SC to hear Thiruchendur temple priest's plea on July 1 over consecration timing
The plea, filed by R. Sivarama Subramaniya Sasthrigal, contends that the High Court erred in allowing the ceremony to be conducted on July 7 between 6 a.m. and 6.47 a.m., as recommended by a court-appointed Agama expert committee.
The petitioner asserts that the auspicious time should be 12.05 p.m. to 12.47 p.m., as fixed by him in his capacity as Vidhayahar of the temple.
The matter was mentioned orally before a bench of Justice KV Viswanathan and Justice NK Singh for urgent listing. Justice Viswanathan, upon learning that the temple in question was Thiruchendur's famous Subramaniya Swamy Temple, remarked, 'It is a good temple.'
During the exchange, the judge asked if the petitioner had fixed the time last year as well, to which the counsel confirmed and added that even the High Court had previously recognized the Vidhayahar's authority in such matters.
However, this year, the counsel explained, the High Court had constituted a committee to determine the timing.
Justice Viswanathan, after examining the High Court's order on a digital device presented by counsel, noted that the High Court had specifically directed the temple administration to follow the traditional procedure of seeking written opinions from the Vidhayahar, with clear indication of whether a Pattolai (astrological chart/timing) is a draft or final version.
Despite this, the High Court, in its review judgment, upheld the expert committee's timing, which the petitioner has now challenged. The bench agreed to list the matter on July 1, but declined the petitioner's request for a hearing on June 26.
The petition stems from a Madurai bench judgment delivered by Justices S Srimathy and R Vijayakumar, which refused to interfere with the timing fixed by a five-member expert committee. The committee was appointed following an earlier petition by the Vidhayahar himself, who had opposed the authorities' selection of the early morning window as 'inauspicious.'
Ironically, the same Vidhayahar later questioned the very constitution of the expert committee through a review petition. The High Court, however, noted that it was compelled to form the committee only because the petitioner had issued three separate Pattolais, without clarifying whether the first two were draft versions.
'Had the Vidhayahar been careful and pointed out that the first two Pattolais were drafts and that a final version would follow after consulting the Panchangam, this confusion would not have arisen,' the division bench noted.
The High Court observed that both parties had consented to the formation of the committee at that time and that the majority decision of the experts could not now be revisited merely because it was unfavourable to the petitioner.
The High Court judgment emphasized that, The expert committee's recommendation for the 6:00 a.m. to 6:47 a.m. window was based on Agama principles.
The formation of the committee was 'peculiar to the facts of this case' and should not be treated as a precedent.
Until a civil court decides otherwise, the religious supremacy of the Vidhayahar over temple rituals must be preserved.
Going forward, the temple administration must seek written opinion from the Vidhayahar on consecration timings, with a clear label indicating whether it is a draft or final Pattolai.
Despite this recognition of the Vidhayahar's traditional role, the court upheld the July 7 morning ceremony timing, prompting the current appeal in the Supreme Court.
UNI SNG PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
How much will it cost to house Delhi's nearly 10 lakh stray dogs?
