and not in a good way. Tahir Duckett, executive director of the Center for Innovations in Community Safety and an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law, said some in the D.C. police force may get frustrated by reassignments and being overseen by a federal force that does very different work from community policing. It could also shake DC residents and further hamper crime-fighting. 'It's going to break down community trust, which any police officer will tell you, that the only way that you actually solve murders [or] armed robberies, is when you have really deep trust,' Duckett said. Congress to intervene Trump is taking over MPD by invoking a provision of the D.C. Home Rule Act, a law Congress passed in the 1970s that established a city council and gave it and the mayor control over local affairs. The provision, Section 740, provides Trump – and any U.S. president – some temporary ability to unilaterally seize control of MPD in emergency situations, but it also provides key levers for congressional intervention. Trump already met the initial requirement to provide written notification to Congress of the takeover within 48 hours. House Oversight Committee Republicans confirmed receipt on Monday. With the notifications delivered, Trump can unilaterally take over the police force for up to 30 days. Congress must pass a joint resolution to extend it further, which could leave Democrats in the position of voting against it, thus providing the GOP with a prime opportunity to portray the opposing party as 'soft on crime.' 'Congress will work with President Trump to restore law and order in Washington, D.C.,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) wrote on X. Lawmakers could also vote at any time to immediately take away Trump's control of MPD, and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said he would introduce such a measure. But Republicans' majorities in both chambers make any rebuke unlikely. Congress is also on recess until after Labor Day. Trump has additionally previously floated a federal takeover of the city more broadly, but that would require congressional approval. 800 National Guard troops to patrol DC Beyond the MPD takeover, Trump said on Monday that he's deploying 800 D.C. National Guard troops as the push to rid the capital of crime moves forward 'very rapidly.' Last week, the president had ordered federal law enforcement officials to patrol Washington streets for a week, an effort led by the U.S. Park Police with officers and agents from the FBI, DEA, ICE and other groups. 'The Metropolitan Police Department and the federal authorities will be supported in the effort, a really big effort, [by] the 800 DC National Guardsmen that we'll put on and much more if necessary,' Trump said. 'If necessary, we're going to move service members directly to joining the guardsmen. And that'll take place very rapidly.' The announcement drew sharp pushback from Democrats, arguing the capital's crime rates don't align with Trump's drastic move. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) argued there's 'no basis' for the takeover and suggested Trump 'get lost.' Trump controversially deployed more than 2,000 members of the National Guard in June to Los Angeles to crack down on protests over the administration's immigration policies, a move that bypassed the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). 'The president operates like he is the governor of D.C., and the governor of a state can deploy the National Guard in times of emergency. Here, I think there's an argument that there's no particular urgency,' said Paul Schiff Berman, a former dean of the George Washington University Law School. 'Even if there is an emergency with regard to some law enforcement priorities, it's not at all clear that the President really has the authority to unilaterally suspend the mayor's other governmental responsibilities.' Trump says he'll appoint judges, end no-cash bail Citing crime concerns, the president also shared plans to appoint new D.C. judges and end no-cash bail as part of his crackdown. 'We're going to be appointing some judges. You know, we have some open spots, and we're going to take people — because the judges are letting killers out,' Trump said at Monday's press conference. The president has the power to nominate D.C.'s local judges, and they must clear Senate confirmation. Trump added that Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and others had already recommended several candidates. 'We've got 10 open spots, and we can probably create some more. We need them,' Trump said. D.C.'s local trial court had 13 vacancies as of July 18, and its appeals court had two openings, according to the city's Judicial Nomination Commission. Trump also blasted no-cash bail systems in cities such as D.C., New York and Chicago. Illinois was the first state to eliminate cash bail as a condition of pretrial release back in 2023, while D.C. largely removed cash bail back in the 1990s. 'This dire public safety crisis stems directly from the abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left City Council adopted no cash bail,' Trump said. 'We're going to change no cash bail. We're going to change the statute and get rid of some of the other things, and we'll count on the Republicans in Congress and Senate to vote. We have the majority, so we'll vote.' DC attorney general considering legal options D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D) is leaving the door open to taking legal action against the president. 'We are considering all of our options and will do what's necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents,' Schwalb said in a statement. Schwalb rebuked Trump's assertion that crime is out of control in D.C., pointing to recent data showing violent crime is down 26 percent so far in 2025. 'The Administration's actions are unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful. There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia,' Schwalb said. But it remains unclear whether courts would have the power to review Trump's emergency declaration taking over MPD or otherwise intervene. And for the D.C. National Guard, Trump has greater control compared to state units across the country. The force in D.C. is always under the command of the president, not the mayor. That's in contrast to Trump's bid to federalize the California National Guard, which remains under a legal challenge from Newsom. 'One of the most important bulwarks against authoritarian rule in the United States is the fact that we have a Federalist system with shared sovereignty, so that the president or the federal government generally can't simply take over states,' said Berman. 'The problem is that D.C. is not a state. And so it gives the President more leeway. And that's really dangerous.'
