Australia calls US plan to double steel, aluminium tariffs "unjustified" act of "self harm"
FILE PHOTO: A giant kettle pours molten aluminum into moulds as an employee skims the skin off previously poured moulds at an Alcoa Inc. smelting plant at Point Henry, Australia, on Wednesday, July 30, 2008. Australia's Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell said the federal government would continue to advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs. - Bloomberg
CANBERRA: Australia's Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell on Saturday (May 31) described US President Donald Trump's plan to double tariffs on steel and aluminium as "unjustified" and an act of economic "self harm."
Trump said on Friday that he plans to increase the tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the United States from 25 per cent to 50 per cent from June 4 to protect the domestic industry from foreign competition.
Responding to the announcement, Farrell said in a statement that Australia's position has been "consistent and clear" and that the federal government would continue to advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.
"These tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend," he said. "They are an act of economic self harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade."
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose Labor Party won a second term in government in a landslide at the May 3 election, in April described Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs as "not the act of a friend".
The US administration in March decided against exempting Australia from the steel and aluminum tariffs. Albanese said at the time that the decision went against the "enduring friendship" of the two countries. - Xinhua
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Asean must come up with mechanism for Indo-Pacific security
The anxieties of the Indo-Pacific came into full view at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles demanded an explanation from China for what he called an "extraordinary military build-up". Later, Philippine Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr. branded China's conduct in the South China Sea as "absolutely irresponsible and reckless". The message they convey is deeply interconnected: the Indo-Pacific is on edge. Two key United States allies — one a resident power, the other a proximate neighbour to China — are openly expressing their strategic alarm. Australia's concerns are rooted in the opaque and accelerated nature of China's military modernisation. From aircraft carriers and hypersonic missiles to deepening cyber and space capabilities, China is not merely modernising — it is transforming the strategic equation of the Indo-Pacific. For Canberra, this raises fundamental questions: What are China's intentions? What security guarantees can regional states rely on when the regional balance of power is tilting so rapidly? As a staunch member of the Aukus partnership and a longtime US ally, Australia is not unfamiliar with military alliances. Yet, it seeks more than just deterrence. It wants reassurance, especially from Beijing that strategic competition will not descend into confrontation. In this sense, Marles' remarks are not hawkish, but rather reflective of a nation navigating uncertainty. And it is precisely this uncertainty that Asean, through the Asean Regional Forum and Asean Defence Ministers' Meeting-Plus (ADMM-Plus), must address. For the Philippines, the danger is not speculative. It is already confronting Chinese maritime coercion in the South China Sea. From water cannon attacks near Second Thomas Shoal to sonar interference in its exclusive economic zone, the Philippines is on the front line of China's maritime assertiveness. Teodoro's choice of words — "irresponsible" and "reckless" — is not mere diplomatic posturing. It reflects the lived reality of a Southeast Asian state struggling to assert its sovereignty amid an asymmetrical power contest. That said, Philippines and China must redouble efforts to co-exist: otherwise, Manila risks being sucked into the vortex of US politics, rendering the Philippines all but a surrogate of the US. The risk of escalation is real. Any miscalculation in these contested waters could quickly drag in external powers, especially with the US-Philippines Mutual Defence Treaty now more operational than symbolic. A localised maritime incident could rapidly spiral into a wider regional conflict. Both Canberra's demand for clarity and Manila's call for accountability point to a shared regional need: a trusted, neutral forum to manage tensions, build confidence and enforce norms. That forum is Asean. And it must act before others do. The Asean Regional Forum, long criticised for being a talk shop, must now institutionalise mechanisms that promote transparency in military modernisation. Asean can propose a Regional Military Transparency Registry, encouraging major players, including China, to voluntarily disclose exercises, deployments and strategic doctrines. This will not eliminate mistrust, but it can begin to manage it. The ADMM-Plus, which includes China, Australia, the US and all major Indo-Pacific actors, offers a more defence-oriented platform. Here, Asean should advocate for the establishment of an Incidents-at-Sea Protocol, modelled on Cold War-era US-Soviet agreements. Such a mechanism would allow real-time communication between naval forces during close encounters, thereby reducing the risk of unintended conflict. Additionally, Asean must press for the long-delayed Code of Conduct in the South China Sea to become legally binding. It is no longer enough to merely discuss principles. Enforcement mechanisms must follow. The Philippines' repeated confrontations with China show that vague promises are insufficient. Asean must also creatively utilise its middle powers — Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam — to initiate back-channel diplomacy to build trust among conflicting parties without the constraints of formal negotiation. In this context, Malaysia's current role as Asean chair and its tradition of non-alignment make it particularly suited to initiate such Track 2 dialogues. Australia's quest for strategic reassurance and the Philippines' demand for accountability reflect a larger regional cry for order, predictability and norms. Asean, by virtue of its geography and centrality in regional architecture, remains the best-positioned body to take up this task.