The Supreme Court on Thursday (August 14) reserved its order on pleas challenging its August 11 order to pick up and relocate all stray dogs in Delhi and NCR. If the apex court upholds its previous directive, an estimated 10 lakh stray canines in the national capital will have to be shifted to shelters. What will be the cost to move them? Does the city have that kind of money? A stray dog captured by New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) sits in a cage in a van during a sterilisation and anti-rabies vaccination operation in New Delhi on December 21, 2017. File Photo/AFP The Supreme Court on Thursday (August 14) reserved its order on pleas challenging its earlier directive to round up and relocate all stray dogs in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR). A three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria did not grant a stay on the August 11 order of another bench to municipal authorities. 'Everyone who has come to intervene must take responsibility,' Justice Nath orally observed. The bench also asked all intervenors to file affidavits with supporting evidence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If the apex court upholds the August 11 order to relocate stray dogs to shelters, how much will it cost? We will explain. The August 11 SC order on stray dogs On Monday (August 11), a bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan ordered the Delhi government, civic bodies and authorities of Noida, Gurgaon, and Ghaziabad to start picking up the stray canines and shift them to shelters. The top court directed the creation of dog shelters to initially accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, which should be sterilised and immunised. Its directive came in a suo motu case. The apex court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back to the streets. The New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) catches a stray dog during a sterilisation and anti-rabies vaccination operation in New Delhi on December 21, 2017. File Photo/AFP It also warned that any person or organisation that obstructs the move will face strict action. The order came amid a rise in dog bites and cases of rabies. Delhi recorded 26,334 dog bite cases so far this year, compared to 68,090 cases in 2024, PTI reported, citing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) data. The Supreme Court's order divided the country, with many animal lovers, including politicians and celebrities, criticising the ruling. How much will it cost to relocate stray dogs in Delhi? Delhi is estimated to have 10 lakh stray dogs. If the Supreme Court rules in favour of their relocation to shelters, it could prove quite costly. Cash-strapped MCD will have to set aside around Rs 11 crore every day to feed and care for the canines, Hindustan Times (HT) reported, citing the civic body's preliminary assessment. According to officials, at least Rs 110 per day will have to be spent on food, transport, cleaning, medical care, staff, and utilities for each dog. Animal activists predict that housing so many dogs could cost the Delhi government a whopping Rs 10,000 crore — money it does not have. 'First, the government will have to find 1,000, or maybe 2,000, centres because you can't put so many dogs together — they'll fight. So they'll need to find land first. Then, building each centre would cost at least Rs 4-5 crore, since every facility will require caretakers, feeders, and watchmen,' a dog lover told PTI. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They also dismissed the directive of the apex court to relocate the stray dogs, calling it 'illogical, illegal, impractical, and inhumane.' The dog lover also said it is impossible to shift lakhs of dogs. Currently, MCD rounds up and sterilises over 350 canines daily, releasing them after an observation period of 10 days. The sterilisation process costs about Rs 1,000 per dog. How MCD could implement SC order on stray dogs MCD officials have started mulling locations where shelters for stray dogs can be built in Delhi. An 80-acre plot at Ghogha Dairy for a large shelter, along with other places such as Dwarka Sector 29, is being considered, reported HT. The Supreme Court's final order will determine the scale of relocation of the canines. 'If all dogs have to be relocated, resources can never be practically sufficient,' another civic official told the newspaper. Delhi has not conducted a fresh census of the stray dog population for 16 years. To not carry out enumeration and improve tracking, the civic body is planning to microchip dogs brought to shelters and sterilised. The chips, costing up to Rs 200 each, would contain about five data points, including the canine's history, vaccination, and sterilisation details. Handheld scanners needed for the process could be priced at Rs 4,000 per piece. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bombay High Court protects daughters' right to live in father's house
