logo
New energy-efficient homes in Navan, Co Meath from €415,000

New energy-efficient homes in Navan, Co Meath from €415,000

Irish Times3 days ago

Address
:
Robinrath, off Commons Road, Navan, Co Meath
Price
:
€415,000
Agent
:
Hooke & MacDonald and T&J Gavigan
View this property on MyHome.ie
Cairn Homes
will release the first phase of its Robinrath scheme in
Navan
, Co Meath this Saturday, June 7th. A mix of energy-efficient three-bedroom homes (with two- and three-bedroom duplexes, and four-bedroom homes to launch later this year) will be available through joint selling agents Hooke & MacDonald and T&J Gavigan.
Located off Commons Road, a 20-minute walk to Navan town centre, the site layout includes crescents that neatly loop around parks framed by mature native hedgerows. One of Ireland's two publicly listed housebuilders along with Glenveagh Properties, Cairn Homes, which built 2,593 new homes in Ireland last year, says the scheme was designed with a 'commitment to biodiversity' whereby many mature trees were retained coupled with new plantings 'in an effort to protect and restore local wildlife'.
With a focus on green spaces, prospective owners will appreciate the rear gardens and planned playgrounds close to the town, where the rivers Boyne and Blackwater converge. Its location close to Robinrath Stream, a tributary of the river Boyne, is named after the ancient Irish term robin's rath or robin's fort, which is a ringfort from the medieval period.
Situated about a 45-minute commute from Dublin, 35 minutes from Dublin Airport and a 20-minute trip from the Unesco World Heritage site of
Newgrange
, Robinrath is also close to the magical group of Neolithic passage tombs at Loughcrew. Spread over four undulating peaks that date back to 3,000 BC, it's a place where people gather at the spring and autumn equinoxes to greet the first rays of the sun.
READ MORE
The homes at Robinrath qualify for the State's
Help to Buy
scheme – where buyers can get up to €30,000 towards a deposit – and the
First Home scheme
, in addition to green mortgages which offer lower interest rates to those buying a more energy-efficient home. The developer's
website
has downloadable booklets on all three schemes, outlining in detail how and if potential purchasers qualify for these government initiatives.
[
Look inside: Superbly designed house and mews with unparalleled views over Killiney Bay for €7.25m
Opens in new window
]
This first release this weekend will see 20 three-bedroom houses – which will be ready to occupy by September 2025 – launched to the market, with prices starting from €415,000.
The A2-rated houses, situated a short walk from Navan Educate Together School, feature air-to-water heat pumps, LED lighting and high levels of insulation coupled with high ceilings and lots of natural light.
The three-bedroom midterrace units (106sq m/1,138sq ft) have a separate livingroom to the front, with the kitchen/dining space that opens to the garden located to the rear.
Livingroom
Upstairs there are three bedrooms; two doubles, one of which is en suite with built-in Shaker-style wardrobes, and a good-sized single bedroom.
Main bedroom
Double bedroom
Single bedroom
The end-of-terrace three-bedroom units (105sq m/1,130sq ft) have slightly larger living spaces due to their configuration and a similar layout as the midterrace upstairs, while the semidetached three-bedroom houses, are larger again measuring 114sq m (1,230sq ft).
Robinrath
All the houses feature separate utility rooms and downstairs loos. In each home large glazed patio doors lead to a private rear garden that is seeded with lawn with paved patios and external taps.
Rear garden
Launching this weekend, the 20 homes will be available through joint agents Hooke & MacDonald and T&J Gavigan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oireachtas should slam down gavel on judges' planned 16.7% injury awards hike
Oireachtas should slam down gavel on judges' planned 16.7% injury awards hike

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Oireachtas should slam down gavel on judges' planned 16.7% injury awards hike

