logo
In 28 Years Later, Brexit Britain runs screaming towards its Apocalypse Now. What took it so long?

In 28 Years Later, Brexit Britain runs screaming towards its Apocalypse Now. What took it so long?

Irish Times4 hours ago

'Donald Trump is going to make punk rock great again,' the mouthy musician Amanda Palmer said after that individual was elected president of the United States for the first time. You think?
In the same year, 2016, the United Kingdom elected to leave the European Union. Nobody suggested that punk would feast on incoming catastrophe, but there was great wailing from the literati.
'I think it's a self-inflicted wound,' Martin Amis said. 'I don't like the nostalgic utopia.' Ian McEwan described Brexit as 'the most pointless, masochistic ambition ever dreamed of in the history of these islands'.
One imagined poets and choreographers collapsing in despair up and down the aisles of north London's classier off-licences.
READ MORE
Brexit
would now reap the artistic whirlwind. Right? The Europhobic voters of Stoke-on-Trent will feel silly when they hear about that ballet concerning lengthened queues for non-EU passport holders at Florence airport.
Worthwhile anti-Trump culture proved thin on the ground in that president's opening term. There was even less Brexit-bashing art in the aftermath of 'Britain's fateful decision' (to use the approved cliche). We did get a great many popular – and good – nonfiction books on the mechanics of the referendum, its potential aftermath and its moral implications.
Fintan O'Toole, of this jurisdiction, had a big hit with
Heroic Failure: Brexit and the Politics of Pain
. Tim Shipman's All Out War: The Full Story of How Brexit Sank Britain's Political Class did what the title claimed in exhaustive fashion. There was a lot more where those came from. But few were writing operas or novels on the topic. We are still awaiting the first great anti-Brexit protest song.
These thoughts are prompted by the arrival this week of the second sequel to
Danny Boyle
's classic zombie flick 28 Days Later. It hardly needs to be said that Alex Garland's script for
28 Years Later
does not halt the violence to ponder article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
[
28 Years Later review: Danny Boyle's rattling zombie epic never lets up in pace or invention
Opens in new window
]
We are dealing in allegory here – an unmistakable and blackly hilarious allegory. The mindless zombies have been driven back to Britain from the Continent. (I didn't catch if, like the Romans, the rage virus left Ireland uncolonised.) One proud island off the northeast coast has, however, kept the hordes at bay and, in the process, retreated into a class of mid-20th-century patriotic nostalgia.
Boyle intercuts a reading of Rudyard Kipling's poem Boots with clips from Laurence Oliver's Henry V. 'Gentlemen in England now a-bed shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here!' And so on.
The film-maker confirmed his intentions to El País newspaper. 'We haven't made a political film,'
he said
. 'But we've used the current world as a reference, how we behave in it, what cultural legacy we're going to leave behind. Brexit has constrained us, locked us in, and that's what 28 Years Later is about.'
A stubborn Mancunian of Irish descent, Boyle will care not a whit if the thumping allegory upsets leavers, not least because it in no way impedes the hurtling progress of the core narrative. He can feel proud of showing how the subject can be addressed without dragging your film into po-faced agitprop.
Why have so few artists attempted anything similar over the past decade? Have a look at Anish Kapoor's A Brexit, A Broxit, We All Fall Down from 2019. Created for the Guardian newspaper, it works an
enormous cleft
along the spine of Britain. The meaning is clear – a little too clear for an artist of Kapoor's subtlety. In 2017 the unavoidable, pseudonymous Banksy delivered a mural showing a sculptor
chipping away
one star from the EU flag. Not his most affecting piece.
British novelists proved reluctant to engage so directly with the subject. It remains an oddity that Ali Smith's
Autumn
, frequently labelled the first post-Brexit novel, was published just four months after the vote. Alex Preston, writing in the Financial Times,
marvelled
'that writing this good could have come so fast'. No deluge of Brexit fiction flowed into the succeeding abyss of negotiation.
Plenty of films seemed to offer comment on the Brexit mindset. You could see Christopher Nolan's
Dunkirk
making the case for either side. The triumphant
Paddington 2
played as an argument for diversity and inclusivity. But 28 Years Later really does feel like the closest thing to mainstream cinematic engagement with Brexit since the country voted on June 23rd, 2016.
Maybe the argument against feels too much an obsession of elite London dinner parties. Maybe the wider subject is too complex to address as allegory or side narrative. Most likely audiences (and creators) just got sick of it long before the documents were finally signed.
It's not Vietnam. Nobody was going to make an Apocalypse Now about Brexit. Though Boyle has come closer than seemed possible.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer calls on Iran to ‘return to negotiating table' as he issues response to US bombing nuclear sites
Keir Starmer calls on Iran to ‘return to negotiating table' as he issues response to US bombing nuclear sites

The Irish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Keir Starmer calls on Iran to ‘return to negotiating table' as he issues response to US bombing nuclear sites