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
Shares and dollar tumble as tariff tensions flare
SYDNEY/LONDON: Stocks and the dollar fell on Monday as U.S.-China trade tensions bubbled and investors turned defensive ahead of U.S. jobs data and a widely expected cut in European interest rates. Shares in steelmakers, which export metal to the United States, dropped in reaction to President Donald Trump's threat late on Friday to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50%, starting June 4. The move drew criticism from European Union negotiators. Speaking on Sunday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Trump would soon speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping to iron out a dispute over critical minerals. Beijing then forcefully rejected Trump's trade criticism, suggesting a call might be some time coming. With tensions rising again over tariffs and trade, sentiment looked fragile in Europe, where the STOXX 600 fell 0.2% on the day and euro zone government bonds sold off, while the euro benefited from an investor push out of dollar holdings. "The flip-flopping on trade policy looks set to continue and it appears the uncertainty this creates does not bother President Trump at all. That is likely to give investors the reason to renew selling of the U.S. dollar," MUFG strategist Derek Halpenny said. The dollar has lost 9% in value against a basket of six major currencies so far this year. The index was last down 0.53% on the day at 98.83. White House officials also continued to play down a court ruling that Trump had overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from U.S. trading partners. Investors will be watching for signs to indicate whether Trump will go ahead with the 50% tariff on Wednesday or back off as he has often done before. Safe-haven assets found plenty of demand on Monday, with the likes of the Japanese yen and Swiss franc staging a robust rally, as did gold. There was some speculation about what Ukraine's astonishing attack on Russian air bases might mean for peace talks resuming on Monday. In Poland, nationalist opposition candidate Karol Nawrocki narrowly won a presidential election, delivering a major blow to the centrist government's efforts to cement Warsaw's pro-European orientation. TARIFF TURBULENCE In U.S. markets, S&P 500 futures fell 0.3%, while Nasdaq futures lost 0.4%, suggesting a retreat at the opening bell later. The S&P had climbed 6.2% in May, while the Nasdaq rallied 9.6% on hopes that final import levies will be far lower than the sky-high levels initially touted by Trump. Front-running the tariffs has already caused wild swings in the U.S. economy, with a contraction in the first quarter likely turning into a jump this quarter as imports fall back. The Atlanta Fed GDPNow estimate is running at an annualised 3.8% for April-June, though analysts assume this will slow sharply in the second half of the year. Data this week on U.S. manufacturing and jobs will offer a timely reading on the pulse of activity, with payrolls expected to rise 130,000 in May and unemployment to remain at 4.2%. A rise in unemployment is one of the few developments that could get the Federal Reserve to start thinking of easing again, with investors having largely given up on a cut this month or next. A move in September is given an approximately 75% chance, though Fed officials have stopped well short of endorsing such pricing. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday that cuts remain possible later this year as he saw downside risks to economic activity and employment and upside risks to inflation from the tariffs. The Senate will this week start considering a tax-and-spending bill that will add an estimated $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt. Across the Atlantic, the European Central Bank is considered almost certain to cut its rates by a quarter point to 2.0% on Thursday, while markets will be sensitive to guidance on the chance of another move as early as July. The Bank of Canada meets Wednesday and markets imply a 76% chance it will hold rates at 2.75%, while sounding dovish on the future given the tariff-fuelled risk of recession there. On Monday, the dollar fell 0.9% on the yen to below 143 , and was down 0.6% to 0.818 Swiss francs. The euro was up 0.55% to $1.1412, around its highest since late April. In commodity markets, gold rallied 2% to $3,356 an ounce , having lost 1.9% last week. Brent crude oil rose by almost 4% to $65 a barrel after OPEC+ decided to increase output in July by the same amount as in each of the prior two months, a relief to some who had feared an even bigger increase. - Reuters
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Indonesia trade surplus shrinks as global tariff fears boost imports from China
JAKARTA (Bloomberg): Indonesia posted its smallest trade surplus in more than five years on signs importers are stocking up on goods from China and other key trading partners to mitigate the risks of rising global tariffs. The surplus narrowed to US$159 million in April, its smallest since October 2019 and far below a median estimate of US$2.8 billion in a Bloomberg survey of analysts. Imports into Southeast Asia's largest economy jumped by 22% year-on-year to $20.59 billion in the month, helped by increases in capital goods, raw materials and consumer goods, according to Indonesia's statistics agency on Monday. Exports rose just 5.8% to $20.76 billion, with higher shipments of coffee and basic metals helping to offset a 21% drop in mining exports that was partly caused by weaker coal shipments. The sharp rebound in imports suggests pre-emptive restocking at a time of rising trade risks due to higher US tariffs, according to Hosianna Evalita Situmorang, an economist at PT Bank Danamon Indonesia. Imports from China, Indonesia's largest trading partner, rose by 54% year-on-year. Goods from Japan and Singapore were also significantly higher. The statistics agency in a briefing didn't provide a detailed breakdown by category of monthly imports from individual countries. Indonesia's imports from China through April this year comprised mainly mechanical and electrical machinery and equipment, along with vehicles and parts. The pattern of higher imports due to pre-emptive restocking could continue in the coming months given ongoing trade headwinds, including from US President Donald Trump's higher steel import tariffs that are due to take effect in June, as well as an end to the tariff reprieve in July, Situmorang said. Mining exports will also likely remain under pressure from tariff risks and weak demand in China, she said. The smaller surplus could also weigh on Indonesia's current account, although pressures should be "manageable thanks to low oil prices and steady services,' Situmorang added. Indonesia in recent years has posted monthly trade surpluses typically well over $1 billion. The country last posted a trade deficit in April 2020. -- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