The Bombay High Court has cancelled orders of the Satara trial court and the district appellate court that told three sisters to leave their late father's property. The High Court said their right to live in the house is protected under Hindu law. Justice Gauri Godse, deciding in favour of the sisters, said, 'Irrespective of whether Rama (father) died before or after 1956, the appellants, being daughters of Rama, had a right to his property. Before 1956, Rama or his heirs, who inherited his property, were bound to maintain the appellants, and on the death of Rama, they were entitled to be maintained out of his estate under a moral, though not a legal, obligation to maintain them. After the 1956 Act, Section 14 has improved their right of maintenance acquired before the 1956 Act, which has culminated in an absolute right. In view of Section 23 of the 1956 Act, the appellants had the right of residence in the dwelling house.' The land originally belonged to Natha, who had two sons — Rama and Chandar. In a family partition, the land went to Rama. Rama had three sons and three daughters. One of his sons, Laxman, was married to the woman who later took the matter to Court. She claimed that after another partition in 1966, this property went to her husband Laxman. She said Laxman had let his sisters stay in the house out of sympathy, but after his death, she ended this arrangement in 1986 and asked them to leave. The sisters said their father Rama had allowed them to live there for maintenance and that they had built the house with their own money. One sister, widowed in 1949, moved in while her father was alive. The other two, deserted by their husbands, joined her later — one of them in 1956 with her infant son. Two lower courts had agreed with the widow and ordered the sisters to leave, calling them 'gratuitous licensees' who had no permanent right to stay. Justice Godse found it 'unbelievable' that the widow's husband had given them permission to live there when one sister had already moved in before 1966, the year he got his share of the property. Quoting legal principles, the Judge observed, 'Pre-1956, unmarried daughters, widows or destitute daughters were entitled to be maintained by their father and reside in the father's property. Hence, in the present case, the right of the defendants to residence prior to 1956 would become an absolute right after the Act of 1956 came into force.' The Judge added, '...Under any contingency, the plaintiff is not entitled to seek possession from the appellants on the ground that they were gratuitous licensees and she terminated it.' The High Court said the sisters' right to live in the home 'needs to be protected' and cancelled the previous orders, dismissing the case to evict them.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
5 things to do as a pet parent after adopting a stray dog
Following the Supreme Court's recent order to shift all stray dogs in Delhi NCR away from residential localities to dedicated shelters, social media is flooded with heated debates. While the Court's decision comes in cognisance of a media report citing dog bite incidents, leading to rabies and endangering public health, animal lovers have spoken up in favour of our furry friends. Veterinarians and pet experts encourage people to adopt strays and give them a loving home. Stray dogs are absolute darlings, but after living on the streets, they need time to adjust to a new life in a home. Darshankaur Khalsa, Co-Founder of Pets of Paradise, shared some key pointers to keep in mind when adopting a stray: 1. Understand Their Protective Instincts: Street dogs are territorial because they've had to be constantly alert and protective to survive. They need to learn that they are safe with you. Your body language and calm demeanor are key to helping them realise they no longer need to be on high alert. 2. Establish a Feeding Routine: For dogs who have been scavengers, the concept of regular meals is completely new. It takes time for them to overcome food insecurity and food aggression. Even our dog, Snow, still sometimes hides her food to eat it later in a private spot. Consistent feeding schedules help them understand that they will always have enough to eat. 3. Be Patient with Training: It takes a while for a stray dog to understand 'home.' Pidhi would constantly try to escape the house at first. Be patient as you teach them house rules, such as which furniture is accessible and which isn't. The goal is to build trust and help them feel secure in their new environment. 4. Emphasise Love Over Discipline: Many stray dogs have had bad experiences with humans and are easily scared. Teaching with love and positive reinforcement is crucial. Avoid confining them in cages or small spaces. They need to be able to roam freely and explore the house to build confidence and feel they have a safe space. 5. Give Them Your Time and Affection: What stray dogs often lack most on the streets is love and attention. Spending quality time with them, playing, and simply being present is the best way to bond and show them they are finally part of a family. Divyanshi Tiwari, a pet mom, added that the first thing to do after bringing a stray home is a proper health check, vaccinations, and deworming. 'Staying on top of yearly shots is important for preventing diseases and keeping both your dog and the community safe,' she said. A stray might be nervous at first. Let them adjust slowly to your home and family, without overwhelming them. Give them enough to settle and adjust. 'No matter how friendly they are, leashes keep them and others safe,' said Tiwari. According to her, it is always preferred to use a leash when outside. Siddhant Dhingra, Realtor, Dua Properties, Faridabad agreed, saying that indies are hardy, intelligent and incredibly loyal but the early days are about to earning trust, not enforcing rules too harshly. As a dog dad, he emphasised on stablishing a consistent walking and potty schedule. 'Start with basic commands like 'sit, stay, come'.' Also, get them a harness and chew toys so that they don't damage household products. While animal rights groups gear up to challenge the Supreme Court order, let's find out what veterinarians have to say about this issue.