SIR Keir Starmer has said the US took action to 'alleviate' Iran's nuclear threat. The Prime Minister urged the Tehran 'to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis' as he responded to Trump's blitz. Advertisement In a statement, the Labour party leader said: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. "Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. "The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. "We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis." Advertisement This comes after the US military bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities in an historic strike against the Islamic Republic. Iran has since threatened "everlasting consequences" as Houthis vowed to target US forces. In a statement posted on X, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi wrote: "The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations. "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior. Advertisement Most read in The Sun Exclusive Exclusive "In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defense, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people." Iran has lashed out with two rounds of missiles into Israel in the wake of America's strikes. The IDF announced about an hour ago that the second wave was on its way, and urged all Israelis to obey the instruction of the Home Front Command. Citizens were also instructed not to share information about locations or casualties. Advertisement At least 16 people are reported to have been injured. Meanwhile Yemen's Houthi's warned they will target US ships in the Red Sea if they are involved in any potential attack on Iran, the group announced on Saturday. The group's military spokesperson Yahya Saree said: 'We will target US ships and battleships in the Red Sea if Washington participates in the Saree added how they consider any potential Israeli attack on Iran to be aimed at 'removing Tehran as an obstacle to an Israeli plan to dominate the region'. Advertisement In Washington, Trump said the The president added that Iran must now make peace or "we will go after" other targets in Iran after the US strikes. Trump said in a nationally televised speech at the White House: "Tonight I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Advertisement But the president also said that if Iran didn't cut a peace deal now it would continue to face American military power. He said: 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." 'Remember there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. Advertisement 'But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. 'Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight." America has now directly joined Israel's campaign of bombing Iran as they both seek to obliterate Tehran's nuclear program. A response from Iran, or from the Ayatollah in hiding, has not yet come. Advertisement Ali Khamenei is believed to be cowering away in the secret lair as Israeli missile attacks rain down nearby. Two informed sources inside the country told Iran International the country's ageing dictator is holed up in the bunker in Lavizan, a neighbourhood in Tehran. Read more on the Irish Sun Posting on Truth Social, President Donald Trump said He said a full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. Advertisement 1 Sir Keir Starmer called on Iran to "return to the negotiation table" Credit: PA

US strikes Iranian nuclear sites and Tehran warns of ‘everlasting consequences'
US strikes Iranian nuclear sites and Tehran warns of ‘everlasting consequences'

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

US strikes Iranian nuclear sites and Tehran warns of ‘everlasting consequences'

The United States has attacked three sites in Iran, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying the country's nuclear programme in a risky gambit to weaken a long-time foe which has prompted fears of a wider regional conflict. US President Donald Trump asserted that Iran's key nuclear sites had been 'completely and fully obliterated', in an address to the nation from the White House. There was no independent damage assessment. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran confirmed attacks took place on its Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz sites, but it insisted its nuclear programme will not be stopped. Iran and the UN nuclear watchdog said there are no immediate signs of radioactive contamination at the three locations following the strikes. It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran. Mr Trump acted without congressional authorisation, and he warned there will be additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against US forces. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he said. Iran's top diplomat, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, warned in a post on X that the US attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate. Hours later, Iranian missiles struck areas in northern and central Israel, according to an Israeli rescue service. Initial reports suggested at least 16 people suffered minor injuries and several buildings were damaged. A satellite image of the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran, taken early this year (Maxar Technologies/AP) Following the Iranian barrage, Israel's military said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the Iranian missile launchers that had fired, and that it had begun a series of strikes towards military targets in western Iran. Iran has maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Mr Trump and Israeli leaders have argued Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon, making it an imminent threat. The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel that significantly degraded Iran's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, and damaged its nuclear enrichment facilities. But US and Israeli officials have said American B-2 stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb that only they have been configured to carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. Mr Trump appears to have made the calculation – at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republicans – that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps permanently. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.' Mr Trump later added: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. The White House and Pentagon did not immediately elaborate on the operation but an update is expected on Sunday morning. But one US official said the attack used bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant that is built deep into a mountain. The weapons are designed to penetrate the ground before exploding. In addition, US submarines launched about 30 Tomahawk missiles, according to another US official. The decision to attack was a risky one for Mr Trump, who won the White House partially on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. But he has vowed he will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear programme peacefully.

UN calls US strikes on Iran 'dangerous escalation' as world leaders react
UN calls US strikes on Iran 'dangerous escalation' as world leaders react

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

UN calls US strikes on Iran 'dangerous escalation' as world leaders react

The United States carried out attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran overnight, joining Israel's bombing campaign after days of speculation over US involvement in the conflict. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace," Mr Trump said in a televised address to the nation from the White House after the strikes. Here is a roundup of the key reactions so far. Iran: 'Everlasting consequences' Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US attacks as "outrageous" and said his country has a right to defend its sovereignty. "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences," he posted on X, adding that the attacks were "lawless and criminal" behaviour. "In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people," the foreign minister said. Iran's atomic energy organisation also called the US attacks "a barbaric act that violates international law". "The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran assures the great nation of Iran... it will not let the path of development of this national industry (nuclear), which is the result of the blood of nuclear martyrs, be stopped," it said in a statement published by state media. Israel: 'Change history' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Mr Trump, saying the attacks will "help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace." "Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Mr Netanyahu said in a video message, adding that the attacks demonstrated "America has been truly unsurpassed." He also told Israelis that his promise to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities had been "fulfilled". Hamas: 'Brutal aggression' Palestinian militant group Hamas condemned the "blatant US aggression against the territory and sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran". "This brutal aggression is a dangerous escalation," Hamas said, calling the attack "a flagrant violation of international law, and a direct threat to international peace and security." UN: 'Dangerous escalation' UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the strikes a "dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge". "At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos," Guterres said in a statement. "There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace." Democrats: 'Unilateral military action' The top Democrat in the US House of Representatives accused Mr Trump of pushing the United States toward war. "President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East," Congressman Hakeem Jeffries said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store