The introduction in April 2021 of judicial guidelines on personal injury awards had an immediate and sharp effect – with the median value of compensation awarded by the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB) falling 46 per cent to €10,000 in the eight months that followed. The guidelines were also aimed at creating more consistency in awards, regardless of whether they were resolved directly with an insurer, the IRB, or through the courts. The problem is, there is no comprehensive data available from the courts on awards – not helped by a dearth of written judgments at District and Circuit Court levels – for anyone to make such an assessment. Either way, an all-too-high number of claimants – encouraged, no doubt, by their lawyers – continue to think they can fare better going down the legal route than settling through the IRB. Figures published by the board last month show that while the motor crash claimants consenting to being assessed by the IRB in the first instance rose from 62 per cent to 78 per cent between 2020 and last year, the acceptance rate of awards from the board fell marginally, to 47 per cent. [ Judges expected to support draft guidelines for 16.7% rise in personal injuries awards Opens in new window ] The board of the judicial council, required by law to review the guidelines every three years, proposed in December that payouts increase by 16.7 per cent. This was adopted by the council of the State's judges in late January and passed over to the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan, who must put the amendments before Houses of the Oireachtas for approval. READ MORE There is an expectation that the minister will bring the proposal before the Oireachtas before the summer recess. The planned blanket hike has been met with resistance from insurers and business lobby groups, who know that the increase will be passed directly on to consumers and companies. Motorists, who had seen insurance premiums fall by 25 per cent between 2017 and 2022, have already stomached rate increases in more recent years as car parts and labour inflation have driven up damage costs. The guidelines review was a crude exercise, with the committee of judges that carried it out applying the general Irish inflation rate to existing awards guidelines. The judicial council even said at the time that the committee 'did not find it possible to carry out any meaningful analysis of the quantum of court awards given under the guidelines that might inform this review'. Nor does there appear to have been any regard given to what's going on elsewhere. The going rate under the existing guidelines for minor neck injuries, where recovery is made within six months, is up to €3,000, 5½ times higher than that in the UK – where awards are among the highest in Europe. [ Is going to court worth it for personal injuries claimants? A lawyer and insurer go head to head on the issue Opens in new window ] 'The large disparity is before the 16.7 per cent increase proposed by the judicial council, which, if introduced, will make the gap even larger,' Aviva Insurance Ireland said in submission last month to the Department of Finance, which is weighing further insurance reforms. 'Comparing Aviva's claims in the UK and Ireland, attritional claims like whiplash represent 30 per cent of the cost of motor insurance premium in Ireland compared to 10 per cent of premium in the UK in 2024 and lower still in Europe.' TDs and senators should reject the planned amendments and push it back to the judiciary to go back to the drawing board. Their key role was inadvertently copper-fastened by a Waterford woman, Bridget Delaney, who mounted a challenge three years ago against the constitutionality of the guidelines. The Supreme Court ruled in April last year that it had been, indeed, unconstitutional to give the judicial council the power to set personal injury guidelines. However, the fact that the initial guidelines were subsequently independently approved by legislators gave them legal effect. The unsophisticated way that the judiciary has gone about reviewing the guidelines suggests they need some help. The IRB argued in its submission to the Department of Finance consultation said that judicial council be required to liaise with it on any future amendments. 'The board's expertise, practical experience, and annual assessment of nearly 10,000 cases annually would meaningfully contribute to the continued relevance, fairness, and effectiveness of the guidelines,' it said. Various submissions called for future guidelines to be benchmarked against European countries. 'Legal expenses and award levels for lower-value claims remain disproportionately high and are not aligned with those observed in the UK and other European jurisdictions,' said German insurance giant Allianz's Irish unit. A number, including the Alliance for Insurance Reform, a lobby group for business and civic organisations, and the IRB said the current requirement that the guidelines be reviewed very three years does not allow them to be embedded. 'Under the current guidelines model, there could be several versions of the guidelines in use dependent on whether a claim has already been assessed or if legal proceedings have been initiated,' said the IRB, which reckons it should be extended to every five years. 'A situation cannot exist whereby the same injury, the same claim, that has been rejected within the Injuries Resolution Board goes into the court system and a different set of guidelines is used to value compensation.' While the setting up of the IRB back in 2004 (then known as the Personal Injuries Assessment Board) was meant to do away with the need for solicitors, 95 per cent of claimants that end up before it are represented by lawyers. The board suggests legal fees now need to be brought into cases its handles. 'The board is aware that in some cases the issue of legal fees becomes an impediment to the acceptance of an IRB award,' it said. There's disquiet in Government, too, about the judges' review process. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe is known to have expressed concern to the Minister for Justice about the knock-on effect of such a large hike to businesses and households. Colm Brophy, Minister of State at the Department of Justice, told the Seanad last month that his boss is looking at what legislative amendments 'can be made to make further reviews of the personal injuries guidelines more inclusive and transparent'. This may include 'making changes to the mechanism and the timing of future reviews of the guidelines', he said. This will not go down well with the judiciary. But it has only itself to blame.

The Irish economy grew by 22% over the past year. Yes, you read that right
The Irish economy grew by 22% over the past year. Yes, you read that right

Irish Times

time20 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish economy grew by 22% over the past year. Yes, you read that right

