Supreme Court issues notices to Centre, others on plea challenging validity of 1995 Waqf Act
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre and others on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995. A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih issued notices to the Centre and others, seeking their responses on the plea, and tagged it with pending petitions that have raised a similar issue.Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, who appeared in the court on behalf of petitioner Nikhil Upadhyay , told the bench that the plea challenges the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995.He referred to the apex court's April 17 order relating to challenges to the validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.Upadhyay said in that order, the court had said petitions challenging the 1995 law and the amendments made therein in 2013 shall be separately shown on the cause list."Why should a challenge to the 1995 Act be allowed in 2025?" the CJI asked. He also asked why should the plea be not dismissed on the ground of delay.The petitioner's counsel said the plea has challenged the amendments made in 2013.He said the apex court is hearing pleas filed in 2020 challenging the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992.The bench agreed to hear the plea and tagged it with the already-pending petitions.Challenging the validity of certain provisions of the 1995 law, the plea said, "Parliament cannot enact law in favour of waqf and waqf properties , depriving non-Muslims from their properties, and special provision giving undue favour to waqf properties."On May 22, the apex court reserved interim orders on three key issues after hearing both sides in the case relating to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.One of the issues relates to the power to de-notify properties declared as "waqf by courts, waqf-by-user or waqf by deed" prescribed in the 2025 Act.The top court had previously identified the three issues, on which a stay was sought by the petitioners challenging the validity of the 2025 Act, for passing interim orders.Apart from the issue of de-notification, the petitioners have raised questions over the composition of state waqf boards and the Central Waqf Council, where they contend that only Muslims should operate except ex-officio members.The third issue relates to a provision that says a waqf property will not be treated so when the collector conducts an inquiry to ascertain if the property is government land.The Centre had strongly defended the 2025 Act, saying waqf by its very nature was a "secular concept" and cannot be stayed given the "presumption of constitutionality" in its favour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
24 minutes ago
- United News of India
Modi did not contradict Trump on his claim of making him surrender: Rahul
Rajgir, June 06 (UNI) Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday said US President Donald Trump had claimed eleven times that he forced Prime Minister Narendra Modi to surrender during operation Sindoor, but he did not contradict it and remained silent. Gandhi, while addressing a conference organised by his party here, said that PM Modi had the habit of surrender. Trump had claimed eleven times that he forced Modi to surrender during the operation Sindoor carried out recently, but the latter did not contradict and remained silent on the issue, he remarked. Congress leader also took potshots at Modi on his decision to conduct a caste census, saying he was also reluctant on the issue. When he exerted slight pressure on Modi on the caste census, he surrendered and announced the decision of his government to conduct a national-level caste census, he added. PM Modi had rejected the demand of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar for a national-level caste census in 2021, when he had called on him, leading an all-party delegation from the state. After his refusal, Nitish Kumar's government had conducted a caste census in Bihar from its resources and named it as caste survey, as carrying out any sort of census is the right of the Central government. Even in parliament on several occasions and during its replies in the Supreme Court in several cases, the Narendra Modi government had expressed its opinion against the caste census in the country. UNI KKS BD
Hans India
36 minutes ago
- Hans India
ICEA, IT Ministry urge states to make India a component manufacturing hub
New Delhi: States should work together and leverage Centre's scheme for encouraging domestic manufacturing of electronic components to make India a global hub of components manufacturing, the India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) said on Friday. Various states such as Tamil Nadu, Assam, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh are coming up with their own policy for encouraging components manufacturing in their respective states. In an industry event in Andhra Pradesh, Sushil Pal, Joint Secretary, MeitY, emphasised the government's commitment to fostering domestic electronics manufacturing through a hybrid scheme which offers Capex support and turnover linked incentive for components manufacturing. He appealed that states have to play a proactive role in this mission of making India a component manufacturing powerhouse for the world. Bhaskar Katamneni, Secretary, IT & EC, state government, unveiled the draft Electronics Component Manufacturing Policy (ECMP) at the event to encourage manufacturing of electronics components in the state. 'We are not only promoting ease of doing business but also enabling the 'Speed of Doing Business'. Andhra Pradesh is crafting a more competitive and agile policy framework compared to the national landscape,' said Katamneni. He said that the Andhra Pradesh-ECMP will be notified in the next 10 days. Additionally, he also discussed on the draft policy and its offerings, like catalysing investments across the component manufacturing value chain through 50 per cent capex support for components manufacturers in the state, turnover linked incentives doubling the centre's incentives, building specialised infrastructure and plug-and-play clusters, and enabling talent development, skilling and R&D support. Pankaj Mohindroo, Chairman, ICEA said that now is the time that industry should proactively resolve for high domestic value addition in the country and build a robust supply chain for electronics manufacturing. The event was attended by senior government officials from Ministry of electronics and IT and the state, along with manufacturers, industry leaders and other stakeholders of electronics ecosystem.
United News of India
41 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC declines urgent hearing on plea against animal sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort
New Delhi, June 6 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Friday declined to grant an urgent hearing to a petition challenging a Bombay High Court order that permitted animal sacrifice near a Dargah located within Vishalgad Fort in Maharashtra's Kolhapur district during the Bakr-Eid celebrations on June 7. The plea, mentioned before a vacation bench comprising justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma, sought immediate intervention against the June 3 High Court order allowing the ritual sacrifice at the historically protected site. The petitioner's counsel argued that Vishalgad Fort is a notified protected monument under the Maharashtra government and raised concerns about recurring law and order issues linked to such permissions in previous years. However, Justice Karol questioned the urgency of the plea, pointing out that similar permissions with restrictions were granted last year and that the High Court had already imposed conditions ensuring the sacrifices takes place within a 'closed and private area.' 'We are sure the High Court has considered this,' Justice Karol remarked. He also observed that multiple religious activities take place in protected monuments across the country, irrespective of the faith involved. The counsel acknowledged that the High Court had last year permitted animal slaughter under restricted conditions and noted that this year's order mirrored those provisions. Nevertheless, the counsel pressed for a listing, citing past tensions. Justice Karol, drawing from his tenure as Chief Justice of the Tripura High Court, recalled passing an order banning animal sacrifice, which was later modified by the Supreme Court to allow it within enclosed premises. 'Sitting in Tripura, I had banned animal slaughter there. This court modified the matter to say it will be carried out in enclosed premises,' he noted. The bench, however, refused to list the matter urgently, observing that the issue would become infructuous once the festival passes. 'What is the urgency? The matter will be infructuous anyhow,' Justice Karol stated. The June 3 Bombay High Court order, passed by justices Dr Neela Gokhale and Firdosh Pooniwalla, reiterated an earlier order dated June 14, 2024, which had permitted animal and bird sacrifice in a closed area near the Dargah, not in any public or open space. The same conditions were extended to cover the upcoming Bakr-Eid and the Urs festival scheduled from June 8 to June 12.