Ireland's economic data was always going to be a bit special at the start of this year. But Thursday's figures were mind-bending. It is impossible to overstate the extent to which we now stand out in international comparisons. And this is not just a curiosity – it matters. The economy, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP) , was 22 per cent larger in the first quarter of 2025 than one year earlier, according to the latest estimates from the Central Statistics Office . Think about it. The figures suggest that for every €1 of activity last year, there was €1.22 in 2025. Even comparing GDP in the first quarter of this year with the last quarter of 2024, there is a rise of close to 10 per cent – this is roughly the extent of growth across the euro zone over the past decade. Of course this bonkers data is not real, in the sense that it does not reflect what is happening in the underlying economy in which we all live. How could it? As has been long discussed the headline economic data is entirely distorted by the activities and tax planning of a small number of very big US tech and pharma companies. From time to time, this has created huge distortions in the figures. A decade ago, top US economist Paul Krugman famously described a 26 per cent GDP growth rate reported for the Irish economy (later revised up to over 30 per cent) as 'leprechaun' economics . At the time the figures were distorted by massive tax-driven investments by the companies concerned, including Apple, essentially a manoeuvre by the companies involved to try to keep their tax bills down as international rules changed. READ MORE Now, as one observer put it, we are seeing another 'Krugman' moment. This time the reasons are different. Big pharma companies have been rushing product over to the US to try to get drugs and key ingredients into the market before Donald Trump announces tariffs on the sector. This has led to a surge in exports, feeding into the GDP data. Many of these are manufactured here – and some are made elsewhere but organised by Irish subsidiaries and so also show up in our figures. And so we see a massive surge in Irish GDP in the first quarter of this year. A big – temporary – decline in pharma exports in GDP will follow at some stage, as the firms involved must now have massive stocks jammed into every free warehouse in the US. Much will depend on how the tariffs story plays out. [ Welcome (back) to the era of Leprechaun economics Opens in new window ] Whether Krugman renews his leprechaun offensive or not, let's not pretend this won't be noticed. Ireland's GDP data is not some irrelevance in a quirky economic corner. The amounts of money being moved through Ireland are now enormous. Daniel Kral, chief economist at Oxford Economics , calculates that Ireland – which accounts for 4 per cent of the euro zone economy – accounted for half its total growth over the past year. Analysts have taken to looking at the figures 'excluding Ireland'. How do we pull back from all of this to judge the underlying health of the economy? Total demand in the domestic economy – adjusted by the CSO to remove the multinational factors - rose just 1 per cent over the year. But we need to look under the surface here, too. Consumer spending, a good measure of how we feel, was up by a decent 2.5 per cent. But the overall figure was dragged down by a fall in business investment, presumably reflecting the international uncertainty. So households continued to spend in the first part of the year, but businesses are taking a wait-and-see approach to big capital spending. This is likely to be reflected in the jobs market as the year goes on – and here AI is also changing the game in many sectors. Consumers may get more cautious too. Uncertainty is starting to slow the economy and this is a trend we need to watch as the year goes on. The piece of data that seemed a bit out of line this week was a 30 per cent fall in corporation tax in May compared with the same month last year. This was affected by the comparison with a strong May last year – which the Department of Finance suggests was boosted by once-off factors. Two of our biggest taxpayers, Pfizer and Microsoft – pay significant amounts of tax that month. But the key early indicator for most of the big companies is June – and what happens here will give a good pointer for the year as a whole. The figures do underline one point. It is our huge reliance on the opaque affairs of four or five massive companies – and our exposure to the sectors they operate in, their own performance and complex decisions on how their tax structures are set up. Our latest bout of data exceptionalism again puts Ireland in the spotlight, when it would have been better to keep the head down. It underlines the outsize take Ireland is getting from pharma and tech activity in the EU – both contentious points in the White House. Notably, the US added Ireland to an economic watch list this week, based on the size of our trade surplus. We are very much on the radar in Washington. Our corporate tax take and manufacturing base are looked on enviously not only from the US , but from elsewhere in Europe. [ 'No long-term commitments to anything' – Ireland's economy is experiencing a silent slowdown Opens in new window ] The advance shipping of products again focuses attention on the scale of activity and tax planning in Ireland by big pharma companies. And this causes a rollercoaster of cyclical activity. But what really counts is longer-term, structural issues. Will these pharma giants decide over time – and it would take years – to relocate some of their production to the US? Will their profits and thus tax payments here be hit by Trump's policies? Or will they – or some of the tech giants – alter their corporate structures so that they pay significantly less tax here? It comes down to whether Trump's policies change the way the economic and corporate world operates fundamentally, a fair bit or not much at all. As Ireland benefits from the current system so much, the more it changes, the more risks there are for us. The coming months will tell a lot.

Nine-figure payouts to Ryanair and Starbucks CEOs are controversial, but Michael O'Leary can point to results
Nine-figure payouts to Ryanair and Starbucks CEOs are controversial, but Michael O'Leary can point to results

Irish Times

time21 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Nine-figure payouts to Ryanair and Starbucks CEOs are controversial, but Michael O'Leary can point to results

Michael O'Leary has hit his target. Ryanair 's share price stayed above €21 for 28 days, earning him a €125 million bonus if he stays until 2028. The deal has its critics. 'Morally questionable,' said Luke Hildyard of the High Pay Centre, a UK think tank. Others argue such payouts reward luck more than leadership, with cheap oil, index inclusion and billions in share buybacks all helping lift Ryanair's stock. O'Leary might counter that Ryanair shares have more than doubled since the deal was struck in 2019, comfortably outperforming rival airlines. Contrast that with Starbucks , where Brian Niccol was handed a reported $113 million sign-on package last August to replace embattled CEO Laxman Narasimhan. Shares soared 25 per cent on the news, adding $21 billion in market value. READ MORE [ Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite Opens in new window ] Since then, Starbucks has slashed head office jobs, trimmed menus and promised a return to its coffeehouse roots. But the results remain bitter. Margins and profits are down. Competition remains fierce in China. The stock tanked after last month's earnings miss and has now given up almost all of its Niccol bump. Niccol may yet prove his worth – his turnaround of Chipotle is textbook stuff – but the caffeine hit investors got from his arrival has faded fast. O'Leary, never one to miss a jab, might well look at Starbucks and say: at least I had to do something to get my millions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